COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

The procedures listed in the first section are a sample Communication Program. The second section consists of additional procedures and remedies that can also or alternatively be run if needed and applicable for a particular client.

(..) means no change in the procedure. 
(**) means procedure added to the list of communication procedures. 
(##) means the wording of one or more flows has been changed.

(**) 	CLEAR KEY WORDS

Clear INTENTION, ATTENTION, SOURCE-POINT, RECEIPT-POINT, CAUSE, EFFECT, IDEA, OBJECT, DISTANCE and DUPLICATION. Clear COMMUNICATION and TWOWAY COMMUNICATION with demos, examples, etc. as needed.

Also clear COMMUNICATION LINE, COMMUNICATION FORMULA, COMMUNICATION LAG and COMMUNICATION PROCEDURE.

(##) 	ROUTINE O-O (PART TWO)

    	"What are you willing to talk to another about?"
    	"What would you like to tell him/her about that?" (Flow 1 to full EP)

    	"What are you willing for another to talk to you about?"
    	"What would you like him/her to tell you about that?" (F2 to EP)

    	"What are you willing for another to talk to others about?"
    	"What would you like him/her to tell others about that?" (F3 to EP)

    	"What are you willing to talk with yourself about?"
    	"What would you like to say to yourself about that?" (F0 to EP)

(Note: Part One would only be run if needed by the client.)

(Ref: Vol. V, p5 18 & Vol. Vl, p300).

(**) NOT WANTING TO COMMUNICATE

    	"Recall not wanting to communicate."
    	"Recall not wanting another to communicate." (F1 to EP)

    	"Recall another not wanting to communicate."
    	"Recall another not wanting you to communicate." (F2 to EP)

    	"Recall another not wanting others to communicate."
    	"Recall others not wanting another to communicate." (F3 to EP)

    	"Recall not wanting to communicate with yourself."
    	"Recall not wanting to communicate about yourself." (F0 to EP)

Then the following can be run (optional):

(##)
"Recall a communication of yours with another."
      	"Recall a no-communication of yours with another." (F1 to EP)

"Recall another's communication with you."
      	"Recall another's no-communication with you." (F2 to EP)

"Recall another's communication with another (others)."
      	"Recall another's no-communication with another (others)." (F3 to EP)

"Recall a communication with yourself."
      	"Recall a no-communication with yourself." (F0 to EP)

(See footnote below regarding the use of either "another" or "others" in flow 3.)

(Ref: Vol . IV, p2 1 1 ) .

(##) 	LOCATIONAL COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

      	"Recall a place from which you have communicated to another." (F1 to EP)

      	"Recall a place from which another has communicated to you." (F2 to EP)

      	"Recall a place from which another has communicated to another (others)." (F3 to EP)

      	"Recall a place from which you have communicated with yourself." (F0 to EP)

OR

      	"Find a place from which you could communicate to another." (F1 to EP)

      	"Find a place from which another could communicate to you." (F2 to EP)

      	"Find a place from which another could communicate to another (others)." (F3 to EP)

      	"Find a place from which you could communicate to yourself." (F0 to EP)

OR

      	"From where could you communicate to another?" (F1 to EP)

      	"From where could another communicate to you?" (F2 to EP)

      	"From where could another communicate to another (others)?" (F3 to EP)

      	"From where could you communicate to yourself?" (F0 to EP)

("Avoidance of the places he must not communicate from leads into all manner of difficulties, since this is inhibited communication." - LRH.)

(Ref: Vol. III, p466).

OR (* *) 
	"Find a spot from which you could communicate to another." (F1 to EP)

    	"Find a spot from which another could communicate to you." (F2 to EP)

    	"Find a spot from which another could communicate to another (others)." (F3 to EP)

    	"Find a spot from which you could communicate with yoursclf." (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol. III, p469).

