HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 AUGUST 1971 Remimeo Tech Div Qual Sec INTERNE CHECKSHEETS OKAYS TO AUDIT (Refers to HCO P/L 6 August 1971 All Issues All Interne Checksheets) An OKAY TO AUDIT means two things. There are 2 "okays to audit". One is OKAY TO AUDIT AS AN INTERNE. This means one has done the checksheet to the satisfaction of the Interne Supervisor. One can now audit for Interne qualification. The other is OKAY TO AUDIT AS AN HGC AUDITOR. This means one has done the Interne checksheet, has audited flublessly to many program completions and is passed by the HGC CIS. Any certificate requires that the Interne meet both these requirements. These TWO okays to audit are required for any graduate certificate. There is a LOT of auditing between these two "okays to audit". Whether so expressed on the Checksheet or not the Case Supervisor for whom the auditor did his Interne Auditing MUST SIGN on the Supervisor Line above Examiner at the end of the checksheet, attesting that this Interne has achieved and maintained flubless auditing and has a permanent okay to audit in an HGC for that Class for which the Checksheet is done. "Supervisor" on that line must read "Case Supervisor". So there is an Interne Supervisor okay to audit for that class given on the checksheet. That says that he may audit now as an Interne. And then there is the Case Supervisor okay to audit for that class of the checksheet for the HGC as an HGC auditor. There are a lot of hours, and there can be a lot of Cramming, a lot of re-study between the first and second okays to audit. The checksheet is not complete until the Case Supervisor can attest that this is a Flubless Auditor, truly skilled and able on whom the Case Supervisor is glad to depend. Rome wasn't built in a day, no auditor ever became a flubless auditor in 3 sessions. The requirements of the Case Supervisor in making the auditor make auditing work may not be set aside or cancelled by any other person. The Case Supervisor has the final word on whether a certificate is issued, after how long and when. LRH:sb.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright ( (c) 1971 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 324 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 NOVEMBER 1971 Remimeo Issue II Registrars Dir Income (Amends HCO PL 20 July 1970, Interne Supers "Internships and Case Supervisors") SELLING INTERNSHIPS 1. AUDITING INTERNSHIPS Internships are sold to graduates of Technical courses who want to get awarded Full Classification for their level of training. Internships are paid courses. The Interne does not get paid by the org where he is interning. There are no professional discounts on Internships. Contracted staff members of orgs who are interning at an AO or Saint Hill get the usual 50% discount. They are not however paid any wages or bonuses by the AO or Saint Hill. Living and travel expenses of the student are paid by the org to which he is contracted. Auditor Internship prices are: US - EU/AF UK/ANZO In area orgs Dianetics Internship $125. f 40. Class IV Internship $250. L100. At Saint Hills SHSBC Internship $375. L150. (Includes all oks to audit from Dianetics up to and including Class VI) Class VII Internship 9775. f 320. In Advanced Orgs Class VIII Internship $375. L150. Class IX Internship $375. f 150. Note that these prices are separate from and in addition to the Course price, with the exception of the Class VII where the Internship is the course. 2. CASE SUPER VISORIS INTERNSHIP The purpose of the C/S Internship is to train a student to become a specialist C/S. The C/S Internships are also paid courses and follow the same discount pattern arrangements as the Auditor Internships. Prices are: Dianetics C/S Internship $125. f 50, Class IV C/S Internship $250. L100. Class VI C/S Internship $375. f 150, Class VII C/S Internship 8375. f 150, Class VIII and IX C/S Internship (HSST) $500. L200. Registrars should be well aware of the benefits of these internships so that they can be sold in volume and with reality. They are a most rewarding activity both for the org and the Interne. Treasury Aide LRH:LQ:mes.rd for Copyright (c) 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder 325 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 NOVEMBER 1971 Issue III Remimeo Qual Sees Interne Supers Registrars C&A INTERNESHIPS LINE-UP AUDITOR INTERNESHIPS All students graduating all technical courses are granted a Provisional Classification Certificate. Full Permanent Classification is awarded when the Graduate has completed a paid Interneship in an Org for that level. Internes train under the Interne Supervisor in Qual and do their daily auditing Intensives in the HGC. The (c) of P is their administrative senior while they are auditing in the HGC. After a period of volume auditing and needed correction, resulting in consistent well done auditing hours in the HGC, the Case Supervisor writes to the Interne Super advising that the Interne is now fully proficient in that level and is eligible for full Classification. The Auditor Interneships line-up is: HSDC Interneship Class 0 to IV Interneship Class VI Interneship (includes Interneships for Dianetics and O-IV) Class VII Interneship Class VIII Interneship Class IX Interneship Class X, XI and XII (when available). An Auditor Interneship is run like this: A. Prerequisite: Classification Cert for the Course. B. Do OK to Audit Checksheet and get OK to Audit. C~ Audit daily Intensives in the HGC, doing daily Cramming for any and all nonstandard actions, as directed by the C/S and the Cramming Officer. D. Do daily TRs, training drills and study under the Interne Super. E. Listen to Class XII tape recorded sessions of the same level then record own sessions and compare to the XII sessions. F. Continue auditing in the HGC, improving auditing standard, increasing number of hours on that level, until Case Supervisor issues a C/S HGC OK to Audit and sends to Interne Super. G. Interne Super puts student on Routing Form to route out of the Interneship for permanent Classification. H. Student is checked by PC Examiner for FN VGIs. (If no FN VGIs, student is returned to the Interneship and Cramming is used to find out what was missed, then back to Interneship to properly complete.) 