FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST PTS AND SP DETECTION, ROUTING AND HANDLING COURSE PART 7/7 CONTENTS ************************************************** This is the PTS and SP Detection, Routing and Handling Course Pack as issued and delivered in the 1977 - 1978 time frame. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. NOTE: With the following exceptions, all documents are reproduced exactly as issued. All italicized or bold characters and underlines have been omitted from this reproduction. Only minor spelling errors have been corrected. If you have questions about the content of an individual issue please refer to the Tech or OEC Volumes (which were posted previously) for clarification. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heretics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association - Unit 8 ************************************************** ===================== 060 HCOB 21 Jan 1966 Search and Discovery, Ethics Type Cases, PTSs HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JANUARY 1966 Remimeo SEARCH AND DISCOVERY (ETHICS TYPE CASES, PTSs) S & D ERRORS (Handling PTSs with S & D) When you have a failed Search and Discovery, the following are incorrect or have been omitted: 1. Incorrect item (errors in listing or assessment (over, or under listing, bad metering, poor question). 2. Person has not actually been made to disconnect from the SP by declaration in writing 3. It was really an ARC Break, not an SP and ARC Breaks should have been looked for instead of SPs. 4. The SP found was refused by the Auditor or Ethics. The golden rule of S & D also applies-if it isn't the correct person or group that was "found" the good indicators won't come in. So any incorrectly done S & D (as above) will not result in a pc bright- eyed and bushy tailed. All S & Ds correctly done on a PC that is PTS result in remarkable recoveries magical to see. So don't blame S & D if it "fails". Blame the lack of skill in using it and the person who ordered it or did it should be retrained. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright ($) 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 061 HCOB 10 Jun 1966 S & D The Missed Item HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1966 Issue II Remimeo Tech Div Hats HGC Auditors Qual Div Staff S & D-THE MISSED ITEM There are four points I want to get across to you. 1. ILLNESS = ONLY PTS 2. ONLY PTS = ILLNESS 3. ONLY A PTS CONDITION CAN MAKE A GRADE V (or any grade) SICK 4. A BAD S & D MAKES A PERSON SICK Get it? GOOD!! Now, if a person who has had an S & D gets sick, what do you know? You know that: - (a) They are a PTS (b) The S & D was not properly done (c) An item was missed NOTE:- The missed item may be on a list that was made 2 or 3 years ago. On the HCO B 5th February 1966 "S & D WARNING", I clearly stated that "It is the action of nearly finding the right one that may make the pc ill". One has restimulated the charge of the RIGHT item, but, has found and okayed the WRONG item. A bad S & D is DEADLY. A bad S & D can cause a dangerous physical condition. A bad S & D can land a pc in hospital (I know of two such cases where it did). So please! PLEASE!! get this, it is so very important. Always, repeat, ALWAYS look for the MISSED item on a priorly done list when the pc gets sick. Know your S & D bulletins, know your listing and nulling bulletin- THOROUGHLY-and you won't go wrong. Let's fix up roller coasters, not help keep them roller coasting. IT'S VERY EASY. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:lb-r.cden Copyright ($) 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 062 HCOB 20 JULY 1966 The Type Two PTS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JULY 1966 Required for Level IV Students TO REVIEW AUDITORS TO ETHICS OFFICERS THE TYPE TWO PTS It has been revealed at Saint Hill that HGC auditors and Review auditors are permitting their preclears to be sent through to Ethics for writing disconnection letters to any person or group which the preclear thinks to have been suppressive of him and then continuing the Search and Discovery to find the SP on the list. This is improper. The auditor should continue the proper auditing of an S and D until the proper item on the list is found. An Ethics Officer should only accept from a Type Two PTS, the proper SP found upon the completion of an S and D properly listed and nulled to one SP. LRH:lb-r L. RON HUBBARD Copyright ($) 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 063 BPL 5 Apr 1972RB PTS Type A Handling BOARD POLICY LETTER 5 APRIL 1972RB ISSUE I Remimeo HCO Sec Hat RE-REVISED 2 SEPTEMBER 1977 Dir I ~ R Hat (To change reference in first E/O Hat line to 7 May 69 which revised PL 27 October 64, the original reference, and to correct the following quote.) PTS TYPE A HANDLING DEFINITION Per HCO Policy Letter of 7 May, 1969, POLICIES ON "SOURCES OF TROUBLE", "a 'source of trouble' Type A is a person 'intimately connected with persons (such as marital or familial ties) of known antagonism to mental or spiritual treatment or Scientology. In practice such persons, even when they approach Scientology in a friendly fashion, have such pressure continually brought to bear upon them by persons with undue influence over them that they make very poor gains in processing and their interest is solely devoted to proving the antagonistic element wrong.'" A SOURCE OF TROUBLE Such persons with antagonistic family members are a source of trouble to Scientology ($) because their family members are not inactive. In fact from direct experience with Inquiry after Inquiry into Scientology, it has been found that those who have created the conditions which brought about the Inquiry in the first place and those who testified before same have been the wives, husbands, mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, or grandparents of some Scientologist. Their testimony has been full of such statements as, "My son completely changed after he went into Scientology - he no longer was respectful to me." "My daughter gave up a wonderful career as a hairdresser to go into Scientology." "My sister got these funny staring eyes the way all Scientologists have." Their testimony was illogical and their descriptions of what occurred were untrue, but the point of the matter is that such persons DID cause Scientology, Scientology Orgs and fellow Scientologists a great deal of trouble and difficulty. DON'T CREATE ANTAGONISM Many Scientologists in their misunderstandings and mis- application of Scientology create the conditions that bring about the antagonism in the first place. A few illustrations of how this is done are as follows: Scientologist to mother: "I now know where you are on the Tone Scale - 1.1. Boy are you sneaky!" (Evaluation and invalidation.) BPL 5.4.72RB I - 2 - Re-kb. 3. ~L77 Father to Scientologist: "Now I don't want you to borrow the car again without my permission. I have told you time and time...." Scientologist to father: "OKAY! FINE! OKAY! GOOD! THANK YOU! I GOT THAT' (Not an acknowledgement but art effort to shut up the father.) Scientologist to older brother: "You murdered me in a past life, you dirty dog!" (Evaluation and invalidation.) Mother to Scientologist: "Whatever are you doing?" Scientologist to mother: "I'm trying to confront your dreadful bank." (Invalidation.) There are so many ways to misuse tech and to invalidate arid evaluate for others in a destructive fashion to bring about bypassed charge, ARC Breaks and upset that they can not all be possibly listed. The idea is NOT to do so. Why create trouble for yourself and for your fellow Scientologists as nothing will have been gained but ill-will? THE WHY Per HCO Policy Letter of March 7, 1965, it is a CRIME to be or become a PTS without reporting it or taking action, or to receive processing while PTS. Further as per HCO Policy Letter of October 27, 196L1, a PTS may not be trained. This means that a person who is PTS may not receive processing or training while PTS and it also means that they had better do something to handle their condition. As per older, now cancelled policy, the PTS individual was required to handle or disconnect from the antagonistic family member before he or she could continue with their training or processing. Many took the easy course and merely disconnected as such disconnection was only temporary for the time of their training or processing and so they did not in actual fact handle the condition in their life which was upsetting