FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST PTS AND SP DETECTION, ROUTING AND HANDLING COURSE PART 4/7 CONTENTS ************************************************** This is the PTS and SP Detection, Routing and Handling Course Pack as issued and delivered in the 1977 - 1978 time frame. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. NOTE: With the following exceptions, all documents are reproduced exactly as issued. All italicized or bold characters and underlines have been omitted from this reproduction. Only minor spelling errors have been corrected. If you have questions about the content of an individual issue please refer to the Tech or OEC Volumes (which were posted previously) for clarification. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heretics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association - Unit 8 ************************************************** ===================== 025 HCOB 28 Nov 1970 Psychosis HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 28 NOVEMBER 1970 Remimeo Class VIlls Class VIII Chksheet C/S Series No. 22 PSYCHOSIS Through a slight change of procedure on certain preclears I have been able to view the underlining motives and mechanisms of psychosis. Very possibly this is the first time the mechanisms which bring about insanity have been fully viewed. I must say that it requires a bit of confronting. The alleviation of the condition of insanity has also been accomplished now and the footnote in "Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health" concerning future research into this field can be considered fulfilled. The things a C/S should know about insanity are as follows: HIGHER PERCENT About 15% to 20% of the human race apparently is insane or certainly a much higher percent than was estimated. The truly insane do not necessarily act insane visibly. They are not the psychiatric obvious cases who go rigid for years or scream for days. This is observed only in the last stages or during temporary stress. Under apparent social behaviour the continual crimes knowingly committed by the insane are much more vicious than ever has been catalogued in psychiatric texts. The actions of the insane are not "unconscious". They are completely aware of what they are doing. All insane actions are entirely justified and seem wholly rational to them. As they have no reality on the harmful and irrational nature of their conduct it does not often ~-' register on an E-Meter. The product of their post duties is destructive but is excused as ignorance or errors. As cases in normal processing they roller coaster continually. They nearly always have a fixed emotional tone. It does not vary in nearly all insane people. In a very few it is cyclic, high then low. All characteristics classified as those of the "suppressive person" are in fact those of an insane person. The easiest ways for a C/S to detect the insane are: 1. Pretending to do a post or duties, the real consistent result is destructive to the group in terms of breakage, lost items, injured business, etc. 2. The case is no case gain or roller coaster and is covered under "PTS symptoms". 3. They are usually chronically physically ill. 4. They have a deep but carefully masked hatred of anyone who seeks to help them. 5. The result of their "help" is actually injurious. 6. They often seek transfers or wish to leave. 7. They are involved in warfare with conflicts around them which are invisible to others. One wonders how they can be so involved or get so involved in so much hostility. TYPES The German psychiatric 1500 or so "different types of insanity" are just different symptoms of the same cause. There is only one insanity and from it springs different manifestations. Psychiatry erred in calling these different types and trying to invent different treatments. DEFINITION Insanity can now be precisely defined. The definition is: INSANITY IS THE OVERT OR COVERT BUT ALWAYS COMPLEX AND CONTINUOUS DETERMINATION TO HARM OR DESTROY. Possibly the only frightening thing about it is the cleverness with which it can be hidden. Whereas a sane person can become angry or upset and a bit destructive for short periods, he or she recovers. The insane mask it, are misemotional continuously and do not recover. (Except by modern processing.) THE NATURE OF MAN Man is basically good. This is obvious. For when he begins to do evil he seeks to destroy his memory in order to change and seeks to destroy his body. He seeks to check his evil impulses by inhibiting his own skill and strength. He can act in a very evil fashion but his basic nature then makes it mandatory that he lessens himself in many ways.. The towering "strength" of a madman is a rarity and is compensated by efforts at self destruction. Man's mortality, his "one life" fixation, all stem from his efforts to check himself, obliterate his memory in a fruitless effort to change his conduct and his self-destructive habits and impulses and losses of skills and abilities. As this rationale proves out completely in processing and fits all cases observed, we have for the first time proof of his actual nature. As only around 20% are insane, and as those who previously worked in the mental field were themselves mainly insane, Man as a whole has been assigned an evil repute. Governments, where such personalities exist, listen to the opinion of the insane and apply the characteristic of 20% to the entire hundred percent. This gives an 80% wrong diagnosis. Which is why mental science itself was destructive when used by states. TECHNIQUES The only technique available at this writing which will benefit the insane is contained in all the overt-motivator sequences and Grade II technology. At Flag at this writing new improvement on this exists but it is so powerful that slight errors in use can cause a psychotic break in the insane. It therefore will only be exported for use by specially trained persons and this programming will require quite a while. MEANWHILE it helps the C/S to know and use these firm rules: ALWAYS RUN DIANETIC TRIPLES. Never run singles. The overt side (Flow 2) is vital. If you only run Flow 1 Motivators, the pc will not recover fully. Further running Flow 1 (Motivator only) any psychotic being processed will not recover but may even trigger into a psychotic break. If one never ran anything but motivators, psychotic manifestations would not erase. HCO B 28 November 1970 - Page 2 DEPEND ON EXPANDED GRADE II TECHNOLOGY TO EASE OFF OR HANDLE THE INSANE. Don't keep asking what's been done to him as he'll trigger. A new discovery on this is that when you run out the motivator the person gets a higher reality on his overts. If you ran out all his motivators he would have no reason for his overts. If these are not then run out he might cave himself in. PATTERN OF BEHAVIOUR The APPARENT pattern of insane behaviour is to come in (ask for processing, go on staff, etc.) with the advertised intention of being helped or helping, then mess up either as a pc or on post, then state how bad it all is and leave. It looks obvious enough. He came, found it bad, left. That is only the APPARENT behaviour. APPARENT REASONS. Based on numerous cases, this is the real cycle. Hearing of something good that might help these hateful awful rotten nasty people, the psycho comes in, wrecks this, upsets that, caves in this one, chops up that one and WHEN SOMEBODY SAYS "NO!" the psychotic either (a) Caves himself in physically or (b) Runs away. The psychotic is motivated by intent to harm. If he realizes he is harming things he shouldn't he caves himself in. If he is afraid he will be found out, he runs. In the psychotic the impulse is quite conscious. CONCLUSION None of this is very nice. It is hard to confront. Even I find it so. Freud thought all men had a hidden monster in them for he dealt mainly with the psychotic and their behaviour was what he saw. All men are not like this. The percentage that are is greater than I supposed but is a long way from all men. Sometimes one only becomes aware of these when things are getting worked on and improved. They stay on as long as it can be made bad or there is hope it can be destroyed. Then when attention is given to improvement they blow. Artists, writers often have these types hanging around them as there is someone or something there to be destroyed. When success or failure to destroy or possible detection appears on the scene they blow, often as destructively as possible. Orgs are subjected to a lot of this. A psychotic succeeds in blowing off good staff. And then sooner or later realizes how evil he is acting and sickens or leaves. The society is not geared to any of this at all. The insane walk around wrecking the place and decent people think it's "human nature" or "inevitable" or a "bad childhood". As of this writing the insane can be handled. The proof of any pudding is the processing. And this is successful. It is also rather swift. But as I say it is so swift the special technique has to be done by the specially trained flubless auditor. For a long while I've realized that we would have to be able to handle insane people as the psychiatrist is fading. I have had opportunity to work on the problem. And have it handled. Until it is fully released, the C/S will benefit greatly from knowing the above as these come on his lines far more often than he has suspected. The insane can be helped. They are not hopeless. I trust this data will be of use. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:rr.rd Copyright ($) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HCO B 28 November 1970 Page 3 ===================== 026 HCOB 1 Nov 1974R Rock Slams and Rock Slammers HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER l974R REVISED AND REISSUED 30 DECEMBER 1976 CANCELS Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1974 Ex Dn Spclsts SAME TITLE Class IVs and above C/See Qual HCO Dept 3 Hats PTS/SP Detection Course ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS A lot of controversy has shown up this year on the subject of R/Ses and R/Sers. Therefore, the following bulletin was compiled from my materials to clarify the matter. My research on this was actually done years ago and remains very valid indeed. R/Ses An R/S or Rock Slam is defined as a crazy irregular slashing motion of the needle. It can be as narrow as one inch or more than a full dial in width, but it's crazy! It slams back and forth. It is actually quite startling to see one. IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHER METER PHENOMENA. Recently Auditors arriving on Flag were found not to know what an R/S was but were calling Dirty Needles, Dirty Reads, Rocket Reads, Body Motion and even Ticks as R/Ses. That comes from never having been trained on what an R/S is and never having seen one. R/SES ARE UNIQUE IN APPEARANCE. On the other hand, far more serious is the fact that Auditors have many times seen R/Ses, didn't mark them down and didn't report them! This is a High Crime as it injures society, the org and the person himself (see HCOB 10 Aug 76 "R/Ses, What They Mean"). Actually this is quite a serious matter because pcs get labelled as R/Sers and get run on Evil Purposes connected with this "R/S" that isn't one. You can really foul up a PC that way. A meter also sometimes "goes crazy" on an R/Ser. You see it work, then it doesn't read, etc. While this is rare it does happen. Auditors have changed their meters just to find the new one was also crazy. But the R/S will show up through all this. An inoperational meter does not mean you have an R/Ser - you might have just forgotten to charge it or have faulty leads. ROCK SLAMMERS In a normal group of 1400, the actual percentage of R/Sers is low. It's about 8 in 1400, or 2 - 21/2%. Those figures should seem familiar. They are the same percentage for SPs. And that gives you a clue to the identification of an R/Ser. HCOB l.ll.74R - 2 - Rev. & Reiss. 30.12.76 Where requirements for Scn or SO Orgs have been established for R/Ses they apply to the 2 - 21/2% of real R/Ser's as these are high risks for staff purposes. These people can of course be salvaged as pcs using Expanded Dianetics. Letting them on staff could be disastrous, however. A handled R/Ser can be expected to eventually wind up in the same category as a cleared cannibal. His experiential track is too educated in evil and too uneducated in anything else. So even when cleaned up will need a lot of living. R/Sers are also very expensive people to keep around. They waste the available resources and produce overt products. They cost a fortune in waste, repairs, lost business. They also cost a heartbreaking number of damaged people. CHECKLIST To assist you in the identification of R/Sers a checklist of characteristics and their references has been done. This checklist is to be used whenever a C/S is called upon to inspect a folder to determine whether a person is an R/Ser. That he R/Ses is the main thing. The other points simply help investigate whether he R/Ses. He doesn't have to have all these characteristics to be an R/Ser. ---------- 1. The R/Ses reported are actual R/Ses and not some other read or broken meter leads, a dusty or worn TA or Trim "pot", or cans in contact with metal such as rings, bracelets, etc. _________ Ref: E-Meter Essentials; Book of E-Meter Drills; The Book Introducing the E-Meter; HCOB 8 Nov 62 "Somatics, How to Tell Terminals and Opposition Terminals" pg 2 and 4; HCOB 6 Dec 62 "R2-lO, R2-12, 3GAXX; HCOB 14 Jan 63 "Rings Causing Rock Slams"; HCOB "False TA Series" 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73. 2. R/Ses have to do with evil thoughts, overts or intentions. _________ 3. Pc is Slow or No Case Gain. _________ 3A. Pc is in a chronically nattery or critical state. _________ Ref: HCOB 23 Nov 62 "Routine Two-Twelve"; HCOB 5 Dec 62 "2-12, 3GAXX, 3-21 and Routine 2-10 Modern Assessment"; HCOB 6 Dec 62 "R2-l0, R2-12, 3GAXX"; HCOB 28 Nov 70 C/S Series 22 "Psychosis"; BPL 31 May 71RA "PTS/SP Checksheet" and materials. HCOB 1.11.74R - 3 - Rev. & Reiss. 30.12.76 4. Pc chronically ill or who acts most "PTS". This can be suppressed and hidden from view, however. _________ Ref: HCO PL 15 Nov 70R "HCO and Confessionals"; HCOB 28 Nov 70 C/S Series 22 "Psychosis"; PTS/SP Pack. 4A. He covers up his crimes with lots of PR. ________ 5. Pc's product is consistently an overt act and his activities destructive to others whether they have spotted this or not. ________ Ref: HCO PL 114 Nov 70 Org Series 14 "The Product as an Overt Act"; PTS/SP Pack; HCO Manual of Justice. 6. Pc's behavior or condition or OCA classifies as psychotic. ________ Ref: HCOB Ex Dn Series and tapes; HCOB 28 Nov 70. 7. The people near him get in trouble. ________ Where some of the answers to this checklist are yes you can be certain an R/S will be found in auditing. HCO handles and Qual programs them for rehabilitation. LIST ONE R/Ser There are, for our purposes, two kinds of R/Sers. (a) Those who R/S on subjects not connected with Sen and (b) Those who R/S on subjects connected to Scientology. The latter is a "List One R/Ser" and it is of great importance to us that they be located and moved off lines when they are part of staffs as their intent is solely to destroy us what ever else they say: their long run actions will prove it. The definition of a List One R/Ser is anyone who has R/Sed on List One. If that is confirmed fully, that's it. Not all points on the checklist have to be present. The full list of Scientology List One items can be found in HCOB 24 Nov AD 12 "Routine 2-12 List One - Issue One, the Scientology List". Where there is any doubt as to the validity of a List One R/S, a verification should be done. The procedure is to vigorously Sec Check the pc on the subject of the reported List One R/S. This Sec Check must be done by an Auditor who knows R/Ses and can make lists read and pull W/Hs connected with R/S. PCs WHO R/S Pcs who R/S are given Ex Dn. This does not change even though the pc is not an R/Ser. See HCOB C/S Series 93 and HCOB 10 Aug 76 "R/Ses, What They Mean". HCOB 1.ll.74R - 4 - Rev. & Reiss. 30.12.76 Where a pc R/Ses he will have Evil Purposes and be on a succumb as a result. R/Ses indicate an area of psychosis which will ruin the pc's life if allowed to go unhandled. SUMMARY This HCOB in no way changes Ex Dn as a requirement for R/Ses or makes it Ok not to handle them. Staff concerned must be able to identify an R/Ser which is different from someone with an R/S. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER Assisted by CS-4/5 LRH:JE:lf Copyright ($) 19714, 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 027 HCOB 10 Aug 1976 R/Ses, What They Mean HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1976 Remimeo All Sec Checkers All HCO Personnel All Meter Operators R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN (INTEGRITY PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS) (PTS PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS) (EXPANDED DIANETICS CHECKSHEETS) (METER OPERATION CHECKSHEETS) (VARIOUS RUNDOWN CHECKSHEETS) The violent left right ragged motion of the needle which sometimes occurs on a pc's meter is called "A Rockslam" or "R/S". The term was taken from a process in the 50s which sought to locate "A rock" on the pc's early timetrack; the "slam" is a description of the needle violence, meaning it "slams" back and forth. For a time all left right motions of the needle were considered and called "Rockslams" until it was found that a smooth left right flow was a symptom of release or key out and this became the "Floating Needle". There is yet another left right motion of the needle called the "Theta Bop". This occurs when the person has or is trying to exteriorize. "Theta" is the symbol for the person as a spirit or goodness; "bop" is an electronic term for a slight hitch in the sweep of a needle. A "Theta Bop" hitches evenly at each end of the sweep left and right and is very even in the middle of the sweep. Neither the "Floating Needle" nor the "Theta Bop" can be confused with a "Rockslani". The difference of. the Rocksiam is uneven, ragged agitation left and right; even the distances traveled left and right are likely to be different in each swing from the last. A "Rockslam" can be caused sometimes by leaving rings on the pc's fingers or by a short circuit in the meter or by the cans (electrodes) touching something like a dress. These are the mechanical considerations and must be ruled out before the pc can be considered to have "Rockslammed". If the pc is not wearing rings and if the meter needle is calm with the lead unplugged, if the lead is okay, and if the pc is not jiggling the ends of the cans against his clothes, then the pc's Rockslam is caused by the pc's bank. One has to be very careful about the correctness of the pc actually having Rockslammed while on the meter, that it was actually observed, that it was not mechanically caused as above. One puts the R/S down on the work sheet and also gives exactly what was asked. And also that the mechanical points were checked without distracting the pc. HCOB 10.8.76 - 2 - ONE MUST ALWAYS REPORT A ROCKSLAM IN THE AUDITING REPORT, NOTE IT WITH SESSION DATE AND PAGE INSIDE THE LEFT COVER OF THE PC'S FOLDER AND REPORT IT TO ETHICS INCLUDING THE QUESTION OR SUBJECT WHICH ROCKSLAMMED, PHRASED EXACTLY. Why? Because the Rockslam is the most important needle manifestation! It gives the clue to the pc's case. In 1970 I began a full-scale research project into the subject of insanity and its relationship to cases and case gains and suppression. It was only then that the full significance of the Rockslam was unearthed. This research developed into what is now called EXPANDED DIANETICS, a series of special processes and actions with their drills and training which permits the auditor to handle a specific case type. This was, by the way, Man's first system of positive detection and handling of psychosis and the first full understanding of what psychosis is. While this bulletin is not in any way a two minute course in or a substitute for full training in Expanded Dianetics, any auditor who audits, sec checks, or handles people on a meter has to know what a Rockslam is and how it behaves and what he should do about it. The first thing is to be able to recognize one and to quickly with the scan of the eye and unplug of the meter cord (without any distraction of or notice by the pc) make the checks for a mechanical Rockslam as given above. You can make a meter "Rockslam" with no pc or cord connected to it by (a) turning it on; (b) put the sensitivity at perhaps 2; Cc) put the needle at "set"; (d) rapidly, very rapidly, move the TA back and forth maybe a quarter of an inch and do it unevenly. That, if you did it very fast and unevenly, would be something that resembled a Rockslam. But no matter how fast you made your fingers move, a real R/S is a trifle faster. If you do that you will see what an R/S looks like. The needle in this experiment is not made to hit the sides of the meter. Now if you take the same setup and smoothly slowly move the tone arm back and forth about 2 times a second without any roughness and the same distance right and left, you will have a Floating Needle. Note it very well as this comes at a time of release and is the thing a good auditor hopes to see and gives him the end-off signal for a process. It has to be well known as you NEVER bypass one in a session and to do so makes an uncomfortable pc. (The pc will often cognite -- get a realization about himself or life at this point and one does not stop him from doing this.) This is the thing you indicate to the pc. You don't ever indicate Rockslams or Theta Bops. When you see it and, without stopping or interrupting the pc's cognition, you always say, Your needle is floating." HCOB 10.8.76 - 3 - Now the Theta Bop can also be shown to yourself by you. Set up the meter as above. Only this time, you smoothly swing it to the right and give it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then you smoothly, at once, swing it to the left and give it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then do it to the right. Arid so on. This is a Theta Bop. It is different than a Floating Needle only in that it hitches at each end of the swing. So learn to recognize it. There is a vicious smooth right direction slash that occurs when a pc hits a certain area of the bank that is called a "Rocket Read" and there is of course the small fall, long fall (which both go to the right and indicate a charged question or reaction) and there is the gradual rise to the left, But these do not repeat back and forth which is the characteristic of the Rockslam, Floating Needle and Theta Bop. All right, so we know exactly what it looks like when we talk about a ROCKSLAM as a read of the meter. We know how it can be mechanically caused. And we know what we have to record and report when it is seen. But exactly what does a Rockslam mean with regards to the pc? If you don't know this you can miss on the pc, on the case, on the org and humanity. A ROCKSLAM MEANS A HIDDEN EVIL INTENTION ON THE SUBJECT OR QUESTION UNDER DISCUSSION OR AUDITING. Two things underlie insanity, or to be more specific, there are two causes and conditions both of which have been lumped together by man and called insanity. He could not of course define it as he didn't know what caused it. The first of these two things does not concern us overly much here and is the subject of a separate check- sheet and training and is called PTS or Potential Trouble Source handling. A "PTS" is a person who has been or is connected with somebody who has evil intentions. A PTS can fee]. uncomfortable in life or be neurotic or go insane because of the actions upon him of a person with evil intentions. Most of the people in institutions are probable PTSes. The second of these two things is insanity caused to the individual himself (let alone others) by hidden evil intentions. The extent of these intentions and what the person will do (and hide) in order to carry them out is quite shocking. These people are covert or overt criminals and many of them are insane -- meaning beyond all rationality in their acts. Because their evil intentions are hidden and because they are often very plausible such individuals are what make "behavior so mysterious" and "man look so evil when you see what mankind does" and all, sorts of fallacies. HCOB 10.8.76 - 4 - It is this last type, the chronic, heavy Rockslamxner, which Expanded Dianetics handles. One Rockslam doesn't make a psychotic. Or a total menace to everyone. But it does mean there could be more and it might in rare cases mean you have, seeing enough of these R/Ses, a very dangerous person on your hands and in your vicinity. And that person must be handled by Expanded Dianetics. You won't see a great many Rockslams in auditing people so you could be totally thrown off by surprise when you see one. And mess it all up because you are surprised. So know what it is and don't get all quivery and make mistakes and blow your confront. Just carry on. If you don't note the EXACT question that was asked and the EXACTLY worded statement the pc made when the R/S was seen, you can muck it up for the Expanded Dianetics guys. They won't be able to get it turned back on again easily and will lose a lot of time. So you have to be sure your auditing report is accurate, that the R/S is written BIG on the column and circled and, no matter what else you do in the session, you have to get it recorded in the left front cover of the folder giving the date and page of the session and you have to report it to Ethics. And also you don't third party the pc and give him a bad time in the session because of it. Now R/Ses most easily turn on during Sec Checks or Integrity Processing or when pulling withholds or trying to investigate something. So the people who see these most often are those engaged in that activity and not routine auditing (when they can also but more rarely turn on). Further the