(##) 	ROUTINE 0-A (ZERO-A) EXPANDED

(The chosen terminals are persons or things that the person can't talk to (or with) easily or wouldn't like to listen to. The C/S may compile an applicable list of such people or things from folder study and the person should be interviewed to give what specific or general types of persons or things he/she would find it difficult to talk to or with, and/or wouldn't like to listen to. On flow I and flow 0, the person is expected to speak as though talking to the chosen terminal  and should be informed of this).

	"If you could talk to ........(chosen subject), what would you talk about?"
	"Alright, if you were talking to .....about that what would you say exactly?" (F1 to EP)

	"If ...........could talk to you, what would he/she talk about?"
	"Alright, if .......were talking to you about that, what would he/she say exactly?" (F2)

	"If ...........could talk to another, what would he/she talk about?"
	"Alright, if ...were talking to another about that what would he/she say exactly?" (F3A)

	"If another could talk to ......., what would he or she talk about?"
"Alright, if another were talking to .....about that what would he or she say exactly?" (F3B)

	"If you could talk with yourself concerning ......., what would you talk about?"
"Alright, if you were talking with yourself about that what would you say exactly?" (F0)

(Ref: Vol. V, p520 & Vol. Vl, p300).

(Note: F3B has been added to this set of flows and to a number of them below, to take into account that flow 3 can flow in either of two directions).

(##) 	ROUTINE 0-B

(Items selected will be SUBJECTS or TOPICS that this person would have difficulty talking about, listening to or hearing others talk about. The C/S can compile an applicable list of such things and/or they can be gotten or checked through an interview. After the person has "run down" (like a clock) on the first question, then ask the second question.)

	"What are you willing to tell me about ......?"
    	"Who else could you say those things to?" (Fl to EP)

	"What are you willing to have someone else tell you about .......?"
    	"Who else could he or she say those things to?" (F2 to EP)

	"What are you willing to let someone else tell others about ......?"
    	"Who else could he or she say those things to?" (F3 to EP)

    	"What are you willing to have yourself say about .....?
    	"Who else could you say those things to?" (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol. V, p518 & Vol. Vl, p300).

(##) 	LEVEL ZERO HAVINGNESS

    	"What solid could you understand?" (Fl to EP)

    	"What solid could another understand?" (F2 to EP)

    	"What solid could another get others to understand?" (F3 to EP)

    	"What solid could you have yourself understand?" (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol. VI, p300).

ADDITIONAL COMM PROCEDURES AND REMEDIES

(##) 	ROUTINE 0-0 (PART ONE)

    	"What are you willing to talk to me about?"
    	"What would you like to tell me about that?" (Flow 1 to EP)

    	"What are you willing for me to talk to you about?"
    	"What would you like me to tell you about that?" (Flow 2 to EP)

    	"What are you willing for me to talk to others about?"
    	"What would you like me to tell others about that?" (Flow 3A to EP)

    	"What are you willing for others to talk to me about?"
    	"What would you like others to tell me about that?" (Flow 3B to EP)

    	"What are you willing to talk to me about concerning yourself?"
    	"What would you like to tell me about that?" (Flow 0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol. V, p518 and Vol. VI, p300).

(**) 	VIEWPOINT COMM PROCEDURE

    	"What would it be alright for you to communicate with?"
    	"Who would it be alright for you to communicate with?" (Fl to EP)

    	"What would it be alright for another (others) to communicate with?"
    	"Who would it be alright for another (others) to communicate with?" (F2 to EP)

    	"What would it be alright for another to get others to communicate with?"
    	"Who would it be alright for another to get others to communicate with?" (F3 to EP)

	"What would it be alright for you to get yourself to communicate with?"
    	"Who would it be alright for you to get yourself to communicate with?" (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol.II, p56).

(**) 	1959 COMM PROCEDURE

	"From where could you communicate to a ......?" (F1 to EP)

	"From where could a .....communicate to you?" (F2 to EP)

	"From where could a ......communicate to another (others)?" (F3A to EP)

	"From where could another (others) communicate to a .......?" (F3B to EP)

	"From where could you communicate with yourself concerning a ......?" (F0 to EP)

(Terminals chosen should be real terminals, not significances, and should be generalized. It is suggested that the terminals used in this procedure be both relevant to the aims of the program (improve ability to comm) and to the individual person's case).