to them as Scientologists. Scientology executives have had to promise the New Zealand government that the policy of disconnection from families would be cancelled. This was done. But since that time, we have had more PTS trouble than before. Therefore, what is needed is a legal and more sensible way to handle. Using recent technology contained in the Data Series Policy Letters, a new procedure is possible. Each PTS individual should report to Ethics and with the assistance of Ethics, find a WHY as to their familial antagonism and then set about actually handling the situation. The WHY could be that his parents wanted him to be a lawyer and so blame Scientology that he is not one, rather than the fact that he flunked out of law school and couldn't stand the' thought of being a lawyer! Or perhaps the WHY is that the Scientologist keeps writing her parents for money or the WHY could be that the mother has just read an entheta newspaper article. BPL 5.4.72RB I - 3 - Rev 2.9.77 In any case the WHY should be found and the PTS individual should then do whatever is necessary to handle. See the Data Series PLs (must be word cleared on the user) to find out how to find a Why. This is not mandatory for doing the PTS/SP Detection Checksheet (BPL 31 May 1971RF). HANDLING The person who is PTS should be declared as such by Ethics and should not receive Scientology training or processing until the situation has been handled. (The exception to this is a full PTS Rundown done in the HCC.) The handling could be as simple as writing to one's father and saying, "I do not complain that you are a janitor, please do not complain that I am a Scientologist. The important thing is that I am your son and that I love and respect you. I know you love me, but please learn to respect me as an adult individual who knows what he wants in life." Or it could be as follows, I am writing to you, Daddy, because Mother keeps sending me these dreadful news paper clippings and they are upsetting to me because I know they are not true. You do not do this and so it is easier for me to write to you." Again there are as many ways of handling as there are Whys found. Each case is individual. Remember, too, there is always the possibility of a NO situation. And if the person thinks he's PTS and isn't, he can get sick. Or if he insists he isn't and is, he can also get upset. So find if there IS a situation first. It is the purpose of Ethics to ensure that the situation is handled. CS-6 for L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER Re-revised by AVU I/A BPI Appeal Line for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:LRH:MSH:AH:lf:pat Copyright ($) 1972, 1977 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 064 BTB 11 Nov 1977 Handling PTS Situations BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 11 NOVEMBER 1977 Remimeo (Reissued 10 December 1977 PTS/SP Detection, to correct typos On Routing and page 1.) Handling Course Level IV, Snr CL IV HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS The majority of the, Technology on how to handle PTSes is already covered in the PTS and SP Detection, Routing and Handling Course. The following LRH tips on handling PTS Type A situations have been excerpted from an LRH lecture as additional data for your use. "I coached a pc one time as to how to talk to his parents. I coached him very, very carefully. This is a sort of an MAA job, not a C/S job. I made him repeat everything after me, very carefully. 'And when your mother says to you so and so and so and so what are you going to say?' It was just good roads and good weather. I forced on him at pain of being squashed, to follow this exact patter with his parents. 'Hello Mama, how are you? How's Papa?' etc., simply good roads and good weather. And she says 'Yeow yeow yeow yeow yeow yeow' and you '...whawha whawha wha'. Why just say 'well alright, alright', and don't answer back and don't engage in any argument of any kind whatsoever. Give it an acknowledgement. I told him 'You are calling them up just because you're passing through and you were interested in how they are, and that is your whole story.' And he did, and that was the end of the whole situation. The pc came back to battery. Relationships with the parents went totally normal. In other words, he was keeping it going by his worry, his upset, his letters, trying to answer their questions, his conversation with them. Whereas I cut it all into just the pattern of something on the order of about a Tone 3.5 straight across the boards. That was the end of the PTS condition. "A PTS condition also has outside handling steps. But you as an auditor, or you as a C/S are possibly limited by the fact that you don't have an MAA, or you do not have somebody who is sufficiently skilled in order to do this job for you, and it winds up blowing everybody's head off. In such an instance, just get hold of the guy, coach him in exactly what he's going to say. 'Oh but no she'd never listen, she won't. She hasn't talked to me for seven years. She won't talk to me in any way shape or form.' 'Well alright, alright, alright, that's fine, good.' Then you get a little bit inventive and you say 'Well, when is her birthday?', or something like that, and the pc says 'Well as a matter of fact, it was a month or two ago,' and you say 'Well alright, why don't you send her a birthday card, and tell her it's a belated birthday card, and that you remembered her birthday and always had kind thoughts of her?' Now the incoming comm may blow his head off, and you just cool him off. Don't engage in any corner of this. This is not the game you're playing. You simply acknowledge any nice part that you can find. 'Papa went hunting, and you're a dirty dog, and I've never seen the like of you, and you're an ungrateful brat and so on, and why don't you be like your Great Uncle Oscar who is now doing time in Sing Sing and will be executed next week?' And so forth, and you say 'I hope Daddy had a fine hunting trip.' It's the only part of it you answer. You coach him into a two-way comm that is well above 2.0 on the tone scale. That mostly BTB 11 Nov 77 - 2 - consists of acknowledgements and mild interest in what's going on. You will, find out these conditions will evaporate, if you can prevent the backflash from being responded to by the PTS person. In other words, there are ways to handle this in real life. "You will find a great many people who are 'PTS', are antagonizing the people. They're antagonizing them beyond belief, and they're telling them what's wrong with them, and they're telling them this and they're telling them that and so on, and the person eventually gets very resentful. Well even that can be patched up. You are not doing anything at the other end of the line. You cool off the PT scene sufficiently, one way or the other, so that the person can sit in the auditing chair." LRH (Compiled from LRH Taped Lecture 7511C20) Julie Gillespie A/CS-4 Approved by LRH Pers Comm Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:AH:KU:jlG:pat Copyright ($) 1977 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 064. HCOB 24 Apr 1972 C/S Series 79 - PTS Interview HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 APRIL 1972 ISSUE I Remimeo D of P Auditors PTS Pack C/S Series 79 Ethics Officers Expanded Dianetics Series 5 PTS INTERVIEWS (Reference HCO B 16 Apr 72 C/S Series 76.) Interviews to discover a PTS condition are done on a meter with all reads marked. The Interview asks (a) about persons who are hostile or antagonistic to the pc (b) about groups that are anti-Scientology (c) about people who have harmed the pc (d) about things that the pc thinks are suppressive to the pc (e) about locations that are suppressive to the pc and about past life things and beings suppressive to the pc. In doing the Interview the Interviewer must realize that a sick person is PTS. There are no sick people who are not PTS to someone or a group or something somewhere. A somewhat suppressive pc will find the good hate suppressive. This does not relieve his condition. He is PTS to SP people, groups, things or locations, no matter how SP he is. He can have been audited by someone he knew in an earlier life and who goofed the session. A few auditors have since been declared. Not because they goofed but because they were SP. However, some PTS pc will make trouble for good people because that is what PTS means (Potential Trouble Source). So do not buy all the good people he is PTS to. Further, when you do get the person or group or thing or location the PTS person will F/N VGI and begin to get well. The PTS condition is actually a problem and a mystery and a withdrawal so it is sometimes hard to find and has to be specially processed (3 S&Ds) to locate it. Usually it is quite visible. Don't have a sick, roller coaster pc appear for Interview and then say "not PTS". It 's a false report. It only means the Interviewer did not find it. The pc sometimes begins to list in such an Interview and such an Interview where a wrong item is found has to be audited to complete the list or find the right item. (See C/S Series 78 HCO B 20 Apr 72, Issue II.) HCO B 24.4.72 -2- Issue I So Interview worksheets are VITAL. The Interview Should end on an F/N. The Interview is followed by the Ethics action of HCO P/L 5 April 72 or other Ethics actions such as handling or disconnection and posting as called for in policy. An Interviewer has to use good TRs and operate his meter properly and know 2 way comm and PTS tech. Some Interviewers are extremely successful. Such Interviews and handling count as auditing hours. When properly done, plus good auditing on the PTS RD, well people result. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:mes Copyright ($) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 065. HCOB 10 Aug 1973 PTS Handling HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1973 A/Guardians HCO Secs E/Os MAAs Tech Secs Ds of P PTS Pack PTS HANDLING (PTS = Potential Trouble Source) There are two stable data which anyone has to have, understand and KNOW ARE TRUE in order to obtain results in handling the person connected to suppressives. These data are: 1. That all illness in greater or lesser degree and all foul ups stem directly and only from a PTS condition. 2. That getting rid of the condition requires three basic actions: A. Discover B. Handle or disconnect. Persons called upon to handle PTS people can do so very easily, far more easily than they believe. Their basic stumbling block is thinking that there are exceptions or that there is other tech or that the two above data have modifiers or are not sweeping. The moment a person who is trying to handle PTSs gets persuaded there are other conditions or reasons or tech, he is at once lost and will lose the game and not obtain results. And this is very too bad because it is not difficult and the results are there to be obtained. To turn someone who may be PTS over to an auditor just to have him mechanically audited may not be enough. In the first place this person may not have a clue what is meant by PTS and may be missing all manner of technical data on life and may be so overwhelmed by a suppressive person or group that he is quite incoherent. Thus just mechanically doing a process may miss the whole show as it misses the person's understanding of why it is being done. A PTS person is rarely psychotic. But all psychotics are PTS if only to themselves. A PTS person may be in a state of deficiency or pathology which prevents a ready recovery, but at the same time he will not fully recover unless the PTS condition is also handled. For he became prone to deficiency or pathological illness because he was PTS. And unless the condition is relieved, no matter what medication or nutrition he may be given, he might not recover and certainly will not recover permanently. This seems to indicate that there are "other illnesses or reasons for illness besides being PTS". To be sure there are deficiencies and illnesses just as there are accidents and injuries. But strangely enough the person himself precipitates them because being PTS predisposes him to them. In a more garbled way, the medicos and nutritionists are always talking about "stress"' causing illness. Lacking HCOB 10.8.73 - 2 - full tech they yet have an inkling that this is so because they see it is somehow true. They cannot handle it. Yet they recognize it, and they state that it is a senior situation to various illnesses and accidents. Well, we have the tech of this in more ways than one. What is this thing called "stress"? It is more than the medico defines it - he usually says it comes from operational or physical shock and in this he has too limited a view. A person under stress is actually under a suppression on one or more dynamics. If that suppression is located and the person handles or disconnects the condition diminishes. If he also has all the engrams and ARC Breaks, problems, overts and withholds audited out triple flow and if ALL such areas of suppression are thus handled, the person would recover from anything caused by "stress". Usually the person has insufficient understanding of life or any dynamic to grasp his own situation. He is confused. He believes all his illnesses are true because they occur in such heavy books! At some time he was predisposed to illness or accidents. When a serious suppression then occurred he suffered a precipitation or occurrence of the accident or illness, and then with repeated similar suppressions on the same chain, the illness or tendency to accidents became pro- longed or chronic. To say then that a person is PTS to his current environment would be very limited as a diagnosis. If he continues to do or be something to which the suppressive person or group objected he may become or continue to be ill or have accidents. Actually the problem of PTS is not very complicated. Once you have grasped the two data first given, the rest of it becomes simply an analysis of how they apply to this particular person. A PTS person can be markedly helped in three ways: (a) gaining an understanding of the tech of the condition (b) discovering to what or to whom he is PTS. (c) handling or disconnecting. Someone with the wish or duty to find and handle PTSs has an additional prior step: He must know how to recognize a PTS and how to handle them when recognized. Thus it is rather a waste of time to engage in this hunt unless one has been checked out on all the material on suppressives and PTSs and grasps it without misunderstoods. In other words the first step of the person is to get a grasp of the subject and its tech. This is not difficult to do; it may be a bit more difficult to learn to run an E-meter HCOB 10.8.73 - 3 - and considerably more difficult to learn how to list for items, but there again this is possible and is much easier than trying to grope around guessing. With this step done, a person has no real trouble recognizing PTS people and can have success in handling them which is very gratifying and rewarding. Let us consider the easiest level of approach: i) Give the person the simpler HCOBs on the subject and let him study them so that he knows the elements like "PTS" and "Suppressive". He may just cognite right there and be much better. It has happened. ii) Have him discuss the illness or accident or condition, without much prodding or probing, that he thinks now may be the result of Suppression. He will usually tell you it is right here and now or was a short time ago and will be all set to explain it (without any relief) as stemming from his current environment or a recent one. If you let it go at that he would simply be a bit unhappy and not get well as he is discussing usually a late lock that has a lot of earlier material below it. iii) Ask when he recalls first having that illness or having such accidents. He will at once begin to roll this back and realize that it has happened before. You don't have to be auditing him as he is all too willing to talk about this in a most informal manner. He will get back to some early this-lifetime point usually. iv) Now ask him who it was. He will usually tell you promptly, And, as you are not really auditing him and he isn't going backtrack and you are not trying to do more than key him out, you don't probe any further. v) You will usually find that he has named a person to whom he is still connected! So you ask him whether he wants to handle or disconnect. Now as the sparks will really fly in his life if he dramatically disconnects and if he can't see how he can, you persuade him to begin to handle on a gradient scale. This may consist of imposing some slight discipline on him such as requiring him to actually answer his mail or write the person a pleasant good roads good weather note or to realistically look at how he estranged them. In short what is required in the handling is a low gradient. All you are trying to do is MOVE THE PTS PERSON FROM EFFECT OVER TO SLIGHT GENTLE CAUSE. vi) Check with the person again, if he is handling, and coach him along, always at a gentle good roads and good weather level and no H E and R (Human Emotion and Reaction) if you please. That is a simple handling. You Can get complexities such as a person being PTS to an unknown person in his immediate vicinity that he may have to find before he can handle or disconnect. You can find people who can't remember more than a few years back. You can find any- thing you can find in a case. But simple handling ends HCOB 10.8.73 - 4 - when it looks pretty complex. And that's when you call in the auditor. But this simple handling will get you quite a few stars in your crown. You will be amazed to find that while some of them don't instantly recover, medication, vitamins, minerals will now work when before they wouldn't. You may also get some instant recovers but realize that if they don't you have not failed. The auditor can do "3 S&Ds" after this with much more effect as he isn't working with a completely uninformed person. "3 S&Ds" only fail because of wrong items or because the auditor did not then put in triple rudiments on the items and then audit them out as engrams triple flow. A being is rather complex. He may have a lot of sources of suppression. And it may take a lot of very light auditing to get him up to where he can do work on suppressives since these were, after all, the source of his overwhelm. And what he did to THEM might be more important than what they did to HIM but unless you unburden HIM he may not get around to realizing that. You can run into a person who can only be handled by Expanded Dianetics. But you have made an entrance and you have stirred things up and gotten him more aware and just that way you will find he is more at cause. His illness or proneness to accidents may not be slight. You may succeed only to the point where he now has a chance, by nutrition, vitamins, minerals, medication, treatment, and above all, auditing, of getting well. Unless you jogged this condition, he had no chance at all: for becoming PTS is the first thing that happened to him on the subject of illness or accidents. Further, if the person has had a lot of auditing and yet isn't progressing too well, your simple handling may all of a sudden cause him to line up his case. So do not underestimate what you or an auditor can do for a PTS. And don't sell PTS tech short or neglect it. And don't continue to transfer or push off or even worse tolerate PTS conditions in people. You CAN do something about it. And so can they. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1973 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 066. HCOB 15 Dec 1973 The Continuous M/W and Continuous Overt HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 15 DECEMBER 1973 All Levels Add Level II Checksheet Ethics Officers Masters at Arms C/Sea THE CONTINUOUS MISSED W/H AND CONTINUOUS OVERT WITH DATA ON DEGRADED BEINGS AND FALSE PTS CONDITIONS Reference: (1) Tape List and HCOB List of Level II Page 4 HCO P/L 26.1.72 Issue VI concerning Withholds and Overts. (2) Admin Know-How - Alter-Is and Degraded Beings HCOB 22 Mar 67. There are two special cases of withholds and overts. They do not occur in all cases by a long ways. But the do occur on a few cases. These are CONTINUOUS MISSED WITHHOLDS and CONTINUOUS OVERTS. This is not quite the same as "The Continuing Overt Act" HCOB 29 September 65. In that type the person is repeating overt acts against something usually named. THE CONTINUOUS MISSED W/H A Continuous Missed Withhold. occurs when a person feels some way and anyone who sees him misses it. Example: A doctor feels very unconfident of his skill. Every patient who sees him misses the fact that he is not confident. This reacts as a missed withhold. It is of course based upon some bad incident that destroyed his confidence (usually of an engramic intensity). But as the person actively withholds this, then those seeing him miss the withhold, This could work in thousands of variations. A woman feels continuous disdain for her child but withholds it. The child therefore continuously misses a withhold. All the phenomena of the missed w/h would continuously react against the child. Probably all dishonest social conduct brings about a Continuous Missed Withhold. The politician who hates people, the minister who no longer believes in God, the mechanic HCOB 15.12.73 - 2 - who privately believes he is a jinx on machinery, these all then set up the phenomena of missed witholds on them selves and can dramatize it in their conduct. THE CONTINUOUS OVERT A person who believes he is harmful to others may also believe that many of his common ordinary actions are harmful. He may feel he is committing a Continuous Overt on others. Example: A clothing model believes she is committing a fraud on older women by displaying clothing to them in which they will look poorly. In her estimation this is a Continuous Overt Act. Of course all older women miss it on her. Appearance, just being alive can be considered by some as an overt. Missed withhold phenomena will result. DEGRADED BEINGS The Continuous Withhold and Continuous Overt are probably a basis of feeling degraded. Degraded Beings, as described in Admin Know-How Alter-Is and Degraded Beings HCOB 22 Mar 67, are that way at least in part because they have some Continuous Missed Withhold or a fancied Continuous Overt Act. This makes them feel degraded and act that way. HANDLING One can add to any program a check for a Continuous Missed Withhold or Continuous Overt as an additional version of rudiments, A master question, which could be broken down into three lists which would have to be done by the laws of L&N, would be, "When anyone looks at you what feeling (action, attitude) of yours do they miss?" Then "When was it missed?" "Who missed it?" and "What did he do that made you believe it had been missed?" Another approach, less dangerous in that lists aren't made, would be: For Continuous Missed Withhold the question could be "Is there some way you feel that others don't realize?" And with 2wc uncover it. Then ask "Who misses this?" with HCOB 15.12.73 - 3 - answer, followed by "When has someone missed it?" with E/S to an early time, Followed by "What did he (or she) do that made you think he (or she) knew?" This will key it out and can change behavior. For Continuous Overt Act it would be "Is there some thing you do that others do not know about?" With 2wc to cover it and get what it is. Then ask "Who has not found out about it?" with an answer. And then "When did some one almost find out?" "What did he (or she) do that made you think he (or she) knew?" Each of the above questions should be F/Ned. MOTION People who have Continuous Withholds or Overts tend to be very slow, flubby and impositive. They have to be very careful. And they make mistakes. Slowness or robotness are keys to the presence of Continuous Missed Withholds or Overts. PTS Quite often a case is FALSELY LABELED PTS when in fact it is really a matter of Continuous Missed Withholds and Continuous Overts. When a "PTS" person does not respond to PTS handling easily then you know you are dealing with Continuous Missed Withholds and/or Continuous Overts. SUMMARY These conditions are not present in all cases. When they are you have a Degraded Being. When a "PTS" person does not respond to PTS handling, try Continuous Missed Withholds and Continuous Overts. You can prevent blows, handle much HE and R and change character in this way. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1973 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 067. HCOB 20 Apr 1972 C/S Series 78 Product Purpose and Why and Error Correction HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972 ISSUE II Remimeo C/S Series 78 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION Where untrained Auditors are finding Whys for a Danger Formula, or post purposes or post products as called for the Est 0 System you will get a certain amount of error and case disturbance. Such upsets also come from word clearing by incompetent persons. The C/S should look for these especially when such campaigns are in progress. He should suspect them as a possibility when a case bogs. A C/S must be sure all such papers and work sheets get into pc's folders. A common repair action is to (1) Do an assessment for type of charge. (2) Handle the charge found by the assessment done, (3) Fly all the reading items found on such assessments by 2wc or direct handling. (4) Suspect LISTING ERRORS on any Why or purpose or product found even though no list exists and reconstruct the list and L4B and handle it. (5) Handle word clearing of any type in or out of session with a Word Clear Correction List done in session by an Auditor. (6) When word clearing is too heavy on the pc or doesn't clean up suspect he has been thrown into implants which are mostly words or the words in some engram. As Implants are actually just engrams, handle it with an L3B. Any item found out of session or by a non auditor is suspect of being a Listing and Nulling (L&N) error even though no list was made. TODAY A CORRECT L&N ITEM MUST BD AND F/N. So treat such items as you would list errors and try to reconstruct the list and either confirm the item or locate the real item (may have been invalidated and Suppressed) or extend the list and get the real item. HCOB 20.4.72 - 2 - The real item will BD F/N. One can establish what the situation is with a post purpose, a Why or a product or any other such item by doing an L4B. SELF AUDITING The commonest reason for self auditing is a wrong or unfound L&N item. People can go around and self list or self audit trying to get at the right why or product or purpose after an error has been made. REACTION NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET AS A WRONG LIST ITEM OR A WRONG LIST. Even, rarely, a DIANETIC LIST can produce wrong list reactions. Ask the pc for his somatics and he blows up or goes into apathy. Or blows. Or attacks the auditor. ALL of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the pc come from out-lists. Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case or even illness. OUT LISTS Therefore when one gets a sharp change in a case (like lowered tone, violence, blows, "determination to go on in spite of the supervisor," long notes from pcs, self C/Sing, etc etc the C/S SUSPECTS AN OUT LIST. This outness can occur in regular sessions even when the item was said to BD F/N. It can occur in "Coffee shop" (out of session auditing of someone), or by Est Os or poorly trained or untrained staff members or even in life. PTS When such actions as finding items by non-auditors are done on PTS people the situation can be bad, so one also suspects the person to be PTS to someone or something. "PTS" does not communicate well in an assessment question so one says "Someone or something is hostile to you" and "you are connected to someone or something that doesn't agree with Dianetics or Scientology." HCOB 20.4.72 - 3 - The main things to know when doing such repairs are (a) that such situations as wrong lists or upset people can occur in an org where untrained people are also using meters and (b) THAT IT IS UP TO THE C/S TO SUSPECT DETECT AND GET THEM HANDLED IN REGULAR SESSION. Do not ignore the possible bad influence. As the good outweighs the bad in such cases, it is not a correct answer to forbid such actions. It is a correct answer to require all such actions and worksheets become part of the folder. One can also persuade the D of P or Qual to gen in the people doing such actions. And do not ignore the effect such actions can have on cases and do not neglect to include them in C/Ses before going on with the regular program. They can all be repaired. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 068. HCOB 17 Mar 1974 TWC Checksheets - TWC, Using Wrong Questions HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH 1974 Remimeo TWC CHECKSHEETS TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS Two Way Comm is not an art. It is a science which has exact rules. Foremost in tile rules is: DON'T USE A LISTING QUESTION IN TWO WAY COMM. By a "listing question" is meant any question which directly or indirectly calls for items in the pc's answer. Use of "who", "what", "which" instantly turn a TWC into a listing question. Listing questions are governed by the rules of Listing and Nulling. If you use a listing question accidentally in TWC you can get the same bad reactions from a pc that you would get on a wrongly done list. The reason for pc upsets in TWC is hidden as it is not apparently a listing process, rarely gets the correction a bad list would get. Asking "who" or "what" or "which" during a TWC after the main question can also turn it into a Listing and Nulling process. TWC questions MUST be limited to feelings, reactions, significances. They must NEVER ask for terminals or locations. EXAMPLE: "Who upset you?" in TWC causes the pc to give items. This is a LIST. "What are you upset about?" does the same thing. "Which town were you happiest in?" is also a LISTING question NOT a TWC question. Any of these result in the pc giving items. They are not then nulled or correctly indicated. The pc can get VERY upset just as he would with a wrong list. Yet the session is not a "listing session" so never gets corrected. EXAMPLE: "How are you doing lately?" is an example of a correct TWC question. It gets off charge and gets no list items. "Are you better these days than you used to be?" "How have you been since the last session?" "What happened" is different than "What illness", "What person", "What town" which are listing questions. HCOB 17.3.74 - 2 - REPAIR When other things fail to locate the upset of a pc look into TWC processes in the folder and treat them as L&N processes where the pc has answered with items. The relief is magical. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:ntm Copyright ($) 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 069. HCOB 17 Apr 1972 C/S Series 76 - C/Sing a PTS Rundown HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 APRIL 1972 Remimeo C/S Series 76 C/SING A PTS RUNDOWN References: HCO B 9 Dec 71 PTS Rundown HCO B 20 Jan 72 PTS Rundown Addition. HCO B 13 Feb 72 PTS RD Additional Issue II LRH Data HCO PL 5 Apr 72 PTS Type A HANDLING HCO B 16 Apr 72 PTS CORRECTION LIST HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/Sing a PTS RD (this HCO B) Any subsequent isrnzes. The whole point of a PTS Rundown is to make a person not PTS any longer. The point is not to just run some processes. It is to have a person all right now. To really understand this rundown, one would have to know what PTS is in the first place and why one was doing the rundown. This would apply to the auditor as well as the C/S. PTS means POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE. It means someone connected to a person or group opposed to Scientology. It's is a TECHNICAL thing. It results in illness and rollercoaster and IS the CAUSE of Illness and rollercoaster. When you do a PTS RD on a pc CORRECTLY he or she should no longer be ill or roller coaster. BUT THIS INCLUDES THE PERSON HANDLING HIS PTS CONDITION IN THE REAL UNIVERSE NOT IN JUST HIS BANK. An auditor and C/S must see that the person is (a) Handled properly in HCO or by the D of P if HCO Isn't there so that the person handles the PTS Connection Itself. (see HCO P/L 5 April 72, PTS TYPE A HANDLING.) (b) Do the RD correctly (see reference HCO Be above.) (c) D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be sure the person is now all right (not PTS). (d) Watch the person's folder for any new signs of illness and roller coaster and if these occur find out what was missed by assessing PTS RD CORRECTION LIST. (See HCO B 16 April 72) HCO B 17.4.72 - 2 - (e) Handling the PTS RD CORR LIST. (f) Re-interviewing to be sure the person is all right now. DATA Anyone handling or auditing or C/Sing PTS cases should have done the PACK "PTS, SP TECH" Pack 1 & Pack 2 which are based on HCO P/L 31 May 71 which is the CHECKSHEET for available tech and policy on this subject. To this checksheet (HCO P/L 31 May 71) must be added these issues: HCO B 9 Dec 71 PTS Rundown HCO B 20 Jan 72 PTS Rundown Addition HCO B 13 Feb 72 PTS RD Additional Issue II LRH Data HCO PL 5 Apr 72 PTS Type HANDLING HCO B 16 Apr 72 PTS CORRECTION LIST HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/Sing a PTS RD (this HOC B) Any subsequent issues. PTS SITUATIONS The hardest thing to get across about a PTS situation is that it IS the reason for continued illness and roller- coaster (loss of gains). The condition does exist. It is in fact common. We have the auditing tech to handle now. The material has to be applied correctly just like any other material. The reason we do the rundown is not to do some sessions or sell some auditing or just explain why the person Is like that. We do the rundown so the person will no longer be PTS. The (EP) End Phenomenon of the PTS RD is attained when the