6510C14 SHSpec-68 Briefing to Review Auditors There are three key data that go out in an org and therefore are essential to be known by the Department of Review, that LRH hasn't been able to teach Tech, Qual or orgs. You will hit them in Review, because no one else will have gotten them: 1. A HIGH TA IS OVERRUN. There is no other reason for a high TA. Review's problem is to find what was overrun and how it was overrun. When someone comes in who has never been audited, and who has never been near another "therapy" or practice, and whose TA is at 5.0, he has still been overrun on something. You just have your work cut out for you in finding it. Don't throw away the datum, the way everyone else has. Using this datum, you are likely to find some interesting things. Say someone went release on Christianity at age six, or on exercise at age twenty, and then went on past that point, doing it some more. Releases don't only happen in scientology. It is likely to be some wisdom or therapy that released him. They are all failed technologies. All past wisdoms may have had technologies that have been alter-ised and lost. We almost went that route by not recognizing the state of release and the phenomenon of the F/N. What has been overrun is not necessarily what the PC was running when the TA went high. You might have overrun some earlier release. It may, for instance, be a restimulation "of an earlier overrun communication release." The PC could have been a problems release and gotten keyed in again on a ruds question. If the HGC or field auditor didn't repair it by asking, as a first question, "What was overrun?", they would never solve it. They would get the wrong overrun. You must find what, exactly, the release was on. Which or what one was it? Get the right when and the right what, and the TA will blow down, and the needle will float. You've got to rehab the right release to get the high TA down . There could be other overruns on the case, too, but there is one that is making the high TA. Get that, and the rehab tech will get it to F/N, quickly or less quickly. 2. A ROLLER-COASTER CASE HAS AN SP IN THE VICINITY. The anatomy of the PTS is that of a problem: postulate/counter-postulate. The person's purpose (postulate) has been or is being suppressed (counter-postulate). There is no other source of roller-coaster. An SP gives the PTS a problem. When the PC roller-coasters, he has run into a postulate/counter-postulate situation since his last gain. A PTS really does make trouble for the auditor, the org, and himself. Ethics exists to get tech in. If it is ever used to throw tech out, it is being used suppressively. Search and discovery is used to find the suppressions that a person has had in life. The S and D question is: 1. "What's been your main purpose in life?" 2. "Who opposed it?" This often makes a problems release in minutes. With a PTS or with any problem you want to solve, "find the source of the counter-postulate.... Man gets "solutions' to problems.... He leaves the [two opposed postulates] in place, not knowing the definition of a problem, and then "solves' the resulting collision, as in Dialectical Materialism -- the anatomy of a problem gone mad. "Any idea is the product of two forces," is the backbone of Dialectical Materialism." To solve a problem, look over the whole perimeter of counter-postulates and find what is the source of the problem. If you handle the problem for the PC, often the problem will evaporate for the other person, also. Problems sometimes evaporate in the physical universe when you find the source of the counter-postulate. In ethics, "when you see that the disconnection or the handle ... causes an enormous problem for the [PTS] or for the other person from whom they are disconnecting, you have invariably found the wrong person.... PTS is the manifestation of a postulate/counter-postulate." Find who, when, where, and what. You could list, "What purpose of yours has been thwarted?" You can get a Grade I release with this. Suppressives are now to be lo ated in Review, because ethics has flubbed it too much. PTS's go to ethics after Review to have note made of the fact that they ar PTS and to get a statement made of handle or disconnect. A PTS condition can be caused by a suppressive action, as well as by a suppressive person. For instance, if you overrun a PC past release, the PC goes PTS to the auditor, just as a mechanical action. Self-auditing is a potential hidden source of overrun. You don't declare the auditor an SP. It was a suppressive act, that's all. The definition of PTS is "connected to a suppressive person or action." The action could be inadvertent. So you find the suppressive person. The person may have only been suppressive for five minutes, or he may have been suppressive for a lifetime. Someone could be PTS and overrun. In that case, you must get the suppression off and rehab the process. A suppressive person isn't someone with horns. It is someone who has had a counter-postulate to the PC. A person may occasionally commit suppressive acts, or he may be habitually suppressive. Someone who is routinely suppressive in life, invalidative of scientology, and trying to keep people from getting well is a social menace. He is the subject of ethics. He is the one who gets declared, not the auditor who overran a process from some inadvertent or stupid mistake. When you tell a person the right SP, it is like locating and indicating BPC. You should get a blowdown and GI's. If the PC again roller-coasters, you've got another SP. So there could be several SP's on the case. You don't go looking for all of them at the same time, but [after you find one suppressive] look for another one. If you found all the SP's and suppressive actions in a person's lifetime, he would be a problems release. And if he goes release on problems, he won't go PTS again, unless he goes home and starts self-auditing. He can overrun himself on self-auditing, so be aware of that. 3. THE SOURCE OF OVERTS IS AN EARLIER MISUNDERSTOOD WORD. The source of the overt is the other key datum that has been missed: A misunderstood word causes individuation, which leads to overts. The word that a student is arguing with the course supervisor about is later than the one that the student really misunderstood. Any confusion, stupidity, or upset in study always stems from a misunderstood word earlier than the one he is upset about. It is always earlier! So the source of the overt is in the formula: 1. Something is misunderstood. 2. The person individuates. 3. He commits overts against the misunderstood thing. If what the person thought was the misunderstood was the misunderstood, the problem would have blown. So it is always earlier. This datum is the key datum in the area of study and comprehension of existence. It regulates a person's I.Q. The Review action is to look for the earlier area and the earlier word that was misunderstood. [Cf. Method 1 Word Clearing] You can unburden a few words earlier than where you think the misunderstood word is, then get the misunderstood just before it. You can date the time of the misunderstood. You should ask what subject the PC was in. A person isn't upset with studying. It is only a misunderstood word. It is not case, and it is not the environment. Remember that you are handling fringes on end-words, so don't push all the way back into R6. Just find what was happening before he hit the thing he doesn't understand. So these three data are the only ones that are really important in Review: 1. High TA = overrun . 2. Roller-coaster = PTS = Who is the SP? That question is the source of hang-ups on the track. You must find the counter-postulate and the source of the counter-postulate. 3. Confusion comes from a misunderstood word earlier than the one the person is confused about.