(Ref: Vol. III, p497 & p503, and Vol. XII, p289).

(**) 	CONFRONT PROCEDURE

	"What about ......could you confront?" (F1 to EP)

	"What about you could ......confront?" (F2 to EP)

	"What about .......could others confront?" (F3A to EP)

	"What about others could .......confront?" (F3B to EP)

	"If you were ......., what about yourself could you confront?" (F0 to EP)

AND/OR (for subjects rather than terminals)

	"What about .......could you confront?" (F1 to EP)

	"What about .......could another confront?" (F2 to EP)

	"What about ......could another get others to confront?" (F3 to EP)

	"What about ......could you get yourself to confront?" (F0 to EP)

(This procedure could be run using terminals or subjects that the person has a communication problem with).

(Ref: Vol. IV, p50).

(* *) 	ALTERNATE CONFRONT

	"What part of a .......could you confront?"
	"What part of a .......would you rather not confront?" (F1 to EP)

	"What part of you could a .....confront?"
	"What part of you would a .....rather not confront?" (F2 to EP)

	"What part of others could a .......confront?"
	"What part of others would a .......rather not confront?" (F3A to EP)

	"What part of a .......could others confront?"
	"What part of a .......would others rather not confront?" (F3B to EP)

	"If you were a ........what part of yourself could you confront?"
	"If you were a ........what part of yourself would you rather not confront?" (F0 to EP)

(This procedure would be effective on this level if run using terminals the person has a communication difficulty with. If a subject were to be run, the questions would need to be adjusted slightly).

("... before one can communicate with something one must be able to BE in a location near it" - LRH, Vol. VII, p264).

(Ref: Vol. III, p547).

(**) 	FAILED COMMUNICATION

    	"With whom have you failed to communicate?"
    	"With what have you failed to communicate?" (F1 to EP)

    	"Who has failed to communicate to you?"
    	"What has failed to communicate to you?" (F2 to EP)

    	"Who has another failed to communicate to?"
   	"With what has another failed to communicate?" (F3 to EP)

    	"Who have you failed to communicate to concerning yourself?"
    	"With what have you failed to communicate concerning yourself?" (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol. IV, p201).

(**) 	REMEDY OF COMM SCARCITY

    	"What wouldn't you mind communicating with?" (F1 to EP)

    	"What wouldnlt another mind communicating with?" (F2 to EP)

    	"What wouldn't another mind others communicating with?" (F3 to EP)

    	"What wouldn't you mind yourself communicating with?" (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol.II, p291 or Book 8-8008, p137/146. Level Five of SIX LEVELS OF PROCESSING - ISSUE 5).

(..) 	AXIOM 51 COMM PROCEDURE

	"What wouldn't you mind ......communicating with?" (F1 to EP)

	"What wouldn't ......mind you communicating with?" (F2 to EP)

	"What wouldn't another (others) mind .......communicating with?" (F3A to EP)

	"What wouldn't ......mind another (others) communicating with?" (F3B to EP)

	"If you were a ..., what wouldn't you mind yourself communicating with?" (F0 to EP)

("... not a low-echelon process" - LRH).

(Ref: Volume II, page 240).

(**) 	PAB NO. 56 COMM PROCEDURE

	"Give me something you could say to ......?" (F1 to EP)

	"Give me something ......could say to you?" (F2 to EP)

	"Give me something ......could say to another (others)?" (F3A to EP)

	"Give me something another (others) could say to ......?" (F3B to EP)

	"Give me something you could say to yourself concerning ......?" (F0 to EP)

("... to separate universes" - LRH).

(Ref: Vol. II, p241 ) .

(**) 	UNIVERSE COMM PROCEDURE

	"What could you say to .......?

	"What could .......say to you?