most likely person to collide with "needing to be sec checked" is an R/Ser, which again increases the numbers of R/Ses seen in these activities compared to routine auditing. But a very heavy R/Ser will also turn them on in routine auditing. It is the exact point of the R/S in the session, the exact question that was asked and the exact subject or phrase where the R/S turned on that are important. And these are very important as then the person can be fully handled with a full Expanded Dianetics rundown by a qualified Expanded Dianetics specialist. When, of course, the person gets to that point on his grade chart. (The grade chart points are after Dianetics (like Drug RDs etc) but before Grades, after Grades but before Power, after Power but before Solo, and after OT III or after any single grade above OT III. These are the only points where Expanded Dianetics can be delivered and the R/S fully and completely handled. Now here is how you can turn off an R/S and mistakenly think it is handled: 1. The overt-motivator sequence has two sides. One is what the person has done (overt) and what is done to the person (motivator). You can ack, when the person R/Ses on something, if anyone has ever INVALIDATED him on that subject or action. He will find some and HCOB 10.8.76 - 5 - the R/S will turn off AND WON'T EVEN BE FAINTLY HANDLED BUT ONLY SUBMERGED. One can believe he has "handled" the R/S. Not true. He has just turned it off and maybe made it harder to find next time. One can ask what the person has done TO the subject mentioned and while this may unburden the case and make the person a bit better, the R/S is NOT handled, only turned off or submerged. ~ almost as if there are so many overts and motivators on this subject or in this area that the push-pull of it makes the needle go wild (R/S). And indeed, this may be the energy cause, in the bank, of the needle reaction. But neither overt nor motivator handles an R/S finally because the CAUSE of the R/S is an INTENTION to harm and it isn't all that likely the basic intention will be reached. 2. Another apparent way the R/S can get "handled" and isn't is to take the R/Ser earlier-similar on the subject of the R/S. The R/S will probably cease, go "clean". But in actual fact it is still there, hidden. 3. The third way an R/S can be falsely "handled" is to direct the person's attention to something else. If, when this is done, the exact subject of the R/S is not noted by the auditor, it will be difficult to find it again when the person goes into Expanded Dianetic auditing. 4. Yet another, and probably the last way to falsely "handle" an R/S is to abuse the person about his conduct or behavior or the R/S, or to "educate" him to do better, or to "modify" his behavior with shocks or surgery or other tortures like the psychiatrists do. In other words one can seek to suppress the R/S in numerous ways. Maybe the R/S won't occur (being too overburdened now) but it is still there, buried very deep and possibly beyond reach now. So if you understand the above four points you will see that although you can ease off t'~ R/S, you have not handled it. It has merely gone out of sight. All right, what then DOES HANDLE an R/S? I warned you that this isn't a two minute course on Expanded Dianetics and it isn't. An R/S is HANDLED by a fully qualified Expanded Dianetics auditor delivering full Expanded Dianetics to the person at that point on the grade chart where Expanded Dianetics is supposed to be delivered. If anyone thinks it can be done effectively any other way or if he C/Ses it to be done and the auditor is stupid enough to try to do that C/S, then it's Committees of Evidence and Suspended Certificates all around. With that warning, and only with that warning, I can briefly state what has to be done with the case. This is not what YOU do if you are not delivering full Expanded Dianetics at the right point on the grade chart. It is a brief statement so that you can understand what lies under that R/S. HCOB 10.8.76 - 6 - The pc with an R/S on any given subject and who R/Ses while discussing that or related subjects HAS AN EVIL INTENTION TOWARD THE SUBJECT DISCUSSED OR SOME CLOSELY RELATED SUBJECT. The pc intends that subject or area of life nothing but calculating, covert, underhanded HARM which will be at all times carefully hidden from that subject. Thus, the Expanded Dianetics Specialist, in handling that case (at the proper point on the grade chart) has to be able to locate each and every subject and question and R/S in that person's folder as noted by Sec Checkers and previous auditors or cramming officers or why finders. He has to have the complete list of R/S subjects. If they are noted as to session date and page and if all sec checking papers and cramming papers are in that person's folder, then the Expanded Dianetics Specialist can do a full and complete job. Otherwise he has to do a lot of other time wasting actions to get the R/Ses found and turned on again. What the Expanded Dianetics Specialist actually does is locate EXACTLY the actual evil intention for every R/S on the case and handle each one to total conclusion. When he is finished, if he has done his job well, the person's behavior will be magically improved and as to his social presence, menace and conduct, well that will be toward survival. When you see an R/S, if you are not an Expanded Dianetic Specialist doing Expanded Dianetics at the correct point on the grade chart, you don't say "Hey, you've got an evil intention!" and you don't ask "Say, what's that evil intention?" or do corny things like that because you'll get the PC self listing, you may get a wrong item, you won't know what to do with it and you're just likely to get the auditing room wrapped around your neck right there. No, you quietly note it, make sure it isn't a mechanical fault, write it big on the work sheet, write down everything the PC is saying swiftly, note what question you were asking and let the pc talk and ack him and go on with what you are doing with the pc at the time. And after session you note it in the left- hand cover of the folder and send a report to Ethics. And some day, when he's done his Drug Rundown o~ gotten to one of the points on the grade chart where a full XDn can be done, why then it will be handled. And a good C/S will program or tip the case for that to b~ done. So that's the know-how you have to know about R/Ses to really help the guy and the society and your group. We're not in the business of curing psychos. The governments at this writing pay the psychiatrists billions a year to torture and kill because of R/Ses they don't know anything about. The crime in the society out there is caused by people who R/S. Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon and Caesar were probably the most loaded R/Sers of all time unless it was Jack the Ripper or your local friendly psychiatrist. HCOB 10.8.76 - 7 - So know what you are seeing when you see it and know what to do about it. And don't kid yourself. Or vilify or mow down people who R/S; we're not in that business. And the Expanded Dianetic Specialist and the pc someday will love you dearly for knowing your job and doing it right. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization U. S. ===================== 028 HCOB 8 Nov 1965 Suppressives and Hidden Standards HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 NOVEMBER 1965 Remimeo Tech Personnel Qual Personnel Tech Div Students Qual Div SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS If you find a Suppressive on a case you will also find a chronic problem. A problem is postulate-counter-postulate. When a person is faced with suppression he is facing a counter-postulate. A hidden standard is a problem a person thinks must be resolved before auditing can be seen to have worked. It's a standard by which to judge Scientology or auditing or the auditor. This hidden standard is always an old problem of long duration. It is a postulate-counter-postulate situation-the source of the counter-postulate was suppressive to the pc. Therefore you can always find a Suppressive by finding a pc's hidden standard and following it back to when it began. You will find there a Suppressive to the pc. Similarly if you trace back the persons and groups who have been suppressive of the pc you will find a hidden standard popping into view. The datum is-a case that betters then worsens (a "Roller Coaster Case" or a "Roller Coaster") is always connected to a suppressive person. The Roller Coaster is caused by the hidden standard going into action. "My eyesight didn't get better." Locate a present time Suppressive on the case and trace that suppressive back to others earlier and you suddenly see the pc brighten up and (apparently for no reason) state his eyesight suddenly improved. A case that betters and worsens (a Roller Coaster) is always connected to a suppressive person and will not get steady gain until the Suppressive is found on the case or the basic suppressive person earlier. Because the case doesn't get well he or she is a Potential Trouble Source. To us, to others, to himself. You can't successfully audit that pc because there is a hidden standard, It makes the pc think he is no better. Suppressives also suppress the pc just like that so long as a hidden standard is present. Find the Suppressive, make the pc handle or disconnect. Then audit the pc up to Problems Release by getting rid of the hidden standard and the basic suppressive. Never audit a pc who is a Potential Trouble Source other than on the infallible, never varied datum, a Roller Coaster is always a PTS connected to an SP. Note also that a person going clear is now a thetan with a new view of life and has new hidden standards (requiring the location of suppressives) which he had no reality on as a Man or later as a Release. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:mLcden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 029 HCOB 24 Nov 1965 Level IV, Search and Discovery HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1965 Remimeo Required for Level IV Students To Review Auditors LEVEL IV SEARCH AND DISCOVERY Prerequisite: A Knowledge of Ethics Definitions and Purposes The process called Search and Discovery requires as well a good knowledge of Ethics. One must know what a SUPPRESSIVE PERSON is, what a POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE is and the mechanism of how and why a case Roller Coasters and what that is. All this data exists in Ethics policy letters and should be studied well before one attempts a "Search and Discovery" or further study of this HCOB. Ethics is not merely a legal action-it handles the whole phenomena of case worsening (Roller Coaster) after processing and without this technology an auditor easily becomes baffled and tends to plunge and squirrel. The only reason a case Roller Coasters after good standard auditing is the PTS phenomena and a Suppressive is present; THREE TYPES There are Three Types of PTS. Type One is the easy one. The SP on the case is right in present time, actively suppressing the person. Type Two is harder for the apparent Suppressive Person in present time is only a restimulator for the actual suppressive. Type Three is beyond the facilities of orgs not equipped with hospitals as these are entirely psychotic. HANDLING TYPE ONE PTS The Type One is normally handled by an Ethics Officer in the course of a hearing. The person is asked if anyone is invalidating him or his gains or Scientology and if the pc answers with a name and is then told to handle or disconnect from that person the good indicators come in promptly and the person is quite satisfied. If however there is no success in finding the SP on the case or if the person starts naming Org personnel or other unlikely persons as SP the Ethics Officer must realize that he is handling a Type Two PTS and, because the Auditing will consume time, sends the person to Tech or Qual for a Search and Discovery. It is easy to tell a Type One PTS from a Type Two. The Type One brightens up at once and ceases to Roller Coaster the moment the present time SP is spotted. The pc ceases to Roller Coaster. The pc does not go back on it and begin to beg off. The pc does not begin to worry about the consequences of disconnection. If the pc does any of these things, then the pc is a Type Two. It can be seen that Ethics handles the majority of PTSs in a fast manner. There is no trouble about it. All goes smoothly. HCOB 24 Nov 65 - 2 - It can also be seen that Ethics cannot afford the time to handle a Type Two PTS and there is no reason the Type Two should not pay well for the Auditing. Therefore, when Ethics finds its Type One approach does not work quickly, Ethics must send the person to the proper division that is handling Search and Discovery. TYPE TWO The pc who isn't sure, won't disconnect, or still Roller Coasters, or who doesn't brighten up, can't name any SP at all is a Type Two. Only Search and Discovery will help. SEARCH AND DISCOVERY The first thing to know is that CASE WORSENING IS CAUSED ONLY BY A PTS SITUATION. There never will be any other reason. As soon as you doubt this datum and think about "other causes" or try to explain it some other way you no longer prevent cases from worsening and no longer rescue those who have worsened. The second thing to know is that A SUPPRESSIVE IS ALWAYS A PERSON, A BEING OR A GROUP OF BEINGS. A suppressive is not a condition, a problem, a postulate Problems and Counter Postulates come into the matter but the SP as a being or group must always be located as a being or a group, not as merely an idea. As the technology is close to and similar to that of a service facsimile a poorly trained auditor can get confused between them and produce a condition he says is the cause. Persons who cannot confront and who therefore see persons as ideas not people are the ones most likely to fail in doing Search and Discovery. The third thing to know is that there can be an actual SP and another person or being similar to the actual one who is only an apparent SP. An actual SP actually suppresses another. An apparent SP only reminds the pc of the actual one and so is restimulated into being a PTS. The actual SP can be in present time (Type One PTS) or is in the past or distant (Type Two PTS). The Type Two always has an apparent SP who is not the SP on the case, is confusing the two and is acting PTS only because of restimulation, not because of suppression. Search and Discovery as a process is done exactly by the general rules of listing. One lists for persons or groups who are or have suppressed the pc. The list is complete when only one item reads on nulling and this is the item. If the item turns out to be a group, one does a second list of who or what would represent that group, gets the list long enough to leave on nulling only one item reading, and that is the SP. An incident is not a person or a group. A condition is not a person or a group. And a group is not a person, what you want is one being. HCOB 24 Nov 65 - 3 - The E-Meter signs are unmistakeable and the good indicators come in strongly when the actual SP is found. This is the entire action. It is liable to the various ills and errors of writing and nulling a list, such as overlisting, underlisting, ARC Breaking the pc by by-passing the item or getting an incomplete list. These are avoided by knowing one's business as an Auditor and being able to handle an E-Meter with skill and confidence. When one goofs on a Search and Discovery and finds the wrong actual SP the signs are the same as those where a Type Two is handled as a Type One-not sure, no good indicators, Roller Coasters again, etc. The actual SP can be back track but it is seldom vital to go far out of PT and usual for a lifetime person to turn up. Done correctly the pc's good indicators come in at once, the pc cognites, the meter reacts very well with Blowdowns and repeated long falls, and the pc ceases to Roller Coaster. Care should be taken not to get too enthusiastic in going far back track on the pc as you run into whole track implants etc, easily handleable only at Level V. The pc can get "over whumped" if you go too far back and you'll wish you hadn't. This normally happens however, only when the pc has been ARC Broken by the Auditor, when the right item has been by-passed and the list is overlong, or when 2 or 3 items are still reading on the list (incomplete list). Locating a Service Facsimile is quite similar to Search and Discovery but they are different processes entirely. Only the doingness is similar. In Search and Discovery the end product is a being. In Service Facsimile the end product is an item or concept or idea. Don't get the two mixed. HANDLING TYPE THREE The Type Three PTS is mostly in institutions or would be. In this case the Type Two's apparent SP is spread all over the world and is often more than all the people there are-for the person sometimes has ghosts about him or demons and they are just more apparent SPs but imaginary as beings as well. All institutional cases are PTSs. The whole of insanity is wrapped up in this one fact. The insane is not just a bad off being, the insane is a being who has been overwhelmed by an actual SP until too many persons are apparent SPs. This makes the person Roller Coaster continually in life. The Roller Coaster is even cyclic (repetitive as a cycle). Handling an insane person as a Type Two might work but probably not case for case. One might get enough wins on a few to make one fail completely by so many loses on the many. Just as you tell a Type Two to disconnect from the actual SP (wherever found on the track) you must disconnect the person from the environment. Putting the person in a current institution puts him in a Bedlam. And when also "treated" it may finish him. For he will Roller Coaster from any treatment given, until made into a Type Two and given a Search and Discovery. The task with a Type Three is not treatment as such. It is to provide a relatively safe environment and quiet and rest and no treatment of a mental nature at all. Giving HCOB 24 Nov 65 - 4 - him a quiet court with a motionless object in it might do the trick if he is permitted to sit there unmolested. Medical care of a very unbrutal nature is necessary as intravenous feeding and soporifics (sleeping and quietening drugs) may be necessary, such persons are sometimes also physically ill from an illness with a known medical cure. Treatment with drugs, shock, operation is just more suppression. The person will not really get well, will relapse, etc. Standard Auditing on such a person is subject to the Roller Coaster phenomena. They get worse after getting better. "Successes" are sporadic, enough to lead one on, and usually worsen again since these people are PTS. But removed from apparent SPs, kept in a quiet surroundings, not pestered or threatened or put infear, the person comes up to Type Two and a Search and Discovery should end the matter. But there will always be some failures as the insane sometimes withdraw into rigid unawareness as a final defense, sometimes can't be kept alive and sometimes are too hectic and distraught to ever become quiet, the extremes of too quiet and never quiet have a number of psychiatric names such as "catatonia" (withdrawn totally) and "manic" (too hectic). Classification is interesting but non-productive since they are all PTS, all will Roller Coaster and none can be trained or processed with any idea of lasting result no matter the temporary miracle. Remove a Type Three PTS from the environment, give him or her rest and quiet, do a Search and Discovery when rest and quiet have made the person Type Two. (Note: These paragraphs on the Type Three make good a promise given in Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health to develop "Institutional Dianetics".) The modern mental hospital with its brutality and suppressive treatments is not the way to give a psychotic quiet and rest. Before anything effective can be done in this field a proper institution would have to be provided, offering only rest, quiet and medical assistance for intravenous feedings and sleeping draughts where necessary but not as "treatment" and where no treatment is attempted until the person looks recovered and only then a Search and Discovery as above under Type Two. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ep.cden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 030 26 Dec 1966 Admin Know-How PTS Sections, Personnel and Ethics HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 DECEMBER 1966 Remimeo ADMIN KNOW-HOW PTS SECTIONS, PERSONNEL AND EXECS An org has certain sections, units, personnel and executives who go PTS to suppressive elements in the society. If one knows this, one becomes less puzzled by non-compliances and trouble in those quarters. One can also do something effective if one realizes why. Legal, accounts and construction and lesser units tend to go PTS very easily. A "P.T.S." is a Potential Trouble Source by reason of contact with a suppressive person or group. Suppression is "a harmful intention or action against which one cannot fight back." Thus when one can do anything about it it is less suppressive. Thus Legal goes PTS being in contact with SP courts and with SP or PTS attorney firms as well as confronting suppressives who are seeking to injure the org through various suppressive actions. Accounts goes PTS through various tax and government supervision suppressions. An Estate Branch listening to Town & Country Planning or zoning suppressives tends to go PTS. In a standard issue corporation the Labour Relations contact point, continually messed up by labour agitators who could do the company in and regulations protecting such, tends to go PTS. An Ethics Officer may become PTS. The Dead File Unit may go PTS on all the entheta letters. As such PTS personnel impinges on top executives, these can also go PTS and the org gets harmed to say the least. HANDLING As one cannot easily disconnect from suppressive society points without leaving the society, it remains that an executive must handle, if not the SP social groups, at least the situation developing from them and into the org. ideally one removes the SP's in the social groups. But where that is not possible one can do several things: (a) Limit the number of org personnel such groups contact. (b) Give such org personnel as do contact such suppressive elements S & D's occasionally. (c) Change such personnel frequently. HCOPL 26 DEC 66 - 2- d) Develop a system to restrain the SP from easily influencing such org personnel as may remain in contact. e) Work gradually but steadily into a position to be able to remove suppressives from the social groups in question, such as becoming more influential as an org, suing, exposing, public education and other means. INDICATORS The first indicator an org executive has of a unit or staff member going PTS is non-compliance. Such personnel are being overwhelmed in various ways by the SP social groups and have no energy left to undertake their duties or forward org programmes. Another indicator is the amount of illness and lack of case progress on the part of such PTS staff members. A third indicator is an executive getting the hat of such a personnel on his own plate. An executive who doesn't notice such indicators and act is being in turn PTS, or simply isn't of executive calibre. METHODS OF BALKING There are several methods by which a staff member acting as an org contact point in connection with suppressives can balk the agents of SP groups. One is to always tape record visibly whatever the agent from such a suppressive group says. "Ah. Mr. Figuretwist of the Tax Division? Good. Now wait a moment so I can record whatever you say. Good. It's now recording. Go ahead." We used to handle the Internal "Revenue" Service of the US this way quite successfully. The org contact point always stopping the IRS inspector they sent around, turning on a portable recorder and then, and not until then, letting the man speak. Quite effective. That org only got into tax trouble when it stopped doing this. After the recording was dropped out as drill the SP utterances of IRS agents were in full cry at the staff and they went PTS and began to make crazy errors and ignore org orders re tax. Any time such agents come around they try to get as many staff into it as possible. And yap and yap and threaten and enturbulate. One must put them in Coventry (silence treatment) from staff other than the contact point. Staff members of a unit that could go PTS must be ordered to walk off without a word whenever such an agent shows up. No "bull sessions" or arguments with such a person. The staff personnel who handles should point at the agent if other staff is about and say some key word like "This is a government man" at which all other staff in the unit turns its back or pointedly walks off. If you do this such agents can't take offence but they get very uneasy, transact quickly, forget their mission to be enturbulative and go away soon. Don't ever think politeness will help you. Tipping one's hat to snakes never stopped a person getting bitten. Walking off has. Staffs are so "reasonable" they think these SP group representatives are there for necessary purposes or serve some purpose, or can be reasoned with-all of which is nonsense. There are no good reporters. There are no good government or SP group agents. The longer you try to be nice the worse off you will be. And the sooner one learns this the happier he will be. Some staff member in such contact points in the org should be the only one who handles and all other staff should be given chits for talking to such a person. This limits the area of enturbulation. The handling staff member can become HCOPL 26 Dec 66 - 3 - expert. But even so watch for bad Indicators in that staff member, and the moment they show up, change the contact point. Never give such persons access to persons high up in the org-or unit. Turn such over to special personnel who can