FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST PTS AND SP DETECTION, ROUTING AND HANDLING COURSE PART 1/7 CONTENTS ************************************************** This is the PTS and SP Detection, Routing and Handling Course Pack as issued and delivered in the 1977 - 1978 time frame. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. NOTE: With the following exceptions, all documents are reproduced exactly as issued. All italicized or bold characters and underlines have been omitted from this reproduction. Only minor spelling errors have been corrected. If you have questions about the content of an individual issue please refer to the Tech or OEC Volumes (which were posted previously) for clarification. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heretics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association - Unit 8 ************************************************** CONTENTS: The approximate line number of the beginning of each part is shown in parenthesis. This assumes that the repeated headers are removed from parts 2 to 7 and the parts are combined into a single large file) part 1 ( 200) --- CONTENTS 000 BPL 31 May 1971R PTS and SP Det, Routing and Handling Checksheet Reissued 13 Nov 1977 001 HCOPL 7 FEB 1965 Keeping Scientology Working Reissued 002 HCOPL 14 FEB 1965 Safeguarding Technology Reissued 7 June 1967 003 HCOPL 17 JUN 1970 Technical Degrades 004 HCOB 20 OCT 1976 PTS Handling 005 HCOPL 20 OCT 1976 PTS Data 006 HCOB 26 OCT 1970 Obnosis and the Tone Scale 007 BTB 3 SEP 1974 Effect Scale Part 2 (2239) 008 HCOB 18 SEP 1967 Scales 009 HCOB 25 SEP 1971RA Tone Scale in Full 010 HCOB 23 DEC 1959 Responsibility 011 HCOB 21 JAN 1960 Justification 012 HCOB 31 MAR 1960 The Present Time Problem 013 HCOB 5 OCT 1961 Clean Hands Make A Happy Life 014 HCOPL 5 APR 1965 Handling the Suppressive Person, The Basis of Insanity 015 HCOPL 7 AUG 1965 Suppressive Person, Main Characteristics of 016 HCOB 29 SEP 1965 The Continuing Overt Act Part 3 (4078) 017 HCOPL 23 DEC 1965 Suppressive Acts, Suppression of Scientology and Scientologists, The Fair Game Law 018 HCOB 28 JAN 1966 Level IV, Search and Discovery Data, How a Suppressive Becomes One 019 HCOB 5 FEB 1966 Level III, S & D Warning 020 HCOB 27 SEP 1966 The Antisocial Personality, The Anti-Scientologist 021 HCOPL 15 AUG 1967 Discipline, SPs and Admin, How Stats Crash 022 HCOPL 1 OCT 1967 Admin-Know How, Uses of Orgs 023 HCOPL 16 OCT 1967 Admin-Know How #16, Suppressives and the Administrator How to Detect SPs as an Administrator 024 HCOB 16 JUL 1970 The Psychiatrist at work Part 4 (5925) 025 HCOB 28 NOV 1970 C/S Series 22 Psychosis 026 HCOB 1 NOV 1974R Rock Slams and Rock Slammers 027 HCOB 10 AUG 1976 R/Ses, What They Mean 028 HCOB 8 NOV 1965 Suppressives and Hidden Standards 029 HCOB 24 NOV 1965 Level IV - Search and Discovery 030 HCOPL 26 DEC 1966 Admin Know-How, PTS Sections, Personnel and Execs 031 HCOB 22 MAR 1967 Admin Know-How, Alter-is and Degraded Beings 032 HCOB 12 MAR 1968 Mistakes, Anatomy Of 033 HCOB 20 MAY 1968 Overt-Motivator Sequence 034 HCOB 16 AUG 1969 Handling Illness in Scientology 035 HCOB 20 APR 1972 XDn Series 4 - Suppressed PCs and PTS Tech part 5 (7882) 036 HCOB 10 MAY 1972 Robotism 037 HCOB 9 DEC 1971RB PTS Rundown - Revised 29 July 76 038 HCOB 3 JUN 1972R PTS Rundown, Final Step - Revised 15 Oct 74 039 HCOPL 27 JUN 1964 Policies on Physical Healing, insanity and Potential Trouble Sources - Reissued 23 June 67 040 HCOPL 5 APR 1965 Academies Relation to HCO Justice, Student Training, The No-Gain-Case Student 041 HCOPL 7 APR 1965 Healing Policy in Field 042 HCOPL 30 JUL 1965 Preclear Routing to Ethics 043 HCOB 16 AUG 1965 Collection from SPs and PTSs 044 HCOPL 14 OCT 1965 Potential Trouble Source Routing 045 HCOPL 30 DEC 1965 PTS Auditing and Routing 046 HCOPL 3 MAR 1966 Attacks on Scientology, Sex and Organizations 047 HCOB 9 NOV 1967 Revision of Remedy A, Remedy B, and S and Ds part 6 (10034) 048 HCOPL 18 JUN 1968 Ethics 049 HCOPL 29 JUN 1968 Enrollment in Suppressive Groups 050 HCOPL 21 OCT 1968 Cancellation of Fair Game Law 051 HCOPL 15 NOV 1968 Cancellation of Disconnection 052 HCOPL 7 MAY 1969 Policies on Sources of Trouble 053 HCOPL 9 FEB 1971 Executive Misbehaviour 054 HCOPL 3 MAY 1972R Exec Series 12 - Ethics and Executives 055 HCOPL 12 MAY 1972 Ethics, PTS Personnel and Finance 056 LRHED 22 JUL 1974 Potential Trouble Sources 057 HCOB 16 AUG 1971 Training Drills Modernized 058 HCOB 30 MAR 1963 Step Four - Handling Originations 059 BTB 13 MAR 1975R TRs Training Breakthrough part 7 (12066) 060 HCOB 21 JAN 1966 Search and Discovery, Ethics Type Cases, PTSs S & D Errors 061 HCOB 10 JUN 1966 S & D - The missed Item 062 HCOB 20 JUL 1966 The Type Two PTS 063 BPL 5 APR 1972RB PTS Type A Handling 064 BTB 11 NOV 1977 Handling PTS Situations 065 HCOB 24 APR 1972R C/S Series 79 - Xdn Series 5 - PTS Interviews 066 HCOB 10 AUG 1973 PTS Handling 067 HCOB 15 DEC 1973 The Continuous M/W and Continuous Overt 068 HCOB 20 APR 1972 C/S Series 78 - Product Purpose and Why and WC Error Correction 069 HCOB 17 MAR 1974 TWC Checksheets - TWC, Using Wrong Questions 070 HCOB 17 APR 1972 C/S Series 76 - C/Sing a PTS Rundown 071 HCOB 20 JAN 1972 PTS R/D Addition 072 HCOB 16 APR 1972 PTS R/D Correction List 073 HCOB 27 JUL 1976 PTS R/D and Vital Info R/D Position Corrected 074 HCOB 7 MAY 1969 Summary of How To Write an Auditor's Report 075 BTB 6 NOV 1972R Auditor Admin Series 12R - The Summary Report Form 076 BTB 20 JUN 1970 Summary Report 077 BTB 6 NOV 1972R Auditor Admin Series 14R 078 HCOB 3 NOV 1971 Auditor Admin Series 15, C/S Series 66 - Auditor's Worksheets 079 BTB 6 NOV 1972R Auditor Admin Series 10R - The Auditor's C/S end of course pack (14579) ======================================================= PTS and SP DETECTION, ROUTING and HANDLING PACK CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION U.S. ---------- ===================== 000. BPL 31 May 1971 RG PTS and SP DETECTION, Routing and Handling Checksheet BOARD POLICY LETTER 31 MAY 1971 RG ISSUE IV Remimeo REVISED 13 NOVEMBER 1977 Qual REVISES & CANCELS Tech BPL 31 MAY 71RF EOs SAME TITLE PTS AND SP DETECTION, ROUTING AND HANDLING CHECKSHEET This checksheet covers HCO PLs and HCO Bs covering the detection and handling of SPs and PTSes. It is of great importance to all personnel in HCO, Tech, Qua]., EstOs and personnel on public lines. PREREQUISITES: (a) Student Hat (or Basic Study Manual if this checksheet done as a hatting action for pcs or staff). (b) A TRs Course completed. NAME: _____________________________________________ DATE: ____________________ ORG:_________________________________________ DATE COMPLETED:_________________ POST: ________________________ LENGTH OF COURSE: Two weeks maximum for full course. STUDY TECH: Full study tech in accordance with the Student Hat must be used throughout this course. SEQUENCE: Once through checksheet, starrate as marked. A student who qualifies for Fast Flow is not required to starrate items. PRODUCT: A person who understands and can perceive and handle PTSes and SPs and is himself de-PTSed. CERTIFICATE: Graduates are awarded the PTS/SP DETECTION AND HANDLING CERTIFICATE. ---------- ]. *HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY Rev. 15.6.70 WORKING ____ ____ ____ 2. *HCO PL 14 Feb 65 SAFEGUARDING TECHNOLOGY ____ ____ ____ Reiss. 7.6.67 3. HCO PL 17 Jun 70R TECH DEGRADES ____ ____ ____ 4. ____ ____ ____ 5. ____ ____ ____ INTRODUCTION: 1. HCO B 20 Oct 76 PTS HANDLING ____ ____ ____ BPL 31 May 71RG - 2 - 2. DEMO: What false PTSness is. ____ ____ ____ 3. HCO FL 20 Oct 76 PTS DATA ____ ____ ____ (Also HCO B) 4. ____ ____ ____ 5. ____ ____ ____ OBNOSIS OF PERSONNEL: 1. Chart of Attitudes ____ ____ ____ 2. HCO B 26 Oct 70 OBNOSIS AND THE TONE SCALE ____ ____ ____ 3. *BTB 6 Feb 60 THE EFFECT SCALE ____ ____ ____ 4. *HCO B 18 Sep 67R SCALES ____ ____ ____ 5. HCO B 25 Sep 71RA THE TONE SCALE ____ ____ ____ 6. BOOK: SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL (Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation is to be used and referred to while reading these chapters.) (Entirely zero-rated.) Publisher's Introduction ____ ____ ____ Chapter 1 Column A. THE TONE SCALE ____ ____ ____ Chapter 2 Column B. DIANETIC EVALUATION ____ ____ ____ Chapter 3 Column C. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOUR ____ ____ ____ Chapter 4 Column D. PSYCHIATRIC RANGE ____ ____ ____ Chapter 5 Column E. MEDICAL RANGE ____ ____ ____ Chapter 7 Column F. EMOTION ____ ____ ____ Chapter 8 Column G. AFFINITY ____ ____ ____ Chapter 13 Column K. SPEECH, TALK; SPEECH, LISTENS ____ ____ ____ Chapter 14 Column L. SUBJECT'S HANDLING OF WRITTEN OR SPOKEN COMMUNICATION WHEN ACTING AS A RELAY POINT ____ ____ ____ Chapter 15 Column N. REALITY (AGREEMENT) ____ ____ ____ Chapter 18 Column P. SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR, ATTITUDE TOWARDS CHILDREN ____ ____ ____ Chapter 19 Column Q. COMMAND OVER ENVIRONMENT ____ ____ ____ Chapter 20 Column R. ACTUAL WORTH TO SOCIETY COMPARED TO APPARENT WORTH ____ ____ ____ Chapter 21 Column S. ETHIC LEVEL ____ ____ ____ Chapter 22 Column T. THE HANDLING OF TRUTH ____ ____ ____ Chapter 23 Column U. COURAGE LEVEL ____ ____ ____ Chapter 24 Column V. ABILITY TO HANDLE RESPONSIBILITY ____ ____ ____ Chapter 25 Column W. PERSISTENCE ON A GIVEN COURSE ____ ____ ____ BPL 31 May 71RG - 3 - Chapter 26 Column X. LITERALNESS WITH WHICH STATEMENTS OR REMARKS ARE RECEIVED ____ ____ ____ Chapter 27 Column Y. METHODS USED BY SUBJECT TO HANDLE OTHERS ____ ____ ____ 7. DRILL: Walk around in the streets and buildings nearby and spot where several individuals are on the Tone Scale. Do this until you are confident that you can easily obnose where a person is on the scale. Do not create Dev-T while doing this action but you may engage in conversation. DO NOT EVER TELL A PERSON WHERE YOU THINK HE IS ON THE SCALE (that would be evaluation); just make your obnosis and keep the results to yourself. Make a written report on each. (50 study points per 10 people.) ____ ____ ____ 8. ____ ____ ____ 9. ____ ____ ____ PROBLEMS, OVERTS AND WITHHOLDS: 1. HCO B 23 Dec 59 RESPONSIBILITY ____ ____ ____ 2. DEMO. The cause of blows. ____ ____ ____ 3. HCO B 21 Jan 60 JUSTIFICATIONS ____ ____ ____ 4. DEMO: What a withhold is. ____ ____ ____ 5. HCO B 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM ____ ____ ____ 6. CLAY DEMO: A problem. ____ ____ ____ 7. HCO B 5 Oct 61 CLEAN HANDS MAKE A HAPPY LIFE ____ ____ ____ 8. ____ ____ ____ 9. ____ ____ ____ SPs: THEORY AND RECOGNITION: 1. TAPE: 19/3/62 THE MECHANICS OF SUPPRESSION ____ ____ ____ 2. CLAY DEMO: What suppression is. ____ ____ ____ 3. HCO PL 5 Apr 65 HANDLING THE SUPPRESSIVE PERSON - THE BASIS OF INSANITY ____ ____ ____ 4. *HCO PL 7 Aug 65 SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS, MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF ____ ____ ____ 5. DEMO: The characteristics of a Suppressive Person. ____ ____ ____ 6. *HCO B 29 Sep 65 THE CONTINUING OVERT ACT ____ ____ ____ 7. HCO PL 23 Dec 65 SUPPRESSIVE ACTS ____ ____ ____ 8. DEMO: Why each of the acts mentioned are suppressive acts. ____ ____ ____ 9. *HCO B 28 Jan 66 LEVEL IV - SEARCH AND DISCOVERY - HOW A SUPPRESSIVE BECOMES ONE ____ ____ ____ 10. CLAY DEMO: How an SP becomes one. ____ ____ ____ 11. HCO B 5 Feb 66 S & D WARNING ____ ____ ____ 12. TAPE: 2 Aug 66 SUPPRESSIVES AND GAEs ____ ____ ____ 13. TAPE: 25 Aug 66 THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY ____ ____ ____ 14. *HCO B 27 Sep 66 THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY ____ ____ ____ 15. DEMO: Each of the characteristics of the Anti-Social Personality. ____ ____ ____ BPL 31 May 71RG - 4 - 16. DEMO: Each of the characteristics of the Social Personality. ____ ____ ____ 17. *HCO PL 15 Aug 67 DISCIPLINE - SPs AND ADMIN - HOW STATS CRASH ____ ____ ____ 18. HCO PL 1 Oct 67 AKH - USES OF ORGS ____ ____ ____ 19. *HCO PL 16 Oct 67 AKH 16 - SPs AND THE ADMINISTRATOR ____ ____ ____ 20. CLAY DEMO: How to detect an SP in an org. ____ ____ ____ 21, HCO B 16 Jul 70 THE PSYCHIATRIST AT WORK ____ ____ ____ 22. HCO B 28 Nov 70 PSYCHOSIS ____ ____ ____ 23. CLAY DEMO: What psychosis really is. ____ ____ ____ 24. HCO B 1 Nov 74R ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS ____ ____ ____ 25. HCO B 10 Aug 76 R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN ____ ____ ____ 26. ____ ____ ____ 27. ____ ____ ____ PTS: THEORY AND RECOGNITION: 1. HCO B 8 Nov 65 SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS ____ ____ ____ 2. HCO B 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY ____ ____ ____ 3. CLAY DEMO: What a PTS is. ____ ____ ____ 4. *HCO PL 26 Dec 66 ADMIN KNOW-HOW - PTS SECTIONS, PERSONNEL & EXECS ____ ____ ____ 3. DEMO: The indicators of PTS in an org. ____ ____ ____ 6. *HCO B 22 Mar 67 ALTER-IS AND DEGRADED BEINGS ____ ____ ____ 7. CLAY DEMO: What a Degraded Being is. ____ ____ ____ 8. HCO B 12 Mar 68 MISTAKES, ANATOMY OF ____ ____ ____ 9. DEMO: Why mistakes occur in the presence of suppression. ____ ____ ____ 10. *HCC B 20 May 68 OVERT MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE ____ ____ ____ 11. CLAY DEMO: The Overt-Motivator Sequence. ____ ____ ____ 12. DEMO: How the O/M Sequence relates to PTS. ____ ____ ____ 13. HCO B 16 Aug 69 HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY ____ ____ ____ 14. *HCO B 20 Apr 72 SUPPRESSED PCs AND PTS TECH ____ ____ ____ 15. HCO B 10 May 72 ROBOTISM ____ ____ ____ 15a. CLAY DEMO: Why it is necessary to 8C someone who is PTS through PTS handling and why the person might easily diverge off of it. ____ ____ ____ 16. *HCO B 9 Dec 71RB PTS RUNDOWN ____ ____ ____ 17. CLAY DEMO: The mechanism of PTS. ____ ____ ____ 18. *HCO B 3 Jun 72 PTS RD FINAL STEP (Theory Section) ____ ____ ____ 19. CLAY DEMO: The basic theory of why SPs are SPs. ____ ____ ____ 20. TAPE: Briefing to Review Auditors SH SPEC #68. ____ ____ ____ 21. DEMO: How PTSness relates to problems. ____ ____ ____ 22. ESSAY: Write a 200 word essay on what the characteristics and manifestations of a PTS are. ____ ____ ____ 23. ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ BPL 31 May 71RG - 5 - ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS. 1. HCO PL 27 Oct 64 POLICY ON PHYSICAL HEALING, INSANITY AND TROUBLESOME SOURCES ____ ____ ____ 2. TAPE: 18 Mar 65 ORGANIZATION AND ETHICS ____ ____ ____ 3. *HCO FL 5 Apr 65 THE NO-GAIN-CASE STUDENT ____ ____ ____ 4. HCO FL 7 Apr 65 HEALING POLICY IN THE FIELD ____ ____ ____ 5. HCO PL 30 Jul 65 PRECLEAR ROUTING TO ETHICS ____ ____ ____ 6. HCO FL 16 Aug 65 COLLECTION FROM SPs AND PTSes ____ ____ ____ 7. HCO FL 14 Oct 65 POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ROUTING ____ ____ ____ 8. HCO PL 30 Dec 65 PTS AUDITING AND ROUTING ____ ____ ____ 9. DEMO: How to route a PTS for handling. ____ ____ ____ 10. HCO FL 3 Mar 66 ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY ____ ____ ____ 11. HCO B 9 Nov 67 REVIEW OF REMEDY A, REMEDY B AND S ? D ____ ____ ____ 12. *HCO PL 18 Jun 68 ETHICS ____ ____ ____ 13. CLAY DEMO: The purpose of Ethics. ____ ____ ____ 14. HCO FL 29 Jun 68 ENROLLMENT IN SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS ____ ____ ____ 15. HCO FL 21 Oct 68 CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME LAW ____ ____ ____ 16. HCO FL 15 Nov 68 CANCELLATION OF DISCONNECTION ____ ____ ____ 17. HCO PL 7 May 69 POLICIES ON "SOURCE OF TROUBLE" ____ ____ ____ 17a. ESSAY. Write an essay on the characteristics of the A to J Types of Sources of Trouble. ____ ____ ____ 17b. DRILL: Drill with another person spotting the manifestations of a PTS person. One person pretends to manifest one of the characteristics of a PTS person including all the A to J types per HCO PL 7 May 69 POLICIES ON SOURCES OF TROUBLE and the other person has to accurately spot if the person is a potential trouble source and what type if so. ____ ____ ____ 18. HCO FL 9 Feb 71 EXECUTIVE MISBEHAVIOR ____ ____ ____ 19. HCO FL 3 May 72 ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES ____ ____ ____ 20. CLAY DEMO: An executive's responsibility regarding Ethics and Justice. ____ ____ ____ 21. HCO FL 12 May 72 PTS PERSONNEL AND Exec Ser 13 FINANCE ____ ____ ____ 22. LRH ED 241R INT POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ____ ____ ____ 23. ____ ____ ____ 24. ____ ____ ____ TRs: 1. HCO B 16 Aug 71 TRAINING DRILLS MODERNIZED ____ ____ ____ 2. HCO B 30 Mar 73 STEP FOUR - HANDLING ORIGINATIONS ____ ____ ____ 3. DRILL: OT TR 0 ____ ____ ____ TR2 ____ ____ ____ TR 0 ____ ____ ____ TR3 ____ ____ ____ TR 0 BB ____ ____ ____ TR 4 ____ ____ ____ TR 1 ____ ____ ____ BPL 31 May 71RG - 6 - 4. B.T.B. 13 Mar 75R TRs TRAINING BREAK THROUGH ____ ____ ____ 5. DRILL: TR 0-4 using the Tone Scale being dramatized on each TR. Do this for the entire Tone Scale. ____ ____ ____ 6. By Two Way Comm with your TR twin find out what tones you have trouble with and do TR 0-4 dramatizing that tone until it is easy to do. Continue this until there are no more tones you have trouble with. ____ ____ ____ PTS: TECHNICAL HANDLING: 1. *HCO B 21 Jan 65 S & D ERRORS ____ ____ ____ 2. *HCO B 10 Jun 66 S & D THE MISSING ITEM ____ ____ ____ 3. HCO B 20 Jul 66 TYPE 2 PTS ____ ____ ____ 4. *B.P.L. 5 Apr 72RB PTS TYPE A HANDLING ____ ____ ____ 4a. B.T.B. 11 Nov 77 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS ____ ____ ____ 5. BOOK: PROBLEMS OF WORK: Chapter 6 Affinity, Reality and Communication. ____ ____ ____ 6a. Clear the word "Antagonism" with the Tech Dictionary. ____ ____ ____ 6b. CLAY DEMO: How a Type A Situation can stem from what the PTS person did to make the other antagonistic and how to handle. ____ ____ ____ 6c. Do an essay on why you have to understand PTS Tech before you can handle it. ____ ____ ____ 6d. DEMO: How one's understanding of what PTS and SP are will help him to handle it. ____ ____ ____ 6e. DEMO: What a PTS person does that causes him to be PTS. ____ ____ ____ 6f. Do an essay of times in your life when you misused a tone on someone and how it affected that person (think of several examples). ____ ____ ____ 6g. Go over each example in 6f and write down how you could have handled them better using the Policy and Bulletins of this checksheet. ____ ____ ____ 7. *HCO B 24 Apr 72 PTS INTERVIEWS ____ ____ ____ C/S Ser 79 8. CLAY DEMO: The purpose of a PTS Interview. ____ ____ ____ 9. HCO B 10 Aug 73 PTS HANDLING ____ ____ ____ 10. CLAY DEMO: How to do a 10 Aug PTS Handling. ____ ____ ____ 11. TAPE: PTS Cassette - CAN WE EVER BE FRIENDS? ____ ____ ____ 11a. CAN WE EVER BE FRIENDS DOCS BOOKLET ____ ____ ____ 12. *HCO B 15 Dec 73 THE CONTINUOUS MISSED W/H, CONTINUOUS OVERT WITH DATA ON DEGRADED BEINGS AND FALSE PTS CONDITIONS ____ ____ ____ 13. CLAY DEMO: The consequences of a false PTS Condition. ____ ____ ____ 14. HCO B 20 Apr 72 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION ____ ____ ____ 15. HCO B 17 Mar 74 2WC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS ____ ____ ____ 16. CLAY DEMO: The effects of a wrong item. ____ ____ ____ 17. CLAY DEMO: How you would see to the correction of someone who had a wrong item found on him. ____ ____ ____ 18. HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/Sing A PTS R/D ____ ____ ____ 19. HCO B 20 Jan 72 PTS R/D ADDITION ____ ____ ____ 20. HCO B 15 Apr 72 PTS CORRECTION LIST ____ ____ ____ 21. HCO B 27 Jul 76 PTS R/D & VITAL INFO R/D POSITION CORRECTED ____ ____ ____ BPL 31. May 71RG - 7 - DE-PTSing: 1. OPTIONAL STEP: If you have a PTS sit get a metered interview to find the antagonistic connection or SP connection (the SSO (Staff or Ethics Officer Public) will arrange for this to be done. ____ ____ ____ 2. OPTIONAL STEP; If there is an item found in 1 then work out and drill a handling. ____ ____ ____ 3. When the handling is worked out and drilled and you are ready to begin then start your PTS handling and send a copy of the handling to the SSO or Ethics Officer so d follow-up action can be included in the handling. ____ ____ ____ 4. Students who are doing this checksheet for de- PTSing purposes may route through and attest this checksheet at this point. ____ ____ ____ 5. ____ ____ ____ 6. ____ ____ ____ SESSION FOLDER ADMIN: (This section for students who are studying to do PTS handlings.) 1. HCO B 7 May 69 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, WORKSHEETS AND SUMMARY REPORT, WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ____ ____ ____ 2. FORM: AUDITOR'S REPORT FORM ____ ____ ____ 3. DRILL: Fill out an Auditor's Report Form and turn it into the Supervisor. ____ ____ ____ 4. B.T.B. 6 Nov 72R THE SUMMARY REPORT FORM Aud Admin Ser 12R ____ ____ ____ 5. B.T.B. 6 Nov 72R THE WORKSHEETS Aud Admin Ser 14R ____ ____ ____ 6. HCO B 3 Nov 71 AUDITOR ADMIN SERIES 15 C/S Ser 66 ____ ____ ____ 7. B.T.B. 6 Nov 72R THE AUDITOR CS Aud Admin Ser 10R ____ ____ ____ 8. Write a C/S for a 10 August PTS Handling. ____ ____ ____ DRILLING:PTS HANDLING: (This section for students who are studying to do PTS handlings.) 1. DRILL: C/S 79 PTS Interview (if trained to use an E-Meter). ____ ____ ____ 2. DRILL: 10 Aug PTS Handling. ____ ____ ____ 3. DRILL: Several PTS Type A Handlings using PTS Cassette and data in BTB 11 Nov 77 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS. ____ ____ ____ 4. CLAY DEMO: The steps of getting someone fully de-PTSed including A) any PTS Type A Sit handled, B B) PTS R/D, C) study of PTS/SP checksheet, D) checkout on, PTS/SF checksheet, E) Stability Check, F) attest. ____ ____ ____ 5. DRILL: Spotting and handling PTS Types A-J. ____ ____ ____ 6. Do 10 Aug on someone. ____ ____ ____ 7. Do a PTS Type A Handling. ____ ____ ____ 8. Class IVs Drill doing a PTS R/D. ____ ____ ____ I attest that I have completed the requirements of this checksheet and that I know and can apply the materials and have no misunderstoods. BFL 31 May 71RG - 8 - NAME: ______________________________________ DATE: ________________ SUPERVISOR: ________________________________ DATE: ________________ Student has passed a metered check for misunderstoods on these materials and has passed 100% written exam. STUDENT EXAMINER: __________________________ DATE: _________________ Student is awarded the PTS/SP DETECTION AND HANDLING CERTIFICATE. DIR CERTS ? AWARDS: ________________________ DATE: _________________ END OF CHECKSHEET Revised by W/O John Eastment CS-4/5 and Paulette Ausley LRH Tech Expeditor Approved by L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER Re-revised by Julie Gillespie A-CS-4 Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:LRH:AH:JG:PA:JE:pat Copyright ($) 1971, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1977 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 001. HCO PL 7 Feb 1965 Keeping Scientology Working Reissued HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY l965 REISSUED l5 JUNE 1970 Remimeo (Reissued 28.1.73 to Sthil Students correct word on p. 8, Assn/Org Sec Hat para 5.) HCO Sec Hat Case Sup Hat Ds of P Hat Ds of T Hat Staff Member Hat Franchise (issued May 1965) Note: Neglect of this Pol ltr has caused great hardship on staffs, has cost countless millions and made it necessary in 1970 to engage in an all out International effort to restore basic Scientology over the world. Within 5 years after the issue of this PL with me off the lines, violation had almost destroyed orgs. "Quickie grades" entered in and denied gain to tens of thousands of cases. Therefore actions which neglect or violate this Policy Letter are HIGH CRIMES resulting in Comm Evs on ADMINISTRATORS and EXECUTIVES. It is not "entirely a tech matter" as its neglect destroys orgs and caused a 2 year slump. IT IS THE BUSINESS OF EVERY STAFF MEMBER to enforce it ALL LEVELS KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING HCO Sec or Communicator Hat Check on all personnel and new personnel as taken on. We have some time since passed the point of achieving uniformly workable technology. The only thing now is getting the technology applied. If you can't get the technology applied then you can't deliver what's promised. It's as simple as that. If you can get the technology applied, you can deliver what's promised. The only thing you can he upbraided for by students or pcs is "no results". Trouble spots occur only where there are "no results". Attacks from governments or monopolies occur only where there are "no results" or "bad results". Therefore the road before Scientology is clear and its ultimate success is assured if the technology is applied. So it is the task of the Assn or Org Sec, the HCO Sec, the Case Supervisor, the D of P, the D of T and all staff members to get the correct technology applied. Getting the correct technology applied consists of. One: Having the correct technology. Two: Knowing the technology. Three: Knowing it is correct. Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology. Five: Applying the technology. Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied. Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology. Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications. - 1 - Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology. Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application. One above has been done. Two has been achieved by many. Three is achieved by the individual applying the correct technology in a proper manner and observing that it works that way. Four is being done daily successfully in most parts of the world. Five is consistently accomplished daily. Six is achieved by instructors and supervisors consistently. Seven is done by a few but is a weak point. Eight is not worked on hard enough. Nine is impeded by the "reasonable" attitude of the not quite bright. Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity. Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are thc only places Scientology can bog down in any area. The reasons for this are not hard to find. (a) A weak certainty that it works in Three above can lead to weakness in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. (b) Further, the not-too-bright have a bad point on the button of Self-Importance. (c) The lower the IQ, the more the individual is shut off from the fruits of observation. (d) The service facs of people make them defend themselves against anything they confront good or bad and seek to make it wrong. (e) The bank seeks to knock out the good and perpetuate the bad. Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be very alert to Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. In all the years I have been engaged in research I have kept my comm lines wide open for research data. I only once had the idea that a group could evolve truth. A third of a Century has thoroughly disabused me of that idea. Willing as I was to accept suggestions and data, only a handful of suggestions (less than twenty) had long run value and none were major or basic; and when I did accept major or basic Suggestions and used them, we went astray and I repented and eventually had to "eat crow". On the other hand there have been thousands and thousands of suggestions and writings which, if accepted and acted upon, would have resulted in the complete destruction of all our work as well as the sanity of pcs. So I know what a group of people will do and how insane they will go in accepting unworkable "technology". By actual record the percentages are about twenty to l00,000 that a group of human beings will dream up bad technology to destroy good technology. As we could have gotten along without suggestions, then, we had better steel ourselves to continue to do so now that we have made it. This point will, of course, he attacked as "unpopular", "egotistical" and "undemocratic". It very well may be. But it is also a survival point. And I don't see that popular measures, self-abnegation and democracy have done anything for Man but push him further into the mud. Currently, popularity endorses degraded novels, self- abnegation has filled the South East Asian jungles with stone idols and corpses, and democracy has given us inflation and income tax. Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if the group had not supported me in many ways I could not have discovered it either. But it remains that if in its formative stages it was not discovered by a group, then group efforts, one can safely assume, will not add to it or successfully alter it in the future. I can only say this now that if is done. There remains, of course, group tabulation or co-ordination of what has been done, which will valuable- only so long as it does not seek to alter basic principles and basic applications. The contributions that were worth while in this period of forming the technology were help in the form of friendship, of defense, of organization, of dissemination, of application, of advices on results and of finance. These were great contributions and - 2 - were, and are, appreciated. Many thousands contributed in this way and made us what we are. Discovery contribution was not however part of the broad picture. We will not speculate here on why this was so or how I came to rise above the hank. We are dealing only in facts and the above is a fact-the group left to its own devices would not have evolved Scientology but with wild dramatization of the bank called "new ideas" would have wiped it out. Supporting this is the fact that Man has never before evolved workable mental technology and emphasizing it is the vicious technology he did evolve-psychiatry, psychology, surgery, shock treatment, whips, duress, punishment, etc, ad infinitum. So realize that we have climbed out of the mud by whatever good luck and good sense, and refuse to sink back into it again. See that Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten above are ruthlessly followed and we will never be stopped. Relax them, get reasonable about it and we will perish. So far, while keeping myself in complete communication with all suggestions, I have not failed on Seven. Eight, Nine and Ten in areas I could supervise closely. But it's not good enough for just myself and a few others to work at this. Whenever this control as per Seven, Eight, Nina and Ten has been relaxed the whole organizational area has failed. Witness Elizabeth, N. J., Wichita, the early organizations and groups. They crashed only because I no longer did Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Then, when they were all messed up, you saw the obvious "reasons" for failure. But ahead of that they ceased to deliver and that involved them in other reasons The common denominator of a group is the reactive bank. Thetans without banks have different responses. They only have their banks in common. They agree then only on bank principles. Person to person the bank is identical. So constructive ideas are individual and seldom get broad agreement in a human group. An individual must rise above an avid craving for agreement from a humanoid group to get anything decent done. The bank-agreement has been what has made Earth a Hell and if you were looking for Hell and found Earth, it would certainly serve. War, famine, agony and disease has been the lot of Man. Right now the great governments of Earth have developed the means of frying every Man, Woman and Child on the planet. That is Bank. That is the result of Collective Thought Agreement. The decent, pleasant things on this planet come from individual actions and ideas that have somehow gotten by the Group Idea. For that matter, look how we ourselves are attacked by "public opinion" media. Yet there is no more ethical group on this planet than Ourselves Thus each one of us can rise above the domination of the bank and then, as a group of freed beings, achieve freedom and reason. It is only the aberrated group, the mob, that is destructive. When you don't do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten actively, you are working for the Bank dominated mob. For it will surely, surely (a) introduce incorrect technology and swear by it. (b) apply technology as incorrectly as possible, (c) open the door to any destructive idea, and (d) encourage incorrect application. It's the Bank that says the group is all and the individual nothing. It's the Bank that says we must fail. So just don't play that game. Do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten and you will knock out of your road all the future thorns Here's as actual example in which a senior executive had to interfere because of a pc spin: A Case Supervisor told Instructor A to have Auditor B run Process X on Preclear C. Auditor B afterwards told Instructor A that "It didn't work" Instructor A was weak on Three above and didn't really believe in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. So Instructor A told the Case Supervisor "Process X didn't work on Preclear C." Now this strikes directly at each of One to Six above in Preclear C. Auditor B, Instructor A and the Case Supervisor it opens the door to the introduction of "new technology" and to failure. What happened here? Instructor A didn't jump down Auditor B's throat, that's all that happened. This is what he should have done: Grabbed the Auditor's report and looked it over. When a higher executive on this case did so she found what the Case Supervisor and the rest missed: that Process X increased Preclear C's TA to 25 TA divisions for the session but that near session end Auditor B Qed and Aed with a - 3 - cognition and abandoned Process X while it still gave high TA and went off running one of Auditor B's own manufacture, which nearly spun Preclear C. Auditor B's IQ on examination turned out to be about 75. Instructor A was found to have huge ideas of how you must never invalidate anyone, even a lunatic. The Case Supervisor was found to be "too busy with admin to have any time for actual cases". All right, there's an all too typical example. The Instructor should have done Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. This would have begun this way. Auditor B: "That process X didn't work." Instructor A: "What exactly did you do wrong?" Instant attack. "Where's your auditor's report for the session? Good. Look here, you were getting a lot of TA when you stopped Process X. What did you do?" Then the PC wouldn't have come close to a spin and all four of these would have retained certainty. In a year, I had four instances in one small group where the correct process recommended was reported not to have worked. But on review found that each one had (a) increased the TA, (b) had been abandoned, and (c) had been falsely reported as unworkable. Also, despite this abuse, in each of these four cases the recommended, correct process cracked the case. Yet they were reported as not having worked! Similar examples exist in instruction and these are all the more deadly as every time instruction in correct technology is flubbed, then the resulting error, uncorrected in the auditor, is perpetuated on every pc that auditor audits thereafter, So Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are even more important in a course than in supervision of cases. Here's an example A rave recommendation is given a graduating student "because he gets more TA on pcs than any other student on the course'" Figures of 435 TA divisions a session are reported "Of course his model session is poor but it's just a knack he has" is also included in the recommendation. A careful review is undertaken because nobody at levels 0 to IV is going to get that much TA on pcs. It is found that this student was never taught to read an E-Meter dial' And no instructor observed his handling of a meter and it was not discovered that he "overcompensated" nervously, swinging the TA 2 or 3 divisions beyond where it needed to go to place the needle at "set". So everyone was about to throw away standard processes and model session because this one student "got such remarkable TA". They only read the reports and listened to the brags and never looked at this student. The pcs in actual fact were making slightly less than average gain, impeded by a rough model session and misworded processes. Thus, what was making the pcs win (actual Scientology) was hidden under a lot of departures and errors. I recall one student who was squirreling on an Academy course and running a lot of off-beat whole track on other students after course hours. The academy students were in a state of electrification on all these new experiences and weren't quickly brought under control and the student himself never was given the works on Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten so they stuck. Subsequently, this student prevented another squirrel from being straightened out and his wife died of cancer resulting from physical abuse. A hard, tough instructor at that moment could have salvaged two squirrels and saved the life of a girl. But no. students had a right to do whatever they pleased. Squirreling (going off into weird practices or altering Scientology) only comes about from non-comprehension. Usually the non-comprehension is not of Scientology but some earlier contact with an off-beat humanoid practice which in its turn was not understood When people can't get results from what they think is standard practice, they can be counted upon to squirrel to some degree. The most trouble in the past two years came from orgs where an executive in each could not assimilate straight Scientology. Under instruction in Scientology they were unable to define terms or demonstrate examples of principles. And the orgs where they were got into plenty of trouble. And worse, it could not be straightened out easily because neither one of these people could or would duplicate instructions. Hence, a debacle resulted in two places, directly traced to failures of instruction earlier. So proper instruction is vital. The D of T and his Instructors and all Scientology Instructors must be merciless in getting Four, Seven, Eight. Nine and Ten into effective action. That one student, dumb and impossible though he may seem and of no use to anyone, may yet some day be the cause of untold upset because nobody was interested enough to make sure Scientology got home to him. With what we know now, there is no student we enroll who cannot be properly trained. As an instructor, one should be very alert to slow progress and should turn the - 4 - sluggards inside out personally. No system will do it, only you or me with our sleeves rolled up can crack the back of bad studenting and we can only do it on an individual student, never on a whole class only. He's slow = something is awful wrong. Take fast action to correct it. Don't wait until next week. By then he's got other messes stuck to him. If you can't graduate them with their good sense appealed to and wisdom shining, graduate them in such a state of shock they'll have nightmares if they contemplate squirreling. Then experience will gradually bring about Three in them and they'll know better than to chase butterflies when they should be auditing. When somebody enrolls, consider he or she has joined up for the duration of the universe -- never permit an "open-minded" approach. If they're going to quit let them quit fast. If they enrolled, they're aboard, and if they're aboard, they're here on the same terms as the rest of us -- win or die in the attempt. Never let them be half-minded about being Scientologists. The finest organizations in history have been tough, dedicated organizations. Not one namby-pamby punch of panty-waist dilettantes have ever made anything. It's a tough universe. The social veneer makes it seem mild. But only the tigers survive -- and even they have a hard time. We'll survive because we are tough and are dedicated. When we do instruct somebody properly he becomes more and more tiger. When we instruct half-mindedly and are afraid to offend, scared to enforce, we don't make students into good Scientologists and that let's everybody down. When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that wandering doubt in her eye into a fixed, dedicated glare and she'll win and we'll all win. Humour her and we all die a little. The proper instruction attitude is, "You're here so you're a Scientologist. Now we're going to make you into an expert auditor no matter what happens. We'd rather have you dead than incapable" Fitting that into the economics of the situation and lack of adequate time and you see the cross we have to bear. But we won't have to bear it forever. The bigger we get the more economics and time we will have to do our job. And the only things which can prevent us from getting that big fast are areas in from One to Ten. Keep those in mind and we'll be able to grow. Fast. And as we grow our shackles will be less and less. Failing to keep One to Ten, will make us grow less. So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or the High Priests. It's our possible failure to retain and practice our technology. An Instructor or Supervisor or Executive must challenge with ferocity instances of "unworkability". They must uncover what did happen, what was run and what was done or not done. If you have One and Two, you can only acquire Three for all by making sure of all the rest. We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't cute or something to do for lack of something better. The whole agonized future of this planet, every Man, Woman and Child on it, and your own destiny for the next endless trillions of years depends on what you do here and now with and in Scientology. This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting out of the trap now, we may never again have another chance. Remember, this is a our first chance to do so in all the endless trillions of years of the past. Don't muff it now because it seems unpleasant or unsocial to do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Do them and we'll win. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jw.rr.nt.rd Copyright ($) 1965, 1967, 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 002. HCO PL 14 Feb 1965 Safeguarding Technology Reissued 7 June 1967 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo All Hats BPI HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1965 (Reissued on 7 June 1967, with the word "instructor" replaced by "supervisor".) SAFEGUARDING TECHNOLOGY For some years we have had a word "squirreling". It means altering Scientology, off-beat practices. It is a bad thing. I have found a way to explain why. Scientology is a workable system. This does not mean it is the best possible system or a perfect system. Remember and use that definition. Scientology is a workable system. In fifty thousand years of history on this planet alone, Man never evolved a workable system. It is doubtful if, in foreseeable history, he will ever evolve another. Man is caught in a huge and complex labyrinth. To get out of it requires that he follow the closely taped path of Scientology. Scientology will take him out of the labyrinth. But only if he follows the exact markings in the tunnels. It has taken me a third of a century in this lifetime to tape this route out. It has been proven that efforts by Man to find different routes came to nothing. It is also a clear fact that the route called Scientology does lead out of the labyrinth. Therefore it is a workable system, a route that can be traveled. What would you think of a guide who, because his party said it was dark and the road rough and who said another tunnel looked better, abandoned the route he knew would lead out and led his party to a lost nowhere in the dark. You'd think he was a pretty wishy-washy guide. What would you think of a supervisor who let a student depart from procedure the supervisor knew worked. You'd think he was a pretty wishy-washy supervisor. What would happen in a labyrinth if the guide let some girl stop in a pretty canyon and left her there forever to contemplate the rocks? You'd think he was a pretty heartless guide. You'd expect him to say at least, "Miss, those rocks may be pretty, but the road out doesn't go that way." All right, how about an auditor who abandons the procedure which will make his preclear eventually clear just because the preclear had a cognition? People have following the route mixed up with "the right to have their own ideas." Anyone is certainly entitled to have opinions and ideas and cognitions-so long as these do not bar the route out for self and others. Scientology is a workable system. It white tapes the road out of the labyrinth. If there were no white tapes marking the right tunnels, Man would just go on wandering it restimulates prenatals, know he is pulling people off the route. Realize he is squirreling. He isn't following the route. Scientology is a new thing-it is a road out. There has not been one. Not all the salesmanship in the world can make a bad route a proper route. And an awful lot of bad routes are being sold. Their end product is further slavery, more darkness, more misery. Scientology is the only workable system Man has. It has already taken people toward higher IQ., better lives and all that. No other system has. So realize that it has no competitor. Scientology is a workable system. It has the route taped. The search is done. Now the route only needs to be walked. So put the feet of students and preclears on that route. Don't let them off of it no matter how fascinating the side roads seem to them. And move them on up and out. Squirreling is today destructive of a workable system. Don't let your party down. By whatever means, keep them on the route. And they'll be free. If you don't, they won't L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRHjw.rd Copyright ($) 1965, 1967 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 003. HCO PL 17 June 1970 Technical Degrades HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970 Remimeo Applies to all URGENT AND SHs and IMPORTANT Academies HGCs Franchises TECHNICAL DEGRADES (This PL and HCO PL Fob 7,1965 must be made part of every study pack as the first items and must be listed on checksheets.) Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without qualifying statements. Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry "A. Background Material-This section is included as an historical background, but has much interest and value to the student. Most of the processes are no longer used, having been replaced by more modern technology. The student is only required to read this material and ensure he leaves no misunderstood." This heading covers such vital things as TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood. These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use. Such actions as this gave us "Quickie Grades", ARC Broke the Field and downgraded the Academy and SH Courses. A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any person found guilty, will be activated in the case of anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES. 1. Abbreviating an official Course in Dianetics and Scientology so as to lose the full theory processes and effectiveness of the subjects. 2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labeling any material "background" or "not used now" or "old" or any similar action which will result in the student not knowing, using, and applying the data in which he is being trained. 3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any course not authorized by myself and the SO Organizing Bureau Flag. 4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use meanwhile any such comments as "historical", "background", "not used", "old", etc. or VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS. 5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation. 6. Running only one process for a grade between 0 to IV. 7. Failing to use all processes for a level. 8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as "I put in Grade Zero in 3 minutes." Etc. -1- 9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial or labor saving considerations. 10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or shorten its materials or its application. REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The pressure exerted to speed up student completions and auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not delivering. The correct way to speed up a student's progress is by using 2 way comm and applying the study materials to students. The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make each level fully before going on to the next and repairing them when they do not. The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting materials and actions. Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and Scientology is the answer to any recovery. The product of an org is well taught students and thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright ($) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 004 HCOB 20 Oct 1976 PTS Handling HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1976 Remimeo SSO DPE Ethics Officer PTS/SP Checksheet PTS HANDLING Once in a while I hear of PTS handlings that "didn't work" or "still PTS" or some such. Or I'll come across such extremes as a PTS is virtually an incurable leper to be shunned and kept isolated or almost everyone is PTS to some degree so what can you really do about it. The basic thing to realize is that PTSness, like any other case condition afflicting man, responds to plain old Standard Tech. But one has to have studied and understood that Tech to apply it, naturally. I recall years ago in handling PTSes, that none of them at first knew what PTS really meant or what it was all about even when they used the term freely! So I recently called for a pilot to see what would be the effect of a study method of curing PTSes. FIRST PILOT Before the final pilot was done, an earlier pilot was attempted by an Aide which was not conducted as laid down. CS-5 reviewed the failed pilot to find why so many failed on it. 4 out of 6 were never completed and the 2 that did failed. CS-5 reported "What I found on these was that they uniformly were not PTS in the first place or were PTS but that was not the major trouble with the person. Three of the cases (2 on auditing and 1 on study) were out-ethics, R/Sing, Exp Dn cases who were trying to use PTS as the reason for their behavior. Thus handling their PTSness would not resolve anything. The most interesting case here was the study one who realized that he was not PTS and that that had been a wrong indication and that what was really wrong with him was that he had bad intentions and was committing overts. One of the audited cases had a similar realization but has not done as well on post and did get very sick 2 months or so later. Of the other 3 pilot cases in this first batch one could only come up with in-the-org terminals so is another Exp Dn case and the other 2 assigned to study were severely bugged students so never got off the ground (one has now finished the course 4 months later). So that's what happened to the original pilot." The second pilot was then ordered to determine the original possibility, that people could study their way out of being PTS. HCOB 20 Oct 76 - 2 - SECOND PILOT Three were put onto the PTS/SP checksheet to study and three were handled by Interns who had done the PTS/SP checksheet themselves. The cases handled by auditing! interview steps completed their handlings within 10 hours. The study cases averaged 4-6 weeks of part-time study. 2 studiers from the original pilot also completed the course. All were then watched for bad originations to the Examiner, medical reports, ethics trouble or trouble on post. In all cases, including those not yet complete on study, none of these indicators showed up. One case originated case troubles but this turned out to be one of the "Exp Dn" cases not PTSness. On the study pilot the daily reports and success stories on completion uniformly mention more certainty, more stability and being more at cause with the data. Of particular interest is that three of the participants "cogged" they were not actually PTS (yet evidence of real PTS sits had gotten them on the project) but while they were studying they would align past PTS handlings they didn't fully understand at the time, spot why past PTS terminals were correct or incorrect, spot terminals who gave them a hard time in the past and see why certain people behaved the way they did. In short it appears the studiers were blowing charge on their past PTS handlings and on terminals in their life almost like an auditing session and while they were saying not PTS, no longer PTS (now that they had the data) is probably closer to the truth. All are reported to be doing well on post with no illness, rollercoaster or ethics trouble. The PTS handlers (who had done the PTS/SP pack) were of particular use where the person had a study bug that needed handling before study could be done and assisting in working out the handlings for PTS sits that were uncovered. Also S & Ds and 10 Aug HCOB handlings and PTS interviews are not solo actions. And it takes hours, not intensives to handle. FALSE PTS As noted from the first pilot false PTSness must be watched for as unhattedrtess, ignorance of Scientology basics for handling life, past bad auditing uncorrected as well as unhandled bad intentions and personal out-ethics can be mistaken for PTSness and won't resolve as PTSness. This should be suspected when your "PTSes" start going above 20% of staff and public. SUMMARY We have had the tech of PTSness for years, but it wasn't being fully used and then got mixed in with Exp Dn. PTSness can be handled routinely when the tech is fully known and applied. A PTS person can be brought to cause over his situation through study of the PTS tech. This is vitally important for staff. We can handle and the person himself can handle. There is no substitute for understanding. LRH:JE:nt L. RON HUBBARD Copyright ($) 1976 FOUNDER by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED As assisted by CS-5 This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 005 HCOPL 20 1976 PTS Data HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 OCTOBER 1976 Remimeo SSO DPE Ethics Officer's PTS/SP Checksheet PTS DATA Based on a recent pilot it has become quite obvious that a full and complete PTS handling would consist of: A. PTSness handled terminatedly by interview or auditing by a person trained on BPL 31 May 71RC. B. Complete study and pass on the PTS/ SP Checksheet, BPL 31 May 71RC Revised 12 August 1976, The correctly located suppressive, who is then handled based on a thorough understanding of the mechanics of PTS/SP phenomena form the simplicity that is PTS tech. The tech of locating the suppressive source is also fully covered in the PTS/SP Checksheet and is a vital prerequisite for PTS handlers. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER As assisted by CS-5 LRH:JE:nt Copyright ($) 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 006 HCOB 26 Oct 1970 Obnosis and The Tone Scale HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 26 OCTOBER 1970 Issue III REISSUED 19 SEPTEMBER 1974 Remimeo (Only change is signature) Students Course Super's Hat Auditor's Hat OBNOSIS AND THE TONE SCALE The following is extracted from the Advanced Clinical Course Preparatory Manual for Advanced Students in Scientology. It was published in 1957. OBNOSIS AND THE TONE SCALE Somewhere in your possession, in your desk, or tucked into a bookcase, arc two large pieces of paper. They are covered closely with data invaluable to an Auditor. You have pored over them, and quoted from them many, many times. They are, of course, the Chart of Human Evaluation and the Chart of Attitudes. The data in them is a large part of an Auditor's stock in trade, and every Auditor in the world is, in some degree familiar with them. But how about getting the data off the charts and applying it to life, to some real person? It's not hard to do casually, for some acute tone. "Joe was on a 1.5 kick last night." Sure, he turned red as a beet, and threw a book at your head. Simple. Mary breaks into sobs, and grabs for the Kleenex. Couple of Auditors on the scene exchange looks, nod sagely. "Hmm. Grief!" But how about chronic tone, with that thin, shiny veneer of social tone slicked over it? How sharp and how certain are you about that? Now, take a pc that you are familiar with. What, exactly, is his chronic tone? If you don't know, you had better read on. If you do, read on, and learn more about it. The title of this article starts with an odd word: obnosis. It's been put together from the phrase, "observing the obvious". The art of observing the obvious is strenuously neglected in our society at this time. Pity. It's the only way you ever see anything; you observe the obvious. You look at the isness of something, at what is actually there. Fortunately for us, the ability to obnose is not in any sense "inborn" or mystical. But it is being taught that way by people outside of Scientology. How do you teach somebody to see what is there? Well, you put up something for him to look at, and have him tell you what he sees. That is what is done in an ACC class, the earlier in the course, the better. A student is asked to stand up in the front of the classroom and be looked at by the rest of the students. An instructor stands by, and keeps asking, "What do you see?" The first responses run about like this: "Well, I can see he's had a lot of experience." "Oh, can you? Can you really see his experience? What do you see there?" "Well, I can tell from the wrinkles around his eyes and mouth that he's had lots of experience." "All right, but what do you see?" "Oh, I get you. I see wrinkles around his eyes and mouth." "Good!" The instructor accepts nothing that isn't plainly visible. A student starts to catch on and says, "Well, I can really see he's got ears." "All right, but from where you're sitting can you see both ears right now as you're looking at him?" "Well, no." "Okay. What do you see'?" "I see he's got a left ear." "Fine!" No conjectures, no tacit assumptions will do. Nor are the students permitted to wander in the bank. For example, "He's got good posture." "Good posture by comparison with what?" "Well, he's standing straighter than most people I've seen." "Are they here now?" "Well, no, but I've got pictures of them." "Come on. Good posture in relation to what, that you can see right now." "Well, he's standing straighter than you are. You're a little slouched." "Right this minute?" "Yes." "Very good." You see what the goal of this is? It is to get a student to the point where he can look at another person, or an object, and see exactly what is there. Not a deduction of HCOB 26 Oct 70 III - 2 - what might be there from what he does see there. Not something the bank says ought to go in company with what is there. Just what is there, visible and plain to the eye. It's so simple, it hurts. Along with this practice in observing the obvious about people, the students receive a lot of information about particular physical and verbal indications of tone level. Things very easy to see and hear, by looking at a person's body and listening to his words. "Thetan-watching" has no part in obnosis. Look at the terminal, the body, and listen to what's coming out of it. You don't want to get mystical about this, and start relying on "intuition". Just look at what's there. As examples: You can get a good tip on chronic tone from what a person does with his eyes. At apathy, he will give the appearance of looking fixedly, for minutes on end, at a particular object. Only thing is, he doesn't see it. He isn't aware of' the object at all. If you dropped a bag over his head, the focus of his eyes would probably remain the same. Moving up to grief, the person does look "downcast". A person in chronic grief tends to focus his eyes down in the direction of the floor a good bit. In the lower ranges of grief, his attention will be fairly fixed, as in apathy. As he starts moving up into the fear band, you get the focus shifting around, but still directed downward. At fear itself, the very obvious characteristic is that the person can't look at you. Terminals are too dangerous to look at. He's supposedly talking to you, but he's looking over in left field. Then he glances at your feet briefly, then over your head (you get the impression a plane's passing over), but now he's looking back over his shoulder. Flick, flick, flick. In short, he'll look anywhere but at you. Then, in the lower band of anger, he will look away from you, deliberately. You know, he looks away from you; it's an overt communication break. A little further up the line, and he'll look directly at you all right, but not very pleasantly. He wants to locate you-as a target. Then, at boredom, you get the eyes wandering around again, but not frantically as in fear. Also, he won't be avoiding looking at you. He'll include you among the things he looks at. Equipped with data of this sort, and having gained some proficiency in looking at the isness of people, the ACC students are sent out into the public to talk to strangers and to spot them on the tone scale. Usually, but only as a slight crutch in approaching people, they are given a series of questions to ask each person, and a clipboard for. jotting down the answers, notes, etc. They are public-opinion poll-takers from the Hubbard Research Foundation. The real purpose of their talking to people at all is to spot them on the tone scale, chronic tone and social tone. They are given questions calculated to produce lags and break through social machinery, so that the chronic tone juts out. Here are some sample questions, actually used: "What's the most obvious thing about me'?" "When was the last time you had your hair cut?" "Do you think people do as much work now as they did fifty years ago?" At first, the students merely spot the tone of the person they are interviewing-and many and various are the adventures they have while doing this! Later, as they gain some assurance about stopping strangers and plying them with questions, these instructions are added: "Interview at least 15 people. With the first five, match their tone, as soon as you've spotted it. The next five, you drop below their chronic tone, and see what happens. For the last five, put on a higher tone than theirs." What does an ACC student gain from these exercises? A willingness to communicate with anyone, for one thing. To begin with, students are highly selective about the sort of people they stop. Only old ladies. No one who looks angry. Or only people who look clean. Finally, they just stop the next person who comes along, even though he looks leprous and armed to the teeth. Confrontingness has come 'way up, and he's just somebody else to talk to. They become willing to pinpoint a person on the scale, without shilly-shallying. They say, "He's a chronic 1.1. Social tone 3.5, but real phony." That's the way it is, and they can see it. They also become quite gifted and flexible at assuming tones at will, and putting them across convincingly. Very useful in many situations, and lots of fun to do. They grow adept at punching through a comm lag in an informal situation. At sorting out apparencies from realities. The rise in certainty of communication, and in ease and relaxation of manner while handling people, in the students who have been run through this mill, is something which must HCOB 26 Oct. 70 III - 3 - be. seen or experienced to be believed. The one most often repeated request in every ACC Unit is: "Can't we please have some more obnosis this week? We haven't had enough of it yet." (This statement is very funny to the ACC instructors, because these same students said at the beginning, "If you make me go out there, I'll walk out on the course.") Obnosis is quite important, and should be learned as thoroughly as possible by all Scientologists. HCOB 26 Oct 70 III P 2 L. RON HUBBARD LRH:rd Founder Copyright ($) l957, 1970, l974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 007 BTB 6 Feb 1960 Effect Scale BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 6 FEBRUARY 1960 REISSUED 3 SEPTEMBER 1974 AS BTB CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 6 FEBRUARY 1960 SAME TITLE (Originally issued as Sec E.D. in Washington DC) EFFECT SCALE (For use in Academy instruction) The way a preclear receives an effect (effect tolerable on self) and the way he acts toward others, including the Auditor, that is effect believed, necessary on others, can be observed by an Auditor and used to spot the preclear's Tone Level, either chronic or temporary on any or all Dynamics. These are some examples on what might be observed at different Tones. ENTHUSIASM: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF Can receive large effects on self (the man who loses his fortune bounces and back). He is willing to receive other people's opinions, can accept large changes, he knows he has had a case change and is willing to change. He can accept defeats and will persist. Does not compulsively prevent effect on self. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS He has considerable ability to create effects on others but is not under compulsion to create effects, he is not compelled to affect other people's lives, he grants beingness, can tolerate differences in people. CONSERVATISM: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Not very willing to receive effects that change the status quo. Not willing to be questioned on some subjects, not willing to have other people's attention directed to him such as being pointed out in a crowd, wearing outstanding clothes, etc. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Believes effects which. preserve, the status quo are necessary. Somewhat cautious about creating an effect, withholds those things he thinks might hurt your feelings, or that you might not approve of. Believes he should not create too much effect but should be "one of the crowd". Should respect the privacy .of others. BOREDOME: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Will receive any effect which produces a pleasant randomity, wants to be entertained but otherwise doesn't like to be shifted. Can't be bothered with most ideas and puts off any action. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Doesn't need to do anything about anything, no compulsion to do or not to do (no action either). ANTAGONISM: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Can tolerate effect on self up to a point. May be critical of changes, BTB 6.2.60 - 2 - resent things happening to him. Doesn't want to be the effect of certain things, others opinions, actions, etc., and hurls these effects from self by being critical. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Feels he must make others the recipient of their own effects, compulsively must threaten others to protect self. ANGER: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Can't receive an effect on self and is fighting to ensure this. PC stuck in an anger incident may manifest this in his inability to receive changes, affinity, other's reality, communication, etc. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Must destroy anything that tries to create effect on him. COVERTNESS: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Cannot tolerate much effect on self. Tries to slip out of being an effect by covert means. Gives the impression of taking an order, etc., while holding a destructive intent, and no intention to to actually do it. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS Believes a large effect is necessary to handle others, is incapable of doing this in any other than a covert way. Must cause an effect but is unwilling to be known as the cause of bad effects. If accused of having created bad effects he will claim his intention was good. This PC will make excuses, will make all sorts of "Conditions" in doing a process, will try to give an answer that will satisfy the Auditor, without actually doing the command. FEAR: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - This person can take so little effect that he runs from the slightest thing, jumps at a door slam, etc. A PC in FEAR will manifest this by stiffness, leaning back in his chair, whistling during session (whistling in the dark), he may turn pale, shake, cold sweat, avoid answering questions, squirm, laugh nervously, try to get out of session, etc. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Believes the effect he would have to create to overcome those things which overwhelm him, is huge so huge that he would rather go elsewhere than confront it. May make a lot of logical excuses to get out of being an effect (going upscale to covertness). PROPITIATION: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Very little, does "favours" to protect himself against bad effects. Will try to appease the Auditor to avoid continuing the process. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Propitiative actions. GRIEF: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Tolerable effect would be the acquisition of tokens of a better time. PC with grief "just under the surface" may not be able to tolerate direct questioning on his problem without getting a lump in his throat or being brought to tears. Someone else's grief might be enough effect to cause him to cry. A rough word might not be tolerable. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS -Believes that a large effect would have to be created to overcome his overwhelming opposition, but the idea of creating an effect on others produces the idea of loss and though he Must create vast effects, he is very close to the idea that he cannot create ANY effect, thus the only thing he can do about it is cry. BTB 6.2.60 - 3 - APATHY: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF - Can accept even less effect here. This is the "no effect case". Believes that everything is useless anyway, therefore nothing could make any difference on him. He will tell you that nothing is workable (apathetically). EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS - Believes that an infinite amount of effect must be created to get anything done. (That's why he is in apathy.) This is the general outline of the Sub-Zero Tone Scale: APATHY - A state of disinterest, no affinity, no reality, no communication. There will be social machinery, valences., circuits, etc., but the PC himself will not be THERE. As one proceeds down the Sub-Zero scale there is an increasing state of Hallucinatory Cause, wherein the Thetan considers that he is actually being more Cause. This is the exact reverse of the reality of the situation. He is be- coming more and more Effect. Thus the mystic who is "causing" things far away, etc. In Sub-Apathy a person can tolerate considerable effects, APPARENTLY. This can fool you. The effects are not real and he does not experience them. While he believes all his effects must be created for him, he is unwilling to receive any. As a person descends on the scale and becomes more and more in the state of Must-Create-Effects -- Must-Receive-None, his ability to do either dwindles out. REGRET, on the Sub-Zero scale could be expressed as "trying to undo effects", thus being less effect. BLAME, "effects done are wrong". SHAME, "effects one creates are unworthy, shouldn't have done it". EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF 40.0 Infinite, any effect tolerable on self. \ / \/ 0.0 None. EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS (I.e. to have reality on having 40.0 Non-compulsive. Knows he created an effect) /\ can create effects. / \ 0.0 Has to create total effect to have reality on creating any effect. BTB 6.2.60 - 4 - SUB-ZERO: EFFECT TOLERABLE ON SELF 0.0 No effect tolerable on self /\ / \ -8.0 No effect on self is real (i.e. perceived) but all causes effect .self. (Mockery of 40.0) EFFECT BELIEVED NECESSARY ON OTHERS 0.0 Must cause total effect (although can cause little or no effect). \ / \/ -8.0 Can actually cause nothing but "cause every- thing" (unreality). E.g., "I caused the death of Pope Pius", when speaker was 1,000 miles away. Peter Hemery HCO Secretary WW Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY ($) RDCS:HH:AL:MH:PH:mh Copyright ($) 1960, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. =====================