Type = 11 iDate=15/2/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 20 SERVICE FACSIMILE THEORY AND EXPANDED DIANETICS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1974 (Amended & Reissued 28 March 74 Remimeo -- only change is Series No.) Expanded Dianetics Series 20 SERVICE FACSIMILE THEORY AND EXPANDED DIANETICS As a re-study of Service Facsimilies the following theory is released as background. Note that this is background data for Class IV but is in actual Practice used on Expanded Dianetics. This sheds some light on Evil Purposes. And a new approach comes to light for use in Expanded Dianetics. NONE OF THIS ALTERS CLASS IV and NONE OF IT CANCELS OR CHANGES CLASS IV OR EARLIER DATA. AN OUTLINED NEW XDN RD Service Facs By Dynamics and sections thereof. How to be right on the _______ Dynamic Triple. (The exact Question needs to be worked out for various pcs.) All L&N and therefore very dicey. The theory is that a thetan even when pressed or suppressed to the absolute limit of near extinction will still try, even when "cooperating", to some way be right. A thetan cannot die. His only out is to try to stop something as he himself cannot stop living. This gives rise to fixed ideas as he is trying to stop -- therefore the ideas hold in time and continue. His efforts to be right continue to stop him in a reverse flow. This is true because he is already at near total effect. He also becomes the effect of his own fixed idea efforts to handle. Just as a man being crushed by a house-size rock will still put his hands out to fend it off, so will a thetan continue to fend off his believed oppressions by stopping them. Insistence on rightness is a last refuge of beingness. Thus one gets some very aberrated ones. These he uses in situations where he thinks he might be found wrong. These are called "Service Facsimiles". "Service" because they "serve" him. "Facsimilies" because they are in mental image picture form. They explain his disabilities as well. 257 The facsimile part is actually a self-installed disability that "explains" how he is not responsible for not being able to cope. So he is not wrong for not coping. Part of the "package" is to be right by making wrong. The service facsimile is therefore a picture containing an explanation of self condition and also a fixed method of making others wrong. A real handling would have to include: A. What disability he uses to explain how he is not responsible for not fully coping with life or given situations. B. A fixed postulate he uses to further assert that in actual fact he is still right. C. The computation as contained in B to make others wrong so as to be right. Handling therefore would include: a. The disability R3R Triple. b. L&N for a fixed postulate on each dynamic he uses to be right. c. A realization he is using this to make others wrong so he can be right. All these conditions would have to be handled to fully handle a Service Fac to full EP. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.ntm.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 258  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=17/2/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 91 MUTUAL OUT RUDS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 FEBRUARY 1974 Remimeo C/S Series 91 MUTUAL OUT RUDS It has been known for many many years that the phenomenon of "Mutual Out Ruds" existed. This means TWO OR MORE PEOPLE WHO MUTUALLY HAVE RUDS OUT ON THE WIDER GROUP OR OTHER DYNAMICS AND DO NOT GET THEM IN. Example: A husband-wife co-audit team never run O/Ws on the rest of the family because both of them have similar overts and so consider it usual. Example: Prisoners engaged in co-auditing (as in Narconon) may have similar overts, withholds, ARC Brks and/or problems with the rest of society and so do not think of handling them as out-ruds. Example: Two top class auditors co-auditing, have similar overts on the junior auditors and the org and so never think to get them in. THIS CAN STALL CASES! A C/S has to take this factor into account wherever he has a possibility of its occurring. In one instance mutual out ruds went so far as four auditors, co- auditing, agreeing never to put their overts down on W/Ses "so they would not lose reputation". Needless to say all four eventually blew. If the C/S had done a routine check for mutual out ruds, this whole scene would have been prevented and four beings would not have ruined each other. IN ANY SITUATION WHERE A SMALL PORTION OF A LARGER GROUP IS ENGAGED IN CO-AUDIT THE C/S MUST CHECK ROUTINELY FOR MUTUAL OUT RUDS. This could even apply to an org or vessel which was separate from the rest of society around it: its members could develop mutual out ruds from the rest of society and cases could fail on this point. Be alert to MUTUAL OUT RUD SITUATIONS AND HANDLE BY GETTING THEM IN ON THE REST OF THE SURROUNDING PEOPLE OR SOCIETY. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 259  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=20/2/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  INTROSPECTION RD ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY STEP   Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts M 7/4* Rate Clay Demo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 FEBRUARY 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts M 7/4* Rate Clay Demo INTROSPECTION RD ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY STEP An additional step to the rundown has been found necessary, especially in the case of a psychotic. This is the Responsibility Step. It consists of doing ARC Brks LD Triple, 2wc Recent Actions taking up the best reading overt and running Responsibility on it (i.e. What about _______ could you be responsible for?). If no major increase in responsibility take up another reading overt and run Responsibility on that. Do this until there is a significant increase in responsibility. Follow this with running all E. Purps brought up during the Introspection steps of the RD. If the pc was found to R/S during the RD the C/S would order the R/Sing statements culled and assessed and those with good reads handled by L&N "What intention is connected with (statement)?" then R3R Quad. Additionally the C/S would note areas of low responsibility and order O/W run on those areas. PROGRAMMING DATA In the case of a psycho it is necessary to tailor the Introspection RD steps to the pc, instead of following it as a rote sequence at the risk of running unreading items on the pc. On any pc this is deadly. In a psycho it is pure dynamite. To do this the C/S would order the subjects of the RD steps assessed, then handled in order of large reads. The Auditor's TR-1 and metering must be such that he can make a meter read. The RD could be made to fail on this point by missing hot subjects. THE CLEARED CANNIBAL FACTOR When you clear a cannibal what do you have? Experientially you have a cannibal. His experiential track is such that he's been a cannibal for ages. That's how he's handled life and people around him, that's what he knows how to do. This person is unaware of his responsibilities to other dynamics and is unfamiliar with proper behavior and responsible actions towards others. In the case of an SP, he has been busy destroying others for so long that when he's somewhat cleaned up on this he does not know what else to do or how to act. It's rather pathetic, actually. ISOLATION In a person in a psychotic break, it is necessary to isolate them for them to destimulate and to protect them and others from possible damage. While in isolation the person receives the Introspection RD done flawlessly on a short-session basis, gradiently winning and gaining confidence. Between sessions the muzzled rule is in force. No one speaks to the person or in his hearing. There comes a point where the C/S must decide to release the person from isolation. To do this the C/S must know that the person can take responsibility for his actions as regards others, as well as toward himself. 260 C/S ACTION -- CLEARED CANNIBAL STEP The C/S's action is a direct comm line to the person by notes. The person is provided with paper and pen to reply. The C/S must determine the person's responsibility level. Example: "Dear Joe. What can you guarantee me if you are let out of isolation?" If the person's reply shows continued irresponsibility toward other dynamics or fixation on one dynamic to the exclusion of others damaged the C/S must inform the person of his continued isolation and why. Example: "Dear Joe. I'm sorry but no go on coming out of isolation yet. Your actions threatened the survival of hundreds of people indirectly and 6 families directly by burning down their houses. You are unaware of the effects this could have had and still only concerned about your own welfare. You must hate the human race quite a bit." The C/S has drawn a conclusion based on the information he has and lets the person know where he stands. He does not reintrovert the pc by asking him, "Why did you burn down those houses?" He draws an accurate conclusion and indicates it. This will elicit a protest from the person and bring about an involvement in the dynamics concerned. It also serves to bring about an awareness of consequences. Example: "But... but... I never meant to threaten others' survival. I just wanted to burn down the houses because I like fires. Gosh... I didn't mean it. I don't hate the human race... Oh! I really don't hate the human race." Cognition. The person's auditing is continued between these exchanges. The Auditor may have to clean up some ARC Breaks as the protest is coming off. Skillfully done all the Auditor should have to clean up, except maybe some more O/Ws. When it's obvious the person is out of his psychosis and up to the responsibility of living with others his isolation is ended. SUMMARY Handling the C/Sing and auditing on this RD requires a real understanding of Dianetics and Expanded Dianetics basics and the utmost precision of application. Its results are nothing short of miraculous. I hope this will be of further assistance to you. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ntm.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 261  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=6/3/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  INTROSPECTION RD SECOND ADDITION INFORMATION TO C/SES FIXATED ATTENTION   Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts M 7/4 * Rate Clay Demo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 MARCH 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts M 7/4 * Rate Clay Demo INTROSPECTION RD SECOND ADDITION INFORMATION TO C/SES FIXATED ATTENTION Ref. Creation of Human Ability R2-39 and R2-23 Sometimes the C/S runs into the case whose attention is solidly fixed on something. When attention is fixed we have an unawareness of other things than the object of fixation and a lessening of Self-Determinism to a point of Other-Determinism. Example: The pc is always bringing up cars. He has trouble with cars, has ARC Breaks about cars, W/Hs about cars, commits overts on cars. It worries him all the time, is a constant problem. The fixated attention case appears not to as-is and is usually stuck on the track in the "quiet" portion of an incident. Ahead of it and behind it is extreme randomity. This is not easily confronted so is not-ised. The solution is to get the pc to exercise his attention putting it here and there. INTROVERSION AND ATTENTION The pc whose attention is fixated manifests it in several ways. He will be continuously introverted on the area, will bring it up often in session but it doesn't seem to blow. It also shows up in correspondence to the C/S, frequent originations at Examiner, a fixed vague stare, all evidence of introversion. The pc may not originate it. ANATOMY AND REMEDY This fixation shows up as a problem but it is usually a Hidden Standard, a special problem the pc thinks must be resolved before auditing can be seen to have worked. Hence the NCG (no case gain) aspect. It is always an old problem of long duration. The remedy basically involves getting the terminal connected with the area of fixation located and having the pc put his attention on the terminal and take his attention off the terminal. THE PROCESS STEP 1 -- Determine exactly what the pc has attention fixed on, by folder inspection or 2wc for a BD F/N item. STEP 2 -- Get the area translated into a terminal. This will read well and have a high degree of pc interest. STEP 3 -- Fit the terminal in the commands: "Put your attention on terminal." "Take your attention off terminal." Clear and run it alternate repetitive to the EP of pc's attention no longer fixed on the area, F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention Subjective Repetitive. STEP 4 -- Select two objects. Best are a red pen and a blue pen. Two bowling pins will also do. Place them three to four feet apart at a distance of three to four feet from the pc. Place them on white paper for visibility. 262 STEP 5 -- Name the objects and fit them in the commands: "Put your attention on the red pen." "Put your attention on the blue pen." Clear the commands and run them alternate repetitive to the EP of pc in control of his attention, F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention Objective Repetitive. ALTERNATE STEP 5 -- Name the objects and fit them in the following commands: "Decide to put your attention on the red pen. Tell me when you've done so." "Put your attention on it." Then "Decide to put your attention on the blue pen. Tell me when you've done so." "Put your attention on it." Run this alternate repetitive until the pc is doing the decision step each time, then you can drop out the "Tell me when you've done so." Run it to the EP of pc in control of his attention, F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention Objective Decision Repetitive. NOTE: With both these objective attention processes the pc may swear you are hypnotizing him or something. The process actually runs out hypnotism. The pc will come through a band of Robotism and come out the other end IN CONTROL OF HIS OWN ATTENTION. VITAL PROCESS DATA It would never be okay to run Attention Subjective Repetitive on a significance (a no mass thing). It must be run on a terminal. This is a ONE- SHOT PROCESS, depending for its effectiveness on the correctness of the first item selected. This item is usually unmistakable in a truly fixated case. PROGRAMMING Attention Subjective and Objective Repetitive fits in sequence on the Introspection RD between Steps 6C and 7. If the terminal connected with the area of fixed attention could not be located then the area could not be addressed with Attention Subjective Repetitive, but in some other manner. It is unlikely that no terminal could be found on a truly fixated attention case. ISOLATION When a person is released from isolation after terminated handling of a psychotic break it is usual to welcome them back and restore any lost ARC for them from the group, if needed, with an announcement in the OODs. The person would be interviewed as to whether he wanted to stay or go and what his intentions were. Formal notification would be made that the person was back in good graces and he would be allowed to make up for any damage done, but not forced to do so. In the case of a crew member, it would be expected he would be assigned to the DPF or RPF where there was one, and told to make good. ADDITIONAL CLEARED CANNIBAL STEP There is an additional tool for use by the C/S in raising the pc's responsibility. The C/S sends to the pc HCO B 21 Jam AD10 "Justification" with a note asking the pc to please read the HCO B then tell the C/S if it has any application. This would be done as the first of the series of C/S notes and pc replies on the Cleared Cannibal Step. If the C/S receives any "rant and rave" in reply he would order it Dated and Located as the pc would be answering out of an incident. 263 Regardless, the Justification HCO B would have to be followed by O/Ws as the pc has W/Hs there to be restimmed and not running out the O/Ws could cause the TA to skyrocket. C/SING ON PSYCHOS C/Sing and auditing psychos is a very precise and even touchy business. There must be no mistakes and you cannot be heavy-handed on them. They are at the lowest point on the Effect Scale and therefore delicate at best and easily overwhelmed. It is also policy that a C/S takes it easy on auditors handling psychos. They are very hard to audit and difficult to control. So don't berate the auditor. If they get any kind of a result three cheers. INTEGRITY It has always been a rule that actions of one RD are not mixed in with another action or used randomly outside of the RD. Recently I found that a technique from the Introspection RD was used to indicate by-passed charge or something when handling ruds. This is very wrong. This happened in the field as an isolated instance but is worth mentioning. The integrity of any RD must be maintained or its effectiveness is reduced. When parts of a RD are used at random by a C/S it actually starts the pc on a RD that is left incomplete. So don't extract bits of this RD and use them on other actions. You would do yourself and the pc a disservice. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.jh Copyright $c 1974 By L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 264  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=11/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=8/3/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  L3RD DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST   IMPORTANT Remimeo Dn Chkshts Int RD Chkshts Class IV and above.  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1971RA Remimeo (REVISED 28 JAN 1974) Dn Chkshts (REVISED 8 MARCH 1974) Int RD Chkshts Class IV and above. IMPORTANT L3RD DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST This list includes the most frequent Dianetic errors. A high or low TA and a bogged case can result from failures to erase a chain of incidents. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A CHAIN OR ENGRAM WITHOUT USING THIS LIST as it can have different or several errors. REMEMBER TO CLEAR EACH WORD ON THIS LIST. IF A QUESTION READS AND THE PC SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IT, CLEAR IT AND REASSESS (don't explain it and take it as it read on a misunderstood not on a fact). RUNNING PCS ON DIANETICS WITHOUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DN C/S 1 INDOCTRINATION IS A FOOLISH ACTION. TAKE ANY READ FOUND TO F/N BY FULL REPAIR OF IT PER THE INSTRUCTIONS. 1. There was an Earlier Similar incident. _______ Indicate it, flatten the chain. 2. There was no Earlier Similar incident. _______ Indicate it. Determine if the chain is flat or if the last incident needs to be run through again. Complete the chain to F/N by indication or D/L if needed, or by flattening it. 3. There was an earlier beginning. _______ Indicate it. Handle with R3R and complete the chain. 4. There was no earlier beginning. _______ Indicate it. Complete the chain with R3R ABCD on last incident if unflat. 5. An F/N was indicated too soon. _______ Indicate it. Flatten the last incident. 6. An F/N was indicated too late. _______ Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary. 7. An F/N was not indicated at all. _______ Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary. 8. There was no charge on an item in the first place. _______ Indicate it, and that it shouldn't have been run, D/L if necessary. 9. Jumped chains. _______ Indicate it. Reorient to the original chain, spot flat point and indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary, or flatten the chain. 265 10. Flubbed commands. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. 11. Didn't have a command. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. 12. Misunderstood on the command. _______ Find it and clear it. 13. Incident should be run through one more time. _______ Indicate it. ABCD on the incident, flatten the chain. 14. Too late on the chain. _______ Indicate it. Get the Earlier Similar incident and complete the chain with R3R. 15. Incident gone more solid. _______ Indicate it. Check for earlier incident or earlier beginning and complete the chain. 16. Stopped running an incident that was erasing. _______ Indicate it. ABCD on the incident and erase it. 17. Went past basic on a chain. _______ Indicate it, D/L if necessary. 18. An earlier misrun incident restimulated. _______ Indicate it. Find out what it was and do an L-3RD on it. 19. Two or more incidents got confused. _______ Indicate it, sort it out with an L-3RD on it. 20. An implant was restimulated. _______ Indicate it, if no joy do an L-3RD on the time of the restimulation. 21. The incident was really an implant. _______ Indicate it, D/L if necessary or L-3RD on it. 22. Wrong Item. _______ Indicate it was a wrong item and that all other actions connected with it were wrong. If it is from an L&N list or if any question or difficulty, L-4BR. 23. Not your item. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. 24. Not your incident. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-3RD if any trouble. 25. Same thing run twice. _______ Indicate it. Spot the first flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary. 26. There was a wrong date. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat. 27. There was no date for the incident. _______ Indicate it. Get the date and flatten the incident if unflat. 266 28. It was a false date. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat. 29. There was an incorrect duration. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if unflat. 30. No duration was found for the incident. _______ Indicate it. Get the duration and flatten the incident if unflat. 31. There was a false duration. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if unflat. 32. An earlier Dianetic upset was restimulated. _______ Locate what it was, indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD if necessary. 33. An earlier ARC Break on engrams was restimulated. _______ Indicate it. Sort it out with an L3RD, ARCU CDEINR or an L-1C as applicable. 34. There was am ARC Break in the incident. _______ Indicate it. Flatten the incident if unflat. ARCU CDEINR at that time if necessary. 35. You were Protesting. _______ Indicate it, clean it up E/S to F/N. 36. Auditor demanded more than you could see. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-1C if necessary. 37. Auditor refused to accept what you were saying. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-1C if necessary. 38. You were prevented from running an incident. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L-1C if necessary. 39. You were distracted while running an incident. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L-1C if necessary. 40. Audited over an ARC Brk _______ Problem _______ Withhold. _______ Indicate it and handle the out rud. Do not pull W/Hs before the engram or chain is repaired or it will mush engrams. 41. An item was suppressed. _______ Indicate it. Get the suppress off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten the item. 42. An item was invalidated. _______ Indicate it. Get the inval off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten the item. 43. An item was abandoned. _______ Indicate it, get the item back and run or flatten it. 267 44. The wording of the item was changed. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct wording and give it to him. Flatten it if unflat. 45. Stuck picture. _______ Indicate it. Do an L-3RD on it. You can also unstick it by having him recall a time before it and recall a time after it. D/L if necessary. 46. All black. _______ Spot the black field or picture. Get the correct duration. If no go, L-3RD on it. 47. Invisible. _______ Spot the invisible field or picture. L-3RD on it. 48. Constantly changing pictures. _______ Indicate there was a misassessment and a wrong item was taken off the list. Get the correct item and run it, or L-3RD on that session. 49. There was a persistent mass. _______ L-3RD on it, or D/L. 50. There was trouble with a pressure item or pressure on an item. _______ L-3RD on it, or D/L. 51. You went exterior. _______ Indicate it, D/L if necessary or rehab. If TA high as a result of this do an Int RD Correction List or send to the C/S if pc hasn't had Int RD. 52. Your Int RD was messed up. _______ Indicate it, Int RD Corr List if TA high. If TA OK, 2wc "going into things" or clear up any misunderstoods on Int, Ext, etc. 53. Audited over Drugs or Medicine. _______ Indicate it. L-3RD on that time, then verify all chains to ensure they erased. 54. A past death restimulated. _______ Indicate it, if it doesn't blow run it out. 55. There was nothing wrong in the first place. _______ Indicate it. Continue the action you were on. 56. The real reason was missed. _______ Indicate it. Locate the real reason and handle or do a GF. 57. Something else wrong. _______ Locate what it is and sort it out or do a GF M5 and handle. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ntm.jh Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 268  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=17/3/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  TWC CHECKSHEETS TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH 1974 Remimeo TWC CHECKSHEETS TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS Two Way Comm is not an art. It is a science which has exact rules. Foremost in the rules is: DON'T USE A LISTING QUESTION IN TWO WAY COMM. By a "listing question" is meant any question which directly or indirectly calls for items in the Pc's answer. Use of "who", "what", "which" instantly turns a TWC into a listing question. Listing questions are governed by the rules of Listing and Nulling. If you use a listing question accidentally in TWC you can get the same bad reactions from a pc that you would get on a wrongly done list. The reason for pc upsets in TWC is hidden as it is not apparently a listing process, rarely gets the correction a bad list would get. Asking "who" or "what" or "which" during a TWC after the main question can also turn it into a Listing and Nulling process. TWC questions MUST be limited to feelings, reactions, significances. They must NEVER ask for terminals or locations. EXAMPLE: "Who upset you?" in TWC causes the pc to give items. This is a LIST. "What are you upset about?" does the same thing. "Which town were you happiest in?" is also a LISTING question NOT a TWC question. Any of these results in the pc giving items. They are not then nulled or correctly indicated. The pc can get VERY upset just as he would with a wrong list. Yet the session is not a "listing session" so never gets corrected. EXAMPLE: "How are you doing lately?" is an example of a correct TWC question. It gets off charge and gets no list items. "Are you better these days than you used to be?" "How have you been since the last session?" "What happened" is different than "What illness", "What person", "What town" which are listing questions. REPAIR When other things fail to locate the upset of a pc look into TWC processes in the folder and treat them as L&N processes where the pc has answered with items. The relief is magical. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: ntm.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 270  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=18/3/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  E-METERS SENSITIVITY ERRORS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1974 Remimeo E-METERS SENSITIVITY ERRORS An auditor must set the Sensitivity of an E-Meter exactly right for each pc. The setting is different for almost every pc. TOO LOW Too low a Sensitivity on some Pcs (like Sens 5-32) will obscure reads and make them look like ticks. It will obscure an F/N. Whereas a Sens 16-128 will show reads and F/Ns. A pc can be hindered by the auditor not setting the Sensitivity high enough to show reads and F/Ns. Items are missed as well as F/Ns. TOO HIGH When auditing a flying pc or a Clear or OT the auditor who sets the Sensitivity too high gets weird impressions of the case. "Latent reads" on such a case are common. They aren't latent at all. What happens is that the F/N is more than a dial wide at high Sensitivity and a started F/N looks like a read as its sweep is stopped by the pin on the right of the dial. In this way uncharged items are taken up, the case is slowed, overrun and general upsets requiring repairs occur. On one hand electrode an OT VII sometimes has a 3/4 dial wide F/N at Sens 5-32. This would mean a 3/4 dial F/N at Sens 2-32 with two cans. A Clear sometimes has a floating TA at Sens 32-32 instead of an F/N. He would have to be run at Sens 3-32 two cans to keep him on a dial or detect F/Ns. This is a very important matter as the auditor will miss F/Ns, think beginning F/Ns are reads and as the Pre-OT is off the dial, mix reads. Thus uncharged areas are run and charged ones are missed. The result is very chaotic to repair. Some lower level pcs also have a need for lower Sensitivity settings. SUMMARY Sometimes an easy pc looks very difficult just because of wrong Sensitivity settings. Set the Sensitivity for the pc for a half dial F/N maximum or minimum. Don't get repairs. Get wins. LRH:ntm.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 271  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=21/3/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  END PHENOMENA   Remimeo Attn AO Auditors Class VIII  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 21 MARCH 1974 Remimeo Attn AO Auditors Class VIII END PHENOMENA (Ref: HCO B 20 Feb 1970, "Floating Needles and End Phenomenas") Different types of auditing call for different handlings of End Phenomena. End Phenomena will also vary depending on what you're running. The definition of END PHENOMENA is "those indicators in the pc and meter which show that a chain or process is ended". Misapplication of this definition can result in underrun and overrun processes or actions and the pc snarled up with BPC. TYPES OF EPs In Power Processing the auditor waits for a specific EP and does not indicate an F/N until he has gotten the specific EP for the process. To miss on this in Power is disastrous, thus Power auditors are drilled and drilled on the handling of Power EPs. In Dianetics, the EP of a chain is erasure, accompanied by an F/N, cognition and good indicators. You wouldn't necessarily expect rave indicators on a pc in the middle of an assist, under emotional or physical stress until the full assist was completed though. What you would expect is the chain blown with an F/N. Those two things themselves are good indicators. The cognition could simply be "the chain blew". In Scientology, End Phenomena vary with what you're auditing. An ARC Broken pc on an L-1C will peel off charge and come uptone gradually as each reading line is handled. Sometimes it comes in a spectacular huge cog and VVGIs and dial F/N, but that's usually after charge has been taken off on a gradient. What's expected is an F/N as that charge being handled moves off. In Ruds it's the same idea. When you've got your F/N and that charge has moved off, indicate it. Don't push the pc on and on for some "EP". You've got it. Now a major grade process will run to F/N, Cog, VGIs and release. You'll have an ability regained. But that's a grade process on a set up flying pc. F/N ABUSE Mistakenly applying the Power EP rule to Ruds will have the pc messed up by overrun it invalidates the pc's wins and keys the charge back in. The pc will start thinking he hasn't blown the charge and can't do anything about it. In 1970 I had to write the HCO B "F/Ns and End Phenomena" to cure auditors of chopping pc EPs on major actions by indicating F/Ns too soon. This is one type of F/N abuse which has largely been handled. That bulletin and Power EP handling have been in some instances misapplied in the direction of overrun. "The pc isn't getting EP on these chains as there's no cognition, just 'it erased'," is one example. Obviously the C/S didn't understand the definition of cognition or what an EP is. Another example is the pc spots what it is and F/Ns and the auditor carries on, expecting an "EP". 272 OTs and EPs An OT is particularly subject to F/N abuse as he can blow things quite rapidly. If the auditor misses the F/N due to too high a sensitivity setting or doesn't call it as he's waiting for an "EP", overrun occurs. It invalidates an OT's ability to as-is and causes severe upsets. This error can also stem from auditor speed. The auditor, used to auditing lower level pcs or never trained to audit OTs, can't keep up with the OT and misses his F/Ns or reads. Thus overruns occur and charged areas are bypassed. This could account for those cases who were flying then fell on their heads with the same problems that blew back again. REMEDY The remedy of this problem begins with thoroughly clearing all terms connected with EPs. This is basically Word Clearing Method 6, Key Words. The next action is to get my HCO Bs on the subject of EPs and also related metering HCO Bs fully understood and starrated. This would be followed by clay demos of various EPs of processes and actions showing the mechanics of the bank and what happens with the pc and meter. TRs and meter drills on spotting F/Ns would follow, including any needed obnosis drills and correction of meter position so that the auditor could see the pc, meter and his admin at a glance. Then, the auditor would be gradiently drilled on handling the pc, meter and admin at increasing rates of speed including recognizing and indicating EPs when they occurred. When the auditor could do all of this smoothly at the high rate of speed of an OT blowing things by inspection without fumbling, the last action would be bullbaited drills like TRs 103 and 104, on a gradient to a level of competence whereby the auditor could handle anything that came up at speed and do so smoothly. Then you'd really have an OT auditor. And that's what you'll have to do to make them. SUMMARY Overrun and underrun alike mess up cases. Both stem from an auditor inability to recognize and handle different types of EPs and inexpertness in handling the tools of auditing at speed. Don't overrun pcs and have to repair them. Let the pc have his wins. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 273  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=4/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=24/3/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 32RA USE OF DIANETICS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1971 RA REVISED 24 MARCH 1974 Remimeo C/S Series 32RA USE OF DIANETICS (Revised per HCO B 15 July 1971, Issue I, "Quads Cancelled"-Revisions in this type style.) It is mandatory important urgent that one does not audit three flow items until one has brought all earlier Dianetic Items into three flows. TRIPLE On a case where only Flow One (Single) has been run, you don't suddenly run a Triple (F1, F2, F3) such as on the LX Class VIII lists until one has run the earliest Dn item ever run (or that can be found) on Dn Triple and then on forward on Triple up to the LX. REASON Auditing additional flows while earlier items remain Single restimulates the missing flows and stacks them up as mass. They can make a pc uncomfortable until run. All the missing flows (that were not run) are still potential mass. This mass restimulates like something too late on the chain when a flow not run on earlier items is run on later items. Auditing itself is a sort of time track. The earliest session blows the later sessions. FULL FLOW TABLE Before running Triple Dianetics one makes a table of earlier items run. Like this: Full Flow Table Flow Date Item Previously Run Must Run 2/3/62 Guf Shoulder F 1 F 2,3 3/3/67 Gow in Foot F 1 F 2,3 30/4/67 Chow in Chump F 1 F 2,3 29/9/68 LX Anger F 1,2,3 LX Peeved F 1,2,3 4/10/69 Feeling Numb F 1,2,3 5/9/70 EXT RD F 1,2,3 9/10/70 Feeling of Goof F 1,2,3 10/10/71 Dn Assist on Head F 1 F 2,3 FLOWS F1 is FLOW ONE, something happening to self. F2 is FLOW TWO, doing something to another. F3 is FLOW THREE, others doing things to others. F0 as run in the Introspection RD is FLOW ZERO, self doing something to self. 274 R3R COMMANDS Standard R3R Commands are used on Triple Dianetics. They are the subject of another HCO B. The Zero Command for the Introspection RD, however, is very easy being "Locate an incident of (loss or emotion) (pain and unconsciousness) when you caused yourself to have a(an) (item)" with the other commands of R3R as usual. NARRATIVE The question will come up, do we Triple Narrative items or Multiple somatic items. The test is, did the flows already run F/N when they were originally run. If they did, include them. If they didn't run exclude them. This does not mean you omit everything that didn't run. REPAIR While auditing this FULL FLOW DIANETICS you will find various chains that did not F/N when originally run. These are included and should be concluded to F/N. This means one has to find out if they by-passed the F/N, went too early, jumped the chain, etc. Usually an L3RD assessed on that faulty action will give the answer. It is easy to make these old flubbed chains F/N unless you work at it too hard. Usually the reason they didn't is visible on the old worksheet. The auditor forgot to ask for Earlier Beginning or by-passed the F/N or jumped the chain or tried to run it twice forgetting he'd run it before. Corny errors. RESULT The result of doing a FULL FLOW DIANETIC ACTION on a case is quite spectacular. The shadowy remains of somatics blow, mass blows and the pc comes up shining. OFFERING FFD Offering the public Full Flow Dianetics must include the cost of C/S work since it is sometimes lengthy. It is best to sell the action at a flat price that's more than adequate to cover the auditing as well as the hours of FESing and FF table making as the time can be quite long. The auditing can be remarkably brief. The greatest amount of time is usually spent on the C/Sing and table making. A C/S must liaise with the Dissem Sec and Treasury Sec on selling it or he'll find the org is losing money doing the C/Sing and tables. A nice big fat flat price, not by hours, is best. OT WARNING When doing Triple Dianetics on Clears and OTs (and a very few others) it may be found that many chains are now missing or are just copies of the original. Don't be disturbed. Pc says they're gone now they're gone. Just F/N the fact and carry on with the next flow or item. LRH:ams.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1971, 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Added to by HCO B 4 April 1971-1R, Addition of 13 January 1975, Revised 22 February 1975, C/S Series 32RA-1R, Use of Quad Dianetics, which is on page 377.] 275  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=28/3/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 21 EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE ORIGINAL LECTURES   Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 28 MARCH 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors Expanded Dianetics Series 21 Ref: Ex Dn Tape Lectures and Case Histories. EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE ORIGINAL LECTURES Since the original lectures on Expanded Dianetics and Case Histories were released several HCO Bs were issued under my name which I did not authorize. These have been cancelled. I thought I'd better cover the developments since the original materials and clear up any questions or conflicts that may have arisen over the unauthorized HCO Bs. EXPANDED DIANETICS PROGRAMMING Expanded Dianetics programming is not rote but each program is laid out for that individual pc taking him from his current state to a shiny product. The program is worked out from data gotten by FES, OCA, Chart of Human Evaluation and D of P Interviews. The product of an Ex Dn complete pc is visible by OCA, Chart of Human Evaluation, and pc satisfaction in having handled what he wanted handled. Endless Ex Dn to no product occurs only when the C/S violates the basics of Ex Dn programming as covered in my tape lectures and the Case Histories, when the pc is run on actions that he doesn't need and aren't reading or when the pc was not set up for Ex Dn in the first place. EXPANDED DIANETICS SET-UPS Usually a C/S Series 53RF and a list correction are needed set-up actions if they haven't been done. A thorough C/S-1 and full word clearing are vital. A Drug RD must be done or completed before Ex Dn is done or it will fail. This includes Objectives. You can't do Ex Dn until Drugs are all handled. TROUBLE ON ENGRAMS The pc who cannot run engrams has misunderstoods on the commands and terms of R3R and Dianetics, or it's drugs. The pc will be able to run drugs because that's what he's stuck in. He'll run those automatically as long as you've done the necessary Word Clearing. Pcs who won't go backtrack are druggies or in recent shock of having died. This is handled by a thorough Drug RD and if necessary the usual Dianetic backtrack remedies As and Es double-assessed. Ss and Ps could be checked as well. LATER EX DN RUNDOWNS Class VIII C/S-6 list is useful in running out past bad auditing. It is fully covered on Tape 1. Other Class VIII lists are not used as you won't get anywhere running AEIs from a significance. 276 Intentions in AEI Treble Assessments are run in order of read. Interest is not checked. As intentions exist on all 3 flows you could list for the intentions on the other 2 flows after you have listed the intentions connected with _______ and run them R3R Triple. You can only list and run intentions connected with a terminal or mass or somatic never a significance. The R3R commands are: F-1 "Locate an incident of another causing you to have the intention _______ ." F-2 "Locate an incident of you causing another to have the intention _______ ." F-3 "Locate an incident of others causing others to have the intention _______ ." Good Intentions are never run. Never. The cure for a pc who is run on a good intention is a C/S Series 53RF. The cure for the auditor is to fully define the words: good, worthy, positive, pro-survival, evil, bad, unworthy, negative and contra-survival. Then have him re-study the related materials. If it recurs, get him audited on a 3 May PL and Ex Dn. R3R all E. Purps culled from the folder is done as a first action in Ex Dn. Subsequent E. Purps brought up in sessions are noted and R3R'd later on in the program before any PTS RD is done. These E. Purps have to be verified as to wording and checked for read before running, but not interest. Considerable charge can be bypassed if E. Purps are missed so this action is thoroughly done. R/S Handling, also called the Responsibility RD, is done as OCA right-hand side handling. A list of all R/Sing statements is made then each taken up. The idea is an R/S will occur in connection with a terminal which will read when checked, and that's what you want to run. The R/Sing statement itself will often mention a terminal. If not the auditor can do a brief TWC to find out the terminal connected with the statement. Once the terminal is obtained the auditor lists (L & N) for the E. Purp F- 1, 2 & 3 R3R Triple on each after it's listed. If no terminal can be found the auditor would have to L & N for the intention of someone who would (R/S statement). The Wants Handled Rundown is shown in Cases B, C and F. The important points of the RD are to run it as a "wants to get rid of", not a "wants to achieve" and to complete each thing the pc wants handled before going on. Handling of each thing the pc wants handled is dictated by what the "thing" is. A somatic is run R3R Triple. The intention connected with it can also be run. An intention is run R3R Triple. If it's a terminal, L & N for the intention connected with it and run it. You can also L & N and run the intentions on the other 2 flows. If it's a condition L & N W/W would have it then list for and run that terminal's intention. If it's a doingness L & N for the intention of someone who would do that and run it. Additional handling could be done such as PSEAIs double-assessed R3R Triple, handling it as a problem by finding and running out the prior confusion or tracing it back to the earlier problem it is a solution to and running that R3R Triple. Difficulties on this RD stem from not getting the thing the pc really wants handled which will read very well and run like a bomb, or errors in the L & N or R3R or out ethics holding the condition in place. The Multiple-Flow E. Purp Rundown is a very high-powered action which must be precisely done. Its use is covered in C/S Series 22 and Case C. It consists of F-1: L & N "What Evil Impulse have others had toward you?" R3R Triple. F-2: L & N "What Evil Impulse have you had toward others?" R3R Triple. F-3: L & N "What Evil Impulse have others had toward others?" R3R Triple. 277 SUMMARY An Ex Dn program is designed for an individual. C/Sing and auditing are done to achieve a product. When you're paralleling the mind the meter will be reading like mad, the pc will be wildly interested and the results will follow big and fast. With this broad change in Ex Dn I recommend that you re-listen to the Ex Dn tapes, review DMSMH and The Original Thesis as well as the '63 Time Track and R3R materials and re-study the Case Histories working out why each C/S and pgm was done. Better yet do a thorough Ex Dn C/S Course. I'm counting on you to really apply these materials and expect to see lots of good results. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 278  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=17/12/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=30/3/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 23RA INTERIORIZATION SUMMARY   Remimeo Int RD Checksheet  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 DECEMBER 1971R Remimeo (HCO B 2 December 1970 Revised) Int RD (Revised 30 March 1974) Checksheet C/S Series 23RA INTERIORIZATION SUMMARY (Revised and updated to include 1971 Int HCO Bs) All changes are in this type style. INTERIORIZATION CAN BE BADLY MISRUN. The following HCO Bs cover Interiorization Rundowns. HCO B 5 Mar 1971 "Exteriorization and High TA" HCO B 11 Apr 1970 "Auditing Past Exterior" HCO B 6 May 1970 "Blows -- Auditing Past Exterior" HCO B 30 May 1970 "Interiorization Intensive -- 2-Way Comm" HCO B 20 Aug 1970 "Exteriorization Rundown Musts" HCO B 24 Sept 1971 "Urgent -- Interiorization Rundown" HCO B 29 Oct 1971 "Int Rundown Correction List Revised" HCO B 16 Dec 1971 C/S Series 35R (Revised) "Interiorization Errors" HCO B 17 Dec 1971R C/S Series 23RA (this HCO B) The examination of Interiorization Rundowns done in the field discloses that some auditors engaged in running it have not been fully checked out on it. HCO PL 26 Aug 1965 gives the correct way to do a starrate checkout. Clay demos must also be correctly done. These are covered in HCO B 11 Oct 1967 and HCO B 30 Oct 1970. These HCO Bs on Int Rundown, Starrates and Clay Demos plus HCO PL 20 July 1970, Issue III, 2-WC as below, make the necessary pack for checking out an auditor before letting him near an Int Rundown. And all Interiorization materials as above MUST BE CHECKED OUT STARRATE AND IN CLAY before a C/S permits one of his auditors to run it on a pc. QUADS CANCELLED "The disadvantages of Quad Dianetics outweigh any advantages in actual practice. "Flow Zero is therefore cancelled as part of Dianetics and Lower Grades." (LRH HCO B 15 July 71, "Quads Cancelled".) UNNECESSARY "The words 'went in' and 'go in' MUST be said to the pc and cleared on the meter. If there is needle action, one runs an Int RD as per the Int Rundown Pack "If there aren't any reads one does NOT do an Int Rundown on the pc as it is unnecessary and classifies as 'running an unreading item'. "When this test is omitted you get an unnecessary Int RD being done on a pc. "This will eventually have to be repaired. "FLUBBED R3R "When the auditor does not do flubless auditing errors occur in the auditing itself. These will hang up an Int RD. 279 "OVERRUN "It usually happens that an Int RD is overrun. It goes flat on Secondary F2, let us say. The auditor keeps on going past the win. "This will hang up the Rundown. "One of the ways an overrun occurs is the pc goes exterior during it. Yet the auditor keeps on. "Another way is pc has a big Cog, big win. Auditor keeps going on with the RD." -- LRH (HCO B 24 Sept 71, "Urgent -- Interiorization Rundown") REPAIR OF INT "If even years after an Int RD the pc has a high TA or a low TA, then Int trouble is at once suspected and the original Int RD and any repair of it is suspected and must be handled." -- LRH (From the LRH original HCO B C/S Series 35R, Revised 16 Dec 71, "Interiorization Errors") (Handle it by HCO B 29 Oct 71, "Int Rundown Correction List Revised".) TWO-WAY COMM There is a two-way comm step that follows a day or so after an Interiorization Rundown. An auditor doing this step, preferably the same auditor, MUST BE CHECKED OUT ON TWO-WAY COMM. No C/S should permit any auditor to do any 2-way comm until the auditor has been checked out on HCO PL 20 July 1970, Issue III, "Two-Way Comm Checksheet". One can obtain these tapes easily from Pubs (as the Sea Org has recently forced in this line and quality and delivery). Pending such tapes one can certainly get the rest of the materials on the checksheet done by the auditor and let him do 2-way comm while being very watchful as a C/S. C/SING INT The correcting of an Interiorization Rundown is far harder than making sure that auditors cam do the usual in the first place. Nearly all a C/S's hard work comes from auditors not well trained on courses (indifferent courses) and failing to check auditors out well on the materials before permitting them to deliver a new rundown. The correction of Int is hard since until it is complete, other auditing is inadvisable. One, however, gets the Int Rundown done. "INT IS A REMEDY "The Int RD is not understood as a REMEDY. It is not something you do on all pcs. "Pc goes Exterior in auditing. "Later his TA goes high. "Then you do an Int RD. "You test Int for read as above. If it BDs you do an Int RD. "You just don't do one because a pc goes exterior. "One reason unnecessary Int RDs get done is that the Registrar sells one. That makes the Reg a C/S. SO the C/S and auditor run it. 280 "Maybe it wasn't needed. "So if it wasn't needed it will eventually have to be repaired." -- LRH (HCO B 24 Sept 71, "Urgent -- Interiorization Rundown") (Repair with an Int RD Correction List Revised, HCO B 29 Oct 1971.) The Interiorization Rundown is a REMEDY designed to permit the pc to be further audited after he has gone exterior. The Int Rundown is NOT meant to be sold or passed off as a method of exteriorizing a pc. This is very important. It is general auditing on usual Dianetics and Scientology actions that brings about Exteriorization. When the pc goes or is found to be exterior one then orders the Interiorization Rundown. Otherwise the TA will misbehave. The rundown is a REMEDY USED AFTER EXTERIORIZATION HAS OCCURRED BY REASON OF GENERAL AUDITING. Anxiety to get exterior will prompt a pc to buy and a Registrar to sell an Interiorization Rundown. It is in effect just more auditing as far as the Registrar is concerned. When a pc has gone exterior the Registrar can insist on his buying enough hours for the remedy. The Int Rundown stabilizes the exteriorization and makes it possible to audit the pc further. DISABILITY If an auditor can't smoothly audit a rundown as simple as an Int Rundown, then he is exposed as being unable to run Standard Dianetics and should be cleared of his misunderstoods and overts and retrained. The only real trouble one gets into on an Int Rundown stems from the inability of the auditor to run a smooth, good TRed R3R session. Pcs are not hard to run on it. C/S WINS A C/S cannot win at all if he is continually having to make up for flubby auditing by the auditor. Therefore the C/S must be very sure his auditors are fully checked out on things they are to run before running them. If there is no Qual Staff Training Officer or no Cramming, a C/S can fully afford to do the training and cramming himself. Otherwise he will lose far more than that time in C/Sing for auditors not checked out. By the skill of his auditors you know the C/S. Not by his unusual solutions after flubs. The Int Rundown is too easy to do to have any trouble -- the trouble comes when the auditors are not checked out beforehand, starrate and in clay on new things they are to run. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:MH:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1970, 1971, 1974 (Updated with recent by L. Ron Hubbard LRH data by order of ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. Ron Hubbard by Training & Services Bureau) [HCO PL 20 July 1970, Issue III, Two-Way Comm Checksheet, mentioned above was revised on 25 November 1974 as a BPL.] 281  L. RON HUBBARD Founder (Updated with recent LRH data by order of L. Ron Hubbard by Training & Services Bureau)   Type = 11 iDate=24/11/73 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 53RG SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S  Type = 11 iDate=31/12/71 Issue=0 Rev=4 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973 (Cancels HCO B 31 Dec 1971RC) REISSUED 4 APRIL 74 (CANCELLED -- see HCO B 24 Nov 73RB Volume VIII -- 398) Remimeo C/S Series 53RG SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal range to get pc's case handled better. _______________________________________ PC Name ___________________________ Date 1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F, LF, LFBD [to what TA], speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RG should be reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment. A. Interiorization _______ Invisible _______ Went in _______ Black _______ Go in _______ Loss _______ Can't get in _______ Lost _______ Want to get out _______ F. Same thing run twice _______ Kicked out of spaces _______ Same action done by Can't go _______ another auditor _______ B. List errors _______ G. Doing something with Overlisting _______ mind between sessions _______ Wrong items _______ Some other practice _______ Upset with giving H. Word Clearing errors _______ items to auditor _______ Study errors _______ C. Some sort of W/H _______ I. False TA _______ Are you withholding Wrong sized cans _______ something _______ Tired hands _______ Is another withholding Dry hands or feet _______ something from you _______ Wet hands or feet _______ Are others withholding Loosens can grip _______ something from others _______ Has another committed J. Auditor overwhelming _______ overts on you _______ Feel attacked _______ Have you committed Something wrong with any overts _______ F/Ns _______ Have others committed Overrun F/Ns _______ overts on others _______ Missed F/N _______ Not saying _______ Items really didn't read _______ Problems _______ Bad auditing _______ Protest _______ Incomplete actions _______ Don't like it _______ K. Can't have _______ Audited over out ruds _______ Low Havingness _______ Feel sad _______ Rushed _______ L. PTS _______ Tired _______ Suppressed _______ ARC Brk _______ M. Something went on too Upset _______ long _______ Can't get it _______ Went on by a release D. Drugs _______ point _______ LSD _______ Overrun _______ Alcohol _______ Auditor kept on going _______ Pot _______ Over-repair _______ Medicine _______ Puzzled by auditor E. Engram in restimulation _______ keeps on _______ Same engram run twice _______ Stops _______ Can't see engrams too N. Something else _______ well _______ Physically ill _______ 282 O. Repairing a TA that Faulty Meter _______ isn't high _______ Nothing wrong _______ Repairing a TA that isn't low _______ 2. Use only the small fails or falls or BDs. The rises will however show where mass lies. A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 Amended 31 Dec 71.) If pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R. B. If any of these read, do an L4B on the earliest lists you can find that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4B in general. You can go over an L4B several times handling each read to F/N until the whole L4B gives nothing but F/Ns. C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for each or 18 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR HCO B 30 June 71, Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk of long duration.) D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has had a Drug RD, do L3B on it, and handle. E. If any of these, do L3B and handle according to what is stated to do on L3B. F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N. G. Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such 2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life. H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List to the pc's program. I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72, HCO B 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries (b) F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3) Rehab a time he felt really keyed out to F/N. J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. These items are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or retread. K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy. L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD. M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to blow, locate to blow if qualified). N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get further C/S instructions for handling if necessary. O. Get Pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N. Go E/S and indicate if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per I above. General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return to the C/S. LRH:BW:BL:TD:anss.rd Revised by Copyright $c 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 283  Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=7/3/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=6/4/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 28RA USE OF DIANETICS   Remimeo HGC Auditors Dn & Scn Checksheets C/Ses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1971 RA Remimeo Revised 6 April 1974 HGC Auditors Dn & Scn Checksheets C/S Series 28RA C/Ses USE OF DIANETICS Revised per HCO B 15 July 71, Issue I, "Quads Cancelled" (Revisions in this type style) Where a case has only been run on singe flow Dianetics (Flow 1) one goes back to the first Dianetic item ever run of which record can be found and does F1, F2, F3 in that order. To C/S a case for Triple Dianetics it is best to first lay out a Scientology repair, making sure the case is flying, then list out the items already run on Single and Triple. Then get them run so that all three flows are complete on each item in sequence from first to last. This includes any LX items, former practice, drugs or any other engram running. These, like Dianetic items, are listed in their correct sequence of former running. Then the missing flows are run. A rehab step of the flows already run is not necessary. This rehab of a flow already run to EP is usually used only when there is question about its having gone to F/N Cog VGIs. In C/Sing for Triples one COMPLETES any flow of an item found that did not F/N. This is indicated on the Item list. DOING THE LIST The Item list is done by the auditor in his admin time for well done time credits. All former Dianetic items ever run are listed and what flows have been run on them and to what end phenomena. Example: Engram List 3 Sept 69 Sadness (exact wording that was used) F1 4 Sept 69 A Bored Feeling F1 Bogged 6 Sept 69 An Apathetic Outlook F1 Bogged 6 Nov 69 LX Agonized F1 F2 F3 7 Nov 69 Former Therapy F1 F2 F3 F2 Bogged 9 Nov 69 Earlier Practices F1 Bogged 10 Nov 69 A Horrible Sadness F1 Bogged 5 July 70 Int RD F1 F2 F3 F3 Bogged 6 July 71 An Awful Pressure F1 Bogged Such a list is then handled from the earliest forward by: (a) Completing the bogged flow and (b) Completing the missing flow. 284 INT-EXT RD This is handled in its proper sequence on the list if the TA is not high or very low. If the TA on the pc is currently high, Int is handled before any other action is done and all three flows are run on it. A drug chain also makes a high TA if in existence or unflat. FLUBS If any auditor has a poor record of getting Dianetic Results, of bogged flows, etc, he needs an HDC Retread. His drills and TRs are out or he is committing Gross Auditing Errors. Dianetics gves remarkable results only when flawlessly done. The commands must be precisely given and all commands 1-9 A-D are used. It is NEVER shorted "because the pc did it". C/Sing It should be realized Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing. This remains the same in Triple Dianetics. RESULTS Triple Dianetics, including the rerun actions, produces some very startling new gains. Well done Dianetics always has produced fine results. Triple Dianetics almost doubles the gain. REMEDIES Any and all Dianetic Remedies and general technology remain in full use. They are not changed at all. Only Triple Flows are added in each case. Good Luck. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:mes.ntm.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This HCO B is added to by HCO B 7 March 1971, Reissued 13 January 1975, C/S Series 28RA-1, Use of Quadruple Dianetics, Page 374. ] 285  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=5/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=8/4/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 33RA TRIPLE RERUNS   Remimeo All Auditors C/Ses Class VIII  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1971 RA Remimeo REVISED 8 APRIL 1974 All Auditors C/Ses Class VIII C/S Series 33RA TRIPLE RERUNS (Revised per HCO B 15 July 71 Issue I "Quads Cancelled" -- Revisions in this type style.) LAW: WHEN ONE OR MORE OF THE THREE FLOWS OF AN ITEM OR GRADE ARE LEFT UNRUN, WHEN USED IN LATER PROCESSES THE EARLIER UNRUN ONES RESTIMULATE AND MAKE MASS. This tells you that high TAs, heavy pressures and even illness can come from by-passed flows. BY-PASSED FLOWS Example: Dianetic singles have been run on 7 items. Now the auditor begins to run new items Triple without running Triple on the already run items. The result will be 7 unrun Flow 2s and 7 unrun Flow 3s. These will restimulate and form mass and by-passed charge. Example: Now let us say that Dianetics was all run Single and Grades were run Triple. This will restimulate the Dn chains F2 and F3. ANY LATER GRADE RUN WITH MORE FLOWS THAN USED IN EARLIER ACTIONS CAN THROW THE EARLIER UNFLAT FLOWS INTO RESTIM, PILE UP MASS GIVING HIGH TA AND BPC GIVING ARC BREAKS. REPAIR The more the condition is repaired by L1C, L4BR, etc, etc the worse the Mass gets. SOURCE OF HIGH TA Thus High TAs have three principal sources: (1) Overruns (2) Auditing Past Exterior (3) Earlier Unrun flows restimulated by those flows used in later actions. There are other minor ones such as Drug Background, illness, etc as per Hi-Lo TA Assessment. REHABS One must NOT recklessly or continuously rehab a past major action. This causes overrun. The thetan is placed at the end of the incidents not yet in restimulation or run and the bank gets more solid. MASSY THETANS The whole trick of this universe is contained in thetans copying or picturing incidents and then getting stuck in the later portion of them. "Incidents" is the keynote. A Thetan is incident hungry This is what traps him. For some reason he has to be at the earliest end of incidents to erase them. The later he is in incidents and the later he is on the track the more solid he is. 286 This also applies to the "auditing time track". By omitting things like flows on the auditing time track, the thetan thus becomes massy. The whole theory of the Exteriorization Remedy is based on having gone out (later) after he went in (earlier). So Exteriorizing can stick him. (People buy the Ext RD to Exteriorize but the remedy is only done to permit further auditing. They Ext of course when the bank is handled.) When flows of items are by-passed and then later restimulated by auditing them, mass occurs. GETTING IN ALL FLOWS When doing additional flows on earlier items or processes one must also check or rehab those flows marked as run to F/N in worksheets. This again will leave unflat flows and BPC unless it is done. And if it is overdone it will raise the TA by overrun. So if one had a case that had Single Dianetics and was later run on Triple for new items (but the Singles not done into Triple) one would have to RUN FIRST the missing unrun flow or flows and then check the first Single F1 for flatness, then check other previously run flows. The rule is run the previously unrun one or ones first to get charge off, then verify or run the ones listed as run already. Then one would do the same for the next item. Run the previously unrun flow or flows and then verify or run those listed as already run to be sure they F/N. All items, in chronological sequence, and all processes, would have to be run Triple. IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME NOW TO RUN IN ONLY SINGLES. So all C/Ses and Auditing actions are "Rehab or Run F1, F2, F3" when getting in all flows on things run to date. HIGH TA When you are sure an EXT RD has been done correctly and its 2wc went F/N and the TA later goes high, you check the EXT RD. That is the most usual reason. This simple action is amazingly subject to flubs. If the TA goes high later you can do a Hi-Lo TA Assessment and handle. If the TA is still high or low, you had better check the state of flows. Were more flows run on later actions than were run on earlier actions? If so, your pc has felt massy, sometimes even ill. The right action is to get in all flows from the beginning. Bring all his auditing up to Triple. (If his folder is not available, he has kind of had it. I know of no way, at this writing, to recover lost Dn items but will have to work something out.) NOT IN TROUBLE If the pc is not in trouble, his best bet is to get on up the grades to Expanded OT III. IN TROUBLE If he is massy and is having trouble the best bet is to: 287 (1) Be totally sure of his Int RD (2) Check O/Rs particularly of a major grade twice or by-passed F/Ns, locate and indicate them (3) FES, list the items and grades and do a Full Flow action from the beginning of his auditing, raising them all to Triple. RUNNING ZERO FLOWS (As run in the Introspection RD) The Zero Flow in Dianetics is a bit strange. It can be done by full R3R BUT it often depends on the decision the pc made and may F/N very suddenly. It is easily overrun and can be very fast. A pc can be gotten into trouble on Zero Flows if the auditor is slow and is not alert to his meter and misses the F/N and gves R3R commands after the flow has blown. REHAB OR RUN The auditor getting in Triple Flows can also ARC Brk the pc by failing to verify if the previously run flows are flat. All the auditor wants is to see them F/N on the command. If they don't he runs them. Sometimes when he has "run them" again he finds they are being overrun or run twice and has to rehab them by finding this out. The pc sometimes doesn't know until he actually starts to run them. Then he finds they are already run. The clue to this is a climbing TA. If the TA goes up, get off that flow and rehab it. Example: Pc at first thinks "Pain in shoulder" F2 was never run. Starts to run it. TA goes up. Auditor must pull him off of it by finding out if it is being run twice and rehab it to F/N. The moral in all these reruns is don't firefight, keep an L1C List and an L3RD List handy and use them. RESULTS The results of straightening up the Int-Ext RD, rehabbing O/Rs and putting in ALL FLOWS on a pc are fantastic. Getting an All Flows Rundown done correctly gives one all the latent gain the pc has been begging for. So send to Cramming all C/Ses and auditors who flub. Program it right. C/S it right. Audit it right. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:mes.ntm.jh.rd Copyright$c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This HCO B is added to by HCO B 5 April 1971, Reissued 13 January 1975, C/S Series 33RA-1, Triple and Quad Reruns, Page 380.] 288  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=21/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=3 rDate=21/9/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 36RB DIANETICS   Remimeo All Auditors Class VIII Dn Checksheet Int-Ext Chksht  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 21 APRIL 1971 RB REVISED 8 APRIL 1974 Remimeo REISSUED 21 SEPTEMBER 1974 All Auditors Class VIII C/S Series 36RB Dn Checksheet (Revised per HCO B 15 July 71, Issue I, Int-Ext Chksht "Quads Cancelled" Revisions in this type style.) This HCO B has been reissued as C/S Series 36RB. HCO B 21 April 1971RA, C/S Series 36RA, "Dianetics -- Getting In All Flows", is cancelled. DIANETICS (Applies also to Int-Ext Rundown.) (Ref HCO B 4 Apr 71 RA, C/S Series 32RA, and HCO B 5 Apr 71 RA, C/S Series 33RA.) TRs TR Zero exists so an auditor is not ducking the session but can sit there relaxed, doing his job. TR One must be done so the pc can hear and understand the auditor (without blowing the pc's head off either). TR Two must be done so that the pc gets acknowledged. This can be so corrupted that the auditor doesn't ack at all but gives the pc meter reads! Instead of acks! Or keeps saying, "I didn't understand you," etc. TR Three basically existed so that the auditor would continue to give the pc commands and not squirrel off or pack up with total silence. TR Four exists so that the pc's origins are accepted and not Qed and Aed with or invalidated. And, surprise, surprise, TRs are for use in the session itself, not just a drill. They are how one runs a session. Metering can miss every F/N or give "F/Ns" with high or low TA. And one never feeds meter data to the pc: "That read," "That didn't read," "That blew down," just must not exist in session patter. "Thank you. That F/Ned," is as far as an auditor goes. And that's the end of the cycle and says so. Floating needles can be overlooked by an auditor. In Dianetics this fault is fatal. Auditor's Code must be in on all points and particularly Invalidation. Pc says, "That's so and so." An auditor who says, "I'm sorry. You are wrong," or any other invalidation is going to wreck a pc's case. A full knowledge of the Auditor's Code and actually applying it saves endless troubles. It is an auditing TOOL, not just a nice idea. REHABBING CHAINS One rehabs a Dianetic Chain that, according to a previous worksheet, erased by saying, "According to session records (flow direction) (item) erased." That's all. One does not say, "Did the chain giving others a headache erase?" One does not run it again to find out. One does not run a singe command "to see if it F/Ns again". One can say, "Do you agree that the chain giving another a headache erased?" But the more you ask 289 the pc to look for an erased chain the more messed up things will get. It isn't there. But the auditor by his action can imply it should be there or might be there. A totally wrong approach would be "Look around your bank and see if what isn't there any more isn't there." Dianetics is NOT Scientology. A Dianetic Chain is not a release. If you try to use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic Chain, you have had it. It isn't a "release" (which is a key-out). A Dianetic Chain is an erasure. You can't rehab erasures with "How many times?", etc. The test of this is the doing. If you try to use Scn rehab on Dianetic Chains, the PC MIGHT TRY TO FIND SOMETHING. This causes him to key in other unrun or similar items. It is a dangerous action at best to try to handle old erased chains. The best you can do is to tell the pc what the old W/S said. If no W/S exists leave the already erased flows alone! FLUBBED CHAINS Many times, a Folder Error Summary will give a flubbed chain and then fail to note it was repaired in the next session! A C/S and auditor would have been pretty irresponsible to just go on auditing past flubbed chains. The only safe way to handle some previous flubbed chain is to: (a) Verify in the folder if it was repaired. (b) If still unrepaired assess the L3RD on it and handle according to the L3RD. L3RD Using the new L3RD (HCO B 11 Apr 71 RA) is a Dianetic action. A Scientology auditor erroneously can try to use it as a two-way comm type of list. If a chain needed one more ABCD, then two-way comm on it with no ABCD is not going to complete it. L3RD has its own directions. Questions not marked with directions are used to indicate the fact. This can amount to two-way comm as the pc chews it over. But L3RD where marked is handled by Dianetics actions. Look over the list and its directions for each question and you will see that some are given directions that are NOT 2wc. Example: "Earlier beginning" reads. You can't just say, "The incident had an earlier beginning," and you can't say, "Tell me about the earlier beginning." The pc will go up the wall. There'll be no F/N. You have to use R3R and get him to the earlier beginning and then run it and if it still doesn't erase, get him to an Earlier Similar and erase that. L3RD is a Dianetics List. It is not a Scientology List that is cleared each question to F/N by 2-way comm. OVERRUN Overruns are demonstrated by a rising TA. If as you seek to get in Full Flow Dianetics the pc's TA begins to average higher, overrun is occurring. 290 Example: While doing FFD pc's TA has been riding at 2.2 and F/Ns. After a new FFD action it begins to ride at 2.5 and F/Ns. Something is being overrun. Find it and indicate it. And cease to stir the bank up so much! The fault is going over items already run. In doing a Full Flow Table you often find that the same or similar have been run in the past. Sometimes you find that a previous attempt to run the item a second or third time has resulted in an ARC Break, the reason for which was never detected. The right action is to note the session date it was first run and just tell the pc, "Feeling Surprised was run three times. On (first date it was erased) it was erased. When later run it was an overrun." This tends to blow the later charge laid in by trying to run the same item again. It sounds so strange that erased chains can be overrun. But it is true. What happens is that pcs try to cooperate and put something there. FIREFIGHTS The action of a quarrel between an auditor and a pc is called a firefight. Restimulating earlier unrun engrams or overrunning chains upsets a pc. The best action, as soon as a pc is disturbed, is to do an L3RD fast and handle what reads the way it should be handled according to the L3RD. The wrong way is to argue or try to go on. The pc does NOT know what it is. He just feels awful. He tries to guess. He will ARC Brk or get sad if the auditor continues. The correct action is an L3RD. L1C is not of great use in a Dianetic ARC Brk. L3RD is. If the pc remains ARC Broken, try L3RD again, particularly the whole L3RD. A Scientology session would be handled with some other list (L1C, L4BR, etc). A Dianetic session, including and especially FFD, is handled with L3RD. You NEVER prepcheck while doing Dianetics. This mushes up the engrams. INTERIORIZATION ALL these cautions apply as well to an Interiorization-Exteriorization Rundown, when restim occurs one uses an L3RD quickly. Int-Ext RD is essentially a Dianetic, not a Scientology, action. SAFE ACTIONS A fully genned-in auditor, well crammed, well drilled, well skilled, can be trusted with Dianetics, Dianetic Triples and an Int-Ext RD. Auditors not so handled can get pcs into serious trouble with these things. A safe course is to use Triples on new, never audited before pcs. Those begun on Triples, use then only Triple flows. Another safe way is to use FFD only on OT IIIs or OT IVs and done only by fully qualified FFD auditors who are also OT III. The safest course is to require special drilling and cramming on auditors who are already known for their results by actual success story stats and call FFD and Int-Ext RD a skilled specialty. 291 C/S RESPONSIBILITY Any trouble a C/S is running into comes from the factors of TRs, metering, Code and incomplete or false auditors' reports. If when I am C/Sing I ever find an auditor has omitted key session actions or has falsified a report, I order that auditor not to Cramming but a full retrain HDC right on up. A C/S does not see these points. He can get the pc asked what the auditor is doing or did. He can get sessions monitored. This helps him fill this gap in his data. It's what isn't in the auditor's report that is often the trouble. Auditors omit what they said, omit the firefight, omit session alter-is in their worksheets. All this sticks the C/S's neck out for the axe of failure. So particularly in FFD, Int-Ext and other such actions, a C/S has to act to obtain confidence in the auditor's TRs, metering, Code use and accurate worksheets. RISK In FFD, Int-Ext RD and Power, experience has proven that if the auditor is not top grade, if the C/S is not alert, we put a pc at risk. The USUAL is what keeps the pc safe. A thorough study of his case, looking for obvious bugs (such as Int-Ext RD done twice, the case a druggie but drug engrams never run, Int done but its 2wc flubbed, to name a few serious ones), sending auditors to Cramming for the slightest flub, insisting on standard TRs USED IN SESSION, good metering, use of the Code, accurate and complete worksheets, use of standard tech, all guarantee the safety and progress of the pc. INTRODUCING FFD FFD (like the Int-Ext RD) requires flawless C/Sing and auditing or the case goes wrong. When these actions were introduced they showed up any flaws in case studying, TRs, metering, Code and worksheets. There are two ways to handle. (a) Cancel FFD and Int-Ext as actions. Obviously that is going backwards and is impossible. (b) Begin and continue a serious, effective campaign in the org to (1) Train auditors better, (2) Cram expertly on every flub, (3) Raise quality of TRs and metering. As you can see, my approach is to improve quality of training, cramming and delivery. Please help me out in getting this in. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:nt.ts.rd Founder Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This HCO B is added to by HCO B 21 April 1971-1R, Addition of 13 January 1975, Revised 22 February 1975, C/S Series 36RB-1R, Quadruple Dianetics -- Dangers of, Page 383.] 292  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=10/4/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Art Series 3 STAGE MANNERS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 APRIL 1974 Remimeo Art Series 3 STAGE MANNERS An actor, performer or musician should have a good command of what is called "Stage Manners". While it is not possible here to give a full text on the subject, these basics should suffice. 1. The performer purpose is basically Communication. (a) To Communicate one must have R (Reality)-which is to say one must be visible. (b) To Communicate one must have R that there is an audience there to be Communicated to. (c) A degree of Affinity with or for the audience must be physically expressed. (One cannot treat an audience with contempt, for instance.) (A perpetual smile is not a must, a respectful look, a friendly look does as well.) If you look over the above ABCs you will see that the general basic of Stage Manners is the ARC Triangle. From this almost anything else can be derived. However, there are some traditional rules. I. You accept applause. This is the contribution of the audience. You do not cut it off. You acknowledge it with bows or other physical actions. But you accept it. You don't dodge it. II. You never turn your back on the audience. (An exception is an actor in play stage situations.) You turn in such a way as to turn facing the audience do not turn the other way around and so give them your back. III. Never express embarrassment or stage fright even when you feel it. Force yourself into a physical appearance and expression of poise. IV. If you goof, ride right over it. Do not break off, call attention to it or look helpless or foolish. Just ride right over it and go on. V. If you do not know what to do with your hands or feet, don't do anything with them. Avoid twisting your feet or legs or hands or arms around. Don't fiddle with things. Be positive in motion. VI. During breaks or silent periods remember you are still on stage and Stage Manners still apply. VII. Always appear to be in control of the place and the audience. VIII.Never let your poise be shattered by a sudden surprise. Ride over it and handle. 293 IX. A performer DOMINATES an audience: (a) By his comm, (b) By his art, (c) By his technical perfection, (d) By his Stage Manners. None of this means that one cannot clown, joke, act superior or even seem austere. These are the arts of presence. But even in doing these, Stage Manners are observed. If as a small child one was always cautioned about his manners and resented it one should get a clear idea of what manners are: In a culture manners are the lubrication that ease the frictions of social contacts. On the stage, Stage Manners are the means of smoothing the problems of interchange between audience and performer. The hallmark of the professional performer, next to his art and expertise, is flawless Stage Manners. Stand before a full-length mirror. (Or use Video Tape.) Assume the postures of your act. Accept applause gracefully. Bow gracefully. Smile pleasantly. Laugh. Be dignified. Demonstrate poise. Assume the posture needed for a non-applauding audience. Ride out boos. Demand more applause. Do the postures to end your performance after applause. Accept a standing ovation. Deplore not being able to give an encore. Appear at the start for a first part of a performance. Assume the postures and poise needed on stage during a one minute break between numbers. Accept a plaque. Accept flowers. Ride over a bad goof. Be respectful to the audience. Kid the audience out of it. Do each one of the IX rules. AND ALL WITHOUT SAYING A WORD. Do it with physical motions or lack of them. When you can do all these things and look right to yourself and feel easy about them you will have and be confident of your Stage Manners. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 294  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=20/4/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  INTROSPECTION RD -- THIRD ADDITION Adds to HCO B 23 Jan 74R Revised 10 Feb 74 Checklist ADDITIONAL INTROSPECTION RD STEPS   Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts INTROSPECTION RD -- THIRD ADDITION Adds to HCO B 23 Jan 74R Revised 10 Feb 74 Checklist ADDITIONAL INTROSPECTION RD STEPS The Introspection RD has as its dominant flow, Flow 0. This follows from basic O/W theory where the person goes down the dwindling spiral to a point where he can only restrain himself and do himself in. The following steps must be added to the checklist to fully handle this in the pc. Otherwise future efforts to help him will be blocked by his own efforts to succumb. 14L. Check "doing yourself in" and "doing others in" for read and R3R Quad the best read. 14M. L&N for the intention be kind it. 14N. R3R Quad the intention. 14O. Repeat the steps above on the second one if it is also reading. Also add the following to the RD after the E. Purps have been run R3R: 1. 2wc "Have you ever wanted to succumb?" to F/N. 2. If so, R3R Quad. 3. If so, L&N for the intention behind "wanting to succumb". 4. R3R Quad. 5. 2wc "Have you ever attempted to commit suicide?" to F/N. 6. If so, R3R Quad. 7. If so, L&N for the intention behind the effort to commit suicide. 8. R3R Quad. 9. 2wc "Is there some other way you were doing yourself in that's been missed?" to F/N. Note all reading items. 10. If so, R3R Quad the BD or best reading item. 11. If so, L&N for the intention behind it. 12. R3R Quad. 13. Repeat 10, 11 and 12 on other hot reads. This would be followed by a D of P Interview and attest unless some adjustment actions were needed; these would be R3R any new E. Purps or new R/S handling, a C/S 53RG or ruds or 2wc or HC List. 295 CAUTION Do not run unreading items, miss reads or run wrong items as it will wind the pc up in the soup. A common error on R3Ring E. Purps culled from the W/Ses has shown up that C/Ses must be alert for. This is taking up infinitive phrases like "to go to the store" that appear to be E. Purps but in actual fact are statements of future actions or conditions, not intentions. Example: Pc says, "I was doing fine then Joe came along and caused me to cave in." "To cave in" is not an E. Purp as stated. It wasn't the pc's intention. Not valid. Example: Pc says, "I was trying to hold on to the rope and he forced me to fall off the cliff." "To fall off the cliff" was not the pc's intention but a statement of an action. Not valid. Example: Pc says, "I wanted to make them wrong and got sick." "To make them wrong" was the intention, is valid and runnable. Have you got the idea? If there is any question in your mind, clear the word "intention", then go over a grammar text and sort out what am infinitive and infinitive phrase are and how they're used. You'll save the pc and yourself a lot of difficulty if you do this. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ntm.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 296  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/4/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 22 EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES   Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1974 (REVISED -- see HCO B 23 Apr 74R Volume VIII -- 372) Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Expanded Dianetics Series 22 EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES The recent review of Expanded Dianetics has shown that Ex Dn can be made to fail if the pc is improperly set up for it. The following checklist is for use by C/Ses to ensure full set-ups for Ex Dn have been done. Attach to the inside left cover of the folder. 1. Pc has done a full set of TRs 0-4 and 6-9. _______ 2. Pc has had a full battery of Objective Processes run to full EP. _______ 3. Pc has been given a thorough C/S 1 and is grooved in. _______ 4. Pc has completed (very) Drug RD which is FLAT. No no-interest but reading items remain unrun. No medicine, drug or stimulant left unrun. _______ 5. Pc successful at Dianetic Engram running. Can run Dn easily. _______ 6. Pc has had Word Clearing Method 1 run very flat to F/N list. _______ 7. Pc has been Word Cleared Method 5 on the L-3ExDRB and R3R words. _______ 8. Pc has had any high or low TA handled with a C/S 53RG. _______ 9. Pc is not in the Non-Interference area. _______ 10. Pc has had any messed up L&N and Why lists corrected. _______ 11. Pc has not been left in the middle of a major action or RD to start Ex Dn. _______ Only if you make sure each of these points is fully in will the pc fly on Ex Dn. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 297  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=25/4/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Art Series 4 RHYTHM   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 APRIL 1974 Remimeo Art Series 4 RHYTHM RHYTHM: Any kind of movement characterized by the regular recurrence of strong and weak elements. Rhythm denotes the regular patterned flow, the ebb and rise of sounds and movement in speech, music, writing, dance and in other physical activities. Meter basically means measure and applies to a system or pattern of measured recurrence of length, beat or numbers in poetry or music. TYPES OF MUSIC RHYTHM There are SIX distinct types of rhythm in music. These are: REGULAR: Meaning the evenly accented (stressed) beat. SYNCOPATED: The placing of upbeats along with downbeats at regular or irregular intervals. STOPPED: In a stopped rhythm there are regular distinct halts to the flow of melody, but all the beats are there, they are simply regularly halted for an interval. (The term comes from choreography as in tap dancing where the dancer taps fill the stops.) ACCENTED: Where one or more beats in a measure received a stronger stress (beat) or accent. Accent in a rhythm can be done by volume, duration, pitch or tone quality (timbre). OMITTED BEAT: The regular omission of one or more beats in measures. Time may have to be counted over two or more measures in order to regularly omit. (Soul, Motown.) ADDED BEAT: Additional strong or, generally, weak beats are added to the rhythm in a consistent or inconsistent manner. (Bongos, Congas, etc.) USAGE Any and all rhythms are made up of the six basics above. One, two or more can be employed in complex patterns. REPETITION Rhythm is rhythm because of repetition (recurrence). RAPPORT RAPPORT: Relationship, especially, one of mutual trust or affinity. An audience in rapport is different than an audience of spectators. An audience in rapport PARTICIPATES in small or large ways with the performer or the artist or work of art, often by vocal or body motion. 298 Such participation is achieved by: 1. Reliance on the even recurrence of the rhythm. 2. Ability to predict it will recur. 3. Formation of agreement by such reliable prediction. 4. Permitting the audience to fill gaps or significances. Regular omission of a beat or step or full explanation causes the audience to fill it for themselves and brings about physical or mental participation. RHYTHM All life is a repeating pulse and ebb and surge of motion. Life becomes difficult when rhythmic prediction cannot occur. Anxiety sets in. It is a relief to participate in predictable rhythm in an art form. It is safe and reassuring. If the rhythm is exciting it is also exciting. Therefore participation in predictable rhythm is pleasure and even joy. IMPINGEMENT When one changes rhythm within a singe work one "makes wrong" because the person has predicted the rhythm but the prediction is not met. Thus he is wrong. If the rhythm recurs, the person is made right. A new rhythm attracts attention. If it is agreed with and recurs it gets participation. ART FORMS The above materials, while written from the viewpoint of music, apply to any art form. Even prose has a rhythm. Not all rhythms are pleasant or acceptable. Many ways exist to utilize these observations on rhythm -- i.e. one can begin an unwanted rhythm, using the audience objection to impinge and then turn it into a wanted rhythm. As life itself is going through time and as time is recurrence, some rhythms are too dull to attain any attention. Rhythm, used in art forms, must therefore slow or speed or change the expected rhythms of ordinary life in order to command attention. Rhythm can sooth, lull, excite, arouse to any point of the emotional tone scale. A rhythm one half to one tone below the usual rhythm in life will depress or degrade an audience. A rhythm one half to one tone above the usual rhythm will dominate and interest. Rhythm and its expression is the basic key to all art forms. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ntm.rd Founder Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 299  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=31/5/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  UNHANDLED DRUGS AND ETHICS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 31 MAY 1974 (Also HCO PL 31 May 1974) Remimeo UNHANDLED DRUGS AND ETHICS Several recent cases have come to light where the person was permitted to go on upper grades, Expanded Dianetics, Power and even OT Levels whose drugs had not been handled. In each case there was no or poor case gain, organizational upsets and wasted auditing. THEREFORE IT BECOMES FIRM POLICY THAT ANY REGISTRAR, C/S, D OF P OR AUDITOR WHO PERMITS A PERSON WITH UNHANDLED OR PARTIALLY HANDLED DRUGS TO BE AUDITED ON ANYTHING BUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DRUG RUNDOWN INCLUDING NO INTEREST ITEMS WILL BE SUBJECT TO COMM EV WITH A MINIMUM PENALTY OF TREASON AND A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF EXPULSION. Tech must not be made to fail because of overt, covert or ignorant misapplication of tech. It is fully established that a chief cause of failure in cases is unhandled or only partially handled drugs including medical drugs, treatments and alcohol. This is a barrier to case gain and in this society at this time, the major barrier. Where drugs have not been handled or only partially have been handled, the NO INTERFERENCE ZONE RULE is waived. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:clb.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHT RESERVED 300  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=22/2/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=8/7/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Word Clearing Series 32RA WORD CLEARING METHOD 4   URGENT -- IMPORTANT -- URGENT Vital for all Supervisors, Est-Os, and Cramming Officers. Remimeo All Supervisors Student's Hat HPCSC Mini Crse Super Crse Word Clearing Crse Est Off Crse Dept 13 Personnel  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 22 FEBRUARY 1972RA All Supervisors (Revised 26 March 1972 Student's Hat HPCSC and 8 July 1974. Mini Crse Changes in this type style.) Super Crse Word Clearing Crse Word Clearing Series 32RA Est Off Crse Dept 13 Personnel URGENT -- IMPORTANT -- URGENT Vital for all Supervisors, Est-Os, and Cramming Officers. WORD CLEARING METHOD 4 Tech and Admin Cramming Officers, Word Clearers and Course Supervisors use Method 4 Word Clearing when fishing for a misunderstood word. E.g. Cramming Officers use it to fish for misunderstood words concerning what the person is being crammed on. Word Clearers use it on Interns when the Intern needs a retrain or retread or even if the Intern is sent to Cramming. Course Supervisors use it in the classroom CONTINUOUSLY ON NON-F/N STUDENTS or queries. The whole idea is the person requiring the Method 4 Word Clearing has a Cramming Order or is not an F/Ning student because of confusion as a result of a misunderstood word, as per Word Clearing Series 16R or omitted materials. Method 4 fishes for the misunderstood word, finds it, clears it to F/N, looks for another in the area until there are no more with an F/N VGIs, then moves to another area, handles that -- eventually all the misunderstoods that resulted in the Cramming Order or non-F/N student are handled. It requires no C/S OK for it to be done. Method 1 is not a prerequisite to Method 4. E-Meter Drill No. 21 is the E-Meter Drill to be drilled on Method 4. It's the method of fishing for a cognition. Requires proper application of TRs and metering. All Supervisors, Est-Os, and Dept 13 personnel to check out on, drill, and apply this tech AS IT IS VITAL STUDY TECH. METHOD 4 WORD CLEARING 1. Give person the cans, state, "I am not auditing you." 2. Ask while watching the meter: "Is there any part of what you're studying you did not fully get?" Trace the read. Use "fishing for a cog" drill (per HCO B 25 June 70, Issue III) if needed. If no read the question may be varied, e.g. "Is there any part of the materials you're studying you disagree with?" or "Is there any part of what you're studying you feel you could not apply?" or "In (material being checked) is there anything you didn't understand?" Let the student tell you briefly. Do NOT tell him the data. Verify that his study pack is complete as the data might have been omitted. Also he might never have read the pack at all. 301 If the data was missing do not go on to Step 3. See that he gets the complete pack and reads it. Then repeat Method 4. If the person just has not read the materials do not go on to 3 but get him to read the materials. Then repeat Method 4. 3. Get what it is then ask: "What word was misunderstood just before that?" Meter reads, Word Clearer finds the word, never accepting a confusion but finds the word giving the read (SF, F, LF, BD), gets it looked up in a dictionary and used in sentences until it can be seen from the sentences that the student now understands the word and the word F/Ns. All the tools of Study Tech and Word Clearing are at the Word Clearer's disposal to take the word to F/N. The Word Clearer does not stop at one misunderstood but makes sure all are cleared. 4. Repeat 2 & 3 until the materials are fully cleared up and all misunderstoods or confusions handled. 5. If the action bogs when used in the classroom the student must be sent to Qual for handling and Supervisor to Cramming on TRs and metering and drilling on this procedure. The correct action is a W/C CORRECTION LIST DONE ON THE STUDENT AND HANDLED. Of course if the above question F/Ns on asking, there would be misunderstoods on the material being checked, but the person is in Cramming, not an F/Ning student or whatever, so there obviously are misunderstood words to be found and handled. Look at HCO PL 16 Feb 72, "The Purpose of the Dept of Personnel Enhancement". It says this Dept "reaches and looks for business all over the org and brings it in". So someone with stats down -- student or post stats, confusion, confusion. Well, underneath overloaded, can't seem to handle it, how do you do this, etc, etc, are all indicators of misunderstood words as the person is saying confusion, confusion. Well, underneath the confusion is a misunderstood word just as Word Clearing 16R says. Method 4 Word Clearing is what is used in doing and achieving the purpose of the Dept of Personnel Enhancement, HCO PL 16 Feb 72. One of the ways the Word Clearers in this Dept do the job is using Method 4 Word Clearing. METHOD 4 IS USED BY COURSE SUPERVISORS TO HANDLE ALL STUDENT QUERIES ABOUT CONTENTS OF COURSE MATERIALS. The reason students ask questions about "What is meant" is because of omitted pack materials from their checksheet, failure to read what they have OR BECAUSE OF A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD JUST BEFORE THEY GOT CONFUSED. The Super has to know only where the materials are and BE SMART ENOUGH TO DO METHOD 4 INSTEAD OF GIVING THE STUDENT ALTER-ISED ANSWERS THAT STOP SCIENTOLOGY WORKING. Word Clearing, especially Method 4, is how to get in HIGH CRIME HCO PL 7 Feb 1965, Reissued 15 June 70, "KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING". SUCCESSFUL COURSE SUPERVISION AND SUCCESSFUL CRAMMING REQUIRE THIS ACTION BE FULLY KNOWN AND U-S-E-D. **K*E*E*P** **S*C*I*E*N*T*O*L*O*G*Y** **W*O*R*K*I*N*G** LRH:clb.nt.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder 302  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=8/7/74 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=1 rDate=24/7/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Word Clearing Series 53R CLEAR TO F/N   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY 1974R Issue I Remimeo REVISED 24 JULY 1974 Word Clearing Series 53R (Revisions in this type style) CLEAR TO F/N (Word Clearing Series 32R has been corrected as 32RA to require the F/Ning of all words and forbids W/Cing on a high TA.) Do NOT try to Word Clear a person Method 1, 2 or4 whose TA is high at session start. Use standard auditing procedures by an Auditor of the required class to get the TA down to normal range. (Usually a C/S Series 53RG and handling.) If the TA is high at start of session one of course cannot F/N a TA on Word Clearing when it is high for some other reason. ALWAYS F/N a word being cleared on the meter. It may happen there is a chain and the word has to be earlier similared. But even then, when the chain is F/Ned, the words on the chain that didn't F/N must F/N. Example: A chemical type word reading. Doesn't F/N. E/S it on E/S words, comes down to a lecture in school. The Mis-U word there F/Ns. Now check the words touched while going E/S. Usually they just F/N. Do NOT do a lot of words to "Clean" and say the person has been "Word Cleared". Cases are messed up because the Word Clearing may be over out rudiments or even out lists or out Int. A Word Clearing worksheet must show truthfully all words F/Ned. RED TAB Where a pc has been Word Cleared on the meter without F/Ning or with or to a high or low TA, THE WHOLE FOLDER MUST BE RED TABBED. W/Cing worksheets must go into the pc's folder, just as why finding and touch assists and other auditing actions must be put in the folder. A pc red tabbed because of Word Clearing must be repaired within 24 hours, as in the case of any other red tab. Stalled cases have been traced to Word Clearing errors. Repair of these will get them going again. LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 303  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=8/7/74 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=1 rDate=24/7/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 92R WORD CLEARING ERRORS (Applies to Methods 1, 2, 4 and 5 done on a meter.)   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY 1974R Issue II REVISED 24 JULY 1974 Remimeo C/S Series 92R (Revisions in this type style) WORD CLEARING ERRORS (Applies to Methods 1, 2, 4 and 5 done on a meter.) The attention of the C/S is called to the revised Word Clearing Series 32RA which requires words be F/Ned and to HCO B 8 July 74 of the Word Clearing Series which requires word clearing errors be RED TABBED and that all Word Clearing worksheets be placed in folders. Case troubles have occasionally been traced to metered W/Cing over a High TA or failure to F/N words. This is a hidden area from the C/S unless W/C worksheets are included in folders and the RED TAB system for non-F/N at conclusion is used. Only in this way is a C/S able to get all the data. Correction of W/C errors is done by a Word Clearing Correction List. High TA or Low TA at start of a W/C session is usually handled by C/S 53RG. All "non-session" worksheets such as why finding, contact or touch assists and Word Clearing should go into the pc's folder. None of this can be used as an excuse not to word clear somebody. Make a C/S handle that TA fast and Red Tab the folder until handling occurs. Then do the Word Clearing. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 304  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=17/8/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=24/10/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Word Clearing Series 42R Tape Course Series 10 METHOD 4 NOTES   Remimeo (Translate to European Languages)  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 AUGUST 1972R Remimeo REVISED 8 JULY 1974 (Translate to (Revision in this type style) European Languages) (Reissued 24 October 1974 as a Tape Course Series) Word Clearing Series 42R Tape Course Series 10 METHOD 4 NOTES Too generalized a question in using Method 4 defeats its use and can restimulate a person badly. Example: "Is there anything in college you didn't understand?" That of course is just plain ridiculous as a question. "Have you ever heard anything you didn't understand?" would be similarly silly. BREAK DOWN THE MATERIALS When doing Method 4 you have to break down the materials (put them into small separate units) in order to ask questions. Example: We have Papers 1 & 2, both on the same subject. The wrong question for Method 4 would be "Is there anything in Papers 1 & 2 you didn't understand?" and not even give him the papers to see! The right way to do it would be to take Paper 1 and break it down into its obvious sections, give the person Paper 1 and let him look at it. Point to its 1st section and say, "Is there anything you didn't understand in this section?" while watching the meter. Then point to next section, do the same. Finish Paper 1. Then go to Paper 2 and do it the same. A person has to know what he's being asked about and has to be thinking of it when asked the question. TAPES Just as it would be ridiculous to ask, "Have you ever misunderstood anything you ever read?", it would be silly to ask, "Did you ever have a misunderstood on Tape?" The right way is to take the tape and put it on a machine and play a bit of it. And ask, "Is there anything in the first section of this tape you didn't understand?" while watching the meter. Then high speed the tape forward to another area and do the same. Thus the tape is covered. This can also be done from any tape notes, section by section. BOOKS Books are done chapter by chapter. QUICKIE M4 Method 4 is defeated utterly by: 1. Bad metering, 2. Too general a question, 305 3. Not having the material to hand, 4. Not getting the person's attention on parts of the material, 5. Not taking each word found to F/N. Quickie M4 misses. It sets the person up for a loss in his studying. And we want him to actually succeed in his study, don't we? L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 306  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=17/7/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 23 XDN CASE B   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1974 Remimeo Expanded Dianetics Series 23 (Ref. XDn Series 9) XDN CASE B Further data on XDn Series 9. On further data the failure of this case was due to: 1. PTS to friend of wife who was violently invalidative. He roller coastered = PTS. The PTS scene should have been handled prior to auditing but was not known or suspected at the time. 2. This case had been a drug addict and was married to a drug addict who had been a prostitute and who persuaded him back on drugs. The drug rundown "no interest items" should have been run and he should have been cleaned up on drugs before beginning XDn. It has been proven out time and again that when a very full and complete drug rundown is not done, pcs do not succeed with any other type of auditing including Expanded Dianetics. FURTHER NOTES Further research has shown that headaches are almost invariably an Exteriorization-Interiorization problem. This research case should have had his Ext-Int handled fully. These items added to the research program, before any others, would have brought success: i. Handle Ext-Int by repair or rundown. ii. Handle any out lists L4B. iii. Handle PTS Situation fully and rapidly. iv. Complete Drug RD by culling all "no interest items" and running them. Further repair of this case would include the above but would add:. v. Do an L4B on intentions lists to be sure no lists are out and repair. vi. Do R3R on all reading evil intentions whether pc interested or not. SUMMARY Data gained from running this Case B has been of great assistance in handling other cases since the faults found were not repeated. Hundreds, probably thousands of cases are now winning on XDn with permanent gain. This is due to using fully the developed tech with full skill. LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 307  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=24/11/73 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=30/8/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 53RH SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S  Type = 11 iDate=31/12/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=4 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973R (Cancels HCO B 31 December 1971 RC) Revised & Reissued 30 August 1974 (CANCELLED -- see HCO B 24 Nov 73RB Volume VIII -- 398) Remimeo C/S Series 53RH SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal range to get pc's case handled better. __________________________________________ PC Name ________________________ Date 1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F, LF, LFBD [to what TA], speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RH should be reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment. A. Interiorization _______ Problems _______ Went in _______ Protest _______ Go in _______ Don't like it _______ Can't get in _______ Audited over out ruds _______ Want to get out _______ Feel sad _______ Kicked out of spaces _______ Rushed _______ Can't go _______ Tired _______ ARC Brk _______ B. List errors _______ Upset _______ Overlisting _______ Can't get it _______ Wrong items _______ Upset with giving D. Drugs _______ items to auditor _______ LSD _______ Wrong Why _______ Alcohol _______ Wrong Indication _______ Pot _______ Wrong Indication _______ Medicine _______ Wrong PTS Item _______ C. Some sort of W/H _______ Are you withholding E. Engram in restimulation _______ something _______ Same engram run twice _______ Is another withholding Can't see engrams too something from you _______ well _______ Are others withholding Invisible _______ something from others _______ Black _______ Has another committed Loss _______ overts on you _______ Lost _______ Have you committed any overts _______ Have others committed F. Same thing run twice _______ overts on others _______ Same action done by Not saying _______ another auditor _______ 308 G. Doing something with L. PTS _______ mind between sessions _______ Suppressed _______ Some other practice _______ M. Something went on too H. Word Clearing errors _______ long _______ Study errors _______ Went on by a release point _______ I. False TA _______ Overrun _______ Wrong sized cans _______ Auditor kept on going _______ Tired hands _______ Over-repair _______ Dry hands or feet _______ Puzzled by auditor Wet hands or feet _______ keeps on _______ Loosens can grip _______ Stops _______ J. Auditor overwhelming _______ N. Something else _______ Feel attacked _______ Physically ill _______ Something wrong with F/Ns _______ O. Repairing a TA that Overrun F/Ns _______ isn't high _______ Missed F/N _______ Repairing a TA that Items really didn't read _______ isn't low _______ Bad auditing _______ Faulty Meter _______ Incomplete actions _______ Nothing wrong _______ K. Can't have _______ Low havingness _______ 2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show where mass lies. A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 R, Revised 14 May 74.) If the pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R. B. If any of these read, do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4BR in general. You can go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong Indication or Wrong PTS Item per C/S Series 78. C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for each or 18 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR, HCO B 30 June 71, Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk of long duration.) D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has had a Drug RD, do L3RD on it, and handle. E. If any of these, do L3RD and handle according to what is stated to do on L3RD. F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N. 309 G. Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such 2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life. H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List to the pc's program. I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71 R, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries, (b) F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA obscuring F/Ns. J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor overrunning F/Ns or fading to call them. Or trying to assess through an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be obscured and mistaken for a read if Sensitivity too high. These items are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or retread. K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy. L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD. M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to blow, locate to blow, if qualified). N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get further C/S instructions for handling if necessary. O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N. Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If False TA handle per I above. General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return to the C/S. Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1973, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 310  Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=31/8/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 93 NEW GRADE CHART   URGENT Remimeo Tech Secs C/Ses Auditors Registrars  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 31 AUGUST 1974 Remimeo Tech Secs C/Ses URGENT Auditors Registrars C/S Series 93 NEW GRADE CHART The "NEW" thing to do is the Grade Chart. Everything you are doing should contribute to getting the pc up the Bridge. THIS is the Bridge. There is a new Grade Chart being prepared which has some changes in it, based on recent discoveries. It is urgent that you know of these in advance. DRUG RUNDOWN The effects of an omitted or incomplete Drug RD are severe enough to deny a person any lasting case gain. This is covered in HCO B 31 May 74, "Unhandled Drugs and Ethics". Some orgs have taken this HCO B so literally however, that they have taken pcs off Adv Cses Grades, refused to do Assists on ill pcs and some showed pcs the HCO B and invaled their gains. This was not the intention of the HCO B. The C/S Series remain valid. The Drug RD belongs on the Grade Chart after Life Repair. A Drug RD cannot be done over out ruds and a Life Repair may be necessary to get in a pc's ruds. Life Repair is not a prerequisite for the Drug RD, however, and if done is not to be dragged out intensive after intensive. In some cases a pc could not complete Life Repair without a Drug RD. Following the Drug RD is ARC S/W, then the rest of Dianetics to completion. EXPANDED DIANETICS Ex Dn by the way belongs after Grade IV Expanded. Some pcs R/S and have Evil Purposes to do others in. But no Grade 0 or Grade I or Grade II. What others? Martians? "Got to secretly do everybody in" probably applies to Apeville some long date ago and he's never come up to PT. The answer is to bring the pc up the Grade Chart to Expanded Grade IV then do his Ex Dn. The prerequisites for Ex Dn are covered on HCO B 23 April 74, Ex Dn Series 22, "Expanded Dianetics Requisites". Add to that Expanded Grades up to IV and you have it. GRADE II Some orgs specialize in Grade II, especially on org staff. The pc is always getting Integrity Processing or his O/Ws pulled on so and so. If you look on the Grade Chart you will find Withholds and Overts are Grade TWO. 311 Below Grade TWO lies Grade I (Problems) and Grade Zero (Communications). And below that is Dianetics and at the bottom end of Dianetics is the Drug Handling. Now how do you expect a fellow who has unhandled drugs (or omitted drug items because of "no interest") to even know (no Grade 0) that other people are around or that (Grade I) he is caved in with problems he's never cognited on? And he's supposed to have enough responsibility to answer up on Grade II? With real overts and withholds? This does not mean you must never Sec Check. It does mean that Sec Checks are no substitute for auditing or guarantee of innocence. Grades are Grades and the Grade Chart sequence is correct. SOLO SET-UPS Set-ups for Solo are fully covered on HCO B 8 Jan 72R, Revised 8 July 74, Solo C/S Series 11R. This will be included as part of Solo on the Grade Chart as it is a vital step. Pcs won't make it on Solo if they aren't set up. FULL LIST Here's the full list of Grades showing where the various RDs now offered fit. GROUP PROCESSING -- Not mandatory or a prerequisite. LIFE REPAIR -- As needed but not prerequisite for Drug RD. To get ruds in on Life. DRUG RD, means: TRs 0-4, 6-9 -- Mandatory for a Druggie currently on Drugs, FLAT. Full C/S-1 -- Where not done. To fully educate pc. Objectives -- Full battery to full EPs per basic books and early HCO Bs on them. Class VIII Drug Handling -- List and rehab all drugs, 3 way Recalls, Secondaries and Engrams of Taking and Giving Drugs. AESPs on each reading Drug -- Listed separately and handled with R3R, each drug to full F/N assessment of Drug List. "No Interest" Drug Items -- All reading ones run where they exist. Prior Assessment -- AESPs listed separately and run R3R, prior to first drug or alcohol taken. ARC S/W EXPANDED. DIANETICS, means: C/S 54 -- Complete handling of Pc Assessment Form begun with Drug RD. Health Form -- Fully handled to full F/N Assessment. EXPANDED GRADE 0 -- As issued. EXPANDED GRADE I -- As issued. EXPANDED GRADE II -- As issued, including Integrity Processing. EXPANDED GRADE III -- As issued. EXPANDED GRADE IV -- As issued. 312 EX DN -- Not mandatory except where pc is a low OCA, an R/Ser (2%), chronically ill or psycho. Means: Set-ups -- Per HCO B 23 April 74, Ex Dn Series 22. Introspection RD -- Where pc ill, introverted or in a psychotic break. R3R all E. Purps. OCA Left-hand Side Handling -- As issued. OCA Right-hand Side Handling -- As issued, with PTS RD as necessary. POWER PROCESSING GRADES V & VA -- Only prerequisites are Drug RD and Grade IV. SOLO GRADE VI, means: Solo Set-ups -- Done at SH or AO per Solo C/S Series 11R. Solo Auditor's Course. Solo Audit Grade VI materials. CLEARING COURSE OT I OT II OT III OT VII PROCESSES OT III EXPANDED OT IV OT V OT VI FULL OT VII VERIFICATION OT VIII -- When issued. PROGRAMMING The C/S Series, especially the early HCO Bs, numbers 1-13R, fully cover the use of the Grade Chart in programming. THE GRADE CHART IS THE BASIC PROGRAM OF A PC. This datum has been neglected in some orgs, who have specialized in the new RDs developed since '71. With refinement of repair and corrective actions and the release of new RDs, some may have forgotten that repair is only done to get off the overwhelm so that you can put the pc back on the Grade Chart. SUMMARY I thought I'd better fill you in on these changes and how the new Grade Chart lines up. Make full use of this Chart with C/S Series programming tech in and your pcs will fly. Here's to lots of case gain and rave success stories. LRH:nt.rs.rd Copyright $c 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 313  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=7/9/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Word Clearing Series 54 SUPERLITERACY AND THE CLEARED WORD   Remimeo All Staff All Auditors All Students All Scientologists BPI  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 SEPTEMBER 1974 (Adapted from LRH ED 178 INT of 30 May 1972) Remimeo All Staff All Auditors All Students All Scientologists BPI Word Clearing Series 54 SUPERLITERACY AND THE CLEARED WORD SUPER -- Superiority in size, quality, number or degree. LITERACY -- The ability to read and write. Almost everyone these days is able to read and write. This was not true a century ago but, with modern stress on education, it is true today. But is this enough today? It is an instruction book world. The civilization in which we live is highly technical. Education today goes into the twenties. That's a third of one's life. And what happens when one leaves school? Can he do what he studied? Does he have all his education or did it get left behind? Literacy is not enough. Today's schools and today's world require a new ability -- the ability to look at a page without any strain and absorb what it says and then apply it right now without any stress at all. And is that possible? Am I talking about speed reading? No. That is just being able to read rapidly. It does not improve the comfort of reading and it does not improve the ability to apply. What is really needed is the ability to COMFORTABLY and QUICKLY take data from a page and be able at once to APPLY it. Anyone who could do that would be SUPER-LITERATE. What happens? The average person -- literate -- is able to read words and mentally record words. 314 Like this: WORDS <------------> SAME WORDS ----- ----- --- --- ------ ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- now in his mind When he writes he writes: Words ----- --- ------ ---- ----- | ----- | --- | ------ <----------------------------------------| ---- ----- Words In his mind words are "understood" as other words like this: -- --- --- -- ----- ----- -------- -- ----- ------- ------ --- --- ---- 315 When one is Super-Literate, this is what happens: Words Words Concepts ----- ----- <----> [] [] [] --- --- () () ------ <-------------------> ------ {} {} {} {} ---- ---- () [] {} ----- ----- {} [] () () Therefore as he is dealing in concepts (ideas or understandings) this can happen: Concepts {} [] () {} [] () | | | | | ACTION <---------------------------------------------------| And he thinks in concepts to which he can fit words easily and so can write clearly. In other words, when one is Super-Literate, one reads not words but understandings. And so one can act. CONCEPTS The idea of grasping word meanings conceptually is something new to the field of Linguistics. The endless Semantic circles pursued by Korzybski and company (see Data Series 1, "The Anatomy of Thought") never really led to the realization that a word and its meanings are embodied in the basic concept or idea symbolized by that word. That conceptualization of meanings is foreign to dictionary writers and "experts" is evidenced by the fact that definitions are so subject to alter-is and change with the passage of time. 316 For example, modern definitions of the word "understand" are found to be largely inadequate. A really full and meaningful definition of it could only be found in a First Edition of Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms, 1942: "Understand: To have a clear and true idea or conception, or full and exact knowledge, of something. In general it may be said that understand refers to the result of a mental process or processes (a clear and exact idea or notion, or full knowledge). Understand implies the power to receive and register a clear and true impression." CLEARED WORDS Operating within a society steeped in misunderstood words and mis- definitions, Study Tech is subject to arbitraries. Thus, a CLEARED WORD is defined as follows: A WORD WHICH HAS BEEN CLEARED TO THE POINT OF FULL CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING. In Metered Word Clearing this translates as: F/N, VGIs. There are many ways and combinations to achieve this EP. Using the word in sentences until the meaning is grasped conceptually is the most common. Diagrams, demos, clay, in fact the entire body of Study Tech and its methods are applicable. These are vital tools. For use. Protect them and KEEP SCIENTOLOGY WORKING. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rs.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 317  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=25/9/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 94 REDUCTION OF REFUNDS C/Ses AND OVERLOAD   URGENT -- IMPORTANT Remimeo All Execs All Tech and Qual Divs  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1974 Remimeo All Execs All Tech and URGENT -- IMPORTANT Qual Divs C/S Series 94 REDUCTION OF REFUNDS C/Ses AND OVERLOAD When a C/S is overloaded, he is a potential cause of OUT TECH. He may try to make up time by not reading worksheets of Auditors, by failing to do Folder Error Summaries, by not taking time to write Cramming Orders and neglecting other C/S duties. Recent evaluation has shown that OVERLOADED C/Ses CAN BE THE REASON FOR A HUGE REFUND RATIO IN THE ORG'S GI-CGI. Any non-tech person such as the Ethics Officer can tell at once when a C/S is either not working or overloaded. THE HANDWRITING IN THE WORKSHEETS CAN'T BE READ, WORDS ARE NOT CLARIFIED IN RED, NO FESes ARE SEEN IN FOLDERS AND NO CRAMMING ORDERS EXIST TO MAKE AUDITORS DO HANDWRITING DRILLS TO WRITE FAST AND WELL. Proper C/S posting was piloted by me on Flag years ago. The existing technical executives failed to export it to orgs. The irreducible minimum C/S postings are: SENIOR C/S who handles bugged cases and very upper level actions and keeps the other C/Ses functioning well. He is the highest classed C/S in the org. He is responsible for proper handling and results on all cases. (This is a hat I usually wore in an area.) EXPANDED DIANETIC C/S who does only Expanded Dianetics. GRADE C/S who C/Ses Grade pcs. DIANETIC C/S or C/Ses who handle all routine C/Sing of Dianetics including Drug Rundowns. There are several other C/S posts. In AOs additionally there are Solo C/Ses. In Saint Hills there are Power (Class VII) C/Ses. As an org expands it can have additional types of C/Ses. Some of these are: REVIEW C/S who reviews tech case failures, taking this load off the Senior C/S. STAFF CASES C/S who C/Ses for audited staff. STUDENT AUDITING C/S who C/Ses student sessions. AO REVIEW C/S who C/Ses for fast review on Adv Cse Students. CO-AUDIT C/S where a Co-Audit exists separate from HGC lines. 318 WHAT IS OVERLOAD? When a C/S can't read every worksheet and study and program every case he has, due to time, he is overloaded. WASTED C/Ses To get a Class VI or even a Class IV to C/S lower action folders is a waste of C/Ses since it is easy to train Dianetic C/Ses. SUMMARY TRAIN AND POST enough C/Ses and watch the GI go up ana refunds go down. It is not enough just to get Auditors and more and more Auditors. DON'T OVERLOAD C/Ses. GET MORE OF THEM! L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 319  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=26/9/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  HANDLING FLUBBED PCS   IMPORTANT Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1974 Remimeo IMPORTANT HANDLING FLUBBED PCS In 1970 when auditing by intensives was reimplemented it became clear that Tech repaired any flubs on pcs and did not send them to Qual. Tech did its own repair. Now, with the emphasis on Qual correcting Auditors and C/Ses it is very important that this rule is followed. TECH CORRECTS ITS OWN FLUBBED PCS. IT DOES NOT SEND THEM TO QUAL. Qual must not get into the HGC business. Tech is there to deliver the technology. Qual is there to safeguard the technology by correcting the personnel who flub delivering it and get them to deliver it correctly. Qual does not correct the pcs. TECH ACTION The routine Tech action when a pc is flubbed or Red Tagged is for the Auditor to take the pc back in at once and repair any error with the correction list for that action. Example: Auditor doing an L&N. Pc Red Tags after session. Auditor takes the pc right back in and does an L4BR and corrects the list. Example: Auditor doing Ruds. Pc Red Tags with a high TA. Auditor takes the pc back in straight away, assesses a C/S 53 and handles. If the Auditor can't handle he sends the folder to the Tech C/S who studies the folder, finds the bug and gets it handled fast. The maximum wait is 24 hours. A red-hot Tech Division handles the same day. QUAL ACTION Qual crams the Auditors and C/Ses and Supervisors. The Qual Sec makes sure that the Cramming orders are done and that the flubs are corrected. But, QUAL DOES NOT CORRECT THE PC. TECH DOES. SUMMARY When Quals get into the HGC or Academy business and start delivering the courses or intensives, the Tech goes out the window BECAUSE THEN THERE IS NO QUAL. Qual corrects the Auditors and C/Ses and Supervisors. Tech corrects its own flubbed pcs. LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 320  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 21 iDate=7/4/70 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=29/9/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0    Remimeo Qual Div Hats Tech Div Hats SHSBC Students ARC Break Auditor  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo Qual Div Hats HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1970RA Tech Div Hats (HCO Pol Ltr of 16 Dec 1968 and SHSBC Students 7 Sept 1969 Amended and Reissued) ARC Break Auditor Amended 8 August 1970 Revised 17 September 1974 Revised 29 September 1974 GREEN FORM BEFORE ANY AUDITOR IS PERMITTED TO DO A GF OR ANY PREPARED LIST HE MUST BE ABLE TO MAKE LISTS READ WITH CRAMMING ON TR 1 AND CRAMMING ON HCO Bs 28 FEB 71 (C/S SERIES 24), 9 JUNE 71, ISSUE I (C/S SERIES 41), 20 DEC 71 (C/S SERIES 72), 15 JUNE 72 (C/S SERIES 80), 15 OCT 73 (C/S SERIES 87), 20 NOV 73 (C/S SERIES 89), 6 DEC 73 (C/S SERIES 90), AND BTB 16 JUNE 71R, ISSUE I (FORMERLY HCO B 16 JUNE 71R, ISSUE II). In HGC the Green Form is done on the order of the Case Supervisor to detect reasons for case trouble. If the TA is high or low use C/S 53RH instead. It is assessed Method 5 and handled. The new Auditor's Code is observed on every line. If the line reads and the pc or pre-OT protests it, has no answers, seems ARC Broken by the read or resigned or starts to explain how the thing has been run before, check for false read. Use False and Suppress as per BTB 18 Nov 68R. On Environment ARC Break the Remedy B -- Environment, BTB 14 Aug 68R, is a limited process. S&D is also a limited process, only one F/N available on W, one F/N on S, one F/N on U. They are only done on C/S instructions. Do not audit a pc or pre-OT who has not had sufficient food or rest or who has taken aspirin or drugs; check this before session. If he or she has had insufficient food or rest, send the pc home to have this handled. Indicate the by-passed charge of the incomplete cycle of action of the session on both Questions 2 and 3. The Green Form should be run to F/N VGIs with all reads taken to F/N. It can be done Method 3 and taken to a good win, F/N VGIs. If done M3 it must not be run past the first F/N. PC OR PRE-OT NAME ___________________________________ DATE _______ TIME _______ NAME OF AUDITOR ___________________________________ CLASS _______ GRADE _______ ALL FOLDERS TO HAND _______ LAST AUDITOR'S NAME _______________________________ CONTAINS BEGINNING ASSESSMENT FORM ____________________________________________ 1. FOLDER C/Sed BY NAME ___________________________________________ TA _______ PC OR PRE-OT GRADE ________________ PC OR PRE-OT CLASS ____________________ 2. SUFFICIENT SLEEP __________________________________________________________ PHYSICALLY TIRED __________________________________________________________ SUFFICIENT FOOD ___________________________________________________________ ARE YOU HUNGRY ____________________________________________________________ ALCOHOL ___________________________________________________________________ ASPIRIN/TRANQUILIZERS _______ DRUGS (FIND OUT WHAT IS BEING TAKEN OR WHAT DRUG ITEMS WERE NOT RUN AND WHY) __________________________________________________________ 321 3. WANTS AUDITING (IF DOESN'T, DISCUSS WHY NOT, GET PC TO EXPLAIN) ___________ ___________________________________________________________________________ 4. (a) ARC BREAK (Handle by ARCU CDEINR earlier similar ARC Break.) On new pcs ask if there has been an upset (handle as above). SESSION ASSESSMENT ___________________________________________________ (b) ENVIRONMENT ARC BREAK ________________________________________________ (ARCU CDEINR or Remedy B if ordered by the C/S.) (c) AUDITING ENVIRONMENT _________________________________________________ (Prepcheck.) 5. (a) IGNORED ORIGINATIONS _________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (b) PRESENT TIME PROBLEM _________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) New pcs: "Do you have a persisting problem?" (Handle as above.) (c) EVALUATION ___________________________________________________________ (d) INVALIDATION _________________________________________________________ (e) MISSED WITHHOLDS _____________________________________________________ (Who nearly found out, what did they do to miss it, earlier similar M/W/H to basic.) New pcs ask: "Has someone nearly found out something about you?" (Handle as above.) (e-1) WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP ________________________________________ (Who wouldn't accept it, who said it still read. Indicate false read. 2wc the concern.) (f) OVERTS _______________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar overt to basic.) New pcs: "Have you done something you shouldn't have done?" (Handle as above.) (g) MISUNDERSTOOD WORD OR SYMBOL _________________________________________ (Clear it to F/N.) (h) COMMITTING CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS ______________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa or "Prevent Process".) New pcs: "Are you continuously doing something you shouldn't do?" (Handle as above.) 6. NO AUDITING _______________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 7. (a) SOMETHING THAT ISN'T THERE ___________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (b) TRYING TO PUT SOMETHING WHERE THERE IS NOTHING (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (c) FALSE ASSERTION ______________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 8. (a) ASSESSED BEYOND THE RIGHT ITEM _______________________________________ (Correct the list and give the pc his item.) (b) INCOMPLETE LIST ______________________________________________________ (Complete the list and indicate the item.) 322 (c) OVERLISTED ___________________________________________________________ (Indicate, null with Suppress and get the item.) (d) SOMATIC ITEM ON A LIST NOT READING BUT SOMATIC EXISTS ________________ (Handle as per HCO B 29 Jan 70, "Null Lists in Dianetics".) 9. (a) PICTURE NOT ERASED ___________________________________________________ (Complete chain to erasure and full end phenomena.) (b) STUCK PICTURE ________________________________________________________ (L3RD or run "Recall a time before the incident. What was it?" "Recall a time after the incident. What was it?") (c) PICTURES CHANGING ____________________________________________________ (L3RD.) (d) NO SOMATICS __________________________________________________________ (2wc to F/N, note for C/S.) (e) RECURRING SOMATIC OR FEELING _________________________________________ (Write down any items given and their reads. Run any item that BDs by R-3R.) (f) FORCED TO GO EARLIER PAST THE BASIC ON A CHAIN _______________________ (Locate basic on chain, A, B, C, D or earlier beginning then A, B, C, D as required to F/N, cognition, VGIs and erasure.) (g) AN EARLIER BEGINNING ON AN INCIDENT BEEN MISSED ______________________ (Earlier beginning, A, B, C, D to F/N and end phenomena.) (h) JUMPED CHAINS ________________________________________________________ (Write details. If original chain found, run R-3R to end phenomena.) (i) BLACK FIELD __________________________________________________________ (L3RD.) (j) INVISIBLE FIELD ______________________________________________________ (L3RD.) (k) DISTURBED WHILE RUNNING AN INCIDENT _________________________________ (Clean up any ARC Brk with ARCU CDEINR earlier similar ARC Brk to F/N and GIs. Check if chain erased and if not, run R-3R to end phenomena.) (l) WRONG DATE ___________________________________________________________ (Indicate, get the right date.) (I-1) WRONG LOCATION _______________________________________________________ (Indicate, get the right location.) (m) PSYCHIATRIC INCIDENT _________________________________________________ (Run R-3R.) 10. (a) LOWER LEVELS UNFLAT __________________________________________________ (Find out which and note for C/S.) (b) LOWER LEVELS OVERRUN _________________________________________________ (Rehab any overrun.) (c) LOWER LEVELS NEVER RUN _______________________________________________ (Note for C/S.) 323 (d) ACTUALLY RUN THE PROCESSES FOR EACH GRADE _____________________________ (Note for C/S.) (e) HAS POWER PROCESS BEEN LEFT UNFLAT ____________________________________ (Not to use on Clear and above; Grade V, VA checked by Class VII or VIII Auditors only.) (f) HAS POWER PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN ________________________________________ (Same as (e). Rehabbed by Class VII or VIII only.) (g) IS THERE SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN HANDLED ___________________________ (Note for C/S.) 11. (a) FALSE ATTESTATION _____________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (b) UNTRUE ASSERTIONS ABOUT CASE __________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (c) TOLD A LIE ____________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (d) WASN'T SURE ___________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (e) MISUNDERSTOOD TECH ____________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (f) MISUNDERSTOOD CASE CONDITION __________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (g) EXPERIMENTING _________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (h) ALTERING TECH _________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (i) DOING SOMETHING ELSE WITH TECH ________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) (j) HAVE YOU TYPED, HANDWRITTEN OR TAPED COPIES OF ANY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS ________________________________________________ (Handle with time, place, form and event, Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 12. (a) PROCESS LEFT UNFLAT ___________________________________________________ (Find out which process and note for C/S.) DATE OF SESSION _______________________________________________________ (b) PROCESS OVERRUN _______________________________________________________ (Rehab.) DATE OF SESSION _______________________________________________________ 13. FORMER RELEASE ___________________________________________________________ (Find what release has not been acknowledged and Rehab.) 14. NON-STANDARD PROCESS _____________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 15. BAD AUDITING COMM CYCLE __________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa, L1C if necessary.) 16. CODE BREAKS ______________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 17. HIDDEN STANDARD (WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN FOR YOU TO KNOW SCIENTOLOGY WORKS?) __________________________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 324 18. MIXED THERAPIES (ANY OTHER TREATMENT IN PROGRESS) _______________________ (Note what.) 19. CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON _______________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa or S&D only on C/S order, or handle as in 4a.) 20. (a) CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP ____________________________________ (Handle as in 19.) (b) ENVIRONMENTAL MENACE ________________________________________________ (Folder to C/S.) 21. HERE TO GET DATA FOR SOMEONE ELSE _______________________________________ (What, when, all, who.) 22. HERE BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE DEMANDED IT ___________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 23. SELF-AUDITING DURING INTENSIVE __________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 24. BEING AUDITED BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN AN HGC AUDITOR ______________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 25. CRIMINAL RECORD OR CRIMES FOR WHICH YOU COULD BE ARRESTED _______________ (Note all crimes with what, when, all, who and handle by Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 26. INSANE ASYLUM HISTORY ___________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 27. SHOCK TREATMENT HISTORY _________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 28. HERE TO BE CURED OF SOMETHING NOT MENTIONED _____________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 29. UNPAID DEBTS TO ORGS ____________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 30. KNOWLEDGE OF A CRIME AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY ________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 31. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF SCIENTOLOGY WORKED ON EVERYONE _____________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 32. ANYTHING UPSETTING ABOUT THIS REVIEW ____________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 33. HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED ____________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 34. HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED ___________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 35. HAS ANYTHING BEEN RUSHED ________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 36. HAS ANYTHING BEEN MISSED ________________________________________________ (Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) 325 37. HAS SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN ______________________________________________ (Get what it is and Rehab.) 38. IS A SCIENTOLOGY CONFESSIONAL (SEC CHECK) NOT COMPLETE __________________ (Handle with List L-CR Confessional Repair List.) 39. PC STATEMENT OF THE TROUBLE AS IT IS NOW ________________________________ 40. ASSESS 7 SPECIAL CASES: (a) DOESN'T WANT AUDITING _______________________________________________ (b) PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED __________________________ (c) HAS NOT HAD AUDITING ________________________________________________ (d) SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS _________________________ (e) HAS TAKEN DRUGS _____________________________________________________ (f) FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY ___________________________________ (g) HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES __________________________________ (h) OUT OF VALENCE ______________________________________________________ (i) CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY _______________________ (j) AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT _______________________________________ (k) AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT, ARC BRK _________________________________ PTPs ____________________________________ W/H _____________________________________ (l) HAS AN ENGRAM EXACTLY MATCHING PT DANGERS ___________________________ (m) SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL ____________________________________________ (Return the folder to C/S, do not indicate the item to the pc or pre- OT.) (n) GONE EXTERIOR IN AUDITING ___________________________________________ (o) OVERWHELMED BY AUDITING _____________________________________________ (a) is handled as in 4 of the GF. (c) is handled by Listing and Nulling "Who or what would prevent auditing?" (b) & (d) to (h) handled Recall process, 3 flows each to F/N then engram or chain 3 flows each to F/N. (i) is handled by Listing and Nulling "What are you trying to prevent?" by the LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING. (n) is handled by HCO B 11 April 1970, "Auditing Past Exterior" procedure. GF-40 is handled as per HCO B 8 April 1970, "GF-40 Handling -- Clarification". (o) handled by a Progress and Advance Program (as per C/S Series after 2wc to F/N.) FINISH TA POSITION _______________________ FINISH TIME _______________________ TOTAL TA _________________________________ TOTAL TIME ________________________ RECOMMENDATIONS ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ DATE __________________ AUDITOR SIGN _________________________________________ CASE SUPERVISOR ______________________________________________________________ LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 326  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=6/10/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1974   IMPORTANT Remimeo Ex Dn Specialists  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn Specialists IMPORTANT THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1974 Recent intensive investigation into blocks on tech, dissemination and communication lines uncovered an aberration which is quite widespread and especially common in society. Simply stated I found that WHERE VITAL INFORMATION WAS NOT BEING RELAYED OR WAS HIDDEN OR FALSIFIED, THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE WERE DRAMATIZING WITHHOLDS. You can see this in newspapers, government policies, the medical profession, psychiatry, economies and especially education. I have for years tried to get to the bottom of why people will not teach people. It is the single greatest fault in existing culture in my opinion. The answer that fits all cases is a failure to relay information, brief, instruct, train or supervise stemming from a general past and current OVERT OF WITHHOLDING VITAL INFORMATION. This gives a dramatization in daily conduct of failing to relay information, brief, instruct, train or supervise. And underlying that is the intentional impulse to do so overtly or covertly in a mistaken attempt to forward their own first dynamic. RESEARCH The primary outpoint that led to this conclusion is the premium given to silence in philosophy and the approval accorded the silent by the population whereas such people are in fact quite deadly and useless. It is a generalized dramatization in this society. This would be what made the society favor the "strong silent type" as a sort of ideal. All this in a highly technical society is hazardous. A good example is the current fuel crisis over a supposed scarcity of petroleum fuels for highly inefficient internal combustion engines while answers in the form of new fuels and engines are hidden away in vaults by the vested interests. ORGS In our organizations this is deadly. It blocks our tech lines in the Academy and Qual as well as the HGC. It cuts our dissem lines to public via books, promo, regging, lectures, use of C/F and Addresso and FSMs. It cuts our comm lines and denies data to higher management. It winds up in no application of the tech and no results for the public. That makes this rundown mandatory for top execs including Flag Reps and LRH Comms, all Tech and Qual staff and Dissem, Distrib and HCO Dept 2. 327 PECULIARITY This mechanism is a peculiar one with its own special twist. Earlier rundowns did not hit this particular type of overt. It isn't very visible and doesn't occur in rundowns like L-10. It is not simple withholding information. It is (or once was) the intentional overt of withholding VITAL information. It would be a very long chain and would influence general conduct. A bordering chain is withholding information under torture. Probably an A=A=A sets in which then totally prohibits some (too many) people from imparting important data, thus they can't teach, amongst other things. It has to be fully run out, engrams and all. THE RUNDOWN Where staff are concerned, the necessity of delivering this RD reduces the prerequisites for it to the Drug RD only. It could be done if necessary where the Drug RD was not yet complete but would have to be verified after completion of the Drug RD. Otherwise and for public, this RD belongs on Ex Dn as OCA right-hand side handling. It would probably fit best before the Multiple E. Purp RD and the Responsibility RD. VITAL INFO RD 1. Clear and assess: VITAL DATA _______ THE TRUTH _______ VITAL INFORMATION _______ KNOWLEDGE _______ Choose the best read as the item. 2. a) L&N "What would happen if you communicated _______ ?" b) R3R Quad 3. a) L&N "What problem have you had with _______ ?" b) R3R Quad 4. a) Clear and assess: Withholding (item) under duress. _______ Withholding (item) under torture. _______ Withholding (item) to protect someone. _______ b) R3R Quad 5. a) Clear all words plus fully clear each outpoint with examples and demos so it's understood. b) Assess: Omitted (item). _______ Altered the sequence of (item) . _______ Dropped time out of (item) . _______ Added falsehoods to (item) . _______ Altered the importance of (item) . _______ Used (item) to wrong tgt. _______ Assigned the wrong source for (item) . _______ 328 Made (item) a contrary fact. _______ Added time to the relay of (item) . _______ Added inapplicable data to (item) . _______ Incorrectly included other data with (item) . _______ Complicated (item) . _______ Suppressed (item) . _______ In order of reads: c) R3R Quad Locate a time when another _______ to/for/from (pick which) you. Locate a time when you _______ to/for/from another. Locate a time when another _______ to/for/from another. d) L&N "What would be the intention of someone who _______ ?" e) R3R Quad the intention. 6. a) Assess: Concerning (item) has there been a break in Affinity _______ Reality _______ Communication _______ Understanding _______ b) R3R Quad the largest read. c) Reassess ARCU and handle to F/Ning assessment. 7. a) Clear all words, especially assumption and justify and withholding (in the broad sense). b) L&N "What assumption would justify withholding (item) ?" c) R3R Quad the computation. 8. R3R Quad all E. Purps that came up during the RD. 9. R3R Quad all computations that came up during the RD. SUMMARY The importance of this RD for Tech and Qual staff and sensitive posts cannot be over-emphasized. Although it will be quite popular with the public it is basically designed for staff on these lines. The auditors delivering it should themselves have had it. They must have flawless TRs, be able to make a meter read and must drill the RD in Qual before attempting to deliver it. This RD is very powerful. Don't miss on it with careless delivery. Get it done flawlessly as directed and you will have a resurge on delivery and dissemination lines and open the door to A GOLDEN ERA OF AUDITING QUALITY AND RESULTS FOR PUBLIC AND STAFF. LRH:RS:clb.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED assisted by CS-4 329  L. RON HUBBARD Founder assisted by CS-4   Type = 11 iDate=9/12/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=15/10/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  PTS RUNDOWN   Remimeo Class IV Ex Dn Spclst Requires: W/C 2 *Rate Clay TRs 4000-9 4000-10  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971R (REVISED -- see HCO B 9 Dec 71RA Volume VIII -- 338) Remimeo Class IV REVISED 15 OCTOBER 1974 Ex Dn Spclst Requires: W/C 2 *Rate Clay PTS RUNDOWN TRs 4000-9 4000-10 CASES One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena". P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he becomes a Potential Trouble Source. There are numerous HCO Bs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true observations and predictions. The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS. S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without change. Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too frequent case condition can be handled. WHO DOES IT Hopefully it can be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okays to Audits. For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent Interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very honest auditing and competent C/Sing. DEVELOPMENT Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively covered. The recent wrap-up came about through my OT research in November 1971. The principal breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate having known certain people before. This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks through for a stalled Dianetic Case. In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you were _______ " for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain individuals before this life. But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person before this life. Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds. 330 BREAKDOWN There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown. 1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally familiar with this Rundown. 2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the R3R. 3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster). 4. People who "can't run engrams"-which means a druggie who hasn't had a full Drug Rundown. There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing it are especially rough. Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with engram running. The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature. Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted. BEHAVIOR OF RD Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be noted on the worksheet. The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be sure with an L3B. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have to work at it. In the PTS RD incidents can "develop". Missing pieces can appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2 after finishing F1. Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown. And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied by this Rundown. END PHENOMENA There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person before this life. This is NOT the EP. A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its correction). THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN ROLLERCOASTERS. PARTS There are four parts to the RD. (a) Present and past S&Ds. Collect them up, handle each valid item with R3R Triple, ARC Brk, PTP, W/H and Overts each Triple. If no S&Ds exist do "3 S&Ds" and R3R and Ruds as above. If no folder, get the pc to tell you any past S&D items. Follow Ruds with Can't Have/Enforced Hav per HCO B 3 June 72R. 331 (b) L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you? Includes father, mother, wife or wives (husband), brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents, lovers. Take the BD F/N item. Ask if the pc has known person before this life. If read, R3R Triple, Ruds & Overts Triple. (c) L&N Who have you been after this life? Take the BD F/N item. Ask if known before. If it so reads, R3R Triple, Ruds & Overts Triple, Can't Have/Enforced Hav. (d) L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? To BD F/N item. R3 R Triple, Ruds & Overts Triple, Can't Have/Enforced Hav. That is the extent of the Rundown. FLOWS You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc. Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place). Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others. If you did F1 R3R as "Locate a time you knew _______ " you might get to the pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean motivator F1. This would leave the PTS chain partially run. This is also true of the ruds. RE-DOs If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above should be checked into. Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4B and L3B. Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in) the other person. Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before. THE COMMANDS See 3 S&Ds HCO Bs 13 January 1968 "S&Ds", 19 Jan 68, 16 Aug 69, 14 Jan 68, 28 Nov 67, 10 Nov 67, 9 Nov 67. The commands and actions of doing 3 S&Ds are DRILL TR 4000-9 & TR4000-10 3 S&Ds. HCO B 9 Oct 71, Issue VI. The following R3R commands are used in every case. Put the person or place in the blank: F1. Locate a line when _______ did something to you. R3R. F2. Locate a time when you did something to _______ . R3R. F3. Locate a time when _______ did something to others. R3R. RUDS 1. Did _______ ARC Brk you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. 2. Did you ARC Brk _______ ? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. 332 3. Did _______ ARC Brk others? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S. 4. Did _______ give you a problem? E/S to F/N. 5. Did you give _______ a problem? E/S to F/N. 6. Did _______ give others problems? E/S to F/N. 7. Did you withhold anything from _______ ? E/S to F/N. 8. Did _______ withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N. 9. Did _______ withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N. 10. Did _______ commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N. 11. Did you commit am overt (harmful act) on _______ ? E/S to F/N. 12. Did _______ commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N. AUDITOR'S LIST OF ITEMS TO BE RUN (a) Old S&Ds _______ New S&Ds _______ Past PTS Interviews _______ (b) L&N item _______ (c) L&N item _______ (d) Planets L&N _______ Added Items for PTS Re-do _______ L. RON HUBBARD LRH:nt.rd Founder Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [See also HCO B 20 January 1972, PTS RD Addition, Page 19. The above HCO B was revised by HCO B 9 December 1971 RA, Revised 21 October 1974, PTS Rundown, Page 338. HCO B 9 October 1971, Issue VI, mentioned above as containing the 3 S&Ds Drill was revised by BTB 9 October 1971 RA, Issue VI, revised 23 February 1975, Level 4 Process Drills, which deleted the 3 S&Ds Drill.] 333  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=15/10/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 14 CRAMMING OVER OUT RUDS   IMPORTANT Remimeo Cramming Officers  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 15 OCTOBER 1974 Cramming Officers IMPORTANT Cramming Series 14 CRAMMING OVER OUT RUDS A Cramming Officer can fail in his efforts to correct a flubbing staff member if he tries to cram over out ruds. Cramming done over an ARC Break, like Auditing, will result in the person getting worse, more out of comm or misemotional. Cramming a person over a problem or W/H will produce no change so no correction will occur. Out ruds are easy to spot. The person with an ARC Break, won't talk or is misemotional or antagonistic. A problem produces fixated attention that prevents Cramming from finding the actual area of difficulty. Natter and 1.1 remarks means a withhold. Recently a musician being crammed kept bringing up a dispatch that he was in mystery about concerning the group. Every time it was mentioned it read or BDed yet the Cramming Officer continued "Cramming" him and never handled it. So no product. I sat the musician down, told him he was crammed over a problem, the mystery about the dispatch, cleaned it up by getting the dispatch and letting him go over it, made sure the problem was handled then found the area of misunderstood and traced it back to an early age and the Why fell right out. And I got the Cramming Officer crammed by the Senior C/S and found her Why too. So the moral of the story is DON'T CRAM OVER OUT RUDS. It is too costly in lost production and flaps. CRAMMING OFFICER FLUBS When the Cramming Officer flubs you must get him crammed fast because he will repeat the error on others and there goes your results. In such cases, get him crammed immediately by the Qual Sec or Senior C/S. If it is the Qual Sec who has flubbed, then he is crammed either by the Senior C/S or the Keeper of Tech. INCOMPLETE HANDLING It is often not enough just to correct a Why and do no further handling in Cramming Most Cramming Cycles reveal a broader area of situation which must also be handled. An example is the Auditor who flubs on an L4BR and during the Cramming reveals he never really listened to the key SHSBC L&N tapes. 334 The Cramming Officer who does not also program the Auditor for a review of those tapes would not have fully corrected that Auditor. You could accurately predict future L&N flubs and pc upsets. A subsequent program such as the one above would count as an additional Cramming Cycle for the Cramming Officer, or a Retread if lengthy and would count as additional points. Therefore the maxim of Cramming is: HANDLE THE HELL OUT OF IT. Honest correction must be fully and completely done for the sake of the public and the org as well as the staff member. SUMMARY Cramming success depends on not Cramming over out ruds and on fully handling all areas of confusion or weakness. Follow these operating rules and you will enjoy rave results and real correction. And your org stats will soar. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 335  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 21 iDate=19/10/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  THE DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS ON VITAL INFORMATION LINES   URGENT Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 OCTOBER 1974 Remimeo URGENT THE DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS ON VITAL INFORMATION LINES I have recently unearthed a widespread aberration that underlies the withhold or obstruction of vital information and wanted to warn you to be on the lookout for it. It is, simply stated, DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS. This is not just the person with withholds, this is the person who DRAMATIZES withholds by preventing the relay, exposure or free distribution of vital information. To DRAMATIZE means to act under the influence of past incidents as dictated by those incidents in the bank. The guy is replaying something now that happened in the past, out of its time and context and out of his control. A person dramatizing withholds would be acting out withholding information now, when the actual withholds or incidents of withholding are in the past. VITAL INFORMATION Vital information is vital because survival depends on it. Examples include: HCO Bs, HCO PLs, books, tapes, course checksheets and packs, hats, OEC Volumes, LRH EDs and FOs and other issues, Flag programs and EDs, stats, weekly reports, compliance reports, situation reports, CSWs, evals, even dispatches that contain important information that must be known. Also, an org requires other vital data like accurate C/F and Addresso's, up-to-date files, broad, hard-sell promotion and magazines, accurate accounts files and records, monthly statements, tech data that gives pc and student results, Word Clearing and Cramming results, a Qual Library, broad public dissemination and promotion to name a few. Data that is VITAL must be relayed, must be made known without alter-is or barriers. You can't survive without it. THE DRAMATIZATION There are probably as many different ways to dramatize withholds as there are people who do it. You should know of the main ones I've come across lately. First is a failure to relay. This can be simply not routing on a mail pack or dispatch, not sending out the org's letters or mailings, backlogging Mimeo so new issues don't get seen, having poor tape recorders in the Academy or simply refusing to train or process public and staff. A deadly one is losing tech personnel or not recruiting them. That way nobody is there to relay the Tech to the students and pcs. A few orgs are very busy doing that one. Never making the Auditors and C/Ses and Supervisors do their daily TRs, High Crimes and training is another one. It denies the tech people data they need and also denies Standard Tech to the public especially in terms of results on pcs. 336 Not Hatting or Cramming staff is another one. So is falsifying stats, not promoting, failure to sell training, not calling paid up public in for service, not reporting what is happening in the org. When you see this happening WATCH OUT. Someone is dramatizing withholds and withholding vital information. The worst example of course would be not to have an org there at all. AN ORG'S MAIN PRODUCT The main product of an org is Knowledge, and the results obtained with it. Any post in an org contributes to this product. It is the most valuable product we have to exchange with the public. Knowledge and its results are what public and staff want. It is valuable because without it there can be no survival. REMEDY The Vital Information Rundown HCO B 6 Oct 74 is the remedy for the dramatization of withholds. Train your Auditors on it thoroughly and get it delivered where you are having this problem. If you don't have any Auditors to deliver it or no one to train them you have already been hit by this dramatization. Your only hope is to get an Auditor and train him and get it delivered. YOUR IMMEDIATE ACTION IS TO OPEN UP YOUR VITAL INFORMATION LINES NOW. SUMMARY Look over your org and see if this mechanism has affected your operation. Don't tolerate it. Expose it and relay the vital information. DON'T PERMIT THE DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS TO BLOCK THE FLOW OF VITAL INFORMATION. Your survival depends on it. LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 337  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=9/12/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=21/10/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  PTS RUNDOWN   Remimeo Class IV Ex Dn Spclst Requires: WC 2 *Rate Clay TRs 4000-9 4000-10  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971RA Remimeo REVISED 21 OCTOBER 1974 Class IV Ex Dn Spclst Requires: WC 2 *Rate Clay TRs 4000-9 4000-10 (REVISED - See HCOB 9 Dec 71RB Volume VIII -- 427-B) PTS RUNDOWN References: BPL 31 May 71RA "PTS and SP Detection, Routing and Handling Checksheet" HCO B 20 Jan 72 "PTS RD Addition" HCO B 16 Apr 72 "PTS RD Correction List" HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76, "C/Sing a PTS RD" HCO B 3 June 72R "PTS RD, Final Step" HCO B 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79, "PTS Interviews" HCO B 10 Aug 73 "PTS Handling" HCO B 9 Nov 67 "Review Auditors" HCO B 14 Jan 68 "S&D Type 'S'" HCO B 19 Jan 68 "S&Ds By Button" HCO B 16 Aug 69 "Handling Illness in Scientology" CASES One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena". P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he becomes a Potential Trouble Source. There are numerous HCO Bs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true observations and predictions. The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS. S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without change. Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too frequent case condition can be handled. WHO DOES IT Hopefully it cam be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okays to Audits. For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very honest auditing and competent C/Sing. DEVELOPMENT Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively covered. The recent wrap-up came about through my OT research in November 1971. The principal breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate having known certain people before. 338 This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks through for a stalled Dianetic Case. In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you were _______ " for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain individuals before this life. But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person before this life. Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds. BREAKDOWN There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown. 1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally familiar with this Rundown. 2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the R3R. 3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster). 4. People who "can't run engrams" -- which means a druggie who hasn't had a full Drug Rundown. There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing it are especially rough. Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with engram running. The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature. Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted. With HCO B C/S Series 93, "New Grade Chart", the PTS RD is done as part of Ex Dn after a full Drug RD and Exp Grade IV. BEHAVIOR OF RD Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be noted on the worksheet. The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be sure with an L3RD. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have to work at it. In the PTS RD incidents can "develop". Missing pieces can appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2 after finishing F1. Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown. And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied by this Rundown. 339 END PHENOMENA There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person before this life. This is NOT the EP. A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its correction). THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN ROLLERCOASTERS. FLOWS You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc. Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place). Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others. If you did F1 R3R as "Locate a time you knew _______ " you might get to the pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean motivator F1. This would leave the PTS chain partially run. This is also true of the ruds. RE-DOs If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above should be checked into. Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4BR and L3RD. Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in) the other person. Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before. SUMMARY OF REFERENCES Here are the issues that directly cover the Rundown. HCO B 9 Dec 71RA "PTS Rundown" HCO B 20 Jan 72 "PTS RD Addition" HCO B 16 Apr 72 "PTS RD Correction List" HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76, "C/Sing a PTS RD" HCO B 3 June 72R "PTS RD, Final Step" HCO B 19 Jan 68 "S&Ds By Button" HCO B 16 Aug 69 "Handling Illness in Scientology" HCO B 20 Apr 72 Issue II, C/S Series 78 HCO B 15 Dec 68R "L4BR" HCO B 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79, "PTS Interviews" HCO B 10 Aug 73 "PTS Handling" THE RUNDOWN A. PAST S&Ds: 1. Collect up past S&D items (which should have already been verified on set-ups) or get the pc to tell you them if no folder. _______ 340 2. On the earliest one ask if known before. If it so reads handle per steps 3-6. If not, pick next item and repeat this check for validity. _______ 3. R3R Triple the item using these commands: F1 Locate a time when _______ did something to you. R3R. F2 Locate a time when you did something to _______ . R3R. F3 Locate a time when _______ did something to others. R3R. 4. Triple Ruds and Overts on the item using these commands: (a) Did _______ ARC Brk you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. (b) Did you ARC Brk _______ ? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. (c) Did _______ ARC Brk others? ARCU CDEINR. _______ ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S. (d) Did _______ give you a problem? E/S to F/N. (e) Did you give _______ a problem? E/S to F/N. (f) Did _______ give others problems? E/S to F/N. _______ (g) Did you withhold anything from _______ ? E/S to F/N. (h) Did _______ withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N. (i) Did _______ withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N. _______ (j) Did _______ commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N. (k) Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on _______ ? E/S to F/N. (l) Did _______ commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N. _______ 5. Run "Can't Hav/Enforced Hav" with these steps: (a) Clear "can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or two. (b) Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as motivator repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three terminal to others, others to terminal (four flows of two commands each). 341 (c) After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective Havingness should be run. THE COMMANDS: F1 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you? 2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want? _______ F2 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)? 2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? _______ F3 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others? 2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want? _______ F3A 1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)? 2. What did others try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? _______ -- OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS -- _______ 6. Handle all past S&D items per above steps. _______ B. PAST PTS INTERVIEWS: 7. Collect up all past PTS Interview items (which should have already been verified with C/S Series 78 on set-ups). _______ 8. Check known before on earliest one. If it so read handle as below. _______ 9. R3R Triple the item. _______ 10. Triple Ruds and Overts on the item. _______ 11. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item followed by Objective Hav. _______ 12. Repeat steps 8-11 on all valid past PTS Interview items. _______ C. NEW S&Ds (3 S&Ds): 13. Do 3 S&Ds per HCO B 16 Aug 69, "Handling Illness in Scientology", assessment and 3 L&Ns. _______ 14. Check the first item for known before, handle if it so reads. _______ 15. R3R Triple the item. _______ 16. Triple Ruds and Overts on the item. _______ 17. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item, followed by Objective Hav._______ 18. Repeat steps 14-17 on the other 2 items if valid. _______ D. TROUBLED/WORRIED: 19. L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you? to BD F/N item. (Usually includes father, mother, wife or wives, husband, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents, lovers.) _______ 342 20. Check item for known before, if it so reads: _______ 21. R3R Triple. _______ 22. Triple Ruds and Overts. _______ 23. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav followed by Objective Hav. _______ E. BEEN AFTER: 24. L&N Who have you been after this life? to BD F/N item. _______ 25. Check known before and if it reads: _______ 26. R3R Triple. _______ 27. Triple Ruds and Overts. _______ 28. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _______ F. PLANETS: 29. L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? to BD F/N item. _______ 30. R3R Triple. _______ 31. Triple Ruds and Overts. _______ 32. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _______ 33. D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be sure the person is now all right (not PTS). _______ REPAIR Auditor errors during the RD are handled with L4BR, L3RD, GF Method 5 and handle, C/S 53 if necessary. A really big snarl-up on the RD that won't clear up is handled with HCO B 16 Apr 72, "PTS RD Correction List". If pc gets ill or rollercoasters after the RD is complete the PTS RD Correction List HCO B 16 Apr 72 is done and whatever was missed is cleared up. SUMMARY The PTS RD as revised is very direct and powerful. The L&N blows each aspect apart. Don't miss on it with auditor flubs. Get it drilled thoroughly before it is delivered. LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1971, 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [The 15 October 1974 revision which preceded the above was basically the same text as the original HCO B 9 December 1971, except that it added the Can't Have/Enforced Have step after ruds and it changed the 2WC questions to L&N questions on the Troubled/Worried, Been After and Planets steps.] 343  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=1/11/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS   Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts Class IVs and above C/Ses Qual HCO Dept 3 Hats PTS/SP Detection Course  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Remimeo Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Ex Dn Spclsts Class IVs and above HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1974 C/Ses Qual HCO Dept 3 Hats PTS/SP Detection Course ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS A lot of controversy has shown up this year on the subject of R/Ses and R/Sers. I thought I'd better write an issue on the subject to clarify it. The research on this was actually done years ago. R/Ses An R/S or Rock Slam is defined as a crazy irregular slashing motion of the needle. It can be as narrow as one inch or more than a full dial in width, but it's crazy! It slams back and forth. It is actually quite startling to see one. IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHER METER PHENOMENA. Recently Auditors arriving on Flag were found not to know what an R/S was but were calling Dirty Needles, Dirty Reads, Rocket Reads, even Ticks as R/Ses. That comes from never having been trained on what an R/S is and never having seen one. R/SES ARE UNIQUE IN APPEARANCE. Actually this is quite a serious matter because pcs get labelled as R/Sers and get run on Evil Purposes connected with this "R/S" that isn't one. You can really foul up a pc that way, believe me. A real R/S also has a crazy meter. It doesn't read then it does. This happens because the meter reads just below a pc's reality. If the pc has no reality on the subject, then the meter won't read. So you get a faulty meter. It doesn't read on what it should, then it reads, then it doesn't. ROCK SLAMMERS In a group of 400, the actual percentage of R/Sers is low. It's about 8 in 400, or 2 - 2 1/2 %. Those figures should seem familiar. They are the same percentage for SPs. And that gives you a clue to the identification of an R/Ser. Where requirements for Scn or SO Orgs have been established for R/Ses they apply to the 2 - 2 1/2 % of real R/Sers as these are also considered security risks for staff purposes. These people can of course be salvaged as pcs using Expanded Dianetics. Letting them on staff could be disastrous, however. CHECKLIST To assist you in the identification of R/Sers I have done a complete checklist of characteristics and their references. This checklist is to be used whenever a C/S is called upon to inspect a folder to determine whether a person is an R/Ser. 1. The R/Ses reported are actual R/Ses and not some other read or broken meter leads, a dusty or worn TA or Trim "pot", or cans in contact with metal such as rings, bracelets, etc. _______ 344 Ref: E-Meter Essentials; The Book of E-Meter Drills; The Book Introducing the E-Meter; HCO B 8 Nov 62, "Somatics -- How to Tell Terminals and Opposition Terminals", pp. 2 & 4; HCO B 6 Dec 62, "R2-10, R2-12, 3GAXX"; BTB 14 Jan 63, "Rings Causing 'Rock Slams'"; HCO B False TA Series 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73. 2. R/Ses have to do with Scientology or one or more areas of the old Scientology List One found in The Book of E-Meter Drills. _______ Ref: The Book of E-Meter Drills; HCO B 5 Dec 62, "2-12, 3GAXX, 3-21 and Routine 2-10 Modern Assessment"; HCO B 23 Nov 62, "Urgent -- Routine Two-Twelve"; HCO B 12 Sept 62, "Security Checks Again". 3. Pc is Slow or No Case Gain. Also is in a chronically nattery or critical state. _______ Ref: HCO B 23 Nov 62, "Routine Two-Twelve"; HCO B 5 Dec 62, "2-12, 3GAXX, 3-21 and Routine 2-10 Modern Assessment"; HCO B 6 Dec 62, "R2-10, R2-12, 3GAXX"; HCO B 28 Nov 70, C/S Series 22, "Psychosis"; BPL 31 May 71RA, PTS/SP Checksheet and mat'ls. 4. Pc chronically ill or who acts most "PTS". This can be suppressed and hidden from view, however. _______ Ref: HCO PL 15 Nov 70R, "HCO and Confessionals"; HCO B 28 Nov 70, C/S Series 22, "Psychosis"; PTS/SP Pack. 5. Pc's product is consistently an overt act and his activities destructive to others. _______ Ref: HCO PL 14 Nov 70, Org Series 14, "The Product as an Overt Act"; PTS/SP Pack; HCO Manual of Justice. 6. Pc's behavior or condition or OCA classifies as psychotic. _______ Ref: HCO B Ex Dn Series and tapes; HCO B 28 Nov 70. Where the answers to this checklist are yes you have an R/Ser. HCO handles and Qual programs them for rehabilitation. PCs WHO R/S Pcs who R/S are given Ex Dn. This does not change even though the pc is not an R/Ser. See HCO B C/S Series 93. Where a pc R/Ses he will have Evil Purposes and be on a succumb as a result. R/Ses indicate an area of psychosis which will ruin the pc's life if allowed to go unhandled. SUMMARY This HCO B in no way changes Ex Dn as a requirement for R/Ses or makes it ok not to handle them. Staff concerned must be able to identify an R/Ser which is different from someone with am R/S. I thought you should have this data and hope it clears up any remaining confusion in the area. LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 345  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/1/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=1/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973! THE INTROSPECTION RD   Remimeo Ex Dn Spclsts M7/4 *rate Clay Demo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1974RA REVISED 10 FEBRUARY 1974 REVISED 1 NOVEMBER 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn (Changes are in this type style, Spclsts items 17A, B, C & D) M7/4 *rate Clay Demo THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973! THE INTROSPECTION RD (Changes HCO B 23 Jan 1974, "The Introspection RD".) I have made a technical breakthrough which possibly ranks with the major discoveries of the Twentieth Century. It is certainly the greatest advancement of 1973 and is now being released after a final wrap-up of research. It is called the Introspection Rundown. The purpose of the Introspection RD is to locate and correct those things which cause a person to fixate his attention inwardly, on himself or his bank. This RD extroverts the person so that he can see his environment and therefore handle and control it. RESEARCH In 1970 the actual cause of PSYCHOSIS was isolated (as given in HCO B C/S Series 22, "Psychosis", 28 November 1970). In the ensuing years this has been proven beyond doubt to be totally correct. But what is a psychotic break? Man has never been able to solve the psychotic break. In fact, human beings are actually afraid of a person in a psychotic break and in desperation turn to psychiatry to handle. Psychiatry, desperate in its turn, without effective tech, resorts to barbarities such as heavy drugs, ice picks, electric and insulin shock which half kill the person and only suppress him. The fact remains there has never been a cure for the psychotic break until now. The key is WHAT CAUSED THE PERSON TO INTROSPECT BEFORE THE PSYCHOTIC BREAK. The breakthrough was made on a person who, after a series of wrong indications, went into a full-blown psychotic break -- violence, destruction and all. The psychiatrist at this point would have sharpened up his ice pick, filled his syringes with the most powerful (and deadly) drugs he could find and turned up the volts. His "handling" would have been a final destruction of the individual. corrected the last severe point of wrong indication. Subsequent times of wrong indication in his life were cleared up, the person came out of the psychotic break and into p.t. THIS MEANS THE LAST REASON TO HAVE PSYCHIATRY AROUND IS GONE. The psychotic break, the last of the "unsolvable" conditions that can trap a person, has been solved. And it's quite simple, really. 346 THEORY Def. INTROSPECTION: "(L. from introspicere, to look within) a looking into one's own mind, feelings, reactions, etc.; observation and analysis of oneself." Webster's New World Dictionary. Def. INTROVERSION: "(from intro- + L. vertere, to turn) 2.... a tendency to direct one's interest upon oneself rather than upon external objects or events." Webster's New World Dictionary. The essence of the Introspection RD is looking for and correcting all those things which CAUSED the person to look inward worriedly and wrestle with the mystery of some incorrectly designated error. The result is continual inward looking or self-auditing without relief or end. In a normal person this becomes a diminished activity, unhappiness or illness. In an R/Ser this becomes insanity and a psychotic break occurs at the last severe point of wrong indication. The pc who originates to the Examiner about his case or writes notes to the C/S or auditor is introverted and should have this RD. AUDITOR TRAINING Auditors selected to do this RD must have recently done a HARD TRs Course and the Anti-Q&A materials. They must be able to recognize a ROCK SLAM, which is a particular E-Meter phenomenon. They must be Class IV Expanded Dianetics auditors of proven skill on routine cases. They must not themselves be R/Sers. (The last requisite is waived in a self-salvage co-audit group where all R/S.) They need flawless TRs, no Q&A. This Rundown is very simple but cannot be flubbed, as that will compound the errors and cause further introspection in the pc. It is better not to deliver this RD than to flub any part of it. C/Ses take note. It is an Ethics Offense to attempt this Rundown without the auditor having done the prerequisite training and a further offense for an auditor to flub on it. STEPS OF THE RD (Steps 0 and 00 are for a person in a psychotic break, not a normal person.) Put this checklist on inside front cover of folder as a pgm. 0. On a person in a psychotic break isolate the person wholly with all attendants completely muzzled (no speech). _______ 00. Give Vitamins (B complex, including niacinamide) and minerals (calcium and magnesium) to build the person up. _______ 1. Locate by study or research of the person's case or via associates or 2-way comm the last severe point of introversion just prior to the current psychotic break or illness. There may be several severe points of introversion, prior or subsequent to the one that triggered the break or illness. These points are identified by their upsetting or worrisome effect on the pc. Each is noted down for handling. _______ 2. On each point, indicate the substance of it as a point of introversion to release the By-Passed Charge. Each should BD and F/N. First point indicated to F/N. _______ 2B. Second point indicated to F/N. _______ 347 2C. Third point indicated to F/N. _______ In the case of an out-list, the fact of a wrong item would be indicated and the list corrected by the Laws of L&N. 3. Get the wording of each point stated by the pc as an item (i.e., "What would you call such an incident?") and its read and handle by 2wc each flow E/Sim to F/N. First point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _______ 3A. Second point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _______ 3B. Third point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _______ 4. Verify/Correct all L&N lists. _______ 5. Verify/Correct all Why "lists", PTS Interviews, 3 May PLs per C/S Series 78. _______ 6. R3R Quad item found in No. 3. ("Locate an incident where _______ .") _______ 6A. L&N for the Intention behind the subject in No. 3. Verify Q for read before listing. _______ 6B. R3R Quad the Intention. _______ 6C. R3R Quad, L&N Intention & R3R Quad any other items found (No. 3A, 3B, etc.). _______ 7. Clear the words "Introversion", "Introspection", "Extroversion". _______ 8. ARC BREAKS HANDLING. _______ 8A. 2wc Has another ARC Broken you? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _______ 8B. 2wc Have you ARC Broken another? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _______ 8C. 2wc Have others ARC Broken anyone else? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _______ 8D. 2wc Have you ARC Broken yourself? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _______ 8E. 2wc Has anyone ever made you feel you had an ARC Break when you didn't? E/S to F/N. _______ 8F. 2wc Have you ever made anyone else feel he had an ARC Break when he didn't? E/S to F/N. _______ 8G. 2wc Have others ever made anyone else feel he had an ARC Break when he didn't? E/S to F/N. _______ 8H. 2wc Have you ever made yourself feel you had an ARC Break when you didn't? E/S to F/N. _______ 8I. R3R Quad the item. _______ 8J. L&N for the Intention behind "the forcing of upsets on people who don't have them". _______ 8K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 8J. _______ 9. WITHHOLDS HANDLING. _______ 9A. 2wc Are you withholding something from anyone? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 348 9B. 2wc Is anyone else withholding something from you? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9C. 2wc Are others withholding something from anyone else? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9D. 2wc Are you withholding something from yourself? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9E. 2wc Has anyone demanded W/Hs you didn't have? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9F. 2wc Have you demanded withholds of anyone else they didn't have? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9G. 2wc Have others demanded withholds of anyone else they didn't have? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9H. 2wc Have you demanded W/Hs from yourself that you didn't have? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 9I. R3R Quad "demanded non-existent W/Hs from _______ ". _______ 9J. L&N, Clear Q thoroughly and verify for read first, what purpose would be behind "the demanding of non-existent W/Hs from others"?_______ 9K. R3R Quad the item in No. 9J. _______ 10. PROBLEMS HANDLING. _______ 10A. 2wc Has another given you a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10B. 2wc Have you given another a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10C. 2wc Have others given a problem to anyone else? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10D. 2wc Have you given yourself a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10E. 2wc Has anyone ever made you feel you had a problem when you didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10F. 2wc Have you ever made anyone else feel he had a problem when he didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10G. 2wc Have others ever made anyone else feel he had a problem when he didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10H. 2wc Have you ever made yourself feel you had a problem when you didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 10I. R3R Quad the item. _______ 10J. L&N for the Intention behind "the giving of problems to people that don't belong to them". _______ 10K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 10J. _______ 11. OVERTS HANDLING. _______ 11A. 2wc Has anyone else committed overts on you? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11B. 2wc Have you committed overts on anyone else? Get what, E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11C. 2wc Have others committed overts on anyone else? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11D. 2wc Have you committed any overts on yourself? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 349 11E. 2wc Has anyone ever accused you of something you didn't do? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11F. 2wc Have you ever accused anyone else of something he didn't do? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11G. 2wc Have others ever accused anyone else of something he didn't do? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11H. 2wc Have you ever accused yourself of something you didn't do? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 11I. R3R Quad the item. _______ 11J. L&N for the Intention behind "the accusing of someone of non-existent overts". _______ 11K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 11J. _______ 12. NOT SAYING. _______ 12A. 2wc Are you not saying something about someone else or something? Get what, E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12B. 2wc Is anyone not saying something about you? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12C. 2wc Are others not saying something about anyone else? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12D. 2wc Are you not saying something about yourself? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12E. 2wc Has anyone not accepted your W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12F. 2wc Have you not accepted someone else's W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12G. 2wc Have others not accepted anyone else's W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12H. 2wc Have you not accepted your own W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 12I. R3R Quad "W/Hs weren't accepted". _______ 12J. L&N Intention behind "the rejecting of others' W/Hs". _______ 12K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 12J. _______ 13. FALSE INCIDENTS HANDLING. _______ 13A. 2wc Has anyone ever asked you for things that didn't exist? E/S to F/N. _______ 13B. 2wc Have you ever asked anyone else for things that didn't exist? E/S to F/N. _______ 3C. 2wc Have others ever asked anyone else for things that didn't exist? E/S to F/N. _______ 13D. 2wc Have you ever asked yourself for things that didn't exist? E/S to F/N. _______ 13E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 13F. L&N for the Intention behind "the demanding of false incidents from others". _______ 13G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 13F. _______ 14. PTS HANDLING. _______ 350 14A. 2wc Has anyone given you a false assignment that you were being done in? E/S to F/N. _______ 14B. 2wc Have you given anyone a false assignment that he was being done in? E/S to F/N. _______ 14C. 2wc Have others given anyone else a false assignment that they were being done in? E/Sim to F/N. _______ 14D. 2wc Have you given yourself a false assignment that you were being done in? E/S to F/N. _______ 14E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 14F. L&N for the Intention behind "giving others a false assignment that they were being done in". _______ 14G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 14F. _______ 14H. 2wc Has anyone been doing you in? E/S to F/N. _______ 14I. 2wc Have you been doing anyone else in? E/S to F/N. _______ 14J. 2wc Have others been doing anyone else in? E/S to F/N. _______ 14K. 2wc Have you been doing yourself in? E/S to F/N. _______ 15. FALSE INTERROGATION HANDLING. _______ 15A. 2wc Has anyone ever interrogated you for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 15B. 2wc Have you ever interrogated anyone else for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 15C. 2wc Have others ever interrogated anyone else for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 15D. 2wc Have you ever had yourself interrogated for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 15E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 15F. L&N for the Intention behind "the false interrogating of others"._______ 15G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 15F. _______ 16. FALSE INVALIDATION HANDLING. _______ 16A. 2wc Has anyone ever heavily invalidated you unjustly? E/S to F/N._______ 16B. 2wc Have you ever heavily invalidated anyone else unjustly? E/S to F/N _______ 16C. 2wc Have others ever heavily invalidated anyone else unjustly? E/S to F/N. _______ 16D. 2wc Have you ever heavily invalidated yourself unjustly? E/S to F/N. _______ 16E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 16F. L&N for the Intention behind "the unjust invalidating of others"._______ 16G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 16F. _______ 17. FALSE VALIDATION HANDLING. _______ 17A. 2wc Has another ever validated you for something you didn't deserve? E/S to F/N. _______ 351 17B. 2wc Have you ever validated anyone else for something he didn't deserve? E/S to F/N. _______ 17C. 2wc Have others ever validated anyone else for something they didn't deserve? E/S to F/N. _______ 17D. 2wc Have you ever validated yourself for something you didn't deserve? E/S to F/N. _______ 17E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 17F. L&N for the Intention behind "the false validating of others". _______ 17G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 17F. _______ 18. "HIT" FOR NO REASON. _______ 18A. 2wc Has anyone "hit" you too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 18B. 2wc Have you "hit" anyone else too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 18C. 2wc Have others "hit" anyone else too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 18D. 2wc Have you gotten yourself "hit" too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N. _______ 18E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 18F. L&N for the Intention behind "the 'hitting' of others unfairly". _______ 18G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 18F. _______ 19. INVALIDATED BEINGNESS HANDLING. _______ 19A. 2wc Has anyone ever challenged or questioned who you were? E/S to F/N. _______ 19B. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned anyone else's identity? E/S to F/N. _______ 19C. 2wc Have others ever challenged or questioned anyone else's identity? E/S to F/N. _______ 19D. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned your identity? E/S to F/N. _______ 19E. R3R Quad the item. _______ 19F. L&N for the Intention behind "the invalidating of others' identity". _______ 19G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 19F. _______ 20. INVALIDATED INTENTIONS HANDLING. _______ 20A. 2wc Has anyone ever challenged or questioned your intentions? E/S to F/N. _______ 20B. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned anyone else's intentions? E/S to F/N. _______ 20C. 2wc Have others ever challenged or questioned anyone else's intentions? E/S to F/N. _______ 20D. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned your own intentions? E/S to F/N. _______ 352 20E. R3R Quad "misinterpreted intentions". _______ 20F. L&N for the Intention behind "the invalidating of the intentions of others". _______ 20G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 20F. _______ 21. OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS. _______ An HC List could be added here if the pc's "think" is still weird. NOTE: ITEMS THAT DON'T READ WON'T RUN. DON'T RUN OR LIST Q's THAT DON'T READ OR YOU'LL REINTROVERT THE PC. Frequent D of P Interview is vital whenever the case looks like it is not rapidly progressing. Also a quick assessment may be needed as a separate action to isolate possible charged areas of introspection. At any time after Step 2 Objective Havingness should be done at session end. If one of the items in Steps 3-20 turns out to be false the pc will introvert further. In such a case indicate the fact of it having been unnecessary and get an F/N. Then run Objective Havingness. If the TA goes high (or low) and won't come into range, assess a C/S 53RH and handle. In the case of a pc in a psychotic break, the C/S would have to locate the last severe wrong indication, indicate the fact to the pc and get it corrected (as with a wrong item) as the first action. EXTROVERSION Def. EXTROVERSION: "... Means nothing more than being able to look outward...." "An extroverted personality is one who is capable of looking around the environment...." "A person who is capable of looking at the world around him and seeing it quite real and quite bright is of course in a state of extroversion." (Problems of Work.) The end phenomena of the Introspection RD is the person extroverted, no longer looking inward worriedly in a continuous self-audit without end. The EP on a person in a psychotic break is the end of the psychotic break. The RD is very simple and its results are magical in effectiveness. Flubs can wreck it so don't permit them. You have in your hands the tool to take over mental therapy in full. You need not fear the insane or the psychotic break any longer. Here also is the cure for the continual self-auditing pc who is dug into his bank. It works on all pcs in fact with rave results. Do it flawlessly and we all win. THIS PLANET IS OURS. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ams.rd Founder Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Additional data can be found in HCO B 20 February 1974, Introspection RD -- Additional Actions, Page 260; HCO B 6 March 1974, Introspection RD -- Second Addition -- Information to C/Ses -- Fixated Attention, Page 262; and HCO B 20 April 1974, Introspection RD -- Third Addition -- Additional Introspection RD Steps, page 295.] 353  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=5/11/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  DRUGS, MORE ABOUT   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 NOVEMBER 1974 Remimeo DRUGS, MORE ABOUT Reference: HCO B of 28 August 1968, Issue II, "Drugs". WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS The most wretched part of coming off hard drugs is the reaction called "withdrawal symptoms". People go into convulsions. These are so severe that the addict becomes very afraid of them and so remains on drugs. The reaction can also produce death. In the reference HCO Bulletin above, B1 is mentioned as a means of easing convulsions. Actually, practice since 1968 has shown that "Objective TRs", a Scientology process described in detail in HCO Bs 11 June 1957, "Training and CCH Processes", 15 July 1971, C/S Series 48R, "Drug Handling" and BTB 25 Oct 1971R, Issue II, "The Special Drug Rundown", handle withdrawal symptoms when properly used. Great success has been achieved with them. There is another supplementary way of handling withdrawal symptoms. This does not replace "objective TRs" and at this writing is theoretical, being in a research phase. But so terrible can be withdrawal symptoms and so lacking in success has the medical and psychiatric field been, that the data should be released. Muscular spasms are caused by lack of Calcium. Nervous reactions are diminished by Magnesium. Calcium does not go into solution in the body and is not utilized unless it is in an acid. Magnesium is alkaline. Working on this in 1973, for other uses than drug reactions, I found the means of getting Calcium into solution in the body, along with Magnesium so that the results of both could be achieved. This was the "Cal-Mag Formula". CAL-MAG FORMULA 1. Put one level tablespoon of Calcium Gluconate in a normal sized glass. 2. Add 1/2 level teaspoon of Magnesium Carbonate. 3. Add 1 tablespoon of cider vinegar (at least 5% acidity). 4. Stir it well. 5. Add 1/2 glass of boiling water and stir until all the powder is dissolved and the liquid is clear. (If this doesn't occur it could be from poor grade or old Magnesium Carbonate.) 6. Fill the remainder of glass with lukewarm or cold water and cover. 354 They will stay good for 2 days. It can be made wrongly so that it does not dissolve. Variations from the above produce an unsuccessful mix that can taste pretty horrible. Anything from 1 to 3 glasses of this a day, with or after meals, REPLACES ANY TRANQUILIZER. It does not produce the drugged effects of tranquilizers (which are quite deadly). The application to handle muscular spasms and tics is now quite well established. Using this to combat withdrawal symptoms is experimental. The theory is that withdrawal symptoms are muscular spasms. The matter should be given tests where persons suffering from withdrawal symptoms are available. This does not supplant "Objective TRs". These work. But it may be that "Cal-Mag" would assist those suffering where no competent auditing is available. As Calcium and Magnesium are minerals, not drugs, they form no barrier to auditing. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 355  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=24/11/73 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=12/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 53RI SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S  Type = 11 iDate=24/11/73 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=30/8/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973RA (Cancels HCO B 24 Nov 73, Rev. 30 Aug 74) (CANCELLED -- see HCO B 24Nov73RB Volume VIII -- 398) Revised & Reissued 12 November 1974 Remimeo C/S Series 53RI SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal range to get pc's case handled better. _______________________________________ PC Name __________________________ Date 1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F, LF, LFBD (to what TA), speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RI should be reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment. A. Interiorization _______ Problems _______ Went in _______ Protest _______ Go in _______ Don't like it _______ Can't get in _______ Audited over out ruds _______ Want to get out _______ Feel sad _______ Kicked out of spaces _______ Rushed _______ Can't go _______ Tired _______ ARC Brk _______ B. List errors _______ Upset _______ Overlisting _______ Can't get it _______ Wrong items _______ Upset with giving D. Drugs _______ items to auditor _______ LSD _______ Wrong Why _______ Alcohol _______ Wrong Indication _______ Medicine _______ Pot _______ Wrong PTS Item _______ C. Some sort of W/H _______ Are you withholding E. Engram in restimulation _______ something _______ Same engram run twice _______ Is another withholding Can't see engrams too something from you _______ well _______ Are others withholding Invisible _______ something from others _______ Black _______ Has another committed Loss _______ overts on you _______ Lost _______ Have you committed any overts _______ Have others committed F. Same thing run twice _______ overts on others _______ Same action done by Not saying _______ another auditor _______ 356 G. Doing something with K. Can't have _______ mind between sessions _______ Low havingness _______ Some other practice _______ L. PTS _______ H. Word Clearing errors _______ Suppressed _______ Study errors _______ Something went on too long _______ I. False TA _______ Went on by a release Wrong sized cans _______ point _______ Tired hands _______ Overrun _______ Dry hands or feet _______ Auditor kept on going _______ Wet hands or feet _______ Over-repair _______ Loosens can grip _______ Puzzled why auditor Wrong hand cream _______ keeps on _______ Stops _______ J. Auditor overwhelming _______ Feel attacked _______ N. Something else _______ Something wrong with Physically ill _______ F/Ns _______ Overrun F/Ns _______ O. Repairing a TA that Missed F/N _______ isn't high _______ Items really didn't read _______ Repairing a TA that Bad auditing _______ isn't low _______ Incomplete actions _______ Faulty Meter _______ Invalidation _______ Nothing wrong _______ Evaluation _______ Couldn't get auditing _______ P. False Exam Report _______ Interruptions _______ WAITED at Exam _______ Upset by Examiner _______ 2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show where mass lies. A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 R, Revised 14 May 74.) If the pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R. B. If any of these read, do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4BR in general. You can go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong Indication or Wrong PTS Item per C/S Series 78. C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for each or 18 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR HCO B 30 June 71, Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk of long duration.) D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has had a Drug RD, do L3RD on it, and handle. E. If any of these, do L3RD and handle according to what is stated to do on L3RD. F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N. 357 G. Find out what it is. If Yogi or Mystic exercises or some such 2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life. H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List to the pc's program. I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries, (b) F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA obscuring F/Ns. J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be obscured and mistaken for a read if Sensitivity too high. These items are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or retread. K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy. L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD. M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to blow, locate to blow, if qualified). N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get further C/S instructions for handling if necessary. O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N. Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per I above. P. INDICATE and 2wc to F/N. General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return to the C/S. Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1973, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 358  Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=15/11/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST   TO BE DONE ONLY BY AN AUDITOR WHO CAN MAKE PREPARED LISTS READ. Remimeo Tech Qual ARC Brk Reg ARC Brk Auditor Tours  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1974 Tech Qual Refers to HCO PL 15 Nov 74, ARC Brk Reg "CFs, ARC Breaks in" ARC Brk Auditor Tours STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST TO BE DONE ONLY BY AN AUDITOR WHO CAN MAKE PREPARED LISTS READ. This list is for use by ARC Brk Regs and Auditors, Tours personnel, Tech and Qual when recovering blown Students or fixing up blowy Students or Students in trouble or Students who failed in practice. By "blown Students" we mean Students who have left the org incomplete on their course, Students who have ceased their studies and are in the org, Students who have not gone on to their next service, staff who do not attend or have stopped going to study for any reason or Auditors in the field who have failed in practice. ASSESSMENT This list can be assessed Method 3 or Method 5 depending on the severity of the upset. The EP is a Student who is no longer upset or blowy and ready to return to his service or course and does. 1. THERE WERE MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS. _______ (Find and clear them, each to F/N.) 2. NO HELP OR WORD CLEARING FROM THE SUPERVISOR. _______ (2wc which, if Wd Clg find out where he was having trouble and use WC M4 to clear it up. Take to F/N.) 3. INTERFERENCE FROM THE SUPERVISOR THAT STOPPED YOU FROM GETTING ON. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Clean up any protest.) 4. PERSONAL OUT ETHICS RESULTING IN A W/H. _______ (2wc what, handle as a W/H.) 5. SIMPLY BOOTED OFF FOR REASONS BEST KNOWN TO GOD OR REGISTRARS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 6. DISPUTE OVER FEES. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 7. YOU WERE GIVEN A WRONG WHY. _______ (L4BR and handle.) 8. TOLD YOU WERE PTS AND YOU WEREN'T. _______ (Indicate it. 2wc E/S to F/N. L4BR if any trouble.) 9. DIDN'T FULLY CLEAR EACH WORD. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Clear any Mis-U words.) 359 10. HAVING TO CLEAR WORDS YOU ALREADY UNDERSTOOD. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 11. ARC BRKS ON COURSE. _______ (ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. Watch out for MWHs.) 12. PROBLEMS ON COURSE. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 13. ON COURSE FOR SOME OTHER REASON THAN YOU STATED. _______ (2wc what, E/S to F/N.) 14. SCN DOWNGRADED TO YOU. _______ (2wc for details, find out who, PTS Interview if necessary.) 15. SCN PEOPLE LIED ABOUT TO YOU. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Find out who. PTS Interview if necessary.) 16. OUT 2D. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.) 17. DIDN'T PAY FOR THE COURSE OR SOME SERVICE. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.) 18. SOMEONE KEPT AFTER YOU FOR MONEY. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 19. THERE WAS A FALSE ATTESTATION. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.) 20. FALSE EXAM. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.) 21. COULDN'T APPLY THE MATERIALS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 22. COULDN'T MASTER A METER. _______ (2wc, find out what he didn't understand about it and clear it up to F/N.) 23. NOBODY TO AUDIT. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 24. PREVENTED FROM AUDITING. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 25. YOU WERE CONFUSED. _______ (2wc and clear it up to F/N.) 26. THINGS YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND. _______ (2wc what, clear it up to F/N.) 27. YOU HAD DISAGREEMENTS. _______ (Find out what, find the Mis-U words and clear to F/N.) 28. AN EARLIER SIMILAR SUBJECT WAS MISUNDERSTOOD. _______ (2wc what subject, find out what word in it was Mis-U and clear it up. Clear each word to F/N.) 29. EARLIER FAILED COURSES. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 30. DIDN'T USE WORD CLEARING. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N. Clear any words to F/N where he should have.) 360 31. NO METHOD 1 WORD CLEARING. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 32. INTERRUPTIONS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 33. PREVENTED FROM STUDYING. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 34. ADDED TO YOUR CHECKSHEET. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 35. MISSING MATERIALS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 36. NO MATERIALS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 37. NO DICTIONARY. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 38. TECH TERMS YOU DIDN'T GET. _______ (Find out what. Clear to F/N.) 39. COULDN'T FIND THE MATERIALS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 40. TAPE PLAYERS NOT AVAILABLE. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 41. COULDN'T GET A METER. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 42. FORCED TO HAVE A TWIN. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 43. BAD COACHING. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 44. NO PRACTICAL. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 45. NO SUPERVISOR. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 46. NO PLACE TO STUDY. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 47. STUDIED UNDER DURESS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 48. UNREAL QUOTAS SET. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 49. MADE TO DO TRs TOO OFTEN. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 50. SUPERVISOR OR SOMEONE GAVE VERBAL TECH OR INTERPRETED MATERIALS. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 51. LOTS OF ADVICE NOT IN HCO Bs OR TAPES. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 52. YOU WERE ON THE WRONG COURSE. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 361 53. SOMEONE MAD AT YOU ON COURSE. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 54. EVALUATION. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 55. INVALIDATION. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 56. TOLD YOU PASSED WHEN YOU KNEW YOU DIDN'T. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 57. TOLD YOU FLUNKED WHEN YOU KNEW YOU HADN'T. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 58. NOT ENOUGH SLEEP. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 59. NOT ENOUGH TO EAT. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 60. NO PLACE TO LIVE. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 61. FAMILY TROUBLE. _______ (2WC E/S. PTS Interview if necessary.) 62. YOU WERE TAKING DRUGS OR ALCOHOL. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 63. SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR EYESIGHT. _______ (2wc what E/S to F/N.) 64. VIOLATED STUDENT RULES. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 65. SOME OTHER PHYSICAL PROBLEM. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 66. ERROR IN STUDENT AUDITING. _______ (C/S 53RI.) 67. RESTIM. _______ (C/S 53RI.) 68. BAD EXAMINATION. _______ (2wc to F/N and correct.) 69. CERTIFICATES NEVER CAME. _______ (2wc E/S to F/N.) 70. SOMETHING ON THIS LIST YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND? _______ (Clarify and redo list from that point.) 71. SOMETHING ELSE WRONG. _______ (2wc what, if no joy GF M5 and handle.) Make sure this list is done by an Auditor who can make a meter read and your courses will fill up with rehabilitated Students. LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 362  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=4/8/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=26/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  POST PURPOSE CLEARING   Remimeo Dept 13 Qual Div Qual Bu  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 4 AUGUST 1971R REVISED 26 NOVEMBER 1974 Remimeo Dept 13 Qual Div Qual Bu POST PURPOSE CLEARING (This HCO B is the basic action of the Post Purpose Clearing Unit of Div V, Qual Div, or by Auditors as a technology.) An essential part of HATTING as done in HCO is to get the person's POST PURPOSE CLEARED by an auditor. INSTANT PURPOSE CLEARING HCO usually tells the person what the purpose of the post is and certainly the staff member's seniors would. This action is not metered and goes along with instant hatting. It is not done by an auditor. "George, the purpose of your post is to _______ . Any questions?" Questions are answered and clarified. Giving the person on the post the purpose is a basic hatting step. FULL POST PURPOSE CLEARING This requires an auditor, an E-Meter, and is done in session. Usually this is done after mini-hatting and after some experience with the post. It is NOT done in this full fashion before the person has any knowledge of the post. It can also be done during or at the end of full hatting. But the sooner it is done after mini-hatting and some weeks' experience on the post the more successful it will be. AUDITOR QUALIFICATIONS The auditor doing Post Purpose Clearing must be expert with: 1. TRs 2. Metering 3. Code 4. 2-Way Comm 5. Flying Rudiments 6. L&N. ADMIN A Post Purpose Clearing is given full worksheet and report handling and person goes to Examiner. A record of the session is kept with others done in the PPC RECORD BOOK with especially noted any Rock Slam 363 PC The pc must not be in an Ethics cycle, must be rested, not hungry and not ill or on drugs or medication. ANY RINGS ON THE PC'S HANDS MUST BE REMOVED AS THEY CAUSE A FALSE ROCK SLAM. HAT FOLDER Staff Member must bring hat folder to the PPC session so if there is any confusion on purposes in it they can be cleared from the hat folder. CASE FOLDER Case folder of the pc must also be collected and examined before session. This is repeated in the Rundown so it won't be missed. POST PURPOSE CLEARING STEPS PPC 1 -- Get the staff member's folder. Verify that he is not in the middle of some processes, repair or Major Grade. If so, don't touch. Get C/S OK. PPC 2 -- Fly a rud or do a C/S 53RI if TA high or low. Note that it WAS high on the session worksheet. If the TA does not come down refer the case to Staff C/S and do not proceed. Case would need Folder Error Summary and a Hi-Lo TA List IX. PPC 3 -- 2wc about person's post. Be alert to problems or w/hs and if these seem to be there do E/S to F/N on Problems and/or E/S to F/N on w/hs. PPC 4 -- 2wc "What do you think is your post?" to F/N. If pc can't tell you resort to his hat and clear up confusions to F/N. PPC 5 -- 2wc "Tell me about opportunities you would have on your post." This is carried to F/N. If no F/N treat it as a w/h and ask if there's anything pc isn't telling you. Carry any w/h to F/N. Then check the question again and get the F/N back by 2wc or E/S to F/N. (If you start to clear w/hs in the middle of the Q then the w/hs will F/N but the Q hasn't yet so must be F/Ned also. Overts may come up as well as w/hs and if so F/N them by E/S.) Pc should finish this step with F/N, Cog and GIs. PPC 6 -- 2wc "How does your job align (compare) with what you incline (would like) to do?" Get any conflicts into view if not clean. Go E/S to F/N if there is conflict. If no F/N despite Itsa on conflict ask for overts or withholds and carry this to F/N. Check Q again to be sure it F/Ns. PPC 7 -- Go over hat mat'ls covering pc's post purpose. Ask him how does it seem. Get an F/N or clear any confusions up to F/N. PPC 8 -- L&N, "What do you think is the purpose of your post?" to BD F/N item. PPC 9 -- 2wc "How does this purpose tie in with the purpose of your Division?" Clean this up if there's doubt. Use folders or OEC books. Be sure it's cleaned up to F/N. PPC 10 -- 2wc "How does this purpose tie in with the purpose of the org?" Clean this up to F/N. PPC 11 -- (Using PPC 8 purpose) "Then is (quote it) the purpose of your post?" Get a revision so it's really it or accept it. Say, when it's decided, "Then (quote) is the purpose of your post." 364 PPC 12 -- 2wc "If your post was not done what would happen to the org?" Clean this up to F/N. PPC 13 -- 2wc "How do you feel about accomplishing your post purpose?" Clean this up to F/N. PPC 14 -- Thank pc and send to Examiner. Complete worksheet. Enter results in log. Put the session report in pc's folder. Send a report to the E/O AND TO FLAG if the person Rock Slams and note it in the folder for pgming to include Ex Dn. If you can get no satisfactory F/Ns and Cogs and VGIs or if Exam report is bad, DIRECT THE FACT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HAS AND THE C/O AND THE CASE SUPER FOR IMMEDIATE CORRECTION. The Remedy is L4BR on the whole RD, L1C, C/S 53RI and do the clearing again. Post Purpose Clearing counts as a completion for the Dept on an F/N at Examiner's. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 365  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=1/12/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  WORD CLEARING LISTS FOR PREPARED LISTS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 DECEMBER 1974 Remimeo WORD CLEARING LISTS FOR PREPARED LISTS Reference: LRH ED 257 INT DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS Here is the list of prepared lists with their word clearing lists. PREPARED LIST WC LIST HCO B 24 Nov 73RA BTB 9 Apr 72RA, Issue VII C/S Series 53RI Revised 1 Dec 74 SHORT HI-LO TA CLEARING LIST WORDS IN ASSESSMENT C/S SCIENTOLOGY -- C/S SERIES 53RI HCO B 1 Jan 72RA BTB 9 Apr 72RA, Issue IX LIX HI-LO TA LIST Revised 1 Dec 74 REVISED CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- LIX HI-LO TA LIST REVISED HCO B 29 Oct 71R BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue X INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN LIST REVISED SCIENTOLOGY -- INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST REVISED HCO B 15 Dec 68R BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue V L4BR CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- L4BR HCO B 19 Mar 71 BTB 9 Apr 72, Issue VI L1C CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- L1C HCO B 11 Apr 71RA BTB 28 Apr 74 L3RD DIANETICS -- CLEARING LISTS AND R3R HCO B 2 Apr 72RB, Issue II BTB 3 Apr 72R, Issue I Expanded Dianetics Series 3RB EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 2R L3 EXD RB CLEARING LISTS AND R3R HCO B 29 Feb 72R ----- FALSE TA CHECKLIST HCO B 16 Apr 72 BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue VII PTS RD CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- PTS RD CORRECTION LIST HCO PL 7 Apr 70RA BTB 9 Apr 72RA, Issue I GREEN FORM Revised 1 Dec 74 CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- GREEN FORM 366 PREPARED LIST WC LIST HCO B 30 June 71 BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue III EXPANDED GF 40 RR CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- EXPANDED GF 40 RR HCO B 15 Nov 73R ----- FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST-R HCO B 15 Nov 74 BTB 15 Nov 74 STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST HCO B 4 Feb 72RC BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue XI STUDY CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN REVISED -- Study Series 7 SCIENTOLOGY -- STUDY CORRECTION LIST REVISED HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue I BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue II STUDENT CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN -- STUDY CORR LIST 1 SCIENTOLOGY -- STUDENT CORRECTION LIST HCO B 27 Mar 72R, Issue II BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue III COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN LIST -- STUDY CORR LIST 2 SCIENTOLOGY -- COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue III BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue IV AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN -- STUDY CORR LIST 3 SCIENTOLOGY -- AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue IV BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue V CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN LIST -- STUDY CORR LIST 4RA SCIENTOLOGY -- CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue V BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue VI EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN -- STUDY CORR LIST 5 SCIENTOLOGY -- EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST HCO B 21 July 71RC BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue IV WORD CLEARING CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN LIST REVISED SCIENTOLOGY -- WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST HCO PL 9 Apr 72 ----- ETHICS -- CORRECT DANGER CONDITION HANDLING (Danger Assessment, Long Form and Short Form) HCO PL 13 Mar 72 ----- Esto Series 5 -- PRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT -- ORDERS AND PRODUCTS (Product Clearing Short Form) 367 PREPARED LIST WC LIST HCO PL 23 Mar 72 ----- Esto Series 11 -- FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM HCO PL 12 June 72 ----- Data Series 26, Esto Series 18 LENGTH OF TIME TO EVALUATE (Slow Eval Assessment) HCO B 28 Aug 70RA BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue VIII HC OUT-POINT PLUS-POINT Revised 30 Nov 74 LISTS RA CLEARING LIST WORDS IN SCIENTOLOGY -- HC OUT-POINT PLUS-POINT LISTS HCO B 2 Dec 74 BTB 1 Dec 74, Issue VIII DYNAMIC SORT OUT ASSESSMENT CLEARING LIST WORDS IN (Revised from BTB 4 Dec 71, SCIENTOLOGY -- DYNAMIC SORT Issue II, Replacing HCO B OUT ASSESSMENT 4 Dec 71, Issue II, R-1C Assessment by Dynamics) KEEP THESE LISTS IN SUPPLY FOR USE. TRAIN AUDITORS TO MAKE THESE LISTS READ. USE THEM FOR HAVE RESULTS AND YOU WILL SEE A GOLDEN ERA OF TECH IN YOUR ORG. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 368  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=8/12/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  TR 0 -- NOTES ON BLINKING   Remimeo TR Course Checksheet HQS Course All Auditors C/Ses HSDC Checksheet Academy Levels Checksheets SHSBC Internes Supervisors  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 DECEMBER 1974 Remimeo TR Course Checksheet HQS Course All Auditors C/Ses HSDC Checksheet Academy Levels Checksheets SHSBC Internes Supervisors TR 0 -- NOTES ON BLINKING WHO is doing the confronting? Are you a body? Or a thetan? Students are trying to do an offshoot called Blinkless TR 0. There is no such thing. Sitting with any attention on the body just isn't confront -- you aren't doing the drill right. If your body blinks then OK -- but if you are making it blink BY HAVING ATTENTION ON THE EYES then your TR 0 is out. If the Supervisor came over and said, "Flunk, you blinked," I wouldn't Q&A but continue doing TR 0 instead, because I didn't do it. Excessive blinking shows the thetan is in his eyes. That's not TR 0. Nervous muscles can be cured with Calcium-Magnesium. The body should not interfere with your confront. Just don't use any part of it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 369  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=9/12/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Integrity Processing Series 6RA EFFECTIVENESS OF OVERTS IN PROCESSING  Type = 11 iDate=10/7/64 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=9/12/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1974 Remimeo Cancels HCO B 10 July 1964, Reissued 5 December 1974 as Integrity Processing Series 6R HCO B 10 July 1964, "Overts -- Order of Effectiveness in Processing" remains as originally issued. Cancels BTB 9 Dec 72, "Why Overts Work" Integrity Processing Series 6RA EFFECTIVENESS OF OVERTS IN PROCESSING (The data in this Bulletin has been taken from HCO B 10 July 1964. It is useful in Integrity Processing.) ARC BREAKS The commonest cause of failure in running overt acts is "cleaning cleans" whether or not one is using a meter. The pc who really has more to tell doesn't ARC Break when the Auditor continues to ask for one but may snarl and eventually give it up. On the other hand leaving an overt touched on the case and calling it clean will cause a future ARC Break with the Auditor. "Have you told all?" prevents cleaning a clean. On the unmetered pc one can see the pc brighten up. On the meter you get a nice fall if it's true that all is told. "Have I not found out about something?" prevents leaving an overt undisclosed. On the unmetered pc the reaction is a sly flinch. On a metered pc it gives a read. A pc's protest against a question will also be visible in an unmetered pc in a reeling sort of exasperation which eventually becomes a howl of pure bafflement at why the Auditor won't accept the answer that that's all. On a meter, protest of a question falls on being asked for: "Is this question being protested?" There is no real excuse for ARC Breaking a pc by: 1. Demanding more than is there or 2. Leaving an overt undisclosed that will later make the pc upset with the Auditor. WHY OVERTS WORK Overts give the highest gain in raising cause level because they are the biggest reason why a person restrains himself and withholds self from action. Man is basically good. But the reactive mind tends to force him into evil actions. These evil actions are instinctively regretted and the individual tries to refrain from doing anything at all. The "best" remedy, the individual thinks, is to withhold. "If I commit evil actions, then my best guarantee for not committing is to do nothing whatever." Thus we have the "lazy", inactive person. Others who try to make an individual guilty for committing evil actions only increase this tendency to laziness. 370 Punishment is supposed to bring about inaction. And it does. In some unexpected ways. However, there is also an inversion (a turnabout) where the individual sinks below recognition of any action. The individual in such a state cannot conceive of any action and therefore cannot withhold action. And thus we have the criminal who can't act really but can only re-act and is without any self direction. This is why punishment does not cure criminality but in actual fact creates it; the individual is driven below withholding or any recognition of any action. A thief's hands stole the jewel, the thief was merely an innocent spectator to the action of his own hands. Criminals are very sick people physically. So there is a level below withholding that an Auditor should be alert to in some pcs, for these "have no withholds" and "have done nothing". All of which, seen through their eyes, is true. They are merely saying "I cannot restrain myself' and "I have not willed myself to do what I have done". The road out for such a case is the same as that for any other case. It is just longer. The processes for levels above hold also for such cases. But don't be anxious to see a sudden return of responsibility, for the first owned "done" that this person knows he or she has done may be "ate breakfast". Don't disdain such answers in Level II particularly. Rather, in such people, seek such answers. There is another type of case in all this, just one more to end the list. This is the case who never runs O/W but "seeks the explanation of what I did that made it all happen to me". This person easily goes into past lives for answers. Their reaction to a question about what they've done is to try to find out what they did that earned all those motivators. That, of course, isn't running the process and the Auditor should be alert for it and stop it when it happens. This type of case goes into its extreme on guilt. It dreams up overts to explain why. After most big murders the police routinely have a dozen or two people come around and confess. You see, if they had done the murder, this would explain why they feel guilty. As a terror stomach is pretty awful grim to live with, one is apt to seek any explanation for it if it will only explain it. On such cases the same approach as given works, but one should be very careful not to let the pc get off overts the pc didn't commit. Such a pc (recognizable by the ease they dive into the extreme past) when being audited off a meter gets more and more frantic and wilder and wilder in overts reported. They should get calmer under processing of course, but the false overts make them frantic and hectic in a session. On a meter one simply checks for "Have you told me anything beyond what really has occurred?" Or "Have you told me any untruths?" The observation and meter guides given in this section are used during a session when they apply but not systematically such as after every pc answer. These observations and meter guides are used always at the end of every session on the pcs to whom they apply. LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1964, 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [The 5 December 1974 reissue of HCO B 10 July 1964, which the above HCO B cancels, was taken verbatim from HCO B 10 July 1964.] 371  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/4/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=14/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 22R EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES   Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1974R Ex Dn C/Ses REVISED 14 DECEMBER 1974 Expanded Dianetics Series 22R EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES The recent review of Expanded Dianetics has shown that Ex Dn can be made to fail if the pc is improperly set up for it. The following checklist is for use by C/Ses to ensure full set-ups for Ex Dn have been done. Attach to the inside left cover of the folder. 1. Pc has done a full set of TRs 0-4 and 6-9. _______ 2. Pc has had a full battery of Objective Processes run to full EP. _______ 3. Pc has been given a thorough C/S 1 and is grooved in. _______ 4. Pc has completed (very) Drug RD which is FLAT. No no-interest but reading items remain unrun. No medicine, drug or stimulant left unrun. _______ 5. Pc successful at Dianetic Engram running. Can run Dn easily. _______ 6. Pc has had Word Clearing Method 1 run very flat to F/N list. _______ 7. Pc has been Word Cleared Method 5 on the L-3ExDRB and R3R words. _______ 8. Pc has had any high or low TA handled with a C/S 53RI. _______ 9. Pc is not in the Non-Interference area. _______ 10. Pc has had any messed-up L & N and Why lists corrected. _______ 11. Pc has not been left in the middle of a major action or RD to start Ex Dn. _______ 12. Pc is getting Ex Dn after Dn, after Exp Gr 4 or after OT3. These are the only points Ex Dn is run on a case. _______ Only if you make sure each of these points is fully in will the pc fly on Ex Dn. LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 372  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=12/1/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  QUADS REINSTATED  Type = 11 iDate=15/7/71 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Class IV HDCS Ex Dn Spclsts  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JANUARY 1975 Remimeo Cancels HCO B 15 July 1971, Issue I, Class IV C/S Series 28R, 32R, 33R, 36R -- HDCS "Quads Cancelled" Ex Dn Spclsts QUADS REINSTATED With the release of the Introspection RD and the Vital Info RD and recent HCO Bs such as the revised GF 40 Expanded it is vital that the original Quad Dianetics materials be made fully available to you. I am therefore re-issuing them as C/S Series 28RA-1, "Use of Quadruple Dianetics", 32RA-1, "Use of Quad Dianetics", 33RA-1, "Triple and Quad ReRuns" and 36RB-1, "Quadruple Dianetics, Dangers of". These HCO Bs are fully valid and must be Word Cleared, starrated, done in clay and drilled by any HDC, C1 IV HDC or Ex Dn Specialist before they are permitted to audit Quad Dn. QUAD RULES There are two rules that must be observed in running Quad Dianetics: ONCE A PC HAS BEEN QUAD HE IS QUAD THEREAFTER. WHEN CATCHING UP UNRUN FLOW ZEROS ONLY RUN THOSE THAT READ. Running unreading Flow 0s when putting in missing F0s, as in a Quad pc who was switched to Triples then was having his unrun F0s run, is the reason for overrun manifestations and BPC. NEW PCs New pcs may be started on Quad Dianetics and if so must remain Quad thereafter. Old pcs run Triple, let them remain Triple unless you have to do the Introspection RD or some Quad RD. If so, put in the reading unrun F0s before attempting a new RD Quad. There are probably quite a few pcs run on Quads from 1971 who have since been run Triple. These pcs should be called in and have their reading unrun F0s run. Don't now create a further backing by mixing up process flows on current pcs. DO IT RIGHT, TRIPLE OR QUAD. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 373  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=7/3/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 28RA-1 USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS   Remimeo HGC Auditors Dn & Scn Checksheets C/Ses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1971 REISSUED 13 JANUARY 1975 Remimeo HGC Auditors Dn & Scn Checksheets C/S Series 28RA-1 C/Ses USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS With the introduction of QUADRUPLE DIANETICS the problems of how to C/S it arise. This rule is followed: IN ALL BUT HCO B 24 July 69 DIANETIC ASSISTS WHERE IT CAN BE USED AT ONCE, THE FOURTH FLOW -- 0 -- MUST BE RUN ON ALL ITEMS FORWARD FROM THE FIRST DIANETIC ITEM EVER RUN ON THE CASE IF THE PC IS QUAD AND THE FLOW 0 READS. Where a case has already had Flows 2 and 3 run on Singes, one goes back and runs Flow 0 on those items if it reads. Where a case has only been run on Single Flow Dianetics (Flow 1) one goes back to the first Dianetic Item ever run of which record can be found and does F 2, F 3, F 0 in that order checking the command for read before running it, and then verifying the F1. To C/S a case for Quad Dianetics it is best to first lay out a Scientology repair, making sure the case is flying, then list out the items already run on Single and Triple. Then get them run so that all four flows are complete on each item in sequence from first to last. This includes any LX items, former practice, drugs or any other engram running. These, like Dianetic items, are listed in their correct sequence of former running. Then the missing flows are run if they read. A rehab step of the flows already run is not necessary. This rehab of a flow already run to EP is usually used only when there is question about its having gone to F/N Cog VGIs. In C/Sing for Quadruple one COMPLETES any flow of an item found that did not F/N. This is indicated on the item list. DOING THE LIST The item list is done by the Auditor in his admin time for well done time credits. All former Dianetic items ever run are listed and what flows have been run on them and to what end phenomena. Example: Engram List 3 Sept 69 Sadness (exact wording that was used) F1 4 Sept 69 A Bored Feeling F1 Bogged 374 6 Sept 69 An Apathetic Outlook F1 Bogged 6 Nov 69 LX Agonized F1 F2 F3 7 Nov 69 Former Therapy F1 F2 F3 F2 Bogged 9 Nov 69 Earlier Practices F1 Bogged 10 Nov 69 A Horrible Sadness F1 Bogged 5 July 70 Int RD F1 F2 F3 F3 Bogged 6 July 71 An Awful Pressure F1 Bogged Such a list is then handled from the earliest forward by: (a) Completing the bogged flow and (b) Completing the missing flow, if it reads. INT-EXT RD This is handled in its proper sequence on the list if the TA is not high or very low. If the TA on the pc is currently high, Int is handled before any other action is done and all four flows are run on it with the understanding that a pc run Triple on Int must have the Flow 0 checked for read before running it. A drug chain also makes a high TA if in existence or unflat. AUDITOR CHECKOUT BEFORE RUNNING ANY DIANETICS QUADRUPLE EVERY AUDITOR HDC, VI, VII, VIII AND C/Ses MUST BE CHECKED OUT THOROUGHLY ON THE QUAD DIANETICS CHECKLIST: BTB 6 May 69R "Routine 3 R Revised" Issue II HCO B 4 Jan 71 "Exteriorization and High TA" HCO B 23 Jan 71 "Exteriorization" BTB 1 Dec 70R Dianetics Triple Flow Action BTB 20 May 70 "TR 103, 104 Rundown" HCO B 7 Mar 71 "Use of Quadruple Dianetics" Reissued 13.1.75 C/S Series 28RA-1 HCO B 4 Apr 71 "Use of Quad Dianetics" Reissued 13.1.75 C/S Series 32RA-1 HCO B 5 Apr 71 "Triple and Quad ReRuns" Reissued 13.1.75 C/S Series 33RA-1 HCO B 21 Apr 71 "Quadruple Dianetics -- Dangers Of" Reissued 13.1.75 C/S Series 36RB-1 Any other HCO B of subsequent issue on this subject. THERE IS A PACK ON THIS SUBJECT AVAILABLE FROM FLAG. FLUBS If any Auditor has a poor record of getting Dianetics Results, of bogged flows, etc, he needs an HDC Retread. His drills and TRs are out or he is committing Gross Auditing Errors. Dianetics gives remarkable results only when flawlessly done. The commands must be precisely given and all commands 1-9 A-D are used. It is NEVER shorted "because the pc did it". 375 THUS ANY HDC TO AUDIT QUAD DIANETICS MUST: (A) HAVE A RECORD OF GOOD FLUBLESS DIANETIC AUDITING or (B) MUST HAVE A RETREAD UNDER A COMPETENT SUPERVISOR and (C) MUST BE STARRATED (for true, not just checked) ON THE ABOVE CHECKSHEET OR THE FULL QUAD PACK. C/Sing Quad Dianetics, with the above, otherwise C/Ses the same as general DIANETICS. It should be realized Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing. This remains the same in Quad Dianetics. PROMOTION Quad Dianetics should be promoted only when you have Dianetic Auditors, the Auditors checked out and okayed to audit as above and when you CAN DELIVER. IVs or VIs should be available to do the Progress Pgms and steps. UPPER LEVELS When the IVs VIs VIIs VIIIs or IXs are checked out as above, they should use Quad Dianetics to handle any and all Engram steps called for in general auditing. That they are upper level Auditors does not make it less necessary to do the above. RESULTS Quad Dianetics, including the rerun actions, produces some very startling new gains. Well done Dianetics always has produced fine results. Quad Dianetics almost doubles the gain. REMEDIES Any and all Dianetic Remedies and general technology remain in full use. They are not changed at all. Only the zero flow is added in each case. Good Luck. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1971, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 376  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=4/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=1 aDate=13/1/75 aRev=1 arDate=22/2/75  C/S Series 32RA-1R USE OF QUAD DIANETICS  Type = 11 iDate=4/4/71 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1971-1R ADDITION OF 13 JANUARY 1975 REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1975 Remimeo (Cancels HCO B 4 Apr 71, Reissued 13 Jan 75, same title Does NOT cancel HCO B 4 Apr 71RA, Rev. 24 Mar 74, C/S Series 32 RA, which is still valid.) (Changes in this type style) C/S Series 32RA-1R USE OF QUAD DIANETICS With the introduction of Quadruple Dianetics it is mandatory important urgent that one does not audit four flow items until one has brought all earlier Dianetic items into four flows. TRIPLE This also applies to Triple Dianetics. On a case where only Flow One (Singe) has been run, you don't suddenly run a Triple (F1, F2, F3) such as on the LX Class VIII Lists until one has run the earliest Dn item ever run (or that can be found) on Dn Triple and then on forward on Triple up to the LX. QUAD However, one would now not bother to run only Triples forward. He would locate the earliest Single or Triple (if no Single Flow) item and run it Quadruple by now running the missing flows. In the case of a pc run Triple, Flow 0 is checked for read before running it. INT RD In doing an INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN one mustn't suddenly introduce the 4th flow (F Zero). If the case has only had Triples in Dianetics one mustn't suddenly introduce a Flow Zero on INT. The case should be done on Triple Flow INT. THEN all earlier Dn items in sequence run are: (a) Listed from W/S or Folder Summaries. (b) Brought up to current by running in all the missing flows of Quad. (c) The INT RD fourth flow is audited in when one gets to it IF IT READS. REASON Auditing additional flows while earlier items remain Single or Triple restimulates the mixing flows and stacks them up as mass. They can make a pc uncomfortable until run. All the missing flows (that were not run) are still potential mass. This mass restimulates like something too late on the chain when a flow not run on earlier items is run on later items. 377 Auditing itself is a sort of time track. The earliest session blows the later sessions. FULL FLOW TABLE Before running Quad Dianetics one makes a table of earlier items run. Like this: FULL FLOW TABLE Flow Date Item Previously Run Must Run 2.3.62 Guf Shoulder F1 F2, 3, 0 3.3.67 Gow in Foot F1 F2, 3, 0 30.4.67 Chow in Chump F1 F2, 3, 0 29.9.68 LX Anger F1,2,3 F0 LX Peeved F1,2,3 F0 4.10.69 Feeling Numb F1, 2, 3 F0 5.9.70 Int RD F1,2,3 F0 9.10.70 Feeling of Goof F1, 2,3 F0 10.10.71 Dn Assist on Head F1 F2, 3, 0 FLOWS F1 is FLOW ONE, something happening to self. F2 is FLOW TWO, doing something to another. F3 is FLOW THREE, others doing things to others. F0 is FLOW ZERO, self doing something to self. R3R COMMANDS Standard R3R Commands are used on Quad Dianetics. They are the subject of another HCO B. The Zero Command however is very easy being "Locate an incident of (loss or emotion) (pain and unconsciousness) when you caused yourself to have a(an) (item)" with the other commands of R3R as usual. NARRATIVE The question will come up, do we Triple or Quad Narrative items or Multiple somatic items. The test is, did the flows already run F/N when they were originally run. If they did, include them. If they didn't run exclude them. This does not mean you omit everything that didn't run. REPAIR While auditing this FULL FLOW DIANETICS you will find various chains that did not F/N when originally run. These are included and should be concluded to F/N. This means one has to find out if they by-passed the F/N, went too early, jumped the chain, etc. Usually an L3RD assessed on that faulty action will give the answer. It is easy to make these old flubbed chains F/N unless you work at it too hard. Usually the reason they didn't is visible on the old worksheet. The auditor forgot to ask for Earlier Beginning or by-passed the 378 F/N or jumped the chain or tried to run it twice forgetting he'd run it before. Corny errors. RESULT The result of doing a FULL FLOW DIANETIC ACTION on a case is quite spectacular. The shadowy remains of somatics blow, mass blows and the pc comes up shining. OFFERING FFD Offering the public Full Flow Dianetics must include the cost of FESing, FF table making, and C/S work since it is sometimes lengthy. The auditing can be remarkably brief. The greatest amount of time is usually spent on the C/Sing and the table making. FFD is offered to the public in intensives as per HCO B 31 May 1971 R, C/S Series 39R "Standard 12 1/2 Hour Intensive Programs". Admin time spent on C/Sing, FESing and FF table making should be deducted from the Intensive Hours purchased by the pc. This must be made known to the public when purchasing the service. When offering FFD it should be called Quadruple Dianetics -- 4 times more powerful than previous auditing. A C/S must liaise with the Dissem Sec and Treasury Sec on selling it or he'll find the org is losing money doing the C/Sing and tables. OT WARNING When doing Quadruple Dianetics on Clears and OTs (and a very few others) it may be found that many chains are now missing or are just copies of the original. Don't be disturbed. Pc says they're gone now they're gone. Just F/N the fact and carry on with the next flow or item. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 379  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=5/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 33RA-1 TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS   Remimeo All Auditors C/Ses Class VIII  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1971 Remimeo REISSUED 13 JANUARY 1975 All Auditors C/Ses Class VIII C/S Series 33RA-1 TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS LAW: WHEN ONE OR MORE OF THE FOUR FLOWS OF AN ITEM OR GRADE ARE LEFT UNRUN, WHEN USED IN LATER PROCESSES THE EARLIER UNRUN ONES RESTIMULATE AND MAKE MASS. This tells you that high TAs, heavy pressures and even illness can come from by-passed flows. BY-PASSED FLOWS Example: Dianetic Singles have been run on 7 items. Now the Auditor begins to run new items Triple without running Triple on the already run items. The result will be 7 unrun Flow 2s and 7 unrun Flow 3s. These will restimulate and form mass and by-passed charge. Example: Now let us say all 7 previous items have been run Triple. And the Auditor now runs a new item Quadruple. This leaves 7 unrun Zero chains. These can restimulate and form mass and by-passed charge. Example: Now let us say that Dianetics was all run Single and Grades were run Triple. This will restimulate the Dn chains F2 and F3. Example: Let us say that Dianetics and Scientology Grades were all run Triple. An Interiorization Rundown is now run Quad. This will throw all Dianetic and Scientology unrun Flow Zeros into restimulation and give by- passed charge. ANY LATER GRADE RUN WITH MORE FLOWS THAN USED IN EARLIER ACTIONS CAN THROW THE EARLIER UNFLAT FLOWS INTO RESTIM, PILE UP MASS GIVING HIGH TA AND BPC GIVING ARC BREAKS. REPAIR The more the condition is repaired by L1C, L4BR, etc, etc, the worse the Mass gets. SOURCE OF HIGH TA Thus High TAs have three principal sources: 1. Overruns 2. Auditing Past Exterior 3. Earlier Unrun Flows restimulated by those flows used in later actions. There are other minor ones such as Drug Background, illness, etc, as per Hi-Lo TA Assessment. REHABS One must NOT recklessly or continuously rehab a past major action. This causes overrun. The thetan is placed at the end of the incidents not yet in restimulation or run and the bank gets more solid. MASSY THETANS The whole trick of this universe is contained in thetans copying or picturing incidents and then getting stuck in the later portion of them. 380 "Incidents" is the keynote. A thetan is incident hungry. This is what traps him. For some reason he has to be at the earliest end of incidents to erase them. The later he is in incidents and the later he is on the track the more solid he is. This also applies to the "auditing time track". By omitting things like flows on the auditing time track, the thetan thus becomes massy. The whole theory of the Interiorization Remedy is based on having gone out (later) after he went in (earlier). So Exteriorizing can stick him. (People buy the Int RD to Exteriorize but the remedy is only done to permit further auditing. They Ext of course when the bank is handled.) When flows of items are by-passed and then later restimulated by auditing them, mass occurs. GETTING IN ALL FLOWS When doing additional flows on earlier items or processes one must also check or rehab those flows marked as run to F/N in worksheets. This again will leave unflat flows and BPC unless it is done. And if it is overdone it will raise the TA by overrun. So if one had a case that had Single Dianetics and was later run on Triple for new items (but the Singles not done into Triple) one would have to RUN FIRST the missing unrun flow or flows if they read and then check the first Singe F1 for flatness, then check other previously run flows. The rule is run the previously unrun one or ones first if they read to get charge off, then verify or run the ones listed as run already. Then one would do the same for the next item. Run the previously unrun flow or flows if they read and then verify or run those listed as already run to be sure they F/N. All items, in chronological sequence, and all processes, would have to be run Quad. IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME NOW TO RUN IN ONLY TRIPLES. Whether you have the Quad commands or not they are easy to figure out as you are only missing the Zero Flow, self to self. So all C/Ses and auditing actions are "Rehab or Run F1, F2, F3, F0 if they read" when getting in all flows on things run to date. HIGH TA When you are sure an Int RD has been done correctly and its 2wc went F/N and the TA later goes high, you check the Int RD. That is the most usual reason. This simple action is amazingly subject to flubs. If the TA goes high later you can do a C/S Series 53 or a Hi-Lo TA Assessment and handle. If the TA is still high or low, you had better check the state of flows. Were more flows run on later actions than were rum on earlier actions? If so, your pc has felt massy, sometimes even ill. 381 The right action is to get in all flows from the beginning. And do it Quad. Bring all his auditing up to Quad. (If his folder is not available, he has kind of had it. I know of no way, at this writing, to recover lost Dn items but will have to work something out.) NOT IN TROUBLE If the pc is not in trouble, his best bet is to get on up the grades to Expanded OT III. IN TROUBLE If he is massy and is having trouble the best bet is to: 1. Be totally sure of his Int RD. 2. Check O/Rs particularly of a major grade twice or by-passed F/Ns, locate and indicate them. 3. FES, list the items and grades and do a Full Flow action from the beginning of his auditing, raising them all to Quadruple. RUNNING ZERO FLOWS The Zero Flow in Dianetics is a bit strange. It can be done by full R3R BUT it often depends on the decision the pc made and may F/N very suddenly. It is easily overrun and can be very fast. A pc can be gotten into trouble on Zero Flows if the Auditor is slow and is not alert to his meter and misses the F/N and gives R3R commands after the flow has blown. REHAB OR RUN The Auditor getting in Zero Flows can also ARC Brk the pc by failing to verify if the previously run flows are flat. All the Auditor wants is to see them F/N on the command. If they don't he runs them. Sometimes when he has "run them" again he finds they are being overrun or run twice and has to rehab them by finding this out. The pc sometimes doesn't know until he actually starts to run them. Then he finds they are already run. The clue to this is a climbing TA. If the TA goes up, get off that flow and rehab it. Example: Pc at first thinks "Pain in shoulder" F2 was never run. Starts to run it. TA goes up. Auditor must pull him off of it by finding out if it is being run twice and rehab it to F/N. The moral in all these reruns is don't firefight, keep an L1C List and an L3RD List handy and use them. RESULTS The results of straightening up the Int-Ext RD, rehabbing O/Rs and putting in ALL FLOWS on a pc are fantastic. Getting an All Flows Rundown done correctly gives one all the latent gain the pc has been begging for. So send to Cramming all C/Ses and Auditors who flub. Program it right. C/S it right. Audit it right. LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1971, 1975 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 382  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=21/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=1 aDate=13/1/75 aRev=1 arDate=22/2/75  C/S Series 36RB-1R QUADRUPLE DIANETICS DANGERS OF  Type = 11 iDate=21/4/71 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo All Auditors C/Ses Class VIII Dn Chksht Int-Ext Chksht  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 21 APRIL 1971-1R All Auditors ADDITION OF 13 JANUARY 1975 C/Ses Class VIII REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1975 Dn Chksht (Cancels HCO B 21 Apr 71, Reissued 13 Jan 75, same title Int-Ext Does not cancel HCO B 21 Apr 71RB, Reissued 21 Sept 74, Chksht C/S Series 36RB, which is still valid.) C/S Series 36RB-1R QUADRUPLE DIANETICS DANGERS OF (Applies also to Int-Ext Rundown) (Ref HCO B 4 Apr 71-1R, Addition of 13 Jan 75, Revised 22 Feb 75, C/S Series 32RA-1R, and HCO B 5 Apr 71, Reissued 13 Jan 75, C/S Series 33RA-1) In observing Quad Dianetics in the hands of Scientology Auditors not specially briefed or who had additives and figure-figure on how to move a case already run on Singles and Triples into Full Flow, INVARIABLY THEY OVERRAN. This makes getting Quad Dianetics in on a case dangerous unless the Auditor has the hang of it. The flagrant (and I do mean flagrant) errors found consisted of (a) not being able to run precise Standard Dianetics in the first place; (b) re- running already erased chains "to find if they were flat"; (c) Out TRs to a wild extent; (d) refusing utterly to accept pc's data; (e) faulty metering; (f) complete ignorance of the Auditor's Code, notably committing the crime of Invalidating the pc; (g) running unreading Flows when catching a pc up to Quad. REQUIREMENTS Anyone essaying to run Quad Dianetics MUST BE CRAMMED on his R3R, the use of L3RD, all data on Quad Dianetics (as per references above and including HCO B 27 Mar 71, "Dianetic Erasure"), his basic TRs, his metering and the Auditor's Code, and this HCO B. TRs TR Zero exists so an Auditor is not ducking the session but can sit there relaxed, doing his job. TR One must be done so the pc can hear and understand the Auditor (without blowing the pc's head off either). TR Two must be done so that the pc gets acknowledged. This can be so corrupted that the Auditor doesn't ack at all but gives the pc meter reads! Instead of acks! Or keeps saying, "I didn't understand you," etc. TR Three basically existed so that the Auditor would continue to give the pc commands and not squirrel off or pack up with total silence. TR Four exists so that the pc's origins are accepted and not Qed and Aed with or invalidated. And, surprise, surprise, TRs are for use in the session itself, not just a drill. They are how one runs a session. 383 Metering can miss every F/N or give "F/Ns" with high or low TA. And one never feeds meter data to the pc: "That read," "That didn't read," "That blew down," just must not exist in session patter. "Thank you. That F/Ned," is as far as an Auditor goes. And that's the end of the cycle and says so. Floating needles can be overlooked by an Auditor. In Quad Dianetics this fault is fatal. Auditor's Code must be in on all points and particularly Invalidation. Pc says, "That's so and so." An Auditor who says, "I'm sorry. You are wrong," or any other invalidation is going to wreck a pc's case. A full knowledge of the Auditor's Code and actually applying it saves endless troubles. It is an auditing TOOL, not just a nice idea. REHABBING CHAINS One rehabs a Dianetic Chain that, according to a previous worksheet, erased by saying, "According to session records (flow direction) (item) erased." That's all. One does not say, "Did the chain giving others a headache erase?" One does not run it again to find out. One does not run a singe command "to see if it F/Ns again". One can say, "Do you agree that the chain giving another a headache erased?" But the more you ask a pc to look for an erased chain the more messed up things will get. It isn't there. But the Auditor by his action can imply it should be there or might be there. A totally wrong approach would be, "Look around your bank and see if what isn't there anymore isn't there." Dianetics is NOT Scientology. A Dianetic Chain is not a release. If you try to use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic Chain, you have had it. It isn't a "release" (which is a key-out). A Dianetic Chain is an erasure. You can't rehab erasures with "How many times?", etc. The test of this is the doing. If you try to use Scn rehab on Dianetic Chains, the PC MIGHT TRY TO FIND SOMETHING. This causes him to key in other unrun or similar items. It is a dangerous action at best to try to handle old erased chains. The best you can do is to tell the pc what the old W/S said. If no W/S exists leave the already erased flows alone! FLUBBED CHAINS Many times, a Folder Error Summary will give a flubbed chain and then fail to note it was repaired in the next session! A C/S and Auditor would have been pretty irresponsible to just go on auditing past flubbed chains. The only safe way to handle some previous flubbed chain is to: (a) Verify in the folder if it was repaired. (b) If still unrepaired assess L3RD on it and handle according to the L3RD. L3RD Using the new L3RD (HCO B 11 Apr 71 RA) is a Dianetic action. A Scientology Auditor erroneously can try to use it as a 2-way comm type of list. If a chain needed one more ABCD, then 2-way comm on it with no ABCD is not going to complete it. L3RD has its own directions. Questions not marked with directions are used to indicate the fact. This can amount to 2-way comm as the pc chews it over. But L3RD 384 where marked is handled by Dianetics actions. Look over the list and its directions for each question and you will see that some are given directions that are NOT 2wc. Example: "Earlier beginning" reads. You can't just say, "The incident had an earlier beginning," and you can't say, "Tell me about the earlier beginning." The pc will go up the wall. There'll be no F/N. You have to use R3R and get him to the earlier beginning and then run it and if it still doesn't erase, get him to an Earlier Similar and erase that. L3RD is a Dianetics List. It is not a Scientology List that is cleared each question to F/N by 2-way comm. OVERRUN Overruns are demonstrated by a rising TA. If as you seek to get in Full Flow Dianetics the pc's TA begins to average higher, overrun is occurring. Example: While doing FFD pc's TA has been riding at 2.2 and F/Ns. After a new FFD action it begins to ride at 2.5 and F/Ns. Something is being overrun. Find it and indicate it. And cease to stir the bank up so much! The fault is going over items already run. Already flat zero flows are not uncommon. The zero flattened on the original Triple. Thus getting in that zero flow again is an overrun. In doing a Full Flow Table you often find that the same or similar have been run in the past. Sometimes you find that a previous attempt to run the item a second or third time has resulted in an ARC Break, the reason for which was never detected. The right action is to note the session date it was first run and just tell the pc, "Feeling Surprised was run three times. On (first date it was erased) it was erased. When later run it was an overrun." This tends to blow the later charge laid in by trying to run the same item again. It sounds so strange that erased chains can be overrun. But it is true. What happens is that pcs try to cooperate and put something there. FIREFIGHTS The action of a quarrel between an Auditor and a pc is called a firefight. Restimulating earlier unrun engrams or overrunning chains upsets a pc. The best action, as soon as a pc is disturbed, is to do an L3RD fast and handle what reads the way it should be handled according to the L3RD. The wrong way is to argue or try to go on. The pc does NOT know what it is. He just feels awful. He tries to guess. He will ARC Brk or get sad if the Auditor continues. The correct action is an L3RD. L1C is not of great use in a Dianetic ARC Brk. L3RD is. If the pc remains ARC Broken, try L3RD again Method 5. A Scientology session would be handled with some other list (L1C, L4B, etc). A Dianetic session, including and especially FFD, is handled with L3RD. You NEVER prepcheck while doing Dianetics. This mushes up the engrams. 385 INTERIORIZATION ALL these cautions apply as well to an Interiorization-Exteriorization Rundown, when restim occurs one uses an L3RD quickly. Int-Ext RD is essentially a Dianetic, not a Scientology action. SAFE ACTIONS A fully genned in Auditor, well crammed, well drilled, well skilled, can be trusted with Dianetics, Dianetic Quads and an Int-Ext RD. Auditors not so handled can get pcs into serious trouble with these things. A safe course is to use Quad only on new never audited before pcs. Those begun on Triples, use then only Triple flows. Another safe way is to use FFD only on OT IIIs or OT IVs and done only by fully qualified FFD Auditors who are also OT III. The safest course is to require special drilling and cramming on Auditors who are already known for their results by actual success story stats and call FFD and Int-Ext RD a skilled specialty. C/S RESPONSIBILITY Any trouble a C/S is running into comes from the factors of TRs, metering, Code and incomplete or false Auditor's reports. If when I am C/Sing I ever find an Auditor has omitted key session actions or has falsified a report, I order that Auditor not to Cramming but a full retrain HDC right on up. A C/S does not see these points. He can get the pc asked what the Auditor is doing or did. He can get sessions monitored. This helps him fill this gap in his data. It's what isn't in the Auditor's report that is often the trouble. Auditors omit what they said, omit the firefight, omit session alter-is in their worksheets. All this sticks the C/S's neck out for the axe of failure. So particularly in FFD, Int-Ext and other such actions, a C/S has to act to obtain confidence in the Auditor's TRs, Metering, Code Use and accurate Worksheets. RISK In FFD, Int-Ext RD and Power, experience has proven that if the Auditor is not top grade, if the C/S is not alert, we put a pc at risk. The USUAL is what keeps the pc safe. A thorough study of his case, looking for obvious bugs (such as Int-Ext RD done twice, the case a druggie but Drug engrams never run, Int done but its 2wc flubbed, FFD grossly overrun, to name a few serious ones), sending Auditors to Cramming for the slightest flub, insisting on standard TRs USED IN SESSION, good metering, use of the Code, accurate and complete worksheets, use of standard tech, all guarantee the safety and progress of the pc. INTRODUCING FFD FFD (like the Int-Ext RD) requires flawless C/Sing and auditing or the case goes wrong. When these actions were introduced they showed up any flaws in case studying, TRs, Metering, Code and Worksheets. 386 There are two ways to handle. (a) Cancel FFD and Int-Ext as actions. Obviously that is going backwards and is impossible. (b) Begin and continue a serious, effective campaign in the org to (1) Train Auditors better, (2) Cram expertly on every flub, (3) Raise quality of TRs and metering. As you can see, my approach is to improve quality of training, cramming and delivery. Please help me out in getting this in. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 387  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=16/1/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  PAST LIFE REMEDIES   Remimeo Dn & Ex Dn C/Ses IV and VI C/Ses Class VIII C/S Dn C/S Course  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JANUARY 1975 Remimeo Dn & Ex Dn C/Ses IV and VI C/Ses Class VIII C/S Dn C/S Course PAST LIFE REMEDIES There are many remedies and considerable tech developed over the years on the subject of pcs unable to go earlier than this life. There was no full coverage bulletin which gave the full story on this. The earliest was getting the pc to locate and run imaginary incidents. This is fully covered in Science of Survival, especially Book Two, Chapter Nine, "Imaginary Incidents". The auditor clears the idea of imaginary incidents and running them, then persuades the pc to run them without forcing him. Delusion tends to run off but the real incidents move into view as well. These imaginary incidents can be run R3R narrative or done as part of R3R procedure and running usual items and somatics. It can be incorporated into the AESPs run on the Past Life Remedy as part of the action of grooving in the pc. One of the early Dianetic Remedies was simply "What Attitudes would make one unwilling to go Earlier than this life?" R3R Triple exhaust the list then do Emotions Sensations and Pains separately. Where the pc is afraid of going earlier or seeing the pictures, AESPs that would make you not want to look at earlier lives can be listed separately and run. Often the pc won't go backtrack because he's a druggie. What has happened here is that he restimulated past lives with drugs, got into frightening pictures that he didn't understand and now backs off from ANY bank content except drugs. That is handled with a full Drug R/D, including a full battery of Objectives and all reading items run including "no interest" items. The standard approach on any pc is to get a full Drug R/D done first. Another reason could be the pc is in recent shock of having died. Such a case is overburdened and is destimulated with general auditing and then gets a Past Life Remedy if he hasn't gone backtrack. You could even do a Prior Assessment to this life. The subject of invalidation of past lives and people talking about them out of session or claiming to be famous people invalidates past lives for a pc and is actually related to suppression and PTS phenomena. If you suspect this you could ask "Has anyone been talking to you about past lives or famous people?" From this question possible suppression in the environment can be located and used in a PTS R/D, HCO B 9 Dec 71 R, Revised 21 Oct 74. CHILDREN Children are usually very burdened cases and can be hard to C/S on Dianetics as it hits this life only which will leave the pc wide open to key- in and at the age of 20 be found all keyed in "with all grades run". I find they are jammed into fiction stories, education, books and movies and run these like Engrams. These children speak of "remembering" all the time. They say they can't go backtrack "because they don't remember". They don't seem to take it from pictures. Contrary to psychology theories and popular belief I find children in very rough case shape, nervous, frightened, griefy, etc. They get stuck in the books and movies they see. 388 I have handled this in various ways. The easiest way to unburden cases is by Objectives (contact processes) and Recall (ARC S/W, Self Analysis). That is a general approach. You can list for mental image pictures pc has seen in life in movies or books then get the AESPs of the best reading one and R3R triple or quad. Unwanted feelings, attitudes, emotions, sensations and pains as a child can also be listed and run to unburden the case. A direct approach is to ask "What book or movie were you particularly interested in?" You'll usually find that the person had a stuck picture on it. Then ask "Did you ever have anything to do with that sort of thing?" Then they go into it because you're asking for an E/S. You could then run out the earlier incident R3R triple or quad and you'd be away. Where the pc is stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books you can list for "Bad incidents you've seen or read about", take the best reading one and R3R its reading AESPs. Be sure to accept stories, TV, movies or books as these are fully valid to run. REVIEW A Scientology Review action that can be done is to assess Auditors Auditing Past Lives Dianetics Scientology Time Preclears and Erasure. Then prepcheck in order of reads, reassess and prepcheck. This is a valuable action to do before ARC S/W triple and often by itself will handle those unable to go past track. A further Scientology approach would be to assess the Past, Memory Pictures, Past Lives and prepcheck in order of reads. Then L & N "Who or what would have no future?" then L & N "Who or what would it have been awful to have been?" These items can be checked and used in a PTS R/D or can have their intentions listed and run as part of Ex Dn handling. SUMMARY The technology on past lives is important for a C/S to know, especially the Dianetics C/S. The subject usually resolves with a Drug R/D and general auditing but when it doesn't you have these remedies to use. Use them well. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:rs.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 389  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/1/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII   Remimeo Class VIIIs Class VIII Checksheet  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1975 Remimeo Class VIIIs Class VIII Checksheet THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII The purpose of the Class VIII Course is to train an Auditor up to be able to deliver 100% Standard Tech and turn him into a zealot in pushing in Standard Tech in the field. This has been the purpose of Class VIII since its inception. Its materials are fully valid. The original checksheet has been restored. It is a tough and demanding course. It is not Fast Flow but 3 times through with starrates and exams. THE ORIGINAL CLASS VIII COURSE HAS RETURNED. Training of Auditors as Class VIIIs to forward Standard Tech is absolutely vital today. It is not "old" or "background". Its materials cannot be found on any other course. They are only available on the Class VIII Course. A real Class VIII Auditor cannot be compared with a Class IV or VI. A Class VIII is a flawless, flubless, smooth as silk specialist in Standard Tech. He can handle any case with ease. He is a dedicated advocate for Standard Tech. He pushes in Standard Tech in his area and sets an example by his own flawless performance. STANDARD TECH The way a Class VIII gets in Standard Tech is by encouraging lower classed Auditors to use the materials of Standard Tech and apply them. A Class VIII must beware of invalidating lower classed Auditors and make sure he doesn't fall into that trap. Invalidation never works and is in fact destructive. Under invalidation an Auditor will cease to audit well, will goof and back off from auditing entirely. To get in Standard Tech, always encourage lower level Auditors to apply standard materials, tapes, HCO Bs and books. Help them to do so. Direct them to the references. See they get crammed, not invalidated. After all, they are willing to help, or they wouldn't be Auditors. SUMMARY Class VIII is the standard by which other auditing is judged. Class VIII gives the certainty and precision of 100% Standard Tech. Class VIIIs get in Standard Tech by encouraging lower level Auditors to apply standard materials, never by invalidation. Every Auditor should one day make it to Class VIII. No org can afford to be without at least one Class VIII. These are the Custodians of Standard Tech. Prepared at orders of L. RON HUBBARD LRH:RS:nt.jh Founder Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard by CS-4 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 391  Prepared at orders of L. RON HUBBARD Founder by CS-4   Type = 11 iDate=14/2/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  L10 PREREQUISITES  Type = 11 iDate=25/2/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=25/2/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 11 iDate=25/2/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Tech Hats Qual Hats  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 14 FEBRUARY 1975 Remimeo Tech Hats (Cancels: HCO B 25 Feb 72 Qual Hats BTB 25 Feb 72 HCO B 25 Feb 72 Canc. 26 Jan 75) L10 PREREQUISITES L10 is not restricted to only those who have completed OT III. The only prerequisites to L10 are a completed Drug RD and Expanded Grades. It may not be done between R6EW and OT III, however. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 392  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=2/11/57 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=22/2/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  AN OBJECTIVE RUNDOWN   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 2 NOVEMBER 1957RA REVISED 10 MAY 1974 REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1975 Remimeo AN OBJECTIVE RUNDOWN (Note: The original issue from which this HCO B was taken was not titled "Objectives" but "Intensive Processes for Use in Operation Clear and Operation Staff Clear". The original was unsigned. It was a Confidential staff only issue. When converted to an HCO B, the title was changed erroneously to "objectives". A corrected list of Objectives is therefore published below. Additionally, the original issue omitted two or three key objective processes and put recall [subjective] processes in their place, thus messing up ARC Straight Wire.) OBJECTIVE: (Dictionary Definition) "Of or having to do with a material object as distinguished from a mental concept, idea or belief." Means here and now objects in PT. As opposed to "Subjective". SUBJECTIVE: (Dictionary Definition 2nd meaning) "Proceeding from or taking place in an individual's mind." Look around or physical contact processes are obviously "objective". Recall, think, remember or return on the time track processes are obviously "Subjective". Pcs who have been on drugs obviously have to be run on Objective, not Subjective, processes. Anyone can be brought more into present time with Objective processes. Objectives are vital in assists and other areas of processing. Here is a list of workable Objective processes: 0. "Look at me who am I?" 1. CCH 0 2. CCH 1 3. CCH 2 4. CCH 3 5. CCH 4 6. CCH 1 to 4 repeat as indicated. 7. Locational ("Look at that object") can be used as indicated, to end sessions or even to bridge from one process to another. 8. The following three must be run 1 command each consecutively over and over: (a) "Look around here and find something really real to you." (b) "Look around here and find something you could go into communication with." (c) "Look around here and find something you would really like." 393 9. The following three are run several times for the 1st, fewer for the 2nd, fewer for the 3rd. And then repeated (Trio). (a) "Look around here and tell me what you could have." (b) "Look around here and tell me what you would permit to remain in place." (c) "Look around here and tell me with what you could dispense." 10. Op Pro by Dup to Exterior. (If pc exteriorizes a Dn C/S 1 and an Interiorization RD [flawless] should follow.) The first 10 steps above could be called an Objective Rundown. Note that this does not include many other Objective processes, many versions of havingness. But the above would accomplish a great deal for the pc IF DONE CORRECTLY WITH FLAWLESS TRs! And it would accomplish the general intent of the 1957 RD. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1957, 1974, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 394  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=1/10/65 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=24/2/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  MUTTER TR   Remimeo All Students  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 OCTOBER 1965R REVISED 24 FEBRUARY 1975 Remimeo All Students MUTTER TR NAME: Mutter TR. PURPOSE: To perfect muzzled auditing comm cycle. COMMANDS: "Do fish swim?" "Do birds fly?" POSITION: Student and coach sit facing each other a comfortable distance apart. TRAINING STRESS: 1. Coach has student give command. 2. Coach mutters an unintelligible answer at different times. 3. Student acknowledges. 4. Coach flunks if student does anything else but acknowledge. (Note: This is the entirety of this Drill. It is not to be confused with any other Training Drill.) Note: The whole trick in TR 2 and TR 4 is that it means one understands that the pc has said something or has answered. There is no demand the auditor understand the meaning in the pc's answer in muzzled auditing. In the above drill the coach just mutters or nods and looks wise instead of saying anything comprehensible. The only kind of auditing where you must grab the actual sense of the answer is in listing or in looking for something that will blowdown or trying to find out what the pc thinks is wrong. If the pc has said something he wants the auditor to really grasp, let him explain and of course, if the pc insists, grasp it. But this is rare and happens only when the pc is already ARC Broken. Otherwise the above is the right way to do it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:rs.rd Copyright $c 1965, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [The only change in the 24 February 1975 revision is the addition of the second Note.] 395  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=7/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  EXT AND ENDING SESSION   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1975 Remimeo EXT AND ENDING SESSION When a pc exteriorizes on a good win in session or if the pc has a big win, usually followed by a persistent F/N, the usual action is to end session. When ending session in these circumstances the Auditor must not do any other action, but smoothly end session. This includes asking Say or Ask, running Havingness or anything other than smoothly ending session. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:nt.rd Founder Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=18/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 15 METER USE IN QUAL   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1975 Remimeo Cramming Series 15 METER USE IN QUAL All Cramming actions done in Qual must be done on a meter. This means metered Why Finding, checks for misunderstoods, scouting for areas of uncertainty, completion of clay demos and word clearing. Neglect of the full use of the meter has led to half done, ineffective and often repeat Cramming cycles as the person's why or M/U was never found in the first place. Even worse, a wrong why can act as a wrong list item which brings about case chaos. Every Cramming Officer must know and use all his tools. This includes metering. The meter reveals all. Use it. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:nt.rd Founder Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 397  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=24/11/73 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=3 rDate=22/3/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 53RJ SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S  Type = 11 iDate=24/11/73 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=12/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973RB (Cancels HCO B 24 Nov 1973, Rev. 12 Nov 1974) Revised & Reissued 22 March 1975 Remimeo C/S Series 53RJ SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal range to get pc's case handled better. _______________________________________ PC Name __________________________ Date 1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F, LF, LFBD [to what TA], Speeded Rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RJ should be reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment. A. Interiorization _______ Have others committed Went in _______ overts on others _______ Go in _______ Not saying _______ Can't get in _______ Problems _______ Want to get out _______ Protest _______ Kicked out of spaces _______ Don't like it _______ Can't go _______ Audited over out ruds _______ Feel sad _______ B. List errors _______ Rushed _______ Overlisting _______ Tired _______ Wrong items _______ ARC Brk _______ Upset with giving Upset _______ items to auditor _______ Can't get it _______ Wrong date _______ Wrong location _______ D. Drugs _______ Wrong Why _______ LSD _______ Wrong Indication _______ Alcohol _______ Wrong PTS Item _______ Pot _______ Medicine _______ C. Some sort of W/H _______ Are you withholding something _______ E. Engram in restimulation _______ Is another withholding Same engram run twice _______ something from you _______ Can't see engrams too Are others withholding well _______ something from others _______ Invisible _______ False withhold _______ Black _______ Withholds gotten off Loss _______ more than once _______ Lost _______ Has another committed overts on you _______ F. Same thing run twice _______ Have you committed Same action done by any overts _______ another auditor _______ 398 G. Doing something with K. Can't have _______ mind between sessions _______ Low havingness _______ Some other practice _______ L. PTS _______ H. Word Clearing errors _______ Suppressed _______ Study errors _______ M. Something went on too I. False TA _______ long _______ Wrong sized cans _______ Went on by a release Tired hands _______ point _______ Dry hands or feet _______ Overrun _______ Wet hands or feet _______ Auditor kept on going _______ Loosens can grip _______ Over-repair _______ Wrong hand cream _______ Puzzled why auditor keeps on _______ J. Auditor overwhelming _______ Stops _______ Feel attacked _______ Something wrong with _______ N. Something else _______ F/Ns _______ Physically ill _______ Overrun F/Ns _______ Missed F/N _______ O. Repairing a TA that Items really didn't read _______ isn't high _______ False reads _______ Repairing a TA that Bad auditing _______ isn't low _______ Incomplete actions _______ Faulty Meter _______ Invalidation _______ Nothing wrong _______ Evaluation _______ Couldn't get auditing _______ P. False Exam Report _______ Interruptions _______ Waited at Exam _______ Upset by Examiner _______ 2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show where mass lies. A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 R, Revised 14 May 74.) If the pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R. B. If any of these read, do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4BR in general. You can go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong Indication or Wrong PTS Item per C/S Series 78. C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for each or 20 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF 40RB, HCO B 30 June 71 R, Revised 1 Dec 74.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk of long duration.) D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has had a Drug RD, do L3RD on it, and handle. E. If any of these, do L3RD and handle according to what is stated to do on L3RD. F. Clean up amy protest and inval and rehab to F/N. G. Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such 2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life. 399 H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List to the pc's program. I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries, (b) F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA obscuring F/Ns. J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be obscured and mistaken for a read if Sensitivity too high. These items are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or retread. K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy. L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD. M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to blow, locate to blow, if qualified). N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get further C/S instructions for handling if necessary. O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N. Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If False TA handle per I above. P. Indicate and 2wc to F/N. General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return to the C/S. Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1973, 1974, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 400  Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=25/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  DIET, THEORY OF A NATURAL DIET   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 MARCH 1975 Remimeo DIET, THEORY OF A NATURAL DIET Food, lack of it, incorrect planning or consumption of it or substitution or alteration of it can vastly affect health. Man is not a primary converter of natural energy or masses but depends upon other converters for a primary conversion in most cases. (Except for Vitamin D and one or two other items Man, for instance, does not convert sunlight to energy, but, eating algae which does so convert, is able to obtain and use the energy.) No real study of or search for the natural diet of Man has ever been made or attempted. Studies are made of diets from the viewpoint of how to correct illnesses or maintain health but not what the basic food of the human body would be. Scarcities, availabilities, what can be grown and preserved, the ease of growing, climatic and soil and water conditions, and how to make a profit are factors which have established diet instead of "What does the human body require?" The human body is a complex biological carbon-oxygen engine, running at an operating temperature of 37 Deg Centigrade and, being biological, has the ability to establish and re air itself. To its food requirements then are added the elements required to build as well as to run the body. Almost all mammals live about 6 times their period of growth. Man lives only 3.33 times his growth period. As other mammals than Man are under the same or greater stress but are usually uniform in diet while healthy it can be assumed that Man has departed from his natural diet. Some guesses have been made as to natural diet by an examination of teeth but this would not be an adequate approach. The resolution of Man's natural diet as opposed to what he is eating might do a very great deal to improving racial health. Man's mass efforts towards diet are targeted for quantity and profit. Efforts to establish quality are often resisted by various special interests in the mistaken idea that further knowledge of diet might reduce quantity and profit. However it could be that new food discoveries would vastly increase both production quantity potential and profit. No simple basis for research and discovery of the natural diet exists in known statement form. The necessary first steps to the discovery of Man's correct diet would be: (a) The statement of a possibility that one might have existed or did exist. (b) A formula for search and possible discovery of it. This HCO B has made (a) above. The following would be a formula for its discovery. OVERWEIGHT: Residual elements of food, substances or gases which are not totally eliminated or utilized by the body after ingestion. 401 UNDERWEIGHT OR DEBILITY: Inadequate or lacking foods, substances or gases which are needed for the activity, maintenance or repair of the body. By listing all foods, substances or gases which are stored by the body, one would obtain a list of things ingested, part of which were not utilized or necessary. Simple recording of those items which put on unwanted weight would be a part of this action. The examination of overweight persons and their diets would give another section of it. Further examination of cadavers that had been overweight would round out the list. Which of these were the result of body conversion of what food would be noted. A study and listing of all deficiency diseases and malnutrition causes as contained in The Textbook of Medicine, Beeson and McDermott, pages 1139-1201 and in other papers and texts would give a list of items vital to the activity, maintenance and repair of the body. The items in the overweight and debility lists could then be compared. One would then have, as a result, the elements of a natural diet. A search for foods which contained only the elements which were used and vital could be undertaken. The result would be the elements of a possible natural diet. An examination of the ease of production and supply of such foods could then result in a practical natural diet. Zonal application in specific areas might require the repetition of the formula to take in racial or climatic or production variables. SUMMARY It is said at this time that 80% of Americans are overweight. Their activity and intelligence are failing. The populations of many countries are starving or suffering malnutrition. The wild animals, fish and fowl are ceasing to be a world source of food supply. There is no reason to go on killing off all life on the planet simply because no one knows, beyond opinion or taste, what Man's natural food was or could be. Fads and hobbies should not be the sole source of data on this subject. The problem could be intelligently solved and should be if we are still to have a populated planet. Probably the planet could support billions more than it does. Most of it is wasteland. A system pushed by David Rockefeller and others to solve it by killing off populations through sterilizing and euthanasia is simply impractical, stupid and useless suppression. It would be a far better line to work out Man's natural diet. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 402  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=29/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  ANTI-BIOTICS, ADMINISTERING OF   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 29 MARCH 1975 Also: FLAG ORDER 2186R Ship Captains MO's Hat AO Qual Hats ANTI-BIOTICS, ADMINISTERING OF (This Cancels FO 2313 "Antibiotics, Further Data" and Revises FO 2186.) (Note: This data is given for information alone and is not intended to prescribe or otherwise treat an individual. All prescriptions and treatments should be done in due accordance with the medical laws of any country in which a person seeks treatment.) There are several "anti-biotics". These are moulds or chemical compounds which cause bacteria, germs, to be unable to reproduce themselves (hits their 2D) while not destroying the cells of the body. At least that is one of the leading theories of why they work. "Anti-biotic" means anti = against, biotic = living beings (such as bacteria). So it's against bugs. Disease is said to be caused by germs or virus. Germs are microscopic cells which breed and have a bad effect on body cells and fluids. Virus is a germ that is too small to be seen in a microscope. Thus there are germ infections and virus infections. Usually one type of germ equals one disease, i.e. typhoid fever. However, an illness can be a compound of several types of germs but this is not usual. Virus diseases respond very badly to most anti-biotics. In fact, in the presence of penicillin, a virus sort of suspends action without any real temperature change while the penicillin is present and gets busy again when the penicillin is gone. The effect of most anti-biotics on virus is zero. Some claims are made for some against virus. Measles is a virus illness. So anti-biotics are mainly effective against germs. Venereal disease, pneumonia, wound infections and a long parade of diseases can be cured by anti- biotics. When illness is accompanied by temperature, anti-biotics is usually the first thought. Anti-biotics can however be GROSSLY MISADMINISTERED and in fact usually are even in hospitals. The trick is to get the temperature subnormal with anti-biotics within the blood leveling period. Blood leveling means when the anti-biotic has gotten into the blood and is actually holding the infection (stopping the bacteria's "2D" from continuing). More of the same anti-biotic is given approx 2 hours prior to blood leveling time. This then brings the temperature right on down to subnormal; continue the anti-biotic so that it keeps the temperature subnormal until it just can't keep it subnormal any more and it comes up to normal. It will be found that the patient is now well and not likely to relapse. If blood leveling time is reached (the time is always stated on the instructions and contraindications write-up) and the temperature continues to rise, you have not used the correct anti-biotic and must at this point change to another kind of anti-biotic. Each anti-biotic has its own blood leveling time: Penicillin is 24 hours, Cephaloridine is 8 hours, Streptomycin is 6 hours, etc. 403 Before administering anti-biotics you must ensure that you know exactly what toxicity it is (toxic or poisonous quality the anti-biotic has to the patient). For example Streptomycin can cause pregnant mothers to give birth to children who have impaired hearing. Renal (kidneys; having to do with them) damage can be caused by certain anti-biotics if the person has too much of a certain kind of anti-biotic. Therefore, prior to administering any kind of anti-biotic ensure that you know the patient's full medical history, as well as knowing exactly what the toxicity of the anti-biotic is so that you do not damage the patient. If not enough anti-biotic is given or if it is the wrong kind for that disease the temperature will not be heavily affected or at best sinks to normal without going subnormal. This condition can go on and on and on and the patient relapses. Also if anti-biotics are given too briefly the temperature goes to subnormal, the anti-biotic ceases to be given, the patient feels better, then probably relapses-- gets ill all over again. The above important three error situations are: NOT ENOUGH WRONG KIND STOPPED TOO SOON. To these can be added: GIVEN TOO IRREGULARLY. This last is almost always present when you give the patient the bottle. This is a common medical error. The patients aren't doctors, seldom take the medicine correctly and often not at all. Anti-biotics should be handed out and seen taken. Where there is a large number ill, the times can be standardized for the group. For instance all get it at 3:00 to 3:30, 9:00 to 9:30, etc. Or even 3 hourly can be done this way. One takes the temperature before giving the pill. (A glass of water or a cigarette before temperature taking gives a false report.) Also in this way one can increase or decrease the dose depending on what the temperature was. In very sick cases one has to watch the temperature more closely. In this way every time the temperature starts to rise from the subnormal where you are holding it, you immediately dose the patient. An anti-biotic all by itself cannot depress temperature. It's the reaction of the disease and body that's doing that. TEMPERATURE 98.6 Deg F or 37 Deg C is normal. A thermometer can be a bit off (.1 or.2 high or low) and temperature can vary a bit for "normal" one person to the next. Rising temperature (above normal) is a reaction to a disease. Lowered temperature (below normal) is a reaction to a disease being handled by the body or the anti-biotic plus the body. 100 Deg F or 37.84 Deg C is well above normal and is a sick temperature. 104 Deg F or 40.5 Deg C is dangerously (possible die) high. 97 Deg F or 36.2 Deg C is very satisfactorily subnormal. Temperature rise is probably a body mechanism to burn up a disease, possibly not. But a slight temperature, a few tenths high, can make a person feel really bad. Then when it gets up higher they feel drifty and with it very high go delirious. 404 A subnormal temperature doesn't much affect how one feels. "Chills" come with high temperature. ADMINISTERING DOSES The general rule when administering anti-biotics is: 1. One gives anti-biotics until the temperature comes down past normal to subnormal and comes up to normal again with anti-biotics. After blood leveling time of the first anti-biotic the temperature should break (go normal or below), the person going into a sweat. If it doesn't, then it's either not enough anti-biotic or the wrong kind. 2. After dosage if the temperature just came down a bit from where it was, that type of anti-biotic probably will handle the illness but enough has not been given. Increase the amount being given. If after blood leveling time from the first anti-biotic the temperature did not go lower or even rose, it's the wrong anti-biotic. You change off to another and start all over again. TAKING EFFECT The blood leveling period of an anti-biotic is always stated on the write- up of the anti-biotic (in the box accompanying the anti-biotic). The second administration is usually given 2 hours prior to the blood leveling period. Thus if the blood leveling period is 8 hours the second dose is given 6 hours after the first dose. Take the temperature before the dose and within the next 2 hours take the temperature again and you will know whether the anti-biotic is working as the temperature should now be leveling and/or falling. If the temperature has not leveled or dropped at this period change the antibiotic. When giving anti-biotics F0 2187 "Medical Charts" must be followed. If you don't have a medical chart you don't know and can't see how the anti-biotic is working. PAST MALADMINISTRATION If a person in the past has been treated wrongly with anti-biotics, i.e. got taken off as soon as temperature reached normal and was not continued as by rule 1 or 2, the germ remains dormant and the area may reinfect at a later date. If more anti-biotics are then administered the temperature will go subnormal and then to normal with the anti-biotic. In other words, the cycle will complete. At this point the germ has been killed. SESSIONS Before any session, a heavy dose of vitamins should be given, if the person is on anti-biotics. KEY PROCEDURE When the temperature goes subnormal keep it subnormal until it just won't stay down with the person still taking the anti-biotic. The patient will then be well. The faster you can get the temperature subnormal the better. SIDE EFFECTS Anti-biotics have side effects, often very bad. 405 A patient can be allergic to a certain anti-biotic, meaning he goes red, gets hives, has bad reactions in varying degrees of severity. If so get him on another anti-biotic now. You can test for allergy by scratching the skin and putting a dab of anti- biotic on it (not the sugar or protective covering) on a Band-Aid. After a while if the person is allergic to it the area will get red and puffy. This is not usually done unless you are being super cautious. The Chloro _______ and Aureo _______ families can affect the sense of balance and early preparations destroyed the sense of balance forever. All oral anti-biotics sooner or later give the patient a stomach ache and indigestion. So they should be taken with milk or after a meal, never with just water. The longer you keep them on an anti-biotic the harder it is on the patient's system. The operating rule is give enough of the right kind to get a fast cure. If you started on the wrong kind get them on the right kind the moment you detect the error. DISEASE CYCLES Diseases have their own cycles of action and time periods if not given anti-biotics. Some run for days, some for weeks, some for a lifetime. Gonorrhea for instance lasts a year in a man, five years in a woman. Syphilis has its own cure, not an anti-biotic, which is "Ehrlich's Magic Bullet", neoarsphenamine, Preparation 606, which is a one-shot cure if done right and only kills 1 out of 10,000. Syphilis untreated is a lifetime cycle and drives one crazy, the condition being known as "paresis". Perhaps modern anti-biotics will include it as curative. Pneumonia runs about 6 weeks on its own if the patient lives. These disease cycles do not hold true when anti-biotics are used. They take as long to cure as it takes to slam the temperature to subnormal and hold it there until it can't be held any longer. 24 to 36 hours is the new cycle for lighter illnesses treated with properly dosed correct anti-biotics. More serious diseases require longer but mostly because the areas they infect have poorer blood circulation (such as bone infections). SULFA DRUGS The oldest anti-biotics are the sulfa drugs. These are white tablets usually. Enterovioform for stomach illness is a sulfa drug. They have a very heavy side effect of dizziness and sometimes delusion (spiders on the wall). Sulfathiazole is usually now used as a powder to pour in open wounds and it and its brother sulfas are the only ones that can be used "topically" which means as a surface treatment (as different from internal). They follow when taken internally all the rules of anti-biotic administration. "Gerontal", a trade name for a water-soluble sulfa, is excellent in kidney infections if the rules of anti-biotics are followed. It needs large quantities. You can fall back on sulfa when all else fails. Sulfas are chemical compounds. 406 PENICILLIN Penicillin is the first of the anti-biotics made from mould (as in mouldy bread, etc.). It is the USUAL anti-biotic. It is growing less effective due to diseases getting used to it and medical misadministration of it. A disease treated with an anti-biotic which is not cured, when communicated to another body becomes able in the new body to resist treatment. Thus new anti-biotics are continually searched for. However, penicillin is the basic, usual, anti-biotic to use. ORAL penicillin is not only WORTHLESS but dangerous in that it has never cured anything yet. Taking it by mouth doesn't work and I don't know why companies sell it. Stomach juices kill it. Penicillin has to be SHOT with a needle. Procaine penicillin in 1 cc or 2cc amounts, shot into the buttocks with the person lying down on his face (muscles relaxed), lasts for 24 hours when a 2nd shot is given. Other types of penicillin can also work this way. Ordinary penicillin however has to be shot every 3 hours! Read the literature carefully. There is a 2nd type, "G", for people allergic to the first type (2 types so one can be used if somebody is allergic to the other). If somebody is allergic to it, it's pretty awful. If a shot of 24 or 36 hour penicillin hasn't worked in 8 hours to reduce the temperature at least somewhat use some other anti-biotic at once. Penicillin is no good even when shot for stomach or bowel complaints like dysentery. It is excellent for other types of bacterial infection. It is usually no good for virus infections. OTHER ANTI-BIOTICS Chloro _______ Aureo _______ Strepto _______ compounds are offered under a variety of trade names. The blank fills "mycin" or "mycetin". Kemacetin or some such spelling is a company trade name for Chloro _______ . Chlorofin is almost the same thing. Read the literature for the strength of each tablet or shot and what it is good for. You can puzzle this out even in a foreign language. Follow the literature. If one doesn't work, another will. Chloro _______ or Aureo _______ handles dysentery, stomach and bowel upsets, some viruses and a lot of other things. VITAMINS B1 should be given when giving anti-biotics or the patient gets depressed as all the B1 gets eaten up by anti-biotics, just as alcohol or sleeping pills eat up B1. 100 mg of B1 a day is an absolute minimum for a person taking anti- biotics. B2 is vital to give anyone with stomach and bowel complaints whether he is on anti-biotics or not. Vitamin C is excellent for helping colds and infections. 250 mg is the usual dose a couple times a day. It's much like fruit in that fruit contains a lot of it. If anyone's teeth or gums get sore push in lots of Vitamin C. 407 So B1 and C are usual along with anti-biotics. B1, C and B2 are vital to help clear up stomach and bowel complaints along with anti-biotics. INTESTINAL BACTERIA Natural intestinal bacteria are vital to digest and handle food. These all get killed off by oral anti-biotics and must be replaced. Yoghurt is the usual remedy and one should eat it for several days, a portion a day after getting well with anti-biotics. The clever French put these exact bacteria in glass vials for daily dosage. This does the same thing even better than yoghurt. It is called "Biolactyl". Note: Under medical supervision, LRH has been handling anti-biotics as a ship captain for a long time and has done as well independent biological research. Some of the data (the use of subnormal temperatures) is not known to the medical profession but was discovered by Ron in 1952 when he had to discover it to save an important person's life after two relapses from doctors using older methods. It has since been proven out by many quick successes using anti-biotics on ships. A person treating someone on anti-biotics must go over this HCO B very carefully as it is very condensed, very precise and means exactly what it says. When this data is not known some get into long illnesses which are needless. A person treating another with anti-biotics has to know many other things but the above is very vital. All Div 5 personnel and anyone who will administer anti-biotics must *- rate M9 M4 in Qual on this HCO B. Medical charts (see FO 2187 "Medical Charts") must be made up so that, in case of any fever, the person will be treated standardly to a speedy recovery. Compiled from the notes of LRH by Kima Jason Snr MO Flag for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:KJ:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 408  Compiled from the notes of LRH by Kima Jason Snr MO Flag for L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=19/4/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  OUT BASICS AND HOW TO GET THEM IN   Remimeo C/Ses Supervisors Interne Supers Cramming Officers Auditors KOTS  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo C/Ses Supervisors HCO BULLETIN OF 19 APRIL 1975 Interne Supers Cramming Officers Auditors KOTS OUT BASICS AND HOW TO GET THEM IN In C/Sing lately I have had spectacular case wins just using basics. Like getting the Pc in session, F/Ning what was asked not something else, false TA correction, false reads on W/Hs, catching a forcing of the Pc's attention onto the meter and his TA, etc, etc. Just fundamental auditing. And it has sent bogged cases soaring. Here is a list of the out basics caught which can and did cause "bogs". Noted with these outnesses are the HCO Bs and BTBs which if known, understood and applied will correct the outness. Get flubbing Auditors and C/Ses word cleared, starrate checked out and drilled on the materials appropriate to the out basic found in his or her auditing or C/Sing. 1. Auditing preclears in a bad and noisy environment (Auditor doesn't know he is responsible for the session environment). Reference: HCO B 30 Apr 1969 "Auditor Trust" HCO B 23 May 1971 "Basic Auditing Series 6 Issue VI Auditor Failure to Understand" BTB 17 July 1969R "Flagrant Auditing Errors" Issue II 2. Not assessing and handling an ARC Break that came up in the session. Reference: HCO B 12 Feb 1966 "The 'Dangerous Auditor'" HCO B 7 Sept 1964 "PTPs, Overts and ARC Breaks" HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1 -- Auditor's Rights" HCO B 17 Oct 1964 "All Levels -- Getting the Pc Sessionable" HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" 3. False reads on W/Hs and asking for some W/Hs more than once will ARC Break the Pc. Reference: HCO PL 1 July 1965 "Comm Cycle Additives" Issue II HCO B 15 Aug 1969 "Flying Ruds" BTB 18 Nov 1968R "Model Session,, HCO B 10 July 1964 "Overts -- Order of Effectiveness in Processing" 4. Auditing the Pc over: (a) False TA Reference: HCO B 24 Oct 1971 "False TA" HCO B 26 Oct 1970 "Obnosis and the Tone Scale" Issue III Reissued 19 Sept 74 HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" 409 (b) Pc out of session Reference: HCO B 30 Apr 1969 "Auditor Trust" HCO B 26 Apr 1971 "TRs and Cognitions" HCO B 7 May 1969 "The Five GAEs" Issue IV (c) Int Ext misunderstoods Reference: BTB 2 May 1972R "Clearing Commands" BTB 13 Mar 1973R "Handling Int/Ext" HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" (d) Misunderstoods on basic words Reference: HCO B 14 Nov 1965 "Clearing Commands" BTB 8 Jan 1971 R "Auditing CS-1 for Dianetics and Scientology" BTB 2 May 1972R "Clearing Commands" 5. Calling the Pc's attention to the meter or TA or his hands in session. Reference: HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" (Clause 17) HCO B 14 Oct 1968 "You Must Never...." BTB 17 July 1969R "Flagrant Auditing Errors" Issue II HCO B 26 Apr 1971 "TRs and Cognitions" HCO B 23 May 1971 "Basic Auditing Series 11 -- Metering" Issue IX HCO B 3 July 1971 "Scientology III -- Auditing by Lists Revised" 6. F/Ning a question on something else, not the question asked. Reference: HCO B 21 Sept 1965 "Out Tech" HCO B 7 Apr 1964 "All Levels -- Q & A" HCO B 7 May 1969 "The Five GAEs" Issue IV HCO B 30 Apr 1971 "Auditing Comm Cycle" HCO B 13 Dec 1961 "Varying Sec Check Questions" HCO B 20 Nov 1973 "C/S Series 89 -- F/N What You Ask Issue II or Program" HCO B 21 Nov 1973 "The Cure of Q & A" BTB 23 Dec 1972 "Integrity Processing Series 20 C/Sing Integrity Processing" HCO B 14 Mar 1971R "F/N Everything" 7. Auditor carrying on past Exterior and good win and asking "say or ask". Reference: HCO B 7 Mar 1975 "Ext and Ending Session" HCO B 16 Dec 1971RA "C/S Series 35RA -- Interiorization Errors" 8. Lack of knowledge of Flows, doing FOs on a Triple Pc. Reference: HCO B 12 Jan 1975 "Quads Reinstated" HCO B 7 Mar 1971 "C/S Series 28RA-1 -- Use of Quadruple Dianetics" Reissued 13 Jan 75 HCO B 4 Apr 71-1R "C/S Series 32RA-1R -- Use of Quad Dianetics" 410 HCO B 5 Apr 1971 "C/S Series 33RA-1 -- Triple and Quad Reruns" Reissued 13 Jan 75 HCO B 21 Apr 71-1R "C/S Series 36RB-1R Quadruple Dianetics -- Dangers Of" 9. Auditor C/Sing in the chair (running an L1C "on post" that wasn't C/Sed for to handle an ARC Break that just occurred in session). Reference: BPL 15 Nov 1969R "Rights and Duties" Issue II HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1 -- Auditor's Rights" HCO B 19 Mar 1971 "List-1-C -- L1C" BTB 11 Aug 1972RA "C/S Series 83RA -- Correction Lists" 10. Auditor doing 2WCs without a C/S (C/Sing in the chair). Reference: HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1 -- Auditor's Rights" HCO B 3 July 1970 "C/S Series 14 -- C/Sing 2-Way Comm" 11. False TA. Reference: HCO B 24 Oct 1971 "False TA" HCO B 12 Nov 1971R "False TA Addition" HCO B 15 Feb 1972 "False TA Addition 2" HCO B 18 Feb 1972 "False TA Addition 3" BTB 24 Jan 1973 "Examiner and False TA" Issue II HCO B 24 Nov 1973RB "C/S Series 53RJ -- Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S" HCO B 23 Nov 1973R "Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA" Revised 23 Apr 75 12. Not getting False TA handled before session and TA down with proper hand cream before trying to audit. Reference: HCO B 29 Feb 1972R "False TA Checklist" 13. Applying hand cream during a session. Reference: HCO B 29 Feb 1972R "False TA Checklist" HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" (Clause 17) HCO PL 1 July 1965 "Comm Cycle Additives" Issue II 14. Auditor overrunning due to False TA. Reference: Same as 4 (a) 15. Not writing down on worksheet what was done. Reference: HCO PL 19 Nov 1965 "Auditing Reports" HCO B 7 May 1969 "Summary of How to Write an Issue VI Auditor's Report..." BTB 6 Nov 1972R "Auditor Admin Series 14R Issue VII The Worksheets" Tape Lecture 12 June 1971 "Flag Qual Interne Introductory Lecture" Tape Lecture 7 Apr 1972 "Expanded Dianetics Tape No. 3 Auditor Administration" 411 16. Not writing down vital information in the worksheets. Reference: HCO PL 19 Oct 1974 "Urgent -- The Dramatization of Withholds on Vital Information Lines" BPL 6 Nov 1974 "obstruction of Vital Technical or Management Lines -- High Crime" HCO PL 19 Nov 1965 "Auditing Reports" Also see No. 15 References 17. Poor handwriting, illegible worksheets. Reference: BTB 6 Nov 1972R "Auditor Admin Series 14R Issue VII The Worksheets" Tape Lecture 12 June 1971 "Flag Qual Interne Introductory Lecture" HCO B 3 Nov 1971 "C/S Series 66 -- Auditor's Worksheets" Tape Lecture 7 Apr 1972 Expanded Dianetics Tape No. 3 Auditor Administration" BTB 20 July 1974 "Auditor Expertise Drills Series 1 Basic Auditing Drills" ED 19, ED 20 18. C/S not using the D of P for Interview to get data on what's up with the case when you have a failed session. Reference: HCO B 28 Sept 1971 "C/S Series 62 -- Know Before You Go" HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1 -- Auditor's Rights" 19. Repairing the Pc instead of the Auditor -- going into a sudden repair in the middle of an Advance Program. Reference: HCO B 9 June 1971 "C/S Series 42 -- C/S Rules Issue II Complete Cycles" HCO B 9 June 1971 "C/S Series 43 -- C/S Rules Issue III Trouble for the Pc" HCO B 6 Dec 1973 "C/S Series 90 -- The Primary Failure" HCO B 26 May 1971 "C/S Series 38 -- TRs Course and Auditing Mixing Major Actions" 31 Mar 1971 "C/S Series 31 -- Programming and Misprogramming" HCO B 15 June 1972 "C/S Series 80 -- Dog Pcs" 20. Pc doesn't want auditing. Reference: The Book of Case Remedies Remedy K HCO B 11 May 1969 "Forcing a Pc" HCO B 10 June 1971 "C/S Series 44R -- C/S Rules Issue I Programming from Prepared Lists" HCO B 1 Aug 1968 "The Laws of Listing and Nulling" HCO B 15 Dec 1968R "L4BR for Assessment of All Listing Errors" 21. Agreeing with Pc's demands for the next Grade despite all contrary indicators. Reference: HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1 -- Auditor's Rights" HCO B 16 June 1970 "C/S Series 6 -- What the C/S Is Doing" HCO B 3 Mar 1969 "Case Gain -- Completing Levels" HCO B 9 June 1971 C/S Series 42 -- C/S Rules Issue II Complete Cycles" HCO B 26 Aug 1970 "C/S Series 17 -- Incomplete Cases" HCO B 19 June 1970 "C/S Series 7 -- C/S Q & A" 412 22. Trying to fix "No EP" on one Rundown by trying to run another Rundown. Reference: HCO B 26 May 1971 "C/S Series 38 -- TRs Course and Auditing Mixing Major Actions" HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1 -- Auditor's Rights" HCO B 16 June 1970 "C/S Series 6 -- What the C/S Is Doing" HCO B 7 Apr 1964 "All Levels -- Q & A" 23. Failing to call for an FES when you don't know after a failed Rundown. Reference: HCO B 6 Oct 1970 "C/S Series 19 -- Folder Error Summaries" HCO B 25 June 1970 "C/S Series 11" 24. C/S not reading the worksheets or missing corny errors and not correcting the Auditor. Reference: BTB 30 Nov 1971 R "C/S Series 67 -- The Code of a C/S" HCO B 15 Nov 1969 "Case Supervision, How it Goes Issue II Non-Standard" BPL 15 Nov 1969R "Rights and Duties" Issue II HCO B 22 Sept 1971 "C/S Series 61 -- The Three Golden Rules of the C/S" HCO B 3 Nov 1971 "C/S Series 66 -- Auditor's Worksheets" HCO B 25 Sept 1974 "Urgent -- Important -- C/S Series 94 Reduction of Refunds -- C/Ses and Overload" HCO B 10 Nov 1970 "C/S Series 21 -- C/S Responsibility for Training" HCO B 16 Aug 1972 "C/S Series 84 -- Flubless C/Sing" I am catching C/Ses for real big actions on top of these corny out basics. Errors in Tech are OUT BASICS. You don't have to figure figure on Cloud 89 on what's wrong when the Pc simply hasn't picked up the cans! I bet a lot of cases would go like a shot on just basics! L. RON HUBBARD Founder Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 413  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/4/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA   Remimeo Tech & Qual All Levels All Auditors All Tech Checksheets  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo Tech & Qual HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1975 All Levels All Auditors All Tech Checksheets VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA Ref: HCO B 24 Oct 71 "False TA" HCO B 12 Nov 71R "False TA Addition" HCO B 15 Feb 72 "False TA Addition 2" HCO B 18 Feb 72 "False TA Addition 3" HCO B 29 Feb 72RA "False TA Checklist" HCO B 23 Nov 73R "Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA" After further and more extensive tests vanishing creams have proven unsuitable as a solution to dry hands. In some cases vanishing creams have actually dried out pcs' hands and caused a false high TA. Vaseline Intensive Care Lotion has proven very workable when applied to a pc's hands, rubbed in and any excess wiped off. Another cream called Locorten was also found workable but it contains cortisone which burns the eyes if you rub them with your hands. Further tests are underway on Locorten without cortisone but these are not yet complete. Another hand cream formula was found 90% effective upon test and is somewhat similar to the Locorten formula without cortisone. Its formula is: 75 grams Emulsified Cetomacrofolis Wax (80% cetostearyl alcohol and 20% cetomacrofol 1000) 100 grams Cetyl Alcohol 20 grams Sorbitol Solution -- 70% 1 gram Sorbic Acid up to 500 grams water You could have this cream made up by any pharmacist. A NOTE ON FOOTPLATES Footplates generally give a wrong TA position and obscure F/Ns and reads. They are not recommended except as a last resort where the pc cannot use cans. FALSE TA HANDLING It has never been OK to call a pc's attention to his hands or TA or meter during a session. Therefore when handling a false TA get the TA in range with hand cream or can size or grip before session. Don't check for hand cream or can grip or change cans during the session except as directed on correction lists such as a C/S Series 53RJ under false TA. Otherwise it throws the pc out of session and puts his attention on his TA. Use the session for auditing. LRH:rs.ldv.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder 414  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/11/73 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=23/4/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA   Remimeo Tech & Qual All Levels All Auditors All Tech Checksheets  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 1973R Tech & Qual REVISED 23 APRIL 1975 All Levels All Auditors All Tech Checksheets DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA A couple of years ago some auditors were solving high TA problems by putting hand cream on the pc's hands when they were calloused and talcum powder on a pc's hands when they were too wet. Since no research had been done they were censured. Research has now been done on this matter of dry and wet hands. Apparently when a person has taken certain medicines or chemicals, or uses detergent soaps or is in contact with certain chemicals (such as those in some furniture polishes) the ordinary skin oils vanish. These oils are needed to make an electrical contact with the cans. When these oils are absent, there is no adequate electrical contact and the "TA is High". When a person is deficient in certain minerals or vitamins such as magnesium or B Complex, his hands can be excessively wet. Either of these two conditions in hands or feet can produce an incorrect TA position. The dry condition produces a false high TA. The overly wet condition produces a false low TA. The TA depends on normally moist hands. This does not mean the meter works on "sweat". It does mean the meter works only when there is a correct electrical contact. Too much and too greasy hand cream could produce too low a TA. Vanishing creams don't work as they are found to actually dry out the skin after repeated application and so produce a falsely high TA. Too much powder or drier could produce too high a TA. Therefore one must not go to extremes. DRY HANDS The excessively "dry" hand is seen as shiny or polished looking. It feels very dry. The correct treatment is to use a hand cream such as Vaseline Intensive Care Lotion (obtainable from any cosmetics store) not a greasy hand cream or vanishing cream. A good hand cream rubs all the way into the skin and leaves no excess grease. This restores normal electrical contact. Such a hand cream would only have to be applied once per session -- at session start -- as it lasts for a long while. Hand cream is never applied during session. 415 This would apply to some footplate cases as well (whose hands are defective or too heavily calloused). If a cream leaves smears on a cam, it is too heavily applied or too little absorbed. Hand cream is usually smeared on, rubbed in and can then be thoroughly wiped off. The hands (or feet) will usually produce, then, a normal TA and meter response. WET HANDS Anti-perspirants can be applied to too wet hands. There are many brands of these, often a powder or spray. It can be wiped off after application and should work for two or three hours. It can be applied to hands or feet (for footplates). If the TA then goes too high, use hand cream on top of it. SUMMARY While much work could be done still, the above is enough for a practical result. WARNING Hi TAs and Lo TAs do not widely F/N. If you are getting wide persistent F/N with the TA too high (above 3) or too low (below 2) you have a pc whose hands are too dry or too wet. Using this HCO B should correct it and in future sessions you should continue the remedy on that pc. NOTHING in this HCO B excuses the misreading or falsifying of a TA. Get the TA in normal range with this HCO B before you start calling processes ended. C/S 53RJ and the False TA checklist HCO B 29 Feb 1972RA, Revised 23 Apr 75, are your tools for handling too high and too low TAs. The only other conditions I know of that make an auditor mess up a pc's TA are: (a) A discharged meter (registers high). (b) An incorrectly set meter by trim button. (c) A "fleeting F/N" where the pc F/Ns so briefly the auditor misses it and overruns. (d) Bad TRs. (e) Unflat processes. (f) Overrun processes. (g) Heavy drugs or medicines. False TA often comes to light when the auditor runs out of reasons it is high or low and it dawns on him that he is dealing with false TA. In the latter case he should know all MATERIALS ON THIS SUBJECT OF FALSE TA (given on HCO B 29 Feb 1972RA, Revised 23 Apr 75, as references) AND REMEDY THE FALSE TA SITUATION AND THEN RESUME NORMAL AUDITING. He must not go on calling high or low TA F/Ns just by assuming the TA is false. Given a contact the meter always tells the truth. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:clb.rs.ldv.jh.rd Founder Copyright $c 1973, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 416  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=29/2/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=23/4/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  FALSE TA CHECKLIST   Remimeo Tech & Qual All Levels All Auditors All Tech Checksheets  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 29 FEBRUARY 1972RA Remimeo Tech & Qual REVISED 23 NOVEMBER 1973 All Levels REVISED 23 APRIL 1975 All Auditors All Tech Checksheets FALSE TA CHECKLIST Ref: HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition HCO B 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2 HCO B 18 Feb 72 False TA Addition 3 BTB 24 Jan 73 II Examiner and False TA HCO B 24 Nov 73 C/S 53RJ HCO B 23 Nov 73R Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA The following are the items to be checked by an auditor on any pc. It need only be done once unless the check itself is suspected false, or if conditions of the pc's hands, etc change. The checklist is kept in the pc folder and is entered on the folder summary as an action done. The value of operating with correct can size should not be underestimated, the reference HCO Bs state why. The auditor signs and answers the following points on the checklist, and gets answers from the pc where needed. R-Factor to pc: "We are going to check the cans and adjust them to get the best accuracy." 1. Is the meter charged fully? _______ 2. Is the meter trimmed correctly? _______ 3. Are the leads connected to the meter and cans? _______ 4. Are the cans rusty? _______ 5. Are pc's hands excessively dry requiring hand cream? _______ 6. Are the pc's hands excessively wet requiring powder? _______ 7. The pc is NOT being told continually to wipe his hands? _______ 8. The pc's grip on the cans is NOT being continually checked by the auditor in a way that interrupts the pc? _______ 9. TA position on large cans? Size approx 4 7/8 inches by 2 5/8 inches or 12 1/2 cm by 7 cm _______ 10. TA position on medium cans? Size approx 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches or 9 cm by 5 cm _______ 11. TA position on small cans? Size approx 2 inches by 1 3/16 inches or 5 cm by 3 cm _______ 417 12. Are the cans too large for pc? _______ 13. Are the cans too small for pc? _______ 14. Are the cans just right in size? _______ 15. Are the cans cold? _______ 16. Are the pc's hands dry or calloused? _______ 17. Does the pc have arthritic hands? _______ 18. TA position on foot plates? _______ (Foot plates are used and TA checked on them when the answer to 16 & 17 is affirmative.) 19. Are the pc's feet calloused or excessively wet or dry? _______ 20. Does the pc loosen his grip on the cans? _______ 21. Check the pc's grip, does he hold the cans correctly? (See E-Meter Drill 5.) _______ 22. Is the pc hot? _______ 22A.Is the pc well slept? _______ 23. Is the pc cold? _______ 23A. Is the pc hungry? _______ 24. Is it too late at night? _______ 25. Is auditing being done not in the pc's normal regular awake hours? _______ 26. Are there rings on the pc's hands? _______ 27. Is the pc wearing tight shoes? _______ 28. Is the pc wearing tight clothes? _______ 29. Is it actually chronic High or Low TA case condition? _______ 30. Has the pc gone into despair over his TA? _______ The handling of these points is stated in the reference HCO Bs. The handling of high or low TA after checking these points is by C/S 53RJ, Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S. The way to be sure of a C/S 53BJ or Hi-Lo TA list is by continued assessment and handling of these lists until an F/N on assessment is gotten. So standard tech handles the high and low TA. The C/S Series gives more data on the subject. Compiled by Flag XIIs for Training & Services Bureau Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: BL: JW: nt.jh.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1973, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 418  Compiled by Flag XIIs for Training & Services Bureau Revised by L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 21 iDate=7/4/61 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=3/5/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  JOHANNESBURG CONFESSIONAL LIST -- REVISED   Remimeo only for use as authorized  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1961RA REVISED 3 MAY 1975 Remimeo only for use as authorized JOHANNESBURG CONFESSIONAL LIST -- REVISED (Revised to exclude "represent" questions which were L&N type actions and could cause upset in the event of a wrong item. If a pc lists to a question the rules of L&N apply.) This is the Johannesburg Confessional List further amplified by myself. This is the roughest Confessional List in Scientology. We will call it the "Jo'burg Confessional". It does not necessarily replace other Confessional Lists but it is probably the most thorough one we have now. In reprinting this form use legal (foolscap) length and double-space everything except directions. It must be done by a person qualified per HCO PL 13 November 1974. "HCO May Do Confessional Lists". Every reading item must be F/Ned. JOBURG CONFESSIONAL LIST HCO Confessional Form 2 _______________________________________________ _________________________ Name of Person Date _______________________________________________ Name of Auditor/HCO Terminal DIRECTIONS: Attempt to clear any fall observed. Mark any fall observed or any meter reaction change elicited by the question. Then write what it cleared on. Mark largely if the fall could not be cleared since this constitutes a failure to pass. Only fail somebody if there is no needle motion of any kind even with sensitivity at 16 on any question. If they are failing because it is hard to clear a question, work very thoroughly on it in an effort to clear it. In all cases complete the test. If an important question fails to clear even after Auditor/HCO Terminal has worked very hard to get it off, the test is flunked. The following statement should be read or quoted to the person receiving the Confessional List: "We are about to begin a Confessional. We are not moralists. We are able to change people. We are not here to condemn them. While we cannot guarantee you that matters revealed in this list will be held forever secret, we can promise you faithfully that no part of it nor any answer you make here will be given to the Police or the State. No Scientologist will ever bear witness against you in Court by reason of answers to this Confessional. This Confessional is exclusively for Scientology purposes. The only ways you can fail this Confessional are to refuse to take the test, to fail to answer its questions truthfully or if you are here knowingly to injure Scientology. The only penalty attached to failure of this Confessional is our refusal to employ you or issue you a certificate, and this will only happen if we find you are trying knowingly to injure Scientology. You can pass this test by (1) agreeing to take it, (2) answering each question truthfully and (3) not being a member of a subversive group seeking to injure Scientology." 419 The first questions are nul questions to determine your reaction pattern. We will now begin: Lie Reaction: A. Are you sitting in a chair? B. Are you on the Moon? C. Are all cats black? D. Am I an ostrich? E. Is this Earth? F. Have you ever drunk water? G. Are you holding up a tree? H. Am I an elephant? I. Are you a table? J. Is this a Confessional List? 1. Have you ever lived or worked under an assumed name? 2. Have you given me your right name? 3. Are you here for a different purpose than you say? 4. Have you ever stolen anything? 5. Have you ever forged someone else's signature? 6. Have you ever blackmailed anybody? 7. Have you ever been blackmailed? 8. Have you ever smuggled anything? 9. Have you ever been in prison? 10. Have you ever indulged in drunkenness? 11. Have you ever done any reckless driving? 12. Have you ever burglared any place? 13. Have you ever embezzled money? 14. Have you ever assaulted anyone? 15. Have you ever been in jail? 16. Have you ever told lies in court? 17. Have you ever had anything to do with Pornography? 18. Have you ever committed Arson? 19. Have you ever been a Drug Addict? 20. Have you ever peddled Dope? 21. Have you had any dealings with stolen goods? 22. Do you have a Police Record? 23. Have you ever raped anyone? 24. Have you ever been involved in an abortion? 25. Have you assisted in any abortion? 26. Have you ever committed adultery? 27. Have you ever practiced Homosexuality? 28. Have you ever had intercourse with a member of your family? 29. Have you ever been sexually unfaithful? 30. Have you ever practiced Sodomy? 31. Have you ever consistently made a practice of sexual perversion? 420 32. Have you ever slept with a member of a race of another color? 33. Have you ever committed culpable homicide? 34. Have you ever bombed anything? 35. Have you ever murdered anyone? 36. Have you ever kidnapped anyone? 37. Have you ever done any illicit Diamond buying? 38. Have you ever betrayed anyone for money? 39. Have you ever threatened anyone with a firearm? 40. Have you been in illegal possession of firearms? 41. Have you ever been paid for giving evidence? 42. Have you ever destroyed something belonging to someone else? 43. Have you ever been a spy for an Organization? 44. Have you ever had anything to do with Communism or been a Communist? 45. Have you ever been a newspaper reporter? 46. Have you ever had intercourse while under the influence of drugs? 47. Have you ever had intercourse while under the influence of alcohol? 48. Have you ever used drugs or alcohol to procure sex? 48a. Have you ever used blackmail to procure sex? 49. Have you ever ill-treated children? 50. Have you ever taken money for giving anyone sexual intercourse? 51. Have you ever had any connection with a brothel? 52. Have you ever had anything to do with a baby farm? 53. Have you ever been a spy for the Police? 54. Are you afraid of the Police? 55. Have you ever done anything you are afraid the Police may find out? 56. Have you ever falsified the books in any firm you worked for? 57. Have you ever done anything your Mother would be ashamed to find out? 58. How could you help yourself generally? 59. Have you committed any overts against yourself? 60. How could you help your family? 61. Have you committed any overts against your family? 62. How do you feel about sex? 63. Have you committed any overts against the org? 63a. Have you committed any overts against others? 63b. Have you committed any overts against a group? 64. How could you help the org? 64a. How could you help others? 64b. How could you help a group? 65. How could you help mankind? 66. Have you ever controlled people? 67. How do you feel about being controlled? 68. Have you committed any overts against mankind? 69. How could you help animals and plants? 70. Have you committed any overts against animals and plants? 71. How could you help material things? 72. Have you committed any overts against matter? 72a. Have you committed any overts against energy? 421 72b. Have you committed any overts against space? 72c. Have you committed any overts against time? 73. How could you help Spirits? 74. Have you committed any overts against Spirits? 75. How could you help God or Infinity? 76. Have you committed any overts against God? 76a. Have you committed any overts against Infinity? 77. What is Communism? 78. Do you feel Communism has some good points? 79. Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party? 80. Have you ever been a member of any group with similar ideals as the Communist Party? 81. Do you know any Communist personally? 82. Have you ever injured Dianetics or Scientology? 83. Have you ever committed any overts on a Scientology Organization? 84. Have you ever stolen anything from a Scientology Org? 85. Do you have any overts on LRH? 86. Have you ever had unkind thoughts about LRH? 87. Do you have any overts on Mary Sue? 88. Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Mary Sue? 89. Have you ever injured any Scientologists? 90. Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Scientologists? 91. Have you ever betrayed Scientology? 92. Do you know of any secret plans against Scientology? 93. Have you ever taken money to injure Scientology? 94. Have you ever used Dianetics or Scientology to force sex upon someone? 95. Do you know of any plans to injure a Scientology Organization? 96. Are you upset about this Confessional List? ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Passed Failed ______________________________________________________________________________ WHY? ________________________________ Signed by Examiner L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1961, 1972, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [The Johannesburg Security Check, HCO PL 7 April 1961, Volume IV, Page 242, was revised on 12 November 1972 as HCO PL 7 April 1961R, Johannesburg Security Check -- Revised, to exclude "represent" questions which were L&N type actions. The above HCO PL makes further revisions in this type style.] 422  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/10/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  TECHNICAL QUERIES   Remimeo All Flag All Folo Tech Terminals All Quality Control Personnel All Qual Personnel All Tech Personnel  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 23 OCTOBER 1975 All Flag All Folo Tech Terminals All Quality Control Personnel All Qual Personnel All Tech Personnel TECHNICAL QUERIES Over the years we have had a great deal of experience with "Technical Queries". Many new trainee Auditors have come to Flag. A certain percentage of these were very happy to be there because now their "technical queries" could be "answered". And so my lines would carry their queries and of course an investigation would ensue to find why an org Class IV or VII would have technical queries. IT WAS FOUND IN ALL CASES THAT THE PERSON WITH THE TECHNICAL QUERY HAD MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS OR HAD NEVER READ THE MATERIALS OR LISTENED TO THE REQUIRED TAPES. The misunderstood words were things like "Scientology", "Auditor", "HCO", "tone arm"-things the person was encountering continually in his work. EVERY one of these "technical queries" was already fully covered in the materials but the person had never bothered to clean up his Mis-Us or, occasionally, read the basic materials available to him. It was further found that IT WAS ABSOLUTELY FATAL TO TRY TO ANSWER THESE QUERIES OR EXPLAIN THEM. The explanation given would just dive in under the misunderstood words or absence of study and the person would just have more bewildered queries. So it became the very firm rule on my lines that when technical queries were received the person was at once metered properly to locate the Mis-U words and get them defined or the false report that he or she had studied the materials at all. When "technical queries" were handled this way and ONLY when they are handled this way, the result was F/N VVVVVGIs. Any explanation brought only BIs. So the rule is very very firm. ALWAYS ANSWER A TECHNICAL QUERY BY REFERRAL TO MATERIALS AND A CRAMMING ORDER TO FIND THE MIS-U WORDS. The Auditor who is not handled this way will go on failing. Further, VERBAL tech explanations or letters which explain things enter a false data line into the scene and drives tech further out. Such actions create a squirrel scene. So: NEVER EXPLAIN VERBALLY OR ON PAPER IN ANSWERING A TECHNICAL QUERY. Only refer to materials and issue cramming orders to find the Mis-Us or the unstudied materials. Probably the reason why Flag trained Auditors and Auditors who have been working on my C/S lines produce such phenomenal results is that the above two rules are fully enforced wherever I am working. And it is true -- the best Auditors in the world have been made by applying these rules. 424 And now that you have the Tech Dictionary it is especially easy. So DON'T do an Auditor or Student in by explaining the answers to technical queries. Apply these rules and make them come through on the original materials. To do anything else is a severe disservice. These are the basic rules of keeping tech in. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 425  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=26/10/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 95 "FAILED" CASES   Remimeo All Students All HGC Auditors All C/Ses All Internes  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 26 OCTOBER AD25 Remimeo All Students All HGC Auditors All C/Ses C/S Series 95 All Internes "FAILED" CASES There are no failed cases. There are only failed C/Ses and Auditors. In a recent test, this was proven conclusively. A number of no-case-gain, slow-case-gain, sickie and "failed cases" were rounded up. Using well trained Flag Auditors and the most basic of lists, every one of these cases was soon flying. At another time, lists which had been "nulled" by a group of trainee Auditors were then taken over, on the same pcs, same lists, and renulled by Class Xs. Over half the reading items had been missed by the trainees -- they simply couldn't make the list read on the pcs. Yet the lists were as alive as skyrockets. The pcs, under the trainee Auditors, had accumulated all manner of by-passed charge by having reading items ignored. And in some cases, having non-reading items given attention. To a trainee, all this seems incredible and mysterious. He does not realize how very bad his metering can be, how faint and fainting his TR 1. He has numerous tricks which defeat him -- such as keeping his sensitivity on 32 for a pc who only requires sensitivity 1, whereas the Auditor misses all his F/Ns as he can't keep the needle at set. He doesn't put his meter so he can see pc, paper and meter dial all in the same scope of vision and misses the reads. His Auditor presence is so poor and his attitude so unprofessional that the pc isn't really in session. His own introversion prevents him from really observing the pc's tone or reaction. All these faults can be cured and HAVE to be before an Auditor can call himself a real Auditor. Short of that he is just a fooling-about dilettante. And he has "failed pcs". It takes hard sweating work to get good enough to be a real Auditor. It takes hours and hours and hours of TRs the hard way. It takes a high degree of honesty that includes never faking and going by misunderstoods in his materials, always being honest in his auditing reports, constant practice with his metering, drills with the tone scale and a large degree of self-discipline. It isn't "talent" that makes the good Auditor. It is practice and more practice until he himself knows first that he didn't know and then knows that he really knows. The source of out tech is only laziness and dishonesty. Someone who is afraid of work thinks he can PR the C/S and the pc, fumble his way through and succeed out of fakery. That route is failure. And it ends in "failed cases". Don't be a psychologist or psychiatrist. That was their route. In the hands of a thoroughly trained and drilled Auditor, Scientology works and works splendidly. There are no dog cases, no "ncgs", no failed cases. But there are "Auditors" who don't study and drill hard enough to become real Auditors. And there are C/Ses who don't know their business and who don't keep up their study and are too lazy to FES or read sessions or cram their Auditors. 426 There are an awful lot of excellent Auditors and many very fine C/Ses. But in some local areas, where verbal tech gets going and ethics is out, the quality sags. And there you have ncgs and slow pcs and "failed cases". Want to know how lazy your C/Ses and Auditors are? How many ncgs and failed cases do you have around? If you have any at all, tech in your area is out. A C/S 53RJ taken to F/Ning list and a GF40X taken to an F/Ning list will cure any ncg or failed case. BUT it has to be done by an Auditor who has sweated it out doing the checksheets of Qual required to make a list read. So do not send to find the real who when cases bog or "fail". Don't blame and repair cases. Repair the Auditors and C/Ses. It not only can be done. It is easier to do it than wrestle around with an "ARC Broken field". And it not only can be done, if MUST be done. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 427  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=27/7/76 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  PTS RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO RD POSITION CORRECTED   ALL AUDITORS Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JULY 1976 Remimeo ALL AUDITORS PTS RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO RD POSITION CORRECTED It has just come to my attention that HCOB 9 December 1971RA and HCOB 6 October 1974, which were written by then CS-4, restricted PTS handling and Vital Info RD to Expanded Dianetics which is a false position. The PTS Checksheet is Board Policy Letter 31 May 1971RB. That checksheet MUST be studied and passed by ALL staff concerned with PTS handling whether in HCO or in Div 4 or Div 5. In short, THAT is the actual position on the grade chart or in classes of the PTS Rundown. When listing has to be done to handle a PTS person or to find a why or who, on PTS RDs or anything else, it is dangerous for anyone but a Class IV who has been interned to do it. THAT is a matter of who can do listing. It is NOT a matter of where the pc is on the grade chart. YOU HAVE TO HANDLE THOSE WHO ARE PTS AS PTSes BEFORE YOU CAN AUDIT THEM SUCCESSFULLY. ANYONE HANDLING PTS PEOPLE MUST HAVE PASSED AND BEEN CERTIFIED ON THE PTS CHECKSHEET, BPL 31 May 1971RB. The errors put in these two HCOBs have caused orgs and the field to fill up with PTSes which went unhandled. You cannot audit a PTS person on anything but what handles PTSness. The HCOBs are being reissued as HCOB 9 December 1971RB and HCOB 6 October 1974R to correct the error of placing PTS RD in Expanded Dianetics where it does not belong and placing the Vital Info RD in Expanded Dianetics. A mission that worked more than a year correcting HCOBs that were marked as written by me but weren't and reissuing as Board Technical Bulletins missed these. They otherwise did well. The person who wrote the originals found them and called it to attention as an error. PLEASE CORRECT THIS IN ALL PACKS. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt Copyright $c 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This issue was added after printing was completed and thus does not appear in the indexes.] 427-A  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=9/12/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=3 rDate=29/7/76 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  PTS RUNDOWN   Remimeo Class IV Ex Dn Spclst Requires: WC 2 *Rate Clay TRs 4000-9 4000-10  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo Class IV HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971RB Ex Dn Spclst REVISED 29 JULY 1976 Requires: Revision in this type Style to cancel WC 2 any restriction of PTS RD to Ex Dn *Rate and to add Flow 0 Commands Clay for Quad pcs. TRs 4000-9 4000-10 PTS RUNDOWN References: BPL 31 May 71RA PTS/SP Checksheet HCOB 20 Jan 72 PTS RD Addition HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/S'ing a PTS RD HCOB 3 Jun 72R PTS RD, Final Step HCOB 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79 PTS Interviews HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS Handling HCOB 9 Nov 67 Review Auditors HCOB 14 Jan 68 S&D Type "S" HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds by Button HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scn CASES One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena." P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he becomes a Potential Trouble Source. There are numerous HCOBs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true observations and predictions. The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS. S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without change. Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too frequent case condition can be handled. WHO DOES IT Hopefully it can be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okay to Audits. For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very honest auditing and competent C/Sing. DEVELOPMENT Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively covered. The recent wrap up came about through my OT research in November 1971. 427-B The principle breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate having known certain people before. This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks through for a stalled Dianetic Case. In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you were _______ " for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain individuals before this life. But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person before this life. Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds. BREAKDOWN There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown. 1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally familiar with this Rundown. 2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the R3R. 3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster). 4. People who "can't run engrams" -- which means a druggie who hasn't had a full Drug Rundown. There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing it are especially rough. Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with engram running. The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature. Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted. The prerequisites for a PTS RD are covered in 2 and 4 above. It is not restricted to Ex Dn but is a separate RD developed before Ex Dn. BEHAVIOR OF RD Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be noted on the worksheet. The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be sure with an L3RD. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have to work at it. In the 427-C PTS RD incidents can "develop." Missing pieces can appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2 after finishing F1. Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown. And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied by this Rundown. END PHENOMENA There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person before this life. This is NOT the EP. A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its correction). THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN ROLLERCOASTERS. FLOWS You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc. Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place). Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others. If you did F1 R3R as "Locate a time you knew _______ " you might get to the pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean motivator F1. This would leave the PTS chain partially run. This is also true of the ruds. RE-DOs If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above should be checked into. Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4BR and L3RD. Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in) the other person. Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before. SUMMARY OF REFERENCES Here are the issues that directly cover the Rundown: HCOB 9 Dec 71RA PTS Rundown HCOB 20 Jan 72 PTS RD Addition HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/Sing a PTS RD HCOB 3 Jun 72RA PTS RD, Final Step HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds by Button HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scientology HCOB 20 Apr 72 C/S Series 78 Issue II HCOB 15 Dec 68R L4BR HCOB 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79 PTS Interviews HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS Handling 427-D THE RUNDOWN A. PAST S&Ds: 1. Collect up past S&D items (which should have already been verified on set-ups) or get the pc to tell you them if no folder. _______ 2. On the earliest one ask if known before. If it so reads handle per steps 3-6. If not, pick next item and repeat this check for validity. _______ 3. R3R Triple/Quad the item using these commands: F1. Locate a time when _______ did something to you. R3R. F2. Locate a time when you did something to _______ . R3R. F3. Locate a time when _______ did something to others. R3R. F). Locate a time when you did something to yourself because of _______ . R3R. _______ 4. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overt on the item using these commands: (a) Did _______ ARC Break you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. (b) Did you ARC Break _______ ? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. (c) Did _______ ARC Break others? ARCU CDEINR. (d) Did you ARC Break with yourself because of _______ ? ARCU CDEINR. _______ ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S. (e) Did _______ give you a problem? E/S to F/N. (f) Did you give _______ a problem? E/S to F/N. (g) Did _______ give others problems? E/S to F/N. (h) Did you give yourself problems because of _______ ? E/S to F/N. _______ (i) Did you withhold anything from _______ ? E/S to F/N. (j) Did _______ withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N. (k) Did _______ withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N. 427-E (l) Did you withhold anything from yourself because of _______ ? E/S to F/N. _______ (m) Did _______ commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N. (n) Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on _______ ? E/S to F/N. (o) Did _______ commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N. (p) Did you commit an overt on yourself because of _______ ? E/S to F/N _______ 5. Run "Can't Hav/Enforce Hav" with these steps: (a) Clear "can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or two. (b) Run on the SF items "can't have/enforced have" as motivator repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three terminal to others, others to terminal, (four flows of two commands each, or five if pc Quad. (c) After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective Havingness should be run. THE COMMANDS: F1. 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you? 2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want? _______ F2. 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)? 2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? _______ F3. 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others? 2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want?_______ F3A.1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)? 2. What did others try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? _______ F0. 1. What Can't Have did you run on yourself because of _______ ? 2. What did you try to force on yourself because of _______ that you didn't want? _______ 427-F -- OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS -- _______ 6. Handle all Past S&D items per above steps. _______ B. PAST PTS INTERVIEWS: 7. Collect up all past PTS Interview items (which should have already been verified with C/S Series 78 on set-ups). _______ 8. Check known before on earliest one. If it so reads handle as below. _______ 9. R3R Triple/Quad the item. _______ 10. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item. _______ 11. Can't Hav/Enforce Hav on the item followed by Objective Hav. _______ 12. Repeat steps 8-11 on all valid past PTS Interview items. _______ C. NEW S&Ds (3 S&Ds): 13. Do 3 S&Ds per HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scientology, assessment and L&Ns. _______ 14. Check the first item for known before, handle if it so reads. _______ 15. R3R Triple/Quad the item. _______ 16. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item. _______ 17. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item, followed by Objective Hav._______ 18. Repeat steps 14-17 on the other items if valid. _______ D. TROUBLED/WORRIED: 19. L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you? to B/D F/N item. (Usually includes father, mother, wife or wives, husband, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents, lovers.) _______ 20. Check item for known before, if it so reads: _______ 21. R3R Triple/Quad. _______ 22. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts. _______ 23. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav followed by Objective Hav. _______ E. BEEN AFTER: 24. L&N Who have you been after this life? to BD F/N item. _______ 25. Check known before and if it reads: _______ 26. R3R Triple/Quad. _______ 27. Triple/Quad Ruds & Overts. _______ 28. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _______ 427-G F. PLANETS: 29. L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? to BD F/N item. _______ 30. R3R Triple/Quad _______ 31. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts. _______ 32. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _______ 33. D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be sure the person is now all right (not PTS). _______ REPAIR Auditor errors during the RD are handled with L4BR, L3RD, GF Method 5 and handle, C/S 53 if necessary. A really big snarl up on the RD that won't clear up is handled with HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List. If pc gets ill or rollercoasters after the RD is complete the PTS RD Correction List HCOB 16 Apr 72 is done and whatever was missed is cleared up. SUMMARY The PTS RD as revised is very direct and powerful. The L&N blows each aspect apart. Don't miss on it with auditor flubs. Get it drilled thoroughly before it is delivered. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt Copyright $c 1971, 1974, 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This issue was added after printing was completed and thus does not appear in the indexes.] 427-H  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=6/10/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=29/7/76 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1974   IMPORTANT Remimeo Ex Dn Specialists  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1974R REVISED 29 JULY 1976 Remimeo To cancel restriction of this RD to Ex Dn. Ex Dn Specialists IMPORTANT THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1974 Recent intensive investigation into blocks on tech, dissemination and communication lines uncovered an aberration which is quite widespread and especially common in society. Simply stated I found that WHERE VITAL INFORMATION WAS NOT BEING RELAYED OR WAS HIDDEN OR FALSIFIED, THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE WERE DRAMATIZING WITHHOLDS. You can see this is newspapers, government policies, the medical profession, psychiatry, economics and especially education. I have for years tried to get to the bottom of why people will not teach people. It is the single greatest fault in existing culture in my opinion. The answer that fits all cases is a failure to relay information, brief, instruct, train or supervise stemming from a general past and current OVERT OF WITHHOLDING VITAL INFORMATION. This gives a dramatization in daily conduct of failing to relay information, brief, instruct, train or supervise. And underlying that is the intentional impulse to do so overtly or covertly in a mistaken attempt to forward their own first dynamic. RESEARCH The primary outpoint that led to this conclusion is the premium given to silence in philosophy and the approval accorded the silent by the population whereas such people are in fact quite deadly and useless. It is a generalized dramatization in this society. This would be what made the society favor the "strong silent type" as a sort of ideal. All this in a highly technical society is hazardous. A good example is the current fuel crisis over a supposed scarcity of petroleum fuels for highly inefficient internal combustion engines while answers in the form of new fuels and engines are hidden away in vaults by the vested interests. ORGS In our organizations this is deadly. It blocks our tech lines in the Academy and Qual as well as the HGC. It cuts our dissem lines to public via books, promo, regging, lectures, use of C/F and Addresso and FSMs. It cuts our comm lines and denies data to higher management. It winds up in no application of the tech and no results for the public. 427-I That makes this rundown mandatory for top execs including Flag Reps and LRH Comms, all Tech and Qual staff and Dissem, Distrib and HCO Dept 2. PECULIARITY This mechanism is a peculiar one with its own special twist. Earlier rundowns did not hit this particular type of overt. It isn't very visible and doesn't occur in rundowns like L-10. It is not simple withholding information. It is (or once was) the intentional overt of withholding VITAL information. It would be a very long chain and would influence general conduct. A bordering chain is withholding information under torture. Probably an A = A = A sets in which then totally prohibits some (too many) people from imparting important data, thus they can't teach, amongst other things. It has to be fully run out, engrams and all. THE RUNDOWN Where staff are concerned, the necessity of delivering this RD reduces the prerequisites for it to the Drug RD only. It could be done if necessary where the Drug RD was not yet complete but would have to be verified after completion of the Drug RD. The prerequisite for public is Drug RD. VITAL INFO RD 1. Clear and assess: VITAL DATA _______ THE TRUTH _______ VITAL INFORMATION _______ KNOWLEDGE _______ Choose the best read as the item. 2. (a) L&N "What would happen if you communicated _______ ?" (b) R3R Quad. 3. (a) L&N "What problem have you had with _______ ?" (b) R3R Quad. 4. (a) Clear and assess: Withholding (item) under duress. _______ Withholding (item) under torture. _______ Withholding (item) to protect someone. _______ (b) R3R Quad. 5. (a) Clear all words plus fully clear each outpoint with examples and demos so it's understood. (b) Assess: Omitted (item) . _______ Altered the sequence of (item) . _______ 427-J Dropped time out of (item) . _______ Added falsehoods to (item) . _______ Altered the importance of (item) . _______ Used (item) to wrong tgt. _______ Assigned the wrong source for (item) . _______ Made (item) a contrary fact. _______ Added time to the relay of (item) . _______ Added inapplicable data to (item) . _______ Incorrectly included other data with (item) . _______ Complicated (item) . _______ Suppressed (item) . _______ In order of reads: (c) R3R Quad Locate a time when another _______ to/for/from (pick which) you. Locate a time when you _______ to/for/from another. Locate a time when another _______ to/for/from another. (d) L&N "What would be the intention of someone who _______ ?" (e) R3R Quad the intention. 6. (a) Assess: Concerning (item) has there been a break in Affinity _______ Reality _______ Communication _______ Understanding _______ (b) R3R Quad the largest read. (c) Reassess ARCU and handle to F/Ning assessment. 7. (a) Clear all words, especially assumption and justify and withholding (in the broad sense). (b) L&N "What assumption would justify withholding (item) ?" (c) R3R Quad the computation. 8. R3R Quad all E. Purps that came up during the RD. 9. R3R Quad all computations that came up during the RD. SUMMARY The importance of this RD for Tech and Qual staff and sensitive posts cannot be over-emphasized. Although it will be quite popular with the public it is basically designed for staff on these lines. The auditors delivering it should themselves have had it. They must have flawless TRs, be able to make a meter read and must drill the RD in Qual before attempting to deliver it. 427-K This RD is very powerful. Don't miss on it with careless delivery. Get it done flawlessly as directed and you will have a resurge on delivery and dissemination lines and open the door to A GOLDEN ERA OF AUDITING QUALITY AND RESULTS FOR PUBLIC AND STAFF. L. RON HUBBARD Founder Assisted by CS-4. LRH:RS:nt Copyright $c 1974, 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This issue was added after printing was completed and thus does not appear in the indexes.] 427-L  L. RON HUBBARD Founder Assisted by CS-4.   Type = 11 iDate=10/8/76 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN   (INTEGRITY PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS) (PTS PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS) (EXPANDED DIANETICS CHECKSHEETS) (METER OPERATION CHECKSHEETS) (VARIOUS RUNDOWN CHECKSHEETS) Remimeo All Sec Checkers All HCO Personnel All Meter Operators  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1976 All Sec Checkers All HCO Personnel All Meter Operators (REVISED -- see HCOB 10Aug76R Volume XI -- 238) R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN (INTEGRITY PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS) (PTS PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS) (EXPANDED DIANETICS CHECKSHEETS) (METER OPERATION CHECKSHEETS) (VARIOUS RUNDOWN CHECKSHEETS) The violent left right ragged motion of the needle which sometimes occurs on a pc's meter is called "A Rockslam" or "R/S." The term was taken from a process in the 50s which sought to locate "A rock" on the pc's early time-track; the "slam" is a description of the needle violence, meaning it "slams" back and forth. For a time all left right motions of the needle were considered and called "Rockslams" until it was found that a smooth left right flow was a symptom of release or key out and this became the "Floating Needle." There is yet another left right motion of the needle called the "Theta Bop." This occurs when the person has or is trying to exteriorize. "Theta" is the symbol for the person as a spirit or goodness; "bop" is an electronic term for a slight hitch in the sweep of a needle. A "Theta Bop" hitches evenly at each end of the sweep left and right and is very even in the middle of the sweep. Neither the "Floating Needle" nor the "Theta Bop" can be confused with a "Rockslam." The difference of the Rockslam is uneven, ragged agitation left and right; even the distances traveled left and right are likely to be different in each swing from the last. A "Rockslam" can be caused sometimes by leaving rings on the pc's fingers or by a short circuit in the meter or by the cans (electrodes) touching something like a dress. These are the mechanical considerations and must be ruled out before the pc can be considered to have "Rockslammed." If the pc is not wearing rings and if the meter needle is calm with the lead unplugged, if the lead is okay, and if the pc is not jiggling the ends of the cans against his clothes, then the pc's Rockslam is caused by the pc's bank. One has to be very careful about the correctness of the pc actually having Rockslammed while on the meter that it was actually observed, that it was not mechanically caused as above. One puts the R/S down on the worksheet and also gives exactly what was asked. And also that the mechanical points were checked without distracting the pc. ONE MUST ALWAYS REPORT A ROCKSLAM IN THE AUDITING REPORT, NOTE IT WITH SESSION DATE AND PAGE INSIDE THE LEFT COVER OF THE PC'S FOLDER AND REPORT IT TO ETHICS INCLUDING THE QUESTION OR SUBJECT WHICH ROCKSLAMMED, PHRASED EXACTLY. Why? Because the Rockslam is the most important needle manifestation! It gives the clue to the pc's case. In 1970 I began a full-scale research project into the subject of insanity and its relationship to cases and case gains and suppression. It was only then that the full significance of the Rockslam was unearthed. This research developed into what is now called EXPANDED DIANETICS, a series of special processes and actions with their drills and training which permits the auditor to handle a specific case type. This was, by the way, Man's first system of positive detection and handling of psychosis and the first full understanding of what psychosis is. While this bulletin is not in any way a two minute course in or a substitute for full 427-M training in Expanded Dianetics, any auditor who audits, sec checks, or handles people on a meter has to know what a Rockslam is and how it behaves and what he should do about it. The first thing is to be able to recognize one and to quickly with the scan of the eye and unplug of the meter cord (without any distraction of or notice by the pc) make the checks for a mechanical Rockslam as given above. You can make a meter "Rockslam" with no pc or cord connected to it by (a) turning it on; (b) put the sensitivity at perhaps 2; (c) put the needle at "set"; (d) rapidly, very rapidly, move the TA back and forth maybe a quarter of an inch and do it unevenly. That, if you did it very fast and unevenly, would be something that resembled a Rockslam. But no matter how fast you made your fingers move, a real R/S is a trifle faster. If you do that you will see what an R/S looks like. The needle in this experiment is not made to hit the sides of the meter. Now if you take the same setup and smoothly slowly move the tone arm back and forth about 2 times a second without any roughness and the same distance right and left, you will have a Floating Needle. Note it very well as this comes at a time of release and is the thing a good auditor hopes to see and gives him the end-off signal for a process. It has to be well known as you NEVER bypass one in a session and to do so makes an uncomfortable pc. (The pc will often cognite -- and get a realization about himself or life at this point and one does not stop him from doing this.) This is the thing you indicate to the pc. You don't ever indicate Rockslams or Theta Bops. When you see it and, without stopping or interrupting the pc's cognition, you always say, "Your needle is floating." Now the Theta Bop can also be shown to yourself by you. Set up the meter as above. Only this time, you smoothly swing it to the right and give it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then you smoothly, at once, swing it to the left and give it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then do it to the right. And so on. This is a Theta Bop. It is different than a Floating Needle only in that it hitches at each end of the swing. So learn to recognize it. There is a vicious smooth right direction slash that occurs when a pc hits a certain area of the bank that is called a "Rocket Read" and there is of course the small fall, long fall (which both go to the right and indicate a charged question or reaction) and there is the gradual rise to the left. But these do not repeat back and forth which is the characteristic of the Rockslam, Floating Needle and Theta Bop. All right, so we know exactly what it looks like when we talk about a ROCKSLAM as a read of the meter. We know how it can be mechanically caused. And we know what we have to record and report when it is seen. But exactly what does a Rockslam mean with regards to the pc? If you don't know this you can miss on the Pc, on the case, on the org and humanity. A ROCKSLAM MEANS A HIDDEN EVIL INTENTION ON THE SUBJECT OR QUESTION UNDER DISCUSSION OR AUDITING. Two things underlie insanity, or to be more specific, there are two causes and conditions both of which have been lumped together by man and called insanity. He could not of course define it as he didn't know what caused it. The first of these two things does not concern us overly much here and is the subject of a separate checksheet training and is called PTS or Potential Trouble Source handling. A "PTS" is a person who has been or is connected with somebody who has evil intentions. A PTS can feel uncomfortable in life or be neurotic or go insane because of the actions upon him of a person with evil intentions. Most of the people in institutions are probable PTSes. 427-N The second of these two things is insanity caused to the individual himself (let alone others) by hidden evil intentions. The extent of these intentions and what the person will do (and hide) in order to carry them out is quite shocking. These people are covert or overt criminals and many of them are insane -- meaning beyond all rationality in their acts. Because their evil intentions are hidden and because they are often very plausible such individuals are what make "behavior so mysterious" and "man looks so evil when you see what mankind does" and all sorts of fallacies. It is this last type, the chronic, heavy Rockslammer, which Expanded Dianetics handles. One Rockslam doesn't make a psychotic. Or a total menace to everyone. But it does mean there could be more and it might in rare cases mean you have, seeing enough of these R/Ses, a very dangerous person on your hands and in your vicinity. And that person must be handled by Expanded Dianetics. You won't see a great many Rockslams in auditing people so you could be totally thrown off by surprise when you see one. And mess it all up because you are surprised. So know what it is and don't get all quivery and make mistakes and blow your confront. Just carry on. If you don't note the EXACT question that was asked and the EXACTLY worded statement the pc made when the R/S was seen, you can muck it up for the Expanded Dianetics guys. They won't be able to get it turned back on again easily and will lose a lot of time. So you have to be sure your auditing report is accurate, that the R/S is written BIG on the column and circled and, no matter what else you do in the session, you have to get it recorded in the left front cover of the folder giving the date and page of the session and you have to report it to Ethics. And also you don't third party the pc and give him a bad time in the session because of it. Now R/Ses most easily turn on during Sec Checks or Integrity Processing or when pulling withholds or trying to investigate something. So the people who see these most often are those engaged in that activity and not routine auditing (when they can also but more rarely turn on). Further the most likely person to collide with "needing to be sec checked" is an R/Ser, which again increases the numbers of R/Ses seen in these activities compared to routine auditing. But a very heavy R/Ser will also turn them on in routine auditing. It is the exact point of the R/S in the session, the exact question that was asked and the exact subject or phrase where the R/S turned on that are important. And these are very important as then the person can be fully handled with a full Expanded Dianetics rundown by a qualified Expanded Dianetics Specialist. When, of course, the person gets to that point on his grade chart. (The grade chart points are after Dianetics (like Drug RDs etc) but before Grades, after Grades but before Power, after Power but before Solo, and after OT III or after any single grade above OT III. These are the only points where Expanded Dianetics can be delivered and the R/S fully and completely handled.) Now here is how you can turn off an R/S and mistakenly think it is handled: 1. The overt-motivator sequence has two sides. One is what the person has done (overt) and what is done to the person (motivator). You can ask, when the person R/Ses on something, if anyone has ever INVALIDATED him on that subject or action. He will find some and the R/S will turn off AND WON'T EVEN BE FAINTLY HANDLED BUT ONLY SUBMERGED. One can believe he had "handled" the R/S. Not true. He has just turned it off and maybe made it harder to find next time. One can ask what the person has done TO the subject mentioned and while this may unburden the case and make the person a bit better, the R/S is NOT handled, only turned off or submerged. It's almost as if there are so many overts and motivators on this subject or in this area that the push-pull of it makes the needle go wild (R/S). And indeed, this may be the energy cause, in the bank, of the needle reaction. 427-O But neither overt nor motivator handles an R/S finally because the CAUSE of the R/S is an INTENTION to harm and it isn't all that likely the basic intention will be reached. 2. Another apparent way the R/S can get "handled" and isn't is to take the R/Ser earlier-similar on the subject of the R/S. The R/S will probably cease, go "clean." But in actual fact it is still there, hidden. 3. The third way an R/S can be falsely "handled" is to direct the person's attention to something else. If, when this is done, the exact subject of the R/S is not noted by the auditor, it will be difficult to find it again when the person goes into Expanded Dianetic auditing. 4. Yet another, and probably the last way to falsely "handle" an R/S is to abuse the person about his conduct or behavior or the R/S, or to "educate" him to do better, or to "modify" his behavior with shocks or surgery or other tortures like the psychiatrists do. In other words one can seek to suppress the R/S in numerous ways. Maybe the R/S won't occur (being too overburdened now) but it is still there, buried very deep and possibly beyond reach now. So if you understand the above four points you will see that although you can ease off the R/S, you have not handled it. It has merely gone out of sight. All right, what then DOES HANDLE an R/S? I warned you that this isn't a two minute course on Expanded Dianetics and it isn't. An R/S is HANDLED by a fully qualified Expanded Dianetics auditor delivering full Expanded Dianetics to the person at that point on the grade chart where Expanded Dianetics is supposed to be delivered. If anyone thinks it can be done effectively any other way or if he C/Ses it to be done and the auditor is stupid enough to try to do that C/S, then it's Committees of Evidence and Suspended Certificates all around. With that warning, and only with that warning, I can briefly state what has to be done with the case. This is not what YOU do if you are not delivering full Expanded Dianetics at the right point on the grade chart. It is a brief statement so that you can understand what lies under that R/S. The pc with an R/S on any given subject and who R/Ses while discussing that or related subjects HAS AN EVIL INTENTION TOWARD THE SUBJECT DISCUSSED OR SOME CLOSELY RELATED SUBJECT. The pc intends that subject or area of life nothing but calculating, covert, underhanded HARM which will be at all times carefully hidden from that subject. Thus, the Expanded Dianetics Specialist, in handling that case (at the proper point on the grade chart) has to be able to locate each and every subject and question and R/S in that person's folder as noted by Sec Checkers and previous auditors or cramming officers or why finders. He has to have the complete list of R/S subjects. If they are noted as to session date and page and if all sec checking papers and cramming papers are in that person's folder, then the Expanded Dianetics Specialist can do a full and complete job. Otherwise he has to do a lot of other time wasting actions to get the R/Ses found and turned on again. What the Expanded Dianetics Specialist actually does is locate EXACTLY the actual evil intention for every R/S on the case and handle each one to total conclusion. When he is finished, if he has done his job well, the person's behavior will be magically improved and as to his social presence, menace and conduct, well that will be toward survival. When you see an R/S, if you are not an Expanded Dianetic Specialist doing Expanded Dianetics at the correct point on the grade chart, you don't say, "Hey, you've got an evil intention!" and you don't ask "Say, what's that evil intention?" or do corny things like that because you'll get the pc self listing, you may get a wrong item, you won't know what to do with it and you're just likely to get the auditing room wrapped around your neck right there. 427-P No, you quietly note it, make sure it isn't a mechanical fault, write it big on the worksheet, write down everything the pc is saying swiftly, note what question you were asking and let the pc talk and ack him and go on with what you are doing with the pc at the time. And after session you note it in the left-hand cover of the folder and send a report to Ethics. And some day, when he's done his Drug Rundown or gotten to one of the points on the grade chart where a full XDn can be done, why then it will be handled. And a good C/S will program or tip the case for that to be done. So that's the know-how you have to know about R/Ses to really help the guy and the society and your group. We're not in the business of curing psychos. The governments at this writing pay the psychiatrists billions a year to torture and kill because of R/Ses they don't know anything about. The crime in the society out there is caused by people who R/S. Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon and Caesar were probably the most loaded R/Sers of all time unless it was Jack the Ripper or your local friendly psychiatrist. So know what you are seeing when you see it and know what to do about it. And don't kid yourself. Or vilify or mow down people who R/S; we're not in that business. And the Expanded Dianetic Specialist and the pc someday will love you dearly for knowing your job and doing it right. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt Copyright $c 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This issue was added while second printing was in progress and thus does not appear in the subject index.] 427-Q  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=24/10/76 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 96 DELIVERY REPAIR LIST   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 OCTOBER 1976 (REVISED -- See HCOB 24Oct76R Volume XI -- 248) Remimeo (LRH ED 257 INT of 1 December 1974 Revised and Reissued as an HCOB) (Revisions in this type style) C/S Series 96 DELIVERY REPAIR LIST THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH YOUR CF, YOUR PC, YOUR STUDENT, STAFF MEMBER OR YOUR OWN DELIVERY THAT A PREPARED LIST WON'T HANDLE. "ARC Broken CFs," blown students, demanded refunds, low success stories, withdrawn auditors, ineffective staffs are pretty silly problems to have these days. Many years ago I developed a system called "Prepared Lists." These isolated the trouble the pc was having in auditing without taxing anyone's imagination and sending the auditor into a figure-figure on the pc. These prepared lists were assessed on an E-Meter. One took up the biggest read first and then cleaned up all other reads. Time has gone on. The system of prepared lists has been expanded to include not only pcs but students and staff. It may have gone overlooked that such lists now include anything that could happen to a pc or student. In other words, prepared lists have become very thorough. WHO CAN USE The only reason ever found for prepared lists not working was an auditor's weak TR 1 and inability to read a meter. Even this difficulty has been handled by "Qual Okay to Audit" Checksheets. Before an auditor should be let near a prepared list he should be put through at least six "Okay to Audit" short Checksheets in Qual. Qual is not fast flow. Things done in Qual are Method 4 Word Cleared and starrated, with all demos and drills. Only if this is done can you have some certainty that a prepared list will read on the pc and that the pc or student will get handled. These Qual "Okay to Audit" Checksheets are done AFTER a student has been trained and classed as an auditor. The "Okay to Audit" is for auditing in an org whether staff or interne. 427-R The checksheets are: (1) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74R Issue I QUAL OKAY TO OPERATE AN E-METER (2) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue II QUAL OK NO. 2R, QUAL OK TO ASSESS PREPARED LISTS (3) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue III QUAL OK NO. 3, QUAL OK TO AUDIT LISTING AND NULLING (4) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue IV QUAL OK NO. 4, QUAL OK TO CORRECT LISTING AND NULLING (5) Board Policy Letter 8 Nov 71RB QUAL OK NO. 5R, INTERNSHIPS ELECTRONIC ATTESTATION FORM (6) Board Policy Letter 20 July 70R Issue III Revised 25 Nov 74 TWO WAY COMM CHECKSHEET Only when these have been thoroughly and honestly studied, drilled and done should an auditor be permitted to assess prepared lists on pcs and students. It takes standard auditor training to handle the points found reading on a list. CASE SUPERVISING A C/S who is trained as a C/S must know what lists to use. And he must see to it that his auditors are trained via the above checklists. Otherwise the lists just won't read and the C/S, the pc and the org are left up the creek! LOTS of "lists that didn't read" are found in folders. I used to make a practice of just having them nulled again by an auditor whose metering and TRs were good and THEY READ AND THE CASE RESOLVED. PC LISTS 1. HCO BULLETIN 24 NOVEMBER 1973RB, C/S SERIES 53RJ "SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S." This is a famous list. It solved the long long problem of high and low TAs and really solved it. Unfortunately it has a name of being done for high and low TAs. In truth it practically handles the whole repair of any difficult case today! One assesses it Method 5. One handles the reads from the top down. It can also be reassessed several times until it F/Ns on a whole M5 assessment. It is quite remarkable what it will do for a case that has been running badly or is bogged, quite in addition to handling high and low TAs! 2. HCO BULLETIN 1 JANUARY 1972RA, "L1X HI-LO TA REVISED." This is the same list as C/S 53RJ above. It has been brought up to date. It gives the whole question for each subject as in C/S 53RJ and the same handling. It is easier to use on a pc whose attention wanders or who is not very familiar with terms. 3. HCO BULLETIN 29 OCTOBER 1971R, "INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST REVISED." As Interiorization-Exteriorization problems (when they exist) have to be handled before any other thing is handled, an auditor sometimes assesses another list and then finds himself doing this list, "Int" appears on many other lists and when it reads one does this list. One has to go back and complete the original list of course. "Int" problems cause high TA, headaches and general upset. I've begun to think after seeing a lot of headache cases that maybe only Int-Ext problems cause headaches! Instead of repairing Int, sometimes auditors will run it again and again. Also Int can go flat to 427-S Cog VVGIs on an early flow, even a recall flow. Then if one insists on finishing the Int RD, one has trouble and I mean trouble. So this is a valuable list. 4. HCO BULLETIN 15 DECEMBER 1968R, "L4BR" "FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING ERRORS." An out list (meaning one done by Listing and Nulling, not a prepared list) can raise more concentrated hell with a pc than any other single auditing error. The amount of misemotion or illness which a wrong list generates has to be seen to be believed. When a pc is ill after a session or up to 3 days after, always suspect that a listing action done on the pc had an error in it. It MUST be corrected. The prepared list L4BR corrects lists of the Listing and Nulling variety. It can be run on old lists, current lists, general listing. There has been no reason to revise this since 2 June 1972. It really works! 5. HCO BULLETIN 19 MARCH 1971. "LIST 1-C." This is the updated version of the earliest list ever compiled. It is used during sessions at the auditor's discretion and in other ways. It also prevents some pc from insisting "it's an ARC Brk" (which never clears) when it's really a withhold, a common error. It can also be addressed to life. Usually when a session blows up, an L1C is used fast rather than just sit and ack! 6. HCO BULLETIN 11 APRIL 1971RA, L3RD "DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST." This is the key list of Dianetic Auditing and is the Dianetic standby in case of trouble. As the Int RD is also Dianetics, while doing it, one uses L3RD for trouble. 7. HCO BULLETIN 2 APRIL 1972RB ISSUE II. EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 3 RB, "L3 EXD RB." This is the prepared list for Expanded Dianetics. 8. HCO BULLETIN 29 FEBRUARY 1972R, "FALSE TA CHECKLIST." This was a very important discovery about TAs. One uses this when another list indicates a False TA or one is suspected. Auditors have been known to get so desperate about a pc's TA that they falsified worksheets. This (and C/S 53RJ) make that totally needless. I've seen this change a case from despair to VVVVGIs! 9. HCO BULLETIN 16 APRIL 1972, "PTS RD CORRECTION LIST." It also gives the expected actions of a PTS Rundown. Doing PTS Rundowns without this prepared list handy can be risky. 10. HCO POLICY LETTER 7 APRIL 1970RA, "GREEN FORM." This was the earliest Qual Saint Hill weapon (26 June 65) for case cracking. It is modernized up to 29 Sept 74 in the above issue. Used for general case clean-up particularly on an out rud type pc or when ruds won't fly. It is not used to handle high or low TA. 11. HCO BULLETIN 30 JUNE 1971R, "EXPANDED GF 40RB." Called "GF 40X" This is the "7 resistive type cases" at the end of the Green Form expanded out. This is how you get those "earlier practices" and other case stoppers. This done well gives a lot of extensive work in Dianetics. It's lengthy but really pays off. If you were to do a C/S 53RJ Method 5, all handled, and to an F/Ning list and then do a GF 40XRB, all handled, reassessed to an F/Ning list you would "crack" most cases to a point where they ran well. 12. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 28 MAY 1974R, "FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURY AND ILLNESS." While you don't put the pc on the cans for this one, you mark it as to the state the pc is in and it says what you do for illness and injury. This one, done correctly, is how the minister runs the medico out of business. STUDENT LISTS 13. HCO BULLETIN 15 NOVEMBER 1973R, "FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST - R." This is for the handling of timid tech staff who back off from handling rough pcs. 14. HCO BULLETIN 15 NOVEMBER 1974, "STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST." This is the one that gets a bogged student sailing, gets a blown student back, gets 427-T an auditor back auditing. It even cures the revolutionary student! This is the master list for students -- even students in grammar schools and colleges! A real winner. 15. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972R ISSUE I, "STUDENT CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST-1." A list for correcting students on course. STAFF LISTS 16. HCO BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972R ISSUE II, "COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 2R." This is to get the Course Supervisor going well. 17. HCO BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RA ISSUE III, "AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 3." This one corrects Auditors who are having a rough time. 18. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RA ISSUE IV, "CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 4." This one corrects Case Supervisors, gets them back on the rails. 19. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RC ISSUE V, "EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 5." This prepared list locates an executive's troubles and indicates handling. 20. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 4 FEBRUARY 1972RD, "STUDY SERIES 7." A real long workout for a person who won't study or who is having real trouble on a course. Goes after it in depth. Can be used as a second list to Student Rehab list above or by itself. 21. HCO BULLETIN 21 JULY 1971RD, WORD CLEARING SERIES 35RD, "WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST REVISED." Usually written "WCCL." This is the famous list that goes with Method 1 Word Clearing or with any Word Clearing bog. Also corrects high and low TA WHEN it occurs in a Word Clearing session. This is the Word Clearer's friendly friend. 22. HCO POLICY LETTER 9 APRIL 1972, "ETHICS, CORRECT DANGER CONDITION HANDLING." Locates the trouble area that got him into a Danger Condition. Goes with the famous "3 May P/L" HCO PL 3 May 1972. 23. HCO POLICY LETTER 13 MARCH 1972, "ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES NO. 5." An invaluable text and list for PRODUCT CLEARING. It's a list of what you do to clear products. From it a prepared list can be made. 24. HCO POLICY LETTER 23 MARCH 1972, ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES 11, "FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM." 25. HCO POLICY LETTER 12 JUNE 1972, DATA SERIES 26, ESTO SERIES 18. A list you assess to locate trouble an evaluator might be having. Also for slow evaluators or slow students on a Data Series Course. 26. HCO BULLETIN 28 AUGUST 1970RA, "HC OUT-POINT -- PLUS-POINT LISTS RA." This is a prepared list that locates the outpoints in a person's own thinking. When people can't seem to evaluate (or think brightly) this list will do wonders. Some Data Series Course students make no progress at all until they are assessed on this list and handled. 27. HCO BULLETIN 2 DECEMBER 1974, "DYNAMIC SORT OUT ASSESSMENT." (Revised from BTB 4 Dec 71 Issue II, Replacing HCOB 4 Dec 71 Issue II R-1C Assessment by Dynamics.) This gets those dynamics that are charged and handles them. Increases social personality and even can shift valences. 427-U WORD LISTS FOR PREPARED LISTS Nearly every prepared list has all its words on a separate sheet, ready for word clearing on the pc. All the words on a list are cleared on a pc without repeating the same word or asking the list question. Such lists are issued for auditor convenience. A list of these word lists is being issued as HCOB 1 Dec 74 su that you can match them to the prepared lists in this Bulletin. OTHER LISTS There is a whole package of processing, mainly by prepared lists, in Integrity Processing, issued as its own series and now being reissued. There are great Solo Lists for Solo Repair used on Advance Courses. And from time to time when a need for prepared list is found new ones will be issued on different subjects. One can REPAIR a pc or student or staff member. One can also FORWARD a case into new areas with other prepared lists. MIMEO Some orgs backlog their mimeos. The AVAILABILITY of lists to auditors is something which should NOT be neglected. It is highly uneconomical as one loses re-signs and students and staff when prepared lists are in non-existence in an org or even short supply. Tech is the atomic fuel an org runs on. KEEP PREPARED LISTS IN SUPPLY FOR USE. TRANSLATED ISSUES In non-English speaking orgs lists must be very carefully translated and mimeoed for use. In such orgs, more than any others, great care must be taken to have and use lists as they keep tech straight where it tends to go hearsay and verbal. So, that's quite an array of prepared lists, isn't it? If they are not in full use in your org don't wonder about your Delivery Stats Why. Or your org and CF problems. It's a lack of full use of this tech. Hidden in these prepared lists is a wealth of tech that explodes into wins for your org, your CF, your pcs and students. L. RON HUBBARD Founder All revisions by LRH:RS.nt Materials Chief FB Copyright $c 1976 A8 approved by by L. Ron Hubbard L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This issue was added while second printing was in progress and thus does not appear in the subject index.] 427-V  L. RON HUBBARD Founder All revisions by Materials Chief FB A8 approved by L. Ron Hubbard   Type = 11 iDate=26/10/76 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 97 AUDITING REPORTS, FALSIFYING OF   Remimeo All HCOs All Tech Divs All Qual Divs All Courses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 26 OCTOBER 1976 All HCOs Issue I All Tech Divs (Also issued as HCO PL 26 Oct 76 All Qual Divs Issue I, same title.) All Courses C/S Series 97 AUDITING REPORTS, FALSIFYING OF Probably the most covert and vicious crime in auditing is falsifying an auditing report. At first glance, to someone who is trying to PR himself as an auditor or to escape consequences of session goofs, this might not seem to be the huge crime that it is. When an auditing report is falsified, means of repairing the pc are denied, out tech and a need for re-study or re-drilling of materials is covered up, out tech is spread about and the repute of the org and Scientology are at risk. There are many ways of falsifying an auditing report. Chief amongst them is omission of vital data in the report. Another is faking the things run or the pc's actions or reactions. To the person doing this it may seem that he has covered up his incompetence but in actual fact it is eventually detected. A twice declared person recently messed up the cases of several VIPs by simply omitting some of their disagreements with what was being done. Three SPs, now declared, some years ago had a mutual understanding that they would not put down each other's withholds. These three also falsified auditing reports to the effect that they had run certain things on pcs "and there was nothing on them," when in fact they either had not run them or there was reaction which they did not put into the report. They messed up about a dozen people before they were caught and it took many, many hours of careful C/Sing and auditing to salvage those cases (and it also took about two years). They made several hundred serious enemies for themselves and today I doubt any Scientologist would even speak to them and their names are remembered with scathing contempt. It is not only easy to detect a falsified auditing report, it is also inevitable that it will be detected. The person whose auditing reports have been falsified is easy to spot in folders and records. The auditor marks "VGIs, F/N" and the examiner notes by- passed charge and Bad Indicators. An auditor seeking to prevent this being detected has been known to take the examiner report from the folder but that there is no examiner report would be the first thing a C/S would notice. Examiner reports have been forged and exchanged with the actual one but this too is very visible. 427-W Lack of a proper success story points directly to out tech and if it is not visible in the folder then that folder contains falsified auditing reports. The pc in the midst of his auditing, refuses to re-sign for more. An inspection of folder either finds the out tech in the auditing reports or it doesn't. If the Folder Error Summary finds no out tech, the next thing that is looked for is falsified auditing reports and this is extended to looking at the other cases this auditor has handled to see if there is any similarity of reaction. A D of P interview with the pc will reveal falsified auditing reports. It will contain data that does not appear in the auditing reports. The first thing suspect is the auditing reports. Basically, correct tech applied by a competent auditor who has been trained and interned, works and works every time. When it "doesn't work," a C/S begins to look for the real scene. There are many ways he can ascertain the actual scene. Amongst these are outside-the-door session taping, monitors, interviews, lack of success stories, failures to declare, failures to re-sign, examiner reports at variance with the session reports, personal check up into the case and many others. The only thing which temporarily misleads a C/S is a falsified auditing report. But in all our experience with these, the detection of such reports is inevitable even if it occurs a long time afterwards. The person who would falsify an auditing report is usually found to be a suppressive with abundant R/Ses and evil intentions who never should have been trained in the first place. Therefore, the penalty for knowingly falsifying an auditing report in order to make oneself seem more competent than one is or to hide departures from the C/S or to omit vital data necessary to C/Sing, resulting in upsets to a case and time spent in investigation by seniors, is actionable by a Committee of Evidence and if the matter is proven beyond reasonable doubt, a cancellation of all certificates and awards, a declare and an expulsion order are mandatory. Should the person perpetrating the falsification of auditing reports run away (blow) before action can be taken, the result is the same and is enforceable even if the person is not present. A green auditor may look upon the offense as slight. If he is too untrained to realize that proper application of tech works every time and that improper application is a gross overt act, he may not realize the seriousness of his action. This however cannot be pleaded as a defense. It is not a light thing to end the hopes and close the door on a pc just because one is trying to cover up his blunders. The blundering auditor can be repaired by cramming and retraining. But only if it is known how he has blundered. That in itself is nowhere near as serious as hiding the fact. Honesty is the road to truth. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:lf Copyright $c 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This issue was added while second printing was in progress and thus does not appear in the subject index.] 427-X  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=28/10/76 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 98 AUDITING FOLDERS, OMISSIONS IN COMPLETENESS   Remimeo All HCOs. All Tech Divs All Qual Divs All Courses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 28 OCTOBER 1976 All HCOs. (Also issued as HCO PL 28 Oct 76, All Tech Divs same title.) All Qual Divs All Courses C/S Series 98 AUDITING FOLDERS, OMISSIONS IN COMPLETENESS (Ref: HCO PL 26 OCT 76 Issue I HCO B 26 OCT 76) Omissions from folders and complete loss of folders is a very serious matter. A Case Supervisor, as well as a Folder Error Summary Auditor and the Auditor himself can be impeded greatly by folder omissions. Loss of folders entirely is a much greater catastrophe. While cases and even folders can be reconstructed and eventually handled (at enormous trouble and time to the pc and technical people) this does not minimize the offense. Usually Folder Pages are regarded too lightly as a post and are subject to much transfer even when posted. The Director of Tech Services is often far too lax in posting a Folder Archives I/C even as a double hat. Space restrictions often impede the careful preservation of folders in orgs. But all these posts and spaces are vital to a smooth delivery of auditing and should not be lightly looked upon. The commonest (and most senseless) omissions from folders are: 1. WORD CLEARING WORKSHEETS. These are done in Academies or training or Interne areas as well as the HGC and it is often an omitted action to forward them to the person's pc folder. Often the lines to do so are unknown or completely missing. Yet every metered word clearing action should not only be the subject of a worksheet but also must be included in the person's pc folder in date order. Word clearer can fail to F/N a chain or even fail to clear a word as a chain when it doesn't F/N. Such goofs can mess up cases and leave a C/S perplexed as to how the pc was running well one day and badly the next -- yet there is no word clearing worksheet, so the fact of ANOTHER AUDITOR on the case is hidden. 2. QUAL WHY FINDING ACTIONS. As why finding also includes listing, possibly the most vicious omission is the failure to include Why Finding worksheets in the person's folder or even do a worksheet on it. Yet at least one org has been temporarily wrecked by indiscriminate "why finding" in Qual that results in wrong items and wrong lists and messed up the cases of whole staffs. This poor why finding has led at times to why finding becoming a restricted or forbidden practice. Qual worksheets of why finding MUST be included in the person's folder along with any list made which itself must include the question asked. 3. HCO WHY FINDING. These actions must also be the subject of worksheets and must also be included in the person's folder. 427-Y 4. ALL SEC CHECKS AND INTEGRITY PROCESS LISTS AND ACTIONS. It doesn't matter who or what is doing the sec check, the resulting action is NOT the property of the department or branch or person doing the sec checking. A full worksheet must be made and ALL such actions done MUST be included in the routine pc folder of the person. As it is very vital that a pc's folder be COMPLETE as well as exist, hereinafter the loss of a pc's folders and the failure to make worksheets and include them in the person's pc folder shall be actionable by a Committee of Evidence, to be convened by the Senior C/S of an org, and applies to any person or Auditor whether staff, mission or field. L. RON HUBBARD  L. RON HUBBARD Founder