get the business over with at once and get the agent off the premises soon. If you see a manager snapping terminals with such agents, transfer him to another post in the org. Unless you do so, he'll soon cease complying with policy and will soon have the place falling apart. When such agents act or sound very suppressive, get them investigated, find the scandal and attack. It is a fortunate truth that such people also have crimes in their background that can be found. Find and expose them. SP's are at war. Pleasant conduct, mean conduct, any conduct at all is simply more war. So wage the back action as a battle. In all the history of Scientology no interviewing reporter ever helped. They all meant the worst when they acted their best and we are always sorry ever to have spoken. Even if the reporter is all right, his newspaper isn't and will twist his story. We have done best when we have blocked off reporters and worst when we've been nice, so the moral is, a person from an SP group will eventually make an org or some part of it PTS regardless of the agent's conduct. ---------- These words may seem harsh and unreasonable, yet truth is truth and only when we ignore it do we get fouled up. Agents from SP groups lead to PTS staff, units or sections, leads to non-compliance, leads to a mess. It isn't just imagination that SP's attack Scientology. The evidence has been around in plenty for 16 years. We began to prosper the day we cut public SP's correspondence off the org lines and sent it to dead file. Our executives began to function, policy began to be followed, and we began to grow. So we'll attain new expansion just by applying what is in this policy letter. I personally find such agents rather pitiful in their attempts to make trouble. I think the contemporary attempts to upset us and accusations of things we never do quite prove the fact such mean us no good. But many staff and executives try desperately to be nice to them. Handle the business they present as effectively as possible on special channels. Don't be nice. Limit their reach. And have less non-compliance and a far more effective and happier org. After all real suppressives only constitute about 2-1/2 percent of the total population. Why spend more than 2-1/2 percent of your time on them? The whole stunt is realizing that certain groups are SP and recognizing them and then handling them. Be alert and stay alive. It won't always be this way. L RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.rd Copyright ($) 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 031 HCOB 22 Mar 1967 Admin Know-How Alter-is and Degraded Beings HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 MARCH 19o7 Remimeo Level 0 IMPORTANT ADMIN KNOW-HOW ALTER-IS AND DEGRADED BEINGS Alteration of orders and tech is worse than non-compliance. Alter-is is a covert avoidance of an order. Although it is apparently often brought about by non-comprehension, the non-comprehension itself and failure to mention it, is an avoidance of orders. Very degraded beings alter-is. Degraded ones refuse to comply without mentioning it. Beings in fair condition try to comply but remark their troubles to get help when needed. Competent higher toned beings understand orders and comply if possible but mainly do their jobs without needing lots of special orders. Degraded beings find any instruction painful as they have been painfully indoctrinated with violent measures in the past. They therefore alter-is any order or don't comply. Thus in auditing pcs or in org. where you find alter-is (covert non- compliance) and non-compliance, given sensible and correct tech or instructions, you are dealing with a degraded low level being and should act accordingly. One uses very simple low level processes on a degraded being, gently. In admin, orgs and especially the Tech Div where a staff member alter- ises, or fails to comply you are also dealing with a degraded being but one who is too much a pc to be a staff member. He cannot be at cause and staff members must be at cause. So he or she should not be on staff. This is a primary senior datum regulating all handling of pcs and staff members. A degraded being is not a suppressive as he can have case gain. But he is so PTS that he works for suppressives only. He is sort of a super-continual PTS beyond the reach really of a simple S & D and handled only at Sect 3 OT Course. Degraded beings, taking a cue from SP associates, instinctively resent, hate and seek to obstruct any person in charge of anything or any Big Being. Anyone issuing sensible orders is the first one resented by a degraded being. A degraded being lies to his seniors, avoids orders covertly by alter-is, fails to comply, supplies only complex ideas that can't ever work (obstructive) and is a general area of enturbulence, often mild seeming or even "cooperative", often even flattering, sometimes merely dull but consistently alter-ising or non-complying. This datum appeared during higher level research and is highly revelatory of earlier unexplained phenomena-the pc who changes commands or doesn't do them, the worker who can't get it straight or who is always on a tea break. In an area where suppression has been very heavy for long periods people become degraded beings. However, they must have been so before already due to track incidents. HCQB 22 Mar 67 - 2 - Some thetans are bigger than others. None are truly equal. But the degraded being is not necessarily a natively bad thetan. He is simply so PTS and has been for so long that it requires our highest level tech to finally undo it after he has scaled up all our grades. Degraded beings are about 1 8 to I over Big Beings in the human race (minimum ratio). So those who keep things going are few. And those who will make it without the steam of the few in our orgs behind them are zero. At the same time, we can't have a world full of them and still make it. So we have no choice. And we can handle them, even when they cannot serve, at higher levels. This is really OT data but we need it at lower levels to get the job done. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.rd Copyright ($) 1967 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization. U. S. ===================== 032 HCOB 12 Mar 1968 Mistakes, Anatomy of HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 12 MARCH 1968 Remimeo MISTAKES, ANATOMY OF In the presence of Suppression, one makes mistakes. People making mistakes or doing stupid things is evidence that an SP exists in that vicinity. LRH:jc.nt.cden L. RON HUBBARD Copyright ($) 1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 033 HCOB 20 May 1968 Overt-Motivator Sequence HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 MAY 1968 Corrected & Reissued 5 Mar 74 Remimeo OVERT-MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE DIANETICS COURSES LEVEL TWO SOLO AUDIT OT SECTIONS There is an important discovery made in 1952 on the subject of engrams which did not get included in "Book One", Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health. This was the "Overt Motivator sequence of ENGRAMS". AN OVERT, in Dianetics and Scientology is an aggressive or destructive ACT by the individual against one or another of the 8 dynamics- (self, family, group, Mankind, animals or plants, MEST, Life or the Infinite). A MOTIVATOR is an aggressive or destructive act received by the person or one of the dynamics. The viewpoint from which the act is viewed resolves whether the act is an overt or a motivator. The reason it is called a "Motivator" is because it tends to prompt that one pays it back-it "motivates" a new overt. When one has done something bad to someone or something one tends to believe it must have been "motivated". When one has received something bad, he also may tend to feel he must have done something to deserve it. The above points are true. The actions and reactions of people on the subject are often very falsified. People go about believing they were in an auto accident when in actual fact they caused one. Also people may believe they caused an accident when they were only in one. Some people, on hearing of a death, at once believe they must have killed the person even though they were far away. Police in large cities have people turn up and confess to almost every murder as a routine. One doesn't have to be crazy to be subject to the Overt-Motivator sequence. It is not only used on him continually by others, it also is a basic part of his own "case". There are two extreme stages of Overt--Motivator phenomena. One is a person who gives up only motivators (always done to him) and the other is the person who "has done only overts" (done to others). In running engrams you will find 1. All overt engrams that hang up (won't audit easily) have also a motivator engram as the same or different incident. 