326 1. Student Examiner gives a five question Dangerous Auditor type exam covering essential basics for the Classification and examines three folders audited by the Interne in the HGC for flubless auditing application at that level. J. Certs and Awards issues full Classification Certificate for that level. Do not confuse the standard public paid Interneship training line-up with the staff HGC Auditor OK to Audit system. This will result in no paid Interneships and consequent loss of legitimate income. Any Interne who is found to be a Dangerous Auditor, totally incompetent or who puts false reports about sessions into a pc folder, should be ordered to retrain the Course and routed off the Interneship and sent to the Registrar to sign up. They may return to complete the Interneship when the retrain has been completed at no extra charge if done within six months. Any Auditor sent to an AO or SH for an auditing Interneship is paid his wages by his org and the org pays for the Interneship at 50% discount, so long as the Interne has signed or renewed a 21/2 year contract from the date of completion of the course. HASes must insist that this is done before sending an Auditor for an Interneship. As stated in HCO Bulletin 28 April 71 "Okays to Audit in HGCs" it is a commendable for Franchises and Field Auditors to get Okays to Audit in their nearest org, and the above programme must be extended and offered to all Franchise and Field Auditors. Old HPA/HCAs should be encouraged to do Academy 0 to IV Retread at half price, then Interne full price to full Classification. The benefits of Interneship training: I . Auditor has all. auditing and C/Sing misapplications and misunderstoods cleaned up on that level, under daily supervision. (Internes C/S their own folders and then send to Org C/S who OK's or not.) 2. Auditor gets loads of auditing experience through the volume auditing produced on the Interneship. 3. Full org Cramming service. 4. Access to the Org Library. 5. Word Clearing facilities and utilization to the full. 6. Daily case supervision and training directions in auditing and case supervising by the Org Case Supervisor. 7. Personal attention by Interne Supervisor plus daily training and drilling, in addition to any Cramming actions done, to improve auditing techniques and Auditor presence. 8. Electronic aids-can listen to flubless Cl XII tapes for the level, record their own sessions and compare to the XII sessions. 9. The attainment of competent ability to audit at the level trained and full Classification for that level. LRH:JZ:nt.rd Qual Aide Copyright (c) 1971 for by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder {Amended by HCO P/L 1 August 1972R (revised 25 August 1972), Qual Handling of Students and Internes on the Fast Flow System, in the 1972 Year Book.) 327 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 NOVEMBER 1971 Remimeo Issue IV Interne Super C/Ses Registrars CASE SUPERVISOR INTERNESHIPS Case Supervisor Interneships are sold to those persons or orgs wanting specialist trained Case Supervisors. The Case Supervisor Interneships line-up is: Dianetics Case Supervisor Interneship Class 0 to IV Case Supervisor Interneship, Class VI Case Supervisor Interneship Class VII Case Supervisor Interneship Class VIII and IX Case Supervisor Interneship. Do not under-rate the value of CIS specialist training in Dianetics and 0 to IV. Benefits of Case Supervisor Interneships: A. Learns the basic laws of the physical universe. B. The full attainments of Dianetics and Scientology, objective and subjective. C. How a C/S operates. D. CIS admin actions and procedures. E. Re-studies certain basic books in more detail for Knowledge to apply in C/Sing. F. The CIS Series. G. How to Programme Cases for the level. H. How to do expert folder error summaries. 1. How to repair a case for the level. J. How to "trouble shoot" a case and find out what really needs to be done for the level. K. How to train up good auditors. L. The attainment of competent ability to CIS for the level. CIS Interneships checksheets may vary but all will cover the above as applicable to the level. It is realized that there may be some missing checksheets for Interneships; but the criteria in sales must be "Can the org deliver this service?" so the Registrar and sales people must find out which checksheets, packs and Interneships are available. As new checksheets arrive, the Interne Super must advise Dissem Sec of this new service. Qual Aide for LRH:JZ:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright (c) 1971 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 328 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 NOVEMBER 1971 Issue V Remimeo (c) of Ps Interne Supers Cramming Offs PCOS Registrars C&A HGC AUDITORS AND HGC AUDITORS IN TRAINING Auditors on staff go through the OK to Audit system, using Interneship facilities, as needed, up to their highest level of training. They may be trained on new Rundowns and procedures in Cramming of the Interneship and get an OK to Audit. (Includes word clearing, star-rate, clay demos of key principles and auditing actions drilled on a doll before OK to Audit.) They also work for and get the second OK to Audit, as issued by the Div IV C/S, which gives full HGC Auditor status for that level or procedure. HGC Auditors usually work and produce many more hours per level than other Auditors, and therefore, when awarded full HGC Auditor status are nominated the senior Auditors for that Class on the continent. They may have "HGC Status" written on their Certificate just underneath the Classification on their Certificate. An HGC Auditor is designated In Training until he or she has gained the full HGC OK to Audit from the Div IV C/S. At that time, he or she becomes a full HGC Auditor. HGC Auditors in full time study for their next level of training in the org or getting an OK to Audit are on half pay. When they get their first OK to Audit and return to the HGC, they return to full pay and receive a nominal bonus for 25 hours of auditing in the chair. When the HGC Auditor gets his full HGC OK to Audit, he goes onto the FULL bonus system and gets bonuses, as issued, for Well Done Auditing Hours plus Completions. Thus the most experienced senior Auditors are the highest paid Auditors in the org. Any HGC Auditor with no OKays to Audit gets no bonus until attained. Qual Aide for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:JZ:nt.rd Copyright (c) 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 329 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 NOVEMBER 1971 Remimeo Revised 18 February 1972 (Changes in this type style) INTERNESHIPS ELECTRONIC ATTESTATION FORM In the interests of making flubless auditors, this attestation form must be filled out and must accompany ANY FINAL OK TO AUDIT FOR A CLASS. Auditor's name Date Interneship Class Org Name I hereby attest that I have: I . I attest I am fully familiar with and totally relaxed about metering including False TA and including knowing it is charged and handling it as per the False TA HCOBs or CIS Series 53, without introducing arbitraries or flubs of any kind. 2. Made magnetic recording tapes of my own auditing of pcs at this level. 