person is well and stable. As a C/S you MUST put a YELLOW TAB marked PTS on a PTS PC Folder that stays on until the person is NO LONGER PTS. If you do NOT do this there will be about 25% of your pcs or more that YOU WILL BE IN CONTINUAL TROUBLE WITH! Because you will be C/Sing auditing for a person who is PTS, will be ill, will roller coaster because the person has NOT been handled to EP on being PTS. These people, by the way, will tell you "Oh, I'm not PTS." "But your father is suing the org." "Oh yes, I know, but it doesn't bother me. Besides my illness is from some thing I ate last year. And I rollercoaster because I don't like the Examiner. But I'm not PTS." The mystery is solved HOC B 17.4.72 - 3 - when you find they haven't a clue what the letters mean or what the condition is to give them a copy of HOC P/L 5 Apr 72 and let them read it. If they. still want to know more give them HOC P/L 23 Dec 65. (Remembering it has to be Word Cleared Method 4 or he won't have a clue even if he reads it.) We are on no campaign to rid the world of suppressives when we are handling a PTS pc. But facts are facts and tech is tech. In handling a PTS person as a C/S you are on a border line of policy violation unless you make the person do what it says in HCO P/L 5 April 72 first. That handles the situation itself. Then you can handle the person with the PTS Rundown. It is a great rundown. Like any other It has a standard way of going about It. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:mes Copyright ($) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 070. HCOB 20 Jan 1972 PTS R/D Addition HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JANUARY 1972 Remimeo PTS RD ADDITION (Refers to PTS RD HCOB 9 Dec 71) The only reasons a PTS RD does not work are: C/S Error: 1. Not doing one at all. C/S Error: 2. Doing one in the middle of another RD. C/S Error: 3. Doing one without set-up. C/S Error: 4. The person was not PTS-which is to say was not chronically ill or roller coaster and the items didn't read. Auditor Error: 5. The RD was badly run auditor-wise. R3R was bad, metering poor, ruds not correctly or fully done. Auditor & C/S Error: 6. The RD was quickie, only doing step (a) and brushing it off. C/S Error: 7. Even though the whole RD was done fully, there remained on the case an undetected additional person or thing to which the pc was PTS. The rules of PTS are A PERSON WHO ROLLER COASTERS IS ALWAYS PTS. A PERSON WHO IS CHRONICALLY ILL ALWAYS IS PTS. A PTS RUNDOWN THAT DOES NOT WORK HAS NOT BEEN DONE AS PER 1 107 ABOVE. The remedies to the above are 1. Do it. 2. Pgm it in correct sequence. 3. Set the case up properly so it is running well and past errors handled. 4. Establish how well the person holds his gains before Pgming one. If any Q at all, do the RD. 5. Cram the auditor on TRs, Metering, R3R drills and ruds. Do L4B, GF Method Handle, L3B on the pc and redo accordingly. 6. Complete the RD. 7. 2wc "What is your attention on?" to F/N. On PTS RD fly all ruds single; L&N "On the PTS Rundown what being or thing was missed?"; R3R Triple on it; fly all ruds and overts on it triple; if all not very okay now 2wc "What other subject or people might have been overlooked on the PTS RD?" Handle with R3R Triple and Ruds Triple plus overts. --------------- A PTS RD always works. If it works with a relapse there is an error in it as in the numbered paras above. THIS IS VITAL TECH TO THE PC. IT MAKES THE MOST DIFFICULT CASES FLY IF IT IS DONE RIGHT. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:mes.bh Founder Copyright ($) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 071. HCOB 16 Apr 1972 PTS R/D Correction List HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 16 APRIL 1972 Remimeo PTS RD CORRECTION LIST (Reference HCO B 17 Apr 72, "C/Sing the PTS Rundown", C/S Series 76) This Correction List is assessed and handled after a PTS Rundown has been done on the pc. It also serves as a checklist of expected actions with the Rundown. The handlings are given below the assessing statements in each instance. The list is Always Done Method 5 (All assessed then handled). 1. You have been physically ill after auditing. ______ (If this happened after a PTS RD the RD is not complete. 2wc to F/N then find what was incomplete.) 2. You lost the gains achieved in auditing. ______ (Same as 1 above.) 3. You are still in communication with a person or group that does not like Scientology. ______ (Have HCO handle per P/L 5 Apr 72 or if HCO does not act handle with D of P or Tech Sec.) 4. You know someone who disagrees with what you are doing. ______ (See 3 above.) 5. You handled the whole situation completely. ______ (If reads, 2wc to F/N.) 6. You only said it was handled. ______ (2wc to F/N, give pc P/L 23 Dec 65 and P/L 5 Apr 72 and Method 4 WC them and report it to the D of P for further handling.) 7. You don't understand the situation. ______ (See 6 above.) 8. You don't believe there is a situation. ______ (2wc to F/N and probably handling as 6 above. It could be there is no situation now.) 9. You didn't want to handle it and protested. ______ (2wc to F/N. See 6 above.) 10. It can't be handled anyway. ______ (2wc to F/N and see 6 above.) 11. There was something wrong with the auditing or auditor. ______ (Find what and do L1C, L3B or L4B as indicated.) 12. There was earlier bad auditing. ______ (Wasn't set up. Repair Pgm.) 13. You were given the PTS Rundown in the middle of another incomplete rundown. ______ (2wc to F/N. Complete the incomplete RD then verify the PTS RD.) HCOB 16 Apr 72 - 2 - 14. You weren't PTS in the first place. ______ (Find out if the pc was connected to SPs or an SP group in actual fact. Possibly still is but misinterpreting "PTS". If so do 6.) 15. The feelings about the people you were audited on are still there. ______ (2wc to F/N. L1C, L4B, L3B as indicated. Complete the RD.) 16. The PTS Rundown was not complete. ______ (2wc to F/N. Sort out Case on PTS RD Addition HCO B 20 Jan 72.) 17. You still feel PTS. ______ (See 16.) 18. You still can't hold onto your auditing gains. ______ (See 16.) 19. You were ill after the RD. ______ (See 16.) 20. You feel more upset than ever. ______ (See 16.) 21. There is still an additional person that wasn't detected. ______ (See 16.) 22. You were told to attest but were still PTS. ______ (See 16.) 23. You decided you were PTS when you weren't. ______ (2wc to F/N. Handle as indicated by Data pc gives.) 24. You said a person was suppressive who really wasn't. ______ (See 23.) 25. There is a situation that has not been disclosed. ______ (2wc to F/N. Get full data. C/S accordingly.). 26. There were lies told. ______ (See 25.) 27. You don't agree about all this. ______ (See 25.) 28. Your condition was really caused by something else. ______ (See 25.) 29. There were misunderstood words. ______ (See 25.) 30. Everything was all right in the first place. ______ (See 25.) 31. There were list errors. ______ (L4B.) 32. There were engram errors. ______ (L3B.) 33. There were auditor errors. ______ (L1C.) 34. You now feel okay. ______ (2wc to F/N.) LRH:mes.rd Copyright ($) 1972 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 072. HCOB 27 Jul 1976 PTS R/D and Vital Info R/D Position Corrected HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JULY 1976 Remimeo ALL AUDITORS PTS RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO RD POSITION CORRECTED It has just come to my attention that HCOB 9 December 1971RA and HCOB 6 October 1974, which were written by then CS-4, restricted. PTS handling and Vital Info RD to Expanded Dianetics which is a false position. The PTS Checksheet is Board Policy Letter 31 May 1971 RB. That check- sheet MUST be studied and passed by ALL staff concerned with PTS handling whether in HCO or in Div 4 or Div 5. In short, THAT is the actual position on the grade chart or in classes of the PTS Rundown. When listing has to be done to handle a PTS person or to find a why or who, on PTS RDs or anything else, it is dangerous for anyone but a Class IV who has been interned to do it. THAT is a matter of who can do listing. It is NOT a matter of where the pc is on the grade chart. YOU HAVE TO HANDLE THOSE WHO ARE PTS AS PTSes BEFORE YOU CAN AUDIT THEM SUCCESSFULLY. ANYONE HANDLING PTS PEOPLE MUST HAVE PASSED AND BEEN CERTIFIED ON THE PTS CHECKSHEET, BPL 31 May 1971RB. The errors put in these two HCOBs have caused orgs and the field to fill up with PTSes which went unhandled. You cannot audit a PTS person on anything but what handles PTSness. The HCOBs are being reissued as HCOB 9 December 1971 RB and HCOB 6 October 1974R to correct the error of placing N'S RD in Expanded Dianetics where it does not belong and placing the Vital Info RD in Expanded Dianetics. A mission that worked more than a year correcting HCOBs that were marked as written by me but weren't and reissuing as Board Technical Bulletins missed these. They otherwise did well. The person who wrote the originals found them and called it to attention as an error. PLEASE CORRECT THIS IN ALL PACKS. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ==================== 073. HCOB 7 May 1969 Summary of How to Write an Auditor's Report HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MAY 1969 Remimeo Issue VI Dianetic (Revision of HCOB 1 September 1968) Course SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, WORKSHEETS AND SUMMARY REPORT, WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AUDITOR'S REPORT An Auditor's Report should contain: Date Name of Auditor Name of Pc Condition of Pc Length of Session Tune Session started and ended T/A at beginning and end of Session Rudiments What process was run-LISTING THE EXACT COMMANDS (often forgotten by most auditors) Time of Start and End of Process Whether Process is flat or not Any F/Ns. WORK SHEETS A Work Sheet is supposed to be the complete running record of the session from beginning to end. The Auditor should not be skipping from one page to another but should just be writing page after page as the session goes along. A Work Sheet is always foolscap, 8 x 13, written on both sides and each page is numbered. Pc's name is written on each separate sheet. A Work Sheet may be in 2 columns depending on how big the writing is of the Auditor. When the session is completed, the Work Sheets are put in proper sequence and stapled with the Auditor's Report Form on top from beginning to end of session. T/A and time notations should be made at regular intervals throughout the session When making a list on a Pc: 1. Always mark a read as it reads-F. LF. BD. 2. Always circle the reading item. Mark if indicated by the Pc with IND. 3. Always when extending a list put in a line from where it has been extended. e.g. HCOB 7.5.69 VI - 2 - Item Joe Shoes Socks -------------------- extended Sky Wax Pigs, etc., etc. NOTE: When you repair an old auditing session you always write on the old auditing report and W/sheets in a different coloured pen with the date of the report. When running various processes in a session, mark each FN clearly noting time and T/A. SUMMARY REPORT A Summary Report is written exactly as per HCOB 17 March 1969. Two gross goofs I have noticed since case supervising folders on the RSM is that Auditors have not been turning in Ethics cases to the MAA. In one instance, a Pc was audited by 2 auditors in 2 different sessions, got a R/S on crimes against Scientologists and M/W/Hs and neither auditor turned the Pc in to Ethics. This is not the only instance. The second thing is that Auditors are very evaluative of the Pc's case as indicated by their comments on the Summary Report. This is incorrect; this report is used simply as an exact record of what happened during the session. It is not up to the auditor to evaluate the Pc's Case, this is the Case Supervisor's job. The auditor may suggest what is to be run, at which time the Case Supervisor will review the session, what was run, how the Pc went in relation to what was being run and then give his directions. ---------- Auditor Report Forms or W/sheets are never re-copied. The Auditor should always read over his W/sheets before turning in folder to the Case Supervisor and, if any words or letters are missing or cannot be read, they should be written in with a different coloured pen. If these rules are followed it will make the Case Supervisor's job much much easier and auditors' reports more valuable. To add the obvious, it is a CRIME to give any session or assist without making an auditor's report or to copy the original actual report after the session and submit a copy instead of the real report. Assist reports that use only contact or touch assists may be written after a session and sent to Qual L RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jp.an.cs.ei.cden Copyright ($) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 074. BTB 6 Nov 1972R Auditor Admin Series 12R - The Summary Report Form BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 6 NOVEMBER 1972R ISSUE V REVISED & REISSUED 28 JULY 1974 AS BTB (REVISION IN ITALICS) Remimeo CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OP 6 NOVEMBER 1972 ISSUE V SAME TITLE Attach to this BTB ---- BTB 20 June 70 "Summary Report".) Auditor Admin Series 12R THE SUMMARY REPORT FORM The Summary Report Form is a report used simply as an exact record of what happened and what was observed during the session. The form BTB 20 June 70 "SUMMARY REPORT" is used and the Auditor fills in the appropriate data. USE OF SUMMARY REPORTS With the introduction of C/S Series THE FANTASTIC NEW HGC LINE, Summary Report Forms were omitted from the admin procedure at flag. However the use of Summary Report Forms is left entirely to the discretion of the C/S of an Org. They used extensively in training. EVERY STUDENT AUDITOR ON COURSES AND CO-AUDIT MUST WRITE A SUMMARY REPORT FORM A ER EACH SESSION. It is a tool for increasing an Auditor's obnosis of what goes on in a session. It teaches Auditors how to quickly and concisely analyse and report on a case. FILLING IN THE REPORT The Summary Report Form is filled in as follows: 1. The date. 2. The PC's name and the Auditor's name, in BLOCK letters. BTB 6.11.72R - 2 - ISSUE V Rev. 28.7.74 3. The process run, the total tone arm action for the session and the length of the session in hours and minutes. 4. Goals are no longer set at the beginning of session but if the PC in passing mentions any goals he has attained, or more likely gains he has had in the session, these are noted at this point. 5. Aspects of running process -- each of the questions 1 to 22 of the form are answered. Here write down briefly what the preclear was doing in the session. Do not write opinions with regard to what was happen ing or how the preclear was running the process. Here we are interested in the aspects of the case in relationship to the process or processes being run. 6. Ethics Report \ These are written on the Auditor's | 7. Suggest / C/S Sheet per C/S Series 25. The Summary should be done for the session given the preclear for the day. It is not stapled to the worksheets but is paper clipped on top of the Auditors Report Form and beneath the Exam Report. Two sessions in one day calls for only one Summary Report with the TA and data of each session. It should be LEGIBLE and READABLE. If an Auditor's handwriting if poor, it should be printed out by the Auditor. Writing the reports should only take the Auditor 15 minutes to do at the most. Having just audited the preclear you should quite easily fill the report out. Reference: HCOB 14 JUNE 65 Summary Report HCOB 7 May 69 Summary of How to Write an Auditors Report HCOB 5 Mar 71 C/S Series 25, The Fantastic New HGC Line BTB 20 June 70 Summary Report Compiled by Training & Services Bu Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis HDCS:HE:AL:MH:MM:mh 2nd: Molly Harlow Copyright ($) 1972, 1974 Authorized by AVU by L. Ron Hubbard for the BOARDS OP DIRECTORS ALL RIGHTS SERVED of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY ($) This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications organization, U. S. ===================== 075. BTB 20 Jun 1970 Summary Report BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 20 JUNE 1970 REISSUED 21 JULY 1974 AS BTB CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JUNE 1970 SAME TITLE Remimeo SUMMARY REPORT The auditor checks each one off and fills in the appropriate data. DATE: __________ PC or PRE OT __________________ AUDITOR: ______________ PROCESS RUN:_______________ TA: ____ TIME:_______ GOALS AND GAINS. ASPECTS AND GAINS. 1. How did pc do in relation to what was run. 2. Effectiveness of process. 3. Any free needles. 4. General needle behaviour. 5. Did TA go below 2.0 (how low)_________ Did it come up________ 6. Did TA go high __________ Did it come down_________ 7. General TA range. 8. Emotional tone of the pc and whether this improved. 9. Any misemotion. 10. Preclear appearance. 11. Mannerisms. 12. Mannerism changes. 