(To establish what terminals to run, per instructions on page 196, find out who he/she most resembles in his/her family. Note: Not all flows included).

(Ref: Vol. II, p196, p206 & p254).

AND/OR

	"Give me something you wouldn't mind saying to ......."
	"Give me something you wouldn't mind .......saying to you."

(Note: Not all flows included.)

OR

	"What wouldn't you mind saying to ......?" (Fl to EP)

	"What wouldn't you mind ......saying to you?" (F2 to EP)

	"What wouldn't you mind ......saying to others?" (F3A to EP)

	"What wouldn't you mind others saying to ......?" (F3B to EP)

	"What wouldn't you mind saying to yourself concerning .......?" (F0 to EP)

(Find universe the person is stuck in as above ie. who he/she resembles in the family.)

(Ref: Vol. II, p257-9).

(**) 	1955 ARC PROCEDURE

    	"Tell me something you might communicate with."
    	"Tell me something that would communicate with you." (to EP)

    	"What might you agree with?"
    	"What might agree with you?" (to EP)

    	"Tell me something you could like."
    	"Tell me something that might like you." (to EP)

("These are present time, not past or future processes" - LRH. Not all flows given).

(Ref: BOOK Dn '55, p165).

AND/OR:

    	"Tell me someone (something) you could understand." (F1 to EP)

    	"Tell me someone who (something that) could understand you." (F2 to EP)

    	"Tell me someone who (something that) could understand others." (F3 to EP)

    	"Tell me someone (something) you could get yourself to understand." (F0 to EP)

(Ref: BOOK Dn '55, p166).

(**) 	EXPECTED COMMUNICATION PROCEDURE

"Recall an expected communication?" "Recall a completed communication?"

(Note: Not all flows included).

(Ref: Vol III, p143)

(##) 	PAB NO. 54 COMM PROCEDURE

    	"Think a thought" (to EP)

(The thought should be vocalized each time. Part of thc procedure is to get the person to "place the thought in various locations after he has thought it." Then run the other side of the procedure, as below).

    	"Tell me a thought you would be willing to receive from another." (F1 to EP)

    	"Tell me a thought another would be willing to receive from you." (F2 to EP)

    	"Tell me a thought another (others) would be willing to receive from others." (F3 to EP)

    	"Tell me a thought you would be willing to receive from yourself." (F0 to EP)

(Basic procedures which are " very good anywhere on the tone scale" - LRH).

(Ref: Vol. II, p206).

(..) 	BODY PARTS COMM PROCEDURE

	"From where could you communicate to a .......?" (F1 to EP)

	"From where could a ......(body part) communicate to you?" (F2 to EP)

	"From where could a ......communicate to another (others)?" (F3A to EP)

	"From where could another (others) communicate to .......?" (F3B to EP)

	"If you were a .......from where could you communicate?" (F0 to EP)

(To get body part(s) to run: Ask person if sick or well. If ill, then get the body part person says is ill, otherwise if well, find if person has ever been ill and get the body part that was ill ).

(Ref: Vol. III, p498, 524).

(..) 	BODIES AND MEST COMM PROCEDURE

	"From where could you communicate to a ......?" (Fl to EP)

	"From where could a ......communicate to you?" (F2 to EP)

	"From where could a ......communicate to another (others)?" (F3A to EP)

	"From where could another (others) communicate to .......?" (F3B to EP)

	"If you were a .......from where could you communicate?" (F0 to EP)

(Run on a male body, a female body, a body, MEST. A higher echelon procedure).

(Ref: Vol. III, p498 & Vol. XII, p289).

(**) 	CONTINUE TO COMM PROCEDURE

	"From where could you continue to communicate to a .......?"

(Use generalized form of terminal. Note: Not all flows included, but would be similar to the 1959 COMM PROCEDURE above).

(Ref: Vol. III, p472).

(**) 	MELBOURNE 5

"To what could you communicate from this room?"

(Assist for PT location).

(Ref: Vol. III, p547).

(##) 	CDEI COMM PROCEDURE

	"From where could you communicate to an unknown .....?" (Fl to EP )

	"From where could an unknown .......communicate to you?" (F2 to EP )

	"From where could an unknown .......communicate to another (others)?" (F3A to EP)

	"From where could another (others) communicate to an unknown .......?" (F3B to EP)

"From where could you communicate to yourself concerning an unknown ......?" (F0 to EP)

Repeat the above four questions (each to EP) but using the following (instead of "an
unknown .."): "an unwanted ..", "a necessary .." and "a desirable ..".

(Can be run on any terminal that person has become reactive about eg. a body. The example given indicates the use of the general form).

(Ref: Vol III, p534).

(##) 	THE HIDDEN COMM PROCEDURE (R2-60)

    	"Spot a hidden communication" (to EP)
    	"Spot a protected communication" (to EP)
    	"Spot an owned communication" ( to EP )
    	"Spot an inhibited (stopped) communication" ( to EP )
    	"Spot an enforced communication" (to EP)
    	"Spot a desired communication" (to EP)

(The person may need to be directed more closely with "Point to the spot", "How far away does it seem?" etc. per instructions in COHA page 150-152. Note: the questions have beenmade singular to bring them into line with more modern techniques).

(Ref: Book COHA, p150-152).

(##) 	PREVENT COMM PROCEDURE

	"What communication could you prevent ......from originating?" (F1)

	"What communication could .......prevent you from originating?" (F2)

	"What communication could another prevent ......from originating?" (F3A)

	"What communication could ........prevent another from originating?" (F3B)

	"What communication could you prevent yourself from originating concerning .?" (F0)

(Ref: Vol. III, p12).

(**) 	ORIGINATIONS PROCEDURE

"What origin of yours has been mishandled?"

"Recall a time when you were pleased with that person."

AND/OR (a shorter version)

"What origin of yours has been handled properly?"

("Any creation is an origin in a comm line, for the purposes of auditing." - LRH)

(Note: Not all flows included).

(Ref: Vol. III, p321).

(##) 	QUESTIONS PROCEDURE

    	"What question wouldn't you mind asking another?"
    	"What question wouldn't you mind another (others) asking you?" (F1)

    	"What question wouldn't another mind asking you?"
    	"What question wouldn't another mind you asking?" (F2)

    	"What question wouldn't another (others) mind asking another (others)?"
    	"What question wouldn't another (others) mind another (others) asking?" (F3)

    	"What question wouldn't you mind yourself asking?"
    	"What question wouldn't you mind asking yourself?" (F0)

(Ref: Vol II, p55)

(**) 	SEPARATENESS FROM PEOPLE

    	"Select a person from whom you are separate." (F1 to EP)

    	"Select a person who is separate from you." (F2 to EP)

    	"Select a person who is separate from others." (F3 to EP)

    	"Select a person who you can have yourself be separate from." (F0 to EP)

("... to establish the fact that communication terminals exist to which one could speak." - LRH. The word "Locate" can be used instead of "Select").

(Ref: Vol. II, p275 & 290).

(##) 	REFUSE TO COMM

"What (who) would it be alright for you to refuse to communicate with?" (F1)

"What (who) would it be alright for another to refuse to communicate with?" (F2)

"What (who) would it be alright for others to refuse to communicate with?" (F3)

"What (who) would it be alright for you to refuse to communicate with about yourself?" (F0)

(Ref: Vol. II, p56).

(**) 	INVERTED COMMUNICATION

"What communication would you consider bad?"

"What communication would another consider good?"

(Ref: Vol. IV, p199).

(**) 	PRE-HAV COMM PROCEDURE

"Who has communicated to you?" "With whom have you communicated?" "What has communicated to you?" "With what have you communicated?"

(Ref: Vol. IV, p201).

(**) 	FAILED INTEREST

"Who has failed to interest you?" "Who have you failed to interest?" "What has not been interesting?" "What have you failed to make interesting?"

(Ref: Vol. IV, p201).

(**) 	INTEREST PROCEDURE

"How have you interested another?" "How has another interested you?" "What could you make interesting?" "What could another make interesting?"

(Ref: Vol. IV, p201).

(##) 	AN AFFINITY PROCEDURE

"What would you like to confront about another?" (Fl to EP)

"What would another like to confront about you?" (F2 to EP)

"What would another (others) like to confront about another (others)?" (F3 to EP)

"What would you like to confront about yourself?" (F0 to EP)

(Questions adapted to make them more applicable to this level).

(Ref: Vol. III, p463).

(**) 	ARC PROCEDURE 1961

"Who haven't you been willing or able to talk to about your difficulties?" "Who could you have talked to about your difficulties?" "Whose difficulties haven't you wanted to hear about?" "Whose difficulties have you been willing to listen to?"

("Do each question several times by itself" ..	"Then do the whole sequence one time each,
over and over consecutively." - LRH. To get a person more easily in session ie. more willing
to talk about his/her case).

(Ref: Vol. IV, p442).

(**) 	LOOK AT ME

"Look at me, who am I?"

(To "find" the auditor).

(Ref: Vol. II, p444 & Vol. III, p5 & 188).

(**) 	REMEDY AW

"What have I heard?" (to EP).

AN D/O R :

"Recall a terminal" (to EP).

(For a person who has not been acknowledgcd.)

(Ref: Book of Case Remedies, p36).

(**) 	RECALL A TERMINAL

"Recall a terminal" (to EP if not run before).

(REMEDY AN - for person who can't comm due to terminal scarcity).

(Ref: Book of Case Remedies, p34).

(**) 	REMEDY BB

"Who would it be safe to talk to?" (to EP).

AND/OR

"What could you tell me?" (to EP).

(For person with low comm level).

(Ref: Book of Case Remedies, p37).

(##) 	A BASIC COMM PROCEDURE

"Recall a time you communicated to another" (F1 to EP)

"Recall a time another communicated to you" (F2 to EP)

"Recall a time another communicated to another" (F3 to EP)

"Recall a time you communicated with yourself" (F0 to EP)

(Ref: Vol.III, p463 & Vol. IV, p74).

(**) 	9 WAY BRACKET COMM PROCEDURE

"Recall a time when you communicated with something."

("Run as a complete 9 way bracket one command each side. Use communicate only." - LRH. Check now and then as to when the comm took place. Note: Full directions not given.)

(Ref: Vol. III, p294).

(**) 	COMM RECALL PROCEDURE

    	"Recall a communication." (to EP)

(Ref: Vol. III, p536).

(**) 	NOTICE THAT PERSON

"Notice that (person)."

("to establish an adequacy of communication terminals").

(Ref: Vol. II, p275).

	AN D/O R

"Spot a person."

(Run in a populated place.)

(Ref: Vol. II, p290).

NOTE: All the procedures and remedies given above are from or based on technical writings and books by L.Ron Hubbard.

PROCEDURES NO LONGER ON THIS LEVEL

1. 	R2-31 Beingness Procedure (COHA, p74).

2. 	An Obvious Procedure (Think about matter, etc.) (Vol. IV, p53-4)

3. 	Procedure S2, which is likely to be relocated on Level IV. (Ref: Vol. Ill, p497 and p5 18-520).

4. 	Comm Universe Procedure (Vol. III, p524), possibly to be placed at a higher level. However, it could still be run at this level.

FOOTNOTE: The Wording of Flow Three

In flow 3's, there are several possibilities for the wording(s) of the question(s) ie. "another to another", or "others to others" or "another to others" or "others to another". Thus, choices have to be made and this fact is shown above where alternatives are given in brackets for some of the procedures.

Some persons having these techniques run on them may find "another to another" much easier to run, as such situations may have been more common in their lives than any of the other possibilities. Where a technique involves a specific terminal, there are two Flow 3's that should be addressed. These are shown as Flow 3A and Flow 3B above, where applicable.