3. That I have listened to and fully noted the rhythm, quality and presence of LRH tapes for my Interne Class. 4. That I have compared how I sound auditing my present level and how LRH tapes sound auditing this level, by listening to my session tapes and his, playing one after the other. 5. That I have done TRs long and hard to get my auditing to sound like LRH auditing for my class. 6. That I have made a new tape of my sessions after 5 above and newly compared it to LRH tapes and that I am satisfied that my own auditing sounds like LRH auditing. (If not, repeat 5 and 6 until attestation can be made.) 7. 1 attest I am so familiar and relaxed about my auditing presence that I can audit without strain or nerves. Add for SHs and AOs: S. I attest I have witnessed closed circuit TV and have observed sessions accurately. 9. 1 attest I have appeared on closed circuit TV and have been passed on by the auditors assembled as to TRs and presence and metering. 330 Add for Flag in addition to I to 9 above: 10. 1 attest that my metering is flawless and that I know everything there is to know about meter handling and care and every meter manifestation there is. 11. 1 attest that no one could tell the difference between my auditing presence and TRs and that of LRH for my Class. All orgs: 12. 1 attest that my pcs, are delighted with my auditing and their gains. I attest to the above in the full understanding that should I ever be faulted in auditing presence, TRs or metering by a qualified Inspector after signing this checksheet, I will retrain fully from the beginning. Interne Interne Supervisor Case Supervisor L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.mes.rd Copyright (c) 1971, 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 331 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 FEBRUARY 1972 Remimeo Tech & Qual Qual Internes interne Supers C/Ses INTERNESHIP ERRORS FOUND The following points when found to be out on an Interneship have resulted in auditors not being made and progressing on up to the next class. When these points are in, then you make auditors, fact not theory, as it actually happened this way. Before these points went in, the C/S issued stacks of Cramming Orders; now it's 3 in a week. (1) The Tech query line must be made known to exist and Internes are allowed to use it. The line is from the Interne Supervisor, Qual Sec, Continental Qual Aide to Flag, Qual Aide. Interne confusions can be spotted by these terminals and often can refer to the precise HCOB that handles the query. However, the query line does exist and can be used. (2) Checksheets must have recent issues added to the Master checksheet. Missing data on a checksheet is not Keeping Scientology Working. (3) Use only LRH tapes to refer Internes to on TRs. LRH TR tapes are actual auditing sessions recorded live on tape. (4) When an Interneship has over 15 Internes on it, it's time to have a 2nd Super-visor, so as to be able to supervise all practical and keep track of each Interne at all times. An Interneship Course Administrator should also be posted to keep admin straight and tech packs made up, etc, just like a Course Administrator in an Academy. (5) Internes must understand exactly what a program is to be trained on programming. Only in this way will Interne Auditors NOT accept pcs, without a glance at the program or folder summary and just grind away hopefully. Auditors also need to know "Know Before You Go" (C/S Series 62), and "Auditors Rights" (C/S Series 1) which have the basic data, besides Programming C/S Series HCOBs. Interne Supervisors must ensure an Interne Auditor studies his pc's folder before auditing, paying attention particularly to Auditors Rights and Know Before You Go. It's only a five minute to an hour job, not a day long job to do this as the points on the two above HCOBs are being checked against the current C/S, folder summary, program, etc. Quote from LRH "It is the completed program that is the case change result not the session." (6) As it says in the C/S Series No. 21, the C/S is responsible for the training of his auditors under him. Because the C/S has internes on his lines and because any group of auditors can be bettered, the training officer part of the C/S Hat is one which is always worn. So as a C/S works with an auditor he trains him. One goof in a session is met with an order to Cramming on the materials flubbed. 332 After several cramming orders on the same action have been issued on an auditor, it becomes a retread at that level. The auditor has shown signs of not having a good grasp of what is being crammed over and over, hence it's time to retread. RETREAD means picking up the materials that the auditor is weak on. It's a review course. But it does mean going through the pack and the materials of the particular level being retreaded. It's mostly a check of misunderstood words, Method 4 style Word Clearing, on the different sections of the materials of the course, emphasis being placed on what the auditor is weak on. It can be bolstered to Method 4 on every HCOB as they go through the materials. Now if after a retread the auditor still is sent to Cramming on what he just retreaded, he obviously is still weak on it, it becomes retrain on that level. RETRAIN is where the whole course and whole checksheet are done, all the HCOBs, demos, drills, etc exactly as stated on the checksheet. A key cramming question is "What situation did you run into that you had to invent something to do something about it?" This immediately will establish the missingness of the auditor's data so it can be handled when found this way on a Cramming Order, retread or retrain cycle. (7) When it gets to a retrain you know the auditor was untrained in the first place, as he never got a grasp of the materials. He read the material but can't apply it. This brings about the retrain as the original course taken by the auditor did not get him taught, as there is no association between the materials, auditor and pc with that auditor. The action of a session is "over here" away from the materials so he can't get near to it to apply the materials. ALL FAILED INTERNES WERE TRACED TO NOT BEING TRAINED IN THE FIRST PLACE AS THE REAL WHY. The first thing really, that a student has to find out about a subject is that he doesn't know it. This may take a 10th of a second followed by greedy study. And this may never occur until it reaches the point of retrain-then it dawns he doesn't know when faced with the Cramming Orders, the retread, more cramming, and now a retrain. All the above points were and are actual factual points relating to the success of an Interneship. For any Interneship to be a success these points need to be checked often to ensure they are IN by C/Ses and Interne Supervisors, Interne Supervisors, C/Ses and Internes are expected to get the job done; each one has his part to do on these points. Everyone expects it of you. You can do this sort of thing and clear the planet. T/Qual Aide for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:JW:mes.rd Copyright (c) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 333 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1961 CenOCon STAFF AUDITOR TRAINING SEQUENCE OF STUDY For an auditor wishing to obtain maximum results in using SOP Goals for Clearing, and particularly for a staff auditor, the following check-out should be used by HGC training officers, should be an advanced course training stress list and should be used by HCO for checking HGCs: Name ........................... Organization Area .................. I . TRs 0 to 5. 0- 1- 2- 3- 4- 5 2. The Auditor's Code 3. The Code of a Scientologist 4. E-Meter Theory 5. E-Meter Practice 6. Rudiments 7. Definition of In Session 8. Examining Rudiments with an E-Meter 9. Model Session memorized for use 10. Rudiments Processes 11. Case Assessment Forms 12. Auditor's Report Forms 13. The Pre-Hav Scale 14. SOP Goals 15. Doing a Goals Assessment 16. Finding terminals for running the goal 17. Finding Terminal Level on Pre-Hav Scale 18. Developing Commands 19. Filling out (c) of P Check Types 1- 2- 3- 4 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 20. Meter action in running a terminal in SOP Goals and how long to run 21. Reassessing for a new level for the same terminal- how long to run what is done then 334 22. Determining Complete flatness for a terminal on the Pre-Hav Scale 23. Determining Complete flatness for a goal 24. Reassessing Goals 25. Use of Change Process 26. Use of Attention Process 27. Use of CCHs (when rather than how) 28. Use of Johannesburg Security Check 29. The reasons cases bog 30. Use of Formula IS Use of Formula 16 31. Staff Auditor's Hat 32, (c) of P Checking Hat 33. Finding the Havingness Process 34. Balancing Havingness and Confront Processes 35. Finding the Confront Process 36. Using the Havingness and Confront Process while running Pre-Hav Terminals 37. Developing Pre-Hav Commands 38. The CCHs 1- 2- 3- 4 39. The use of the CCHQ 40. The parts of the Human Mind 41. The State of Release 42. The State of Clear 43. The State of Theta Clear 44. Regulations governing Staff Auditors 45. Routing of Reports 46. Function of HGC Admin 47. Functions of the HGC 48. Functions of HCO 49. The Pattern of a Central Org LRH:jl.rd Copyright (c) 1961 L. RON HUB13ARD by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 335 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 JANUARY 1962 HCO Secs Org Secs Ds of P Tech Depts EXAMINATION FOR HGC AUDITORS ALL HGC Auditors are to be examined on the HCO Bulletin of December 21, 196 1 -'Model Session Script Revised'. This examination, which is to consist of a 100% check-out on the actual Bulletin AND a practical test which must demonstrate that the Auditor can really use the new Model Session, is to be passed by ALL HGC Auditors within one week of the receipt of this Policy Letter. This Policy is laid down with the object of improving HGC Auditors' ability to keep Rudiments IN. Directors of Processing are required to report to HCO Technical Secretary WW that this Policy has been complied with. Issued by: HCO Technical Secretary WW on instructions from Mary Sue Hubbard for L. RON HUBBARD LRH:esc.cden Copyright (c) 1962 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 336 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1965 Qual Sec Issue II Tech Sec Examiners AUDITOR ESTIMATION TEST (c) of P References: DofT HCO B 13 Sept 65: Out Tech HGC Training Officers Dir Review HCO B 21 Sept 65: Out Tech Tape Lecture SH 10 July 63 Not Confidential "Auditing Skills for R 3R" or Restricted Tape Lecture SH 21 Sept 65 "Out tech" The following general test questions are used directly or to make up tests for HGC auditor proficiency or for students or internes seeking to qualify as HGC Auditors. It may be required of any HGC en masse at any time to rate the Tech proficiency of that Department. The test is verbal and accompanied by the auditor having to demonstrate with the examiner marking this form or one made from it. Auditor's Name Date of Test Location of Org Grade E-Meter Review - (a) Ability to see needle motion and read at meter distance (b) Handling Tone Arm Overcompensation Undercompensation (c) Instant Read (c) Cleaning Cleans (e) Assessment (f) Possibility of Missing Items on a List (g) Rock Slam (h) Floating Needle (i) Auditor Action on seeing a floating needle 0) Dirty needle (k) Cause of a Dirty Needle (1) Setting up a Meter 2. Data Duplication Review (a) Test on any recent HCO B (b) Synthetic data duplication test Repeating a sentence Doing an action (c) Demonstration of a fundamental auditing action 337 3. Pc In Session Review (a) Bad Indicators (b) Good Indicators (c) Quality of needle of a recent pc (c) Auditor's Code 4. Auditing Cycle Review (a) TR 0 (b) TR I (c) TR 2A. Premature Acknowledgement B. Delayed Acknowledgment (c) TR 3 (e) TR 4 (f) Drawing the Comm Cycle (g) Examples of a Comm Cycle 5. Repetitive Command Review (a) Test of duplication (b) When is a Process flat? (c) Examples of flat processes OBNOSIS 6. Knowledge of Suppressive Person Review (a) Definition of SP (b) Examples of SP (c) Action for an SP (c) Consequences of an SP's acts 7. Knowledge of Potential Trouble Sources (a) Definition of PTS (b) Behavior of a PTS (c) Example of PTS (c) Consequences of PTS (e) Proper Auditor action on PTS (f) Error that can be made in handling PTS 8. ARC Break Review (a) Definition of an ARC Break (b) Consequences of an ARC Break (c) Meter Symptoms of approaching ARC Break (c) Manifestations of an ARC Break (e) Handling an ARC Break (f) Demonstration of handling an ARC Break 338 9. Problem Review (a) Definition of a PTP (b) Example of a PTP (c) Definition of a hidden standard (c) Definition of an overrun (e) Demonstration of an overrun (f) Consequences of a PTP (g) Assessment of PTPs (h) Handling a PTP A. Method B. Method (i) Symptoms of overhandling a PTP How is a Release State Rehabilitated? 10. O/W Review (a) Definition of an overt (b) Definition of a withhold (c) Symptoms of an overt - (c) Reaction of a pc with a withhold (e) Cycle of a misunderstood word (f) Handling withholds (g) Example of a motivator (h) Justifications (i) Assessment of withholds 0) Inadvertent withholds (k) Withhold of nothing (1) Consequences of missing withholds (m) Withholdy pcs who ARC Break easily (n) Action on pcs who don't give up w/hs 11. Continuous Overt Review (a) What is "Case Gain" (b) Who doesn't get case gain? (c) Overruns and TA (c) Detection of continuous overts (e) Auditor Action when condition not relieved (f) What process handles (Mark each question 1.25 pts) LRH:mI.rd Examiner Copyright (c) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD 339 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 JANUARY 1969 SEA ORG Remimeo Tech Hats AUDITORS AND TRAINING No matter the level of training an auditor has obtained, whether it be Class VIII or 0, it may slip unless it gets maintained. The slips are always GROSS, and the GROSS SUDDEN outness is often hidden behind a series of smaller seeming ones spread over a number of pcs, An auditor was found to have slipped on the Auditor's Code by auditing a hungry pc, and careful examination of several other folders audited by this auditor in the same period showed similar other outnesses of a same GROSS nature. Obviously adherence to the Auditor's Code suddenly slipped, and with it went this auditor's TR's. ONLY CONSTANT REFERENCE TO SOURCE WILL MAINTAIN 100% RESULTS! Bit piece training is not sufficient. It is useless to correct the auditor on his ADMIN when it is found that he forgets to write "Ext" alongside the list when extending it. We find that the next list is also goofed, and the auditor should have been retrained on TR's 0 to 4. For a small technical outness to occur, a BIG one has already preceded it. And basically there are NO small outnesses technically. They are always BIG. The policy is hereby established and is to be strictly adhered to, that ALL auditors, Qual and HGC alike, whether Class 0 or Class VIII must train for a minimum of one hour daily. EVERY WORKING DAY. They shall do drills and HCOB study. This is a CORRECTIVE ACTION, and as such comes under the Qual See. The training programme embraces auditors, D/P, C/S, Tech See and Qual Sec. A wise Org Exec Sec if technically trained should not lag behind in this programme. Lt. 0. J. Roos Flag C/S for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:OJR:sdp.ei.rd Copyright (c) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 340 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 APRIL 1965 Gen Non Remimeo Sthil Students Sthil Scn Staff TECHNICAL DIVISION 6 QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION DEPT 20-DIV 7 REVIEW The Department of Review is in the Qualifications Division. It is Division 7, Department 20. It has a Cramming Section which teaches students what they have missed. It has a Case Cracking Section which audits cases (students or HGC pcs or other pcs in difficulty such as field auditor rejects) to a result. Review also has a Staff Training Section. It also has a Staff Co-auditing Section. Any student failing his classification examinations must be ordered to the Review Cramming Section. Any student failing to get 5 or more passes (usual expected number is 10 passes per week on the Saint Hill Course) in two weeks, theory and practical check sheets inclusive, must. be ordered by the (c) of T to the Review Cramming Section. Any student who becomes ARC Broken or whose case does not progress must be ordered to the Case Cracking Section by the (c) of T. Any HGC pc who does not qualify for a grade certificate requested is ordered to the Case Cracking Section. All student blows are ordered to the Case Cracking Section. All pc blows are ordered to the Case Cracking Section. Students coming under Ethics may be ordered to Case Cracking Section by a Court of Ethics but not by a (c) of T. This is done either for one crime or five misdemeanors reported. The student may have recourse. In all other ordering of students or pcs, to Review than Ethics matters, it is considered a normal training or auditing action since the org is there to train or process only average or better students or pcs and does not undertake to invest time, money and staff on unusual cases and the ordering of the student is by the (c) of T, the pc by the (c) of P or students or pcs by the Director of Examinations, or in Ethics matters only by a Court of Ethics but then to auditing only. The entire purpose of the Department of Review is repair and correction of auditing and training difficulties. It is quite fatal to feed students or pcs, rejected by an Examiner of the Department of Examinations, Qualifications Division, back into the Technical Division until the matter is remedied by Review. Academies and HGCs are assembly line actions and the introduction of the failed result back into it until the failure is remedied in Review produces chaos. All Review Services are charged for. There is an invoice unit between Examinations and Review. 341 An amount of money is deposited or an open invoice is signed by the student or pc (unspecified amount). No Review action or service may be given free of charge or less than the fixed rates for the area. But cases can be handled on credit. All cases are handled. None is rejected except Potential Trouble Sources or a person it is unlawful to audit or train. If a person sent to Review will not pay at all, resists even credit, he or she is shifted at once to the next department (Department of Certificates and Awards, Div 7 Dept 2 1 ) to their Hardship Section where some charity arrangement may be made for low level assists by volunteer students or freshly trained internes wanting someone to practise on, not a Review action. The Saint Hill Department of Review Professional Rates are: Auditing per hour f 3.12.0 Training per day f 2 / day. Public rates would be twice that as the Pro. Rate is half the public rate. If the Review fee is not paid by course end the grade or level certificate or classification is not delivered to the student. However if the student has proven credit a note may be signed or the amount billed according to prevailing policy which may be set from time to time. Power processes are only run in the Review Case Cracking Section and may not be taught in the Academy or employed in the HGC since they apply only to the unusual case and while they also work on average cases, the average case runs quite well if not better on routine processes. The Power Processes require specially coached and trained auditors. Review is an extension of my own Case Cracker Hat and my own fast instruction Hat. Auditors meant for Review should be sent to Saint Hill as Internes in the Review Department as it is quite unlike Academies and HGCs. Its personnel is expected to audit or instruct, security check or perform many non-standard actions and may have to do some of each in any working day. Review audits and trains only to a specific result. The training or auditing ends the moment the required Result is achieved and stabilized. Therefore no-one is ever signed up for X hours or Y days. One is signed up only on an open signed invoice which is followed later by a Review Time Sheet and second invoice giving the exact amount owed calculated after the result. Review auditing and training are not commonly available to the public except via the Academy and HGC. But outside persons who have to be examined for one or another reason may be shifted to Review if they fail. Review is the most versatile department in the organization with the single exception of the Office of LRH. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.rd Copyright (c) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Corrected by HCO P/L 29 April 1965 Issue III, Ethics-Review, page 345.1 342 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 APRIL 1965 Gen Non-Remimeo Issue III All Orgs Sthil Staff Sthil Students POWER PROCESSES Only the HGC at Saint Hill and the Case Cracking Section of the Department of Review may use the 3 new Power Levels I recently developed until they have on staff Review Cl VI Personnel who have interned at Saint Hill in the Saint Hill Dept of Review. The processes require the most skilled and exact application and have exact phenomena to be observed which becomes impossible to supervise outside the above departments. Only Class VI auditors may audit these processes first only at Saint Hill and only under the supervision of Mary Sue Hubbard until they have learned them perfectly. Training on such processes can be undertaken only by Provisional Class VI auditors after leaving the course, and only enrolled on staff as Internes in the Department of Review or the HGC. Orgs not having personnel so trained by Interneship may not use these processes in their Review Departments. The fact of having a Review personnel trained in Review at Saint Hill does not permit an org to train new Review personnel in the org. Anybody in an org's Review who will be using or supervising the use of Power Processes must have been interned at Saint Hill. Such training, however, gives no right to. train others. Holding this policy firmly guarantees the full success technically in all cases in any org in the world. Avoiding it in any way jeopardizes that success. These power processes are simple. But so is T.N.T. The reason for this is that there is no adequate repair for errors made in running these processes if their existing remedies are also goofed. The strongest, swiftest Ethics action must follow any slightest violation of the above for these processes alone guarantee sweeping success for Scientology on the roughest cases everywhere. Any auditor who discovers that the pc he is auditing has been illegally audited previously on a power process or any higher level process for which the pc is not graded must report the matter at once to the nearest HCO Ethics Section by collect wire or 'phone call. R6 NEW STUDENTS Before enrolment in the R6 unit of the SHSBC all students who have not been run on the Power Processes and who have any slightest difficulty with R6 EW must be ordered at once to the Review Case Cracking Section for Power Processes. Any student not showing adequate case gain on the course must be ordered to the Review Case Cracking Section. The Power Processes must not appear on any check sheet. TRUSTED AUDITORS I reserve my right to give a process to a trusted Class VI auditor to run on one pc for testing. REVIEW, ORDERS TO No (c) of T or Course Supervisor or Academy Instructor may threaten a student who is disruptive of course discipline with Review auditing or training. Such students may only be ordered to Ethics. Auditing may no longer be used as discipline by any Comm Ev or Scientology Executive. 343 Students who obtain too few passes may be ordered to Review. Students who are ARC Broken may be ordered to Review. REVIEW EXPENSES Any student ordered to the Review Cramming Section or Case Cracking Section is ordered at his or her own expense at prevailing Review rates. Students who cannot pay and whose credit is compromised may be ordered by Review to the Hardship Section where student auditors who have failed in classification may be needful of pcs to catch up on check sheets or get experience with processes. If no such students are available the hardship case or backward student must simply wait for one to show up if one does. PACE OF ORG The organization is geared to the average case and study rate and there is no reason why it should have to pay above its narrow costing allowance for the student who is too bad off or the preclear who cannot gain normally. PRECLEARS When any HGC preclear does not buy enough auditing to attain a case change, and if no result has been obtained, he or she may not be dismissed from the org but must be passed to Review at the preclear's own expense. It is vital that an HGC pc buy enough auditing to obtain a proper result for his case if it is worse than average. Otherwise the matter passes from the preclear's hands and is taken over by Review. No "failed cases" may be dismissed from the org. ALL TO QUALIFICATIONS No student or pc may leave an org by any other exit than through the Department of Examinations. If students or pcs fail for any reason to be up to required standards they are shunted by Examinations to Review. . If the student or pc passes the Department of Examinations' appraisal, he or she is sent to the Department of Certifications for attestation of attainment and for logging out of the org. Until so logged the student or pc has not technically left the org. Departure without logging is "Departure unauthorized" and is treated as a "blow" and passes into the hands of Ethics at once. ETHICS AND STUDENTS AND PCs Students and pcs, shunted about from the Academy or HGC to Examinations, Review and Certification or back again are not considered transferred or subjected to discipline in the Ethics meaning of these words and have therefore no recourse. The entire object of an org is to produce a satisfactory auditor or higher state of case in the pc and anything that impedes this would be an arbitrary and unreasonable restraint upon an org and its Technical and Qualification Divisions and their personnel. A student or pc should signify an understanding of this on enrolling in an org for training or scheduling processing. They are buying progress in life and may not act to prevent its occurrence. If they enter an org they are understood to consider improvement desirable and therefore tacitly agree to be improved by the technology furnished. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright (c) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 344 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 APRIL 1965 Issue III [Excerpt] Remimeo ETHICS REVIEW (Correction to HCO Pol Ltr 24 April 1965 and additional Ethics data) As per HCO Pol Ltr of 28 April 1965, and others of later date, orders to auditing or training may not be made as a sentence or used in an Ethics Court or by a Comm Ev or any other reason. Auditing and training are awards. A student who is disruptive of discipline and acts contrary to the Ethics Codes may not be ordered to Review by the (c) of P, (c) of T or Ethics personnel or other persons in an org. ORDERING STUDENTS & PCs Tech and Qualifications personnel, particularly the Tech See and Qual See and (c) of Estimations, the (c) of P and (c) of T, (c) of Exams and (c) of Review and (c) of Certs may order students or pcs, to Review or to course or to HGC or anywhere in and around these two Divisions without any Ethics action being implied. It is just normal, done to get students and pcs on the road to higher levels. Ethics actions may only suspend training or deny auditing. Therefore, a student ordered to Ethics for discipline who does not then give adequate promise and example of good behaviour and compliance must be thoroughly investigated even to his or her own area and in the meanwhile may not be trained or processed. The student, however, may not be dismissed or expelled unless full Ethics actions and procedures have been undertaken. All sentences carrying a denial of training or processing must carry a means of the right to be trained or processed being restored in a specified time or under specified conditions. STUDENTS AND PCs & ETHICS The routine action of Ethics is to request a reappraisal of behaviour and a signed promise of good behaviour for a specified time. If the student or pc refuses to so promise, then the next action of Ethics is an investigation of the student's course or pcs, processing behaviour. When then confronted with the data, if the student still refuses to promise, Ethics undertakes a full investigation in the student's or pc's own area. If the student or pc still refuses to co-operate, the student goes before a Court of Ethics which may pass sentence. RECOURSE Only after sentence has been passed by a legal body such as a Court of Ethics or Committee of Evidence or after an illegal disciplinary action may a student or pc ask for a recourse. Normally before asking for recourse a student or pc petitions the Office of L. Ron Hubbard if unwilling to accept the discipline but this must be done at once. If the petition is unfavourably acted upon, the student or pc may ask for recourse. Recourse must be requested of the Convening Authority that had local jurisdiction over the student or pc and may not be requested of higher authority. A request to higher authority than the Ethics activity that passed sentence is a petition, not recourse. LRH:jw.ccfen.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright (c) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard [Note: A complete copy of this Policy Letter can be found in ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Volume 1, pages 395-398.] 345 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 JULY 1965 Remimeo All Tech Hats Tech Div All Qual Hats Qual Div Class VII Students PC ROUTING REVIEW CODE The Code has four symbols REV! REV FL? DECLARE? ETH? When the Case Supervisor sends (by marking the summary report in the folder) a pc from the Tech Div to the Qual Div, the following code is used. REV! Means "This pc is in trouble! Please do a Review hard." Review does HCO Pol Ltr 26 June 1965 Form with extreme care and handles thoroughly all points uncovered. PC GOES STRAIGHT TO INVOICE AND REVIEW AUDITOR. REV FL? Means "Could you please find out if this process is flat for me? And anything else you care to do, of course." PC GOES STRAIGHT TO INVOICE AND REVIEW AUDITOR. DECLARE? Means "Pc has reached a grade or Release. Please look at pc and if okay, pass on to Certs and Awards." PC GOES STRAIGHT TO EXAMINER. IF PC LOOKS ALL RIGHT TO EXAMINER AND FOLDER IS OKAY EXAMINER SENDS PC TO CERTS AND AWARDS WITH A CHIT. Review auditor does not get on line at all. However if a casual glance tells the Examiner this pc is not all right or if folder shows a mess, the Examiner routes by a chit to invoice and Review. The pc, however, is not returned to the HGC, but can, of course, in the case of a grade, sign up for more. ETH? Means "This pc may be an Ethics case, roller coasters or no case gain." PC GOES STRAIGHT TO INVOICE AND REVIEW AUDITOR who does HCO Pol Ltr 26 June 65 and returns pc to Examiner who may-or may not-direct pc to Ethics depending on results of the Review. AUDITOR'S PC Note that an auditor may take his pc to Qual if the session won't start or run. The route is not auditor to (c) of P to Review, but the Auditor with the pc to Invoice to Review auditor. The pc's auditor leaves the pc at invoice in Qual and reports then at once to the (c) of P who must assign some work or send the auditor to Dept of Schedules to pick up a low priority pc or even, on peak loads, to the Director of Review to help out. The auditor must not remain unassigned, even if he is put to Files. DEPT OF SCHEDS HGC Admin (The Dept of Schedules, Tech Div) receives folders at the end of the session or the day's auditing and gets them to the Case Supervisor. When the Case Supervisor sends them back (before the next session), HGC Admin then sees what should happen in the folders and routes the pc promptly and as promptly handles any auditor re-assignment. Pcs who are going to come back are promptly reviewed and sent back and the auditor is not changed on them and the auditor is temporarily assigned by HGC Admin to bridge the gap. Pcs who are not going to come back are struck off the assignment board and the auditor is instantly reassigned. If the next pc on the list cannot instantly be found by HGC Admin then the next pc on the list is grabbed. The auditor, then, does not go to Qual with the pc. It is not the auditor who 346 discovers the pc is destined, for Review. This is discovered by HGC Admin before sessions normally begin for the day. The whole interest here is economy of auditing time. Save all of it you can in any way you can. THE ASSIGNMENT BOARD A large cellulose or soft board at least 3 ft by 5 high exists in HGC Admin. Each Auditor's name is printed on a card and each pc's name is put on a card. There is a column for each session period if there are more than one in the day. And one column for pcs who have been sent to Review. The auditors' names are in the column on the left on green cards and the pcs' are in the other columns on white cards. HGC Admin assigns and routes by moving cards on the Assignment Board. There are three possible sessions, morning, afternoon and evening. There is also the Review column, Thus one has 5 vertical columns on the Assignment Board. WAITING LIST BOARD Any pc waiting list is posted, with the pc's name on a white card, on another board in HGC Admin. It reads from left to right in horizontal lines and the white card is removed to the Assignment Board. Students who are waiting for auditing are also put on the waiting list board but their names are on a different (paler) shade of green from that of auditors. These quite commonly are scheduled half days so that one auditor is auditing two of them a day. The student studies the other half of the day. This can also be done (half day scheduling) with town pcs. Out of town pcs are always full day scheduled. LRH:ml.rd Copyright (c) 1965 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 JULY 1965 Gen Non Remimeo [Excerpt] Tech Div Qual Div REVIEW HOLDS Review must NOT hold onto pcs. There is no 2nd HGC in Review. Review does the required actions and sends pc back to HGC Admin. There's no reason to start running intensives in Review. That's for the HGC. Check them, find what's wrong, send them back to HGC. The Case Supervisor of course receives the folder from HGC Admin before the next session. But Review does not ask the Case Supervisor for further directions. Review asks the Dir Review and the Dir Review asks the Qual Sec if needed. But there should be no question on a case. Review actions are very pattern. They do a form. They put it in the folder and send the folder and pc back to HGC Admin. HGC Admin then sends the folder to the Case Supervisor who writes the Case Supervisor's instructions in the folder for the HGC Auditor, who then goes on with the intensive. If the intensive is considered over, by reason of Release or Ethics action, HGC Admin tells the pc and does the remaining necessary actions. LRH:ml.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright (c) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard [Excerpted from HCO Policy Letter of 9 July 1965, Qual Goofs, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED A complete copy appears on page 142.1 347 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1965 Remimeo Ali Staff IMPORTANT Ethics Hat Tech Hats Qual Hats Income Hats POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ROUTING The Ethics Officer, when receiving a person Who has 'roller coastered (case improved then dropped), must route that person to Review. Review only must locate the correct Suppressive Person, repeat the correct SP, the right SP. Review then states: I . Who the SP is (or who they are if more than one); 2. That good indicators came in and stayed in visibly when the SP (or SPs) was found. Review then sends the person to Ethics. Ethics must require the person as per policy to handle or disconnect. If the person will not handle or disconnect, the person is sent again to Review as the right SP has NOT been found. Further UNTIL THE PERSON HAS PAID IN CASH FOR THE REVIEW SEARCH AND DISCOVERY Ethics may not declare the person no longer PTS. (The reason for this is that the person will not pay if the wrong suppressive is found.) HGC Auditors, similarly must send a PTS to Review not Ethics. Supervisors must send any 'student PTS only to Review. Review always sends to Ethics but ONLY when the right SP has been found and indicated. REVIEW AUDITOR The Review Auditor uses "Search and Discovery" as will be covered in an HCO B. If this is not to hand, simply find the right SP, indicate it to, the person and watch the good indicators come in. PTSs may not be handled in ANY other way. The routing is not from Ethics to the Chaplain. Ethics does not route to the Chaplain. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright (c) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 348 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 JUNE 1962 CenOCon ARC BREAK CLEAN-UP PROGRAMME The following programme for cleaning up ARC breaks, initiated by Fred Fairchild, Tech Director in Washington D.C., should be used also in other Orgs. ARC Break Clean-Up Programme PURPOSE: To get the ARC breaks cleaned up with past students and preclears; to invite further activity in Scientology on their part; to get them paying on over-due bills. ACTION. Body Registrar contacts people who are not paying their bills and are out of communication with the Org, and arranges for these people to come in and get an