13. Any change in skin tone. 14. Did colour of eyes change________ Get brighter___________ Get dull___________ 15. Any comm lags. 16. Any cognitions. 17. Any pains turn on ____________ blown 18. Any sensations turn on blown 19. Any difficulties. 20. Did you complete C/S instructions. 21. Was pc happy at session end. 22. TA at session end ______________ Needle at session end ETHICS REPORT: James Fuller SUGGEST: Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU BDCS:SW:AL:MH:JFF:mh for the Copyright ($) 1970, 1974 BOARD OF DIRECTORS by L. Ron Hubbard of the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY ===================== 076. BTB 6 Nov 1972R Auditor Admin Series 14R - The Worksheets BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 6 NOVEMBER 1972R REVISED & REISSUED 25, JULY 1974 AS BTB ISSUE VII Remimeo CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OP 6 NOVEMBER 1972 ISSUE VII SAME TITLE (The only revision is wider CONTENT OP WORKSHEET: "G. reads" was added.) Auditor Admin Series 14R THE WORKSHEETS The worksheets are the sheets on which the Auditor writes a complete running record of the session from beginning to end, page after page, as the session goes along. A worksheet is always foolscap, 8 x 13 written on both sides and each page is numbered, back and front, top center of page. This is so an Auditor can say "Now the R/S occurred on page 25" which saves a lot of time. Further it gives the proper number of pages the session went. The Worksheet is written in two columns. The Auditor writes down the lefthand column and then down the righthand column. CONTENT OF WORKSHEET The most important parts of the session to be noted are: A, When the TA goes up (on what?) B. When the TA goes down (on what?) C. When an F/N occurs (on what - any cog?) D. When VGIs occur (on what?) E. When BIs occur (on what?) F. How the process ran (what commands are being run?) G. Reads TA and time notations should be made at regular intervals throughout the session.. When a process reaches EP - write in the PC's cognition, BTB 6.ll.72R VII - 2 - Rev. 25.7.74 circle the F/N and whether or not it was indicated, note the PC's indicators, the time and TA. When Two Way Comming a subject it is essential that all items (terminals, statements, etc.) that read are so marked on the worksheets -- LF, LFBD. All reading items are circled in green after the session. R/S items, Ethics situations, Ser Pacs and Evil Purps are marked, after the session by ringing them on the W/S with a red pen. SHORTHANDING Auditors usually develop a system of shorthanding the session actions being done, so that session speed is not hampered by Adimin. For example, the repetitive process: Recall a change Recall a no-change Recall a failed change is run as a bracket (the PC is given the first command, then the second and then the third and the first and then the second, etc.) The first command can be abbreviated to 1, the second to 2, and the third to 3. The W/S therefore would look likes 12.32 2.8 a failed change (note that each word of the command is cleared before no-change clearing the command as recall (F/N) a whole) 1. cleared 2. cleared 3. cleared 12.49 2.6 1. Mother went on holiday 2. at school BTB 6.11.72R VII - 3 - Rev. 25.7.74 3. didn't sell bike 1. moved to new house 2. etc. After the session when the commands are written out in full on the Auditors Report Form the numbers are again noted so that the C/S can refer to them. WHATEVER SYSTEM OP ABBREVIATION IS USED BY THE AUDITOR, THE WORKSHEET MUST COMMUNICATE TO THE C/S WHAT ACTIONS WERE TAKEN DURING THE SESSION. LEGIBILITY Worksheets should be written legibly. They are never re-copied. The Auditor should always read over his W/sheets before turning in the folder to the Case Supervisor and if any words or letters are missing or cannot be read, they should be put in in block print, in red. Example: TOTALLY <----(red) want to get xfoflat well | (illegible word) This can be over-done, to the extent that it is almost sarcasm. At the most it should just run into one or two corrections to a page. If the Auditor is having to correct the page more than that he should learn how to write rapidly and legibly. See HCOB 3 Nov 71 "C/S Series 66 Auditors Worksheets" which also appears as Auditor Admin Series 15 and comes next in this series. NECESSITY OF WORKSHEETS It is a CRIME to give any session without making an Auditors Report (i.e. actual W/S taken at that time) or to copy the original W/Sheets after the session and submit a copy instead of the real reports. Assist Reports that use only Contact or Touch Assist are written after the session aid sent to HGC Admin to be filed in the PC folder. he PC is sent to the Examiner after an assist. Reference: HCO PL 19 Nov 65 "Auditing Reports" HCOB 7 May 69 "Summary of How to Write an Auditors Report" BTB 6.11.72R VII - 4 - Rev. 25.7.74 Tape 12 June 71 "Flag Qual Interne Introductory Lecture" HCOB 3 Nov 71 "C/S Series 66 Auditors Worksheets" Tape 7 April 72 "Exp Dn Tape 3 Auditors Administration". Compiled by Training & Services Bu Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:SW:AL:MH:MM:mh Copyrright ($) 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 077. HCOB 3 Nov 1971 Auditor's Worksheets HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 3 NOVEMBER 1971 Remimeo Re-issued 6 November 1972 as Auditor Admin Series 15 C/S Series 66 AUDITOR'S WORKSHEETS A very fast way for a C/S to do himself in is to fall to insist on GOOD LEGIBLE HANDWRITING. When a C/S has auditors who can't write well and rapidly, he gets misunderstood words when he tries to read the worksheets. One temporary solution is to make the auditor block print the word in red above each hard to read word. Some auditors go to an extreme of block printing the whole W/S. The more permanent solution is to have Auditors in Cramming practice writing WELL and CLEARLY no matter how slowly and then, maintaining the same clarity, speed it up. The auditor after many such practice sessions winds up writing clearly and fast. This can be increased until an auditor can write clearly as fast as people talk. The occasional headaches a C/S might get are not from the restim of the case he's studying but are from the words on W/Ses he can't make out. If a C/S does not insist on both block print clarification and auditor writing practice, he will wind up not reading worksheets and may even get foggy about certain cases. A remedy is to go back to the first folders not understood and get the words clarified and then keep this C/S Series HCO B IN. L. RON HUBBARD Founder PS: In the 19th Century secretaries wrote beautiful copperplate longhand faster than a man could talk. So don't say it can't be done. LRH:nt.kjm.rd Copyright ($) 1971, 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 078. BTB 6 Nov 1972R Auditor Admin Series 10R - The Auditor's C/S BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 6 NOVEMBER 1972R ISSUE III REVISED & REISSUED 27 JULY 1974 AS BTB Remimeo (REVISION IN ITALICS) CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 6 NOVEMBER 1972 ISSUE III SAME TITLE Auditor Admin series 10R THE AUDITOR'S C/S The Auditor's C/S is a sheet on which the Auditor writes the C/S instructions for the next session. This is per C/S Series 25: Full blank page. PC's Name (red) Date Auditor's Name (red) Class of Auditor required next session (Session Grade) left blank Auditor's comment (red) or think about the case if he wishes. The next C/S 1. __________________________ Blue 2. __________________________ Blue 3. __________________________ Blue 4. __________________________ Blue Auditor Signature (red) The Auditor does not grade his own session. He leaves this blank. POSITION IN FOLDER The C/S Instructions for the session go under that session, so you get C/S 4.6.68, Auditing session 4.6.68, BTB 6.11.72R - 2 - ISSUE III Rev. 27.7.74 C/S 5.6.68, Auditing Session 5.6.68, C/S 7.6.68, etc. etc. ETHICS SITUATION Under Auditor's comments would be noted any Ethics Situation that came to light in the session. References: HCOB 25 June 70 C/S Series 11 HCOB 5 Mar 71.C/S Series 25 THE FANTASTIC NEW HGC LINE TAPE 7 Apr 72 Exp Dn Tape 3 AUDITORS ADMINISTRATION Compiled by Training & Services Bu Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OP DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY ($) BDCS:SW:AL:MH:MM:mh Copyright ($) 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.. This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publication Organization, U. S. ===================== End of Course Pack