2. All motivator engrams that hang up have an overt engram in the same or different incident. The two types of engrams then are OVERT Engrams and MOTIVATOR Engrams. Example of Overt Engram-SHOOTING A DOG. HCOB 20 May 68 - 2 - Example of Motivator Engram-BEING BITTEN BY A DOG. The rule is that the SUBJECT MATTER MUST BE SIMILAR. They can be in different points in time. When you can't run out (erase) a dog bite engram, why then you find the "shoot dog" engram. PSYCHOSOMATIC ILLS OR ABERRATIONS THAT DO NOT RESOLVE BY RUNNING ONE SIDE, USUALLY RESOLVE BY FINDING AND RUNNING THE OTHER. When you can't erase an engram about shooting a dog, why then there's a bitten by dog. It's all very simple really. There are always two sides to the coin. If one won't run, you try the other. BASICS Finding the basic engram on a chain also applies to finding the basic overt or basic motivator engram. Engrams then hang up (won't run out) when (a) The other type needs to be run and (b) The one found has earlier engrams on it. NON EXTANT ENGRAMS An "engram" sometimes didn't exist. A pc can be trying to run being run over by a car when he never was. What needs to be done, when the incident won't run, is get the pc's incident of running over somebody. It also works in reverse. A pc can be trying to run an engram of running over somebody when he was in fact only run over himself and never did run over anyone. So BOTH engrams can exist and be run or only one side exists and can be run or with a heavy foul up on overts and motivators, one side can be non-factual and won't run because only the other side exists. It is easy to visualize this as a matter of flows. An overt of course is an Outflow and a motivator is an Inflow. SECONDARIES It may never have been said that secondaries always sit squarely on incidents of actual pain and unconsciousness. Also secondaries can exist on the overt-motivator sequence pattern just as in engrams. This is the cause of frozen emotions or "unemotional" people. Also some people complain they can't feel anymore. This works out by overt-motivator sequence. A person in grief over loss (grief is always loss) who then can't run it has caused grief and that overt- secondary can be run. Also a person misemotional over causing grief has been caused grief. It works both ways with ALL POINTS ON THE TONE SCALE. The last is a newer discovery and wasn't known to early Dianeticists. The Overt Motivator Engram phenomena did not receive adequate dissemination. The principle applied to secondaries has not before been released. It is basically Dianetic Engram running that resolves all cases in the end so one had better be pretty good at auditing Engrams and Secondaries, Motivator and Overt both. LRH3p.js.cden L. RON HUBBARD Copyright ($) 1968 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 034 16 Aug 1969 Handling Illness in Scientology HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 16 AUGUST 1969 Remimeo Class VIII Chksht Class VIlls Class VIII C/S Book HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY Sickness is of course the result of engram chains in restimulation. One has to ask, however, what causes restimulation to occur? The answer is Out Ruds plus a suppressive environment or situation. Therefore, obviously, if one wanted to really handle handle handle sickness and do some miracles, one would use the lot of one's weapons. Don't mistake that Dianetics (HCOB 24 July 1969) can all by itself practically bring the dead to life to all intents and purposes and it can be used all by itself. However, when that doesn't work completely, then the Class VIII Case Supervisor and well trained Scientology auditors can step in. Let us examine the basic full dress parade routine of what Scientology and Dianetics could be used. 1. Put in Life Ruds (as given below). 2. 3 S&Ds. 3. All somatics, sensations, emotions and attitudes in or in regard to the sick area listed and handled by DIANETICS (HCOB 24 July 69) (which includes any medical treatment as in that HCOB). 4. A Review that flies a rud and a Scientology auditor runs the second and third flow of each somatic found and run in the Dianetic auditing. ---------- Obviously this illness hasn't a chance at all. It disappears in 1. Or in 2. Or in 3. and there aren't very many that would ever get to 4. The system is obvious. You take away the current out-ruds and the illness can de-stimulate. You take away the suppressions and de-stimulation is more positive. You erase all the engrams and the source is gone. You do the second and third flows and the overts and sympathies are also vanished. On ruds alone you can of course get a recurrence. You also risk a recurrence on the S & Ds. The motivators go on the engram chains. The overts and sympathy for like illness goes on the second and third flows. ---------- LIFE RUDS As the person with Out ruds makes no real gain it is wise to put ruds in "In life". This is done with "In life have you had an ARC Break?" "In life have you had a Problem?" "In life have you had a withhold?" If the person has had much auditing you ask after each of the "In life" questions "Was that present in an auditing session?" HCOB 16 Aug 69 - 2 - S & Ds The full parade for three S & Ds (as given in HCOB 19 January 1968 in the Class VIII pack is as follows: 3 Item S & D Fly a rud. Assess Withdraw From Stop Unmock Suppress Invalidate Make Nothing of Suggest Been Careful of Fail to Reveal Take the 3 that read best (null to 3 items). Use the one that read most first. Test one of these items in these two questions to see which question then reads best. "Who or What has attempted to you?" "Who or What have you tried to ?" List the best reading question by the laws of Listing and Nulling. BE EXACT IN FOLLOWING THOSE LAWS or you'll make the person even sicker! Use each of the 3 this way. Prepcheck any item that does not F/N until it F/Ns or proves not to be the correct one in which event correct the list. If the list item does not F/N on being found and indicated, you prepcheck it to F/N. DIANETICS HCOB of 24 July 69 covers the use of Dianetics in this regard. SECOND AND THIRD FLOWS The running of the 2nd and third flows is covered in VIII materials and in any event is self evident. This rundown is what could be known as beating an illness to death. Handling it medically and spiritually should bring home a winner every time. This full approach is recommended only when one has encountered a resistive situation. Very often a Dianetic Assist precedes all this. Usually the Dianetic handling is done without the ruds or S & Ds. But when you have somebody whose "lumbosis" has not surrendered to Dianetics, you have this full approach to fall back on. It's nice to have a full arsenal. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ldm.ei.rd Copyright ($) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HCO B 16 August 1969 - Page 2 ===================== 035 HCOB 20 Apr 1972 XDx Series 4, Suppressed PCs and PTS Tech HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN 0F 20 APRIL 1972 Remimeo Expanded Dianetics Series 4 (Adds C/S Series 76 to HGDS checksbeet) 8UPPRESSED PCS AND PTS TECH (PTS means Potential Trouble Sources which itself means a person connected to a Suppressive Person.) As the Dianetic Specialist (HGDS) is often called upon to handle pcs who are not well, it is vital that he knows all about and can use "PTS Tech." All sick persons are PTS. All pcs who rollercoaster (regularly lose gains) are PTS. Suppressive persons are themselves PTS to themselves. If a Dianetic Specialist does not know this, have reality upon it and use it, be will have loses on pee he need not have. There is considerable Administrative Tech connected with this subject of PTS and there is a special Rundown which handles PTS people. They get handled ~ the auditor knows his PTS tech, if he audits well and if he uses both the auditing and Administrative Tech to handle. The Administrative Tech requires an interview, usually by the Director of Processing or Ethics Officer and the person is required to handle the PTS situation itself before being audited. A cheek for stability is also made after being audited on the PTS Rundown. For this reason, HCO B 17 April 72 and all the check- sheet of HCO P/L 31 May 71 must be fully known to the Dianetic Specialist. HCO B 17 April 72 is also C/S Series 76 so as to be sure that Case Supervisors handle the Admin and C/Sing correctly. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:mes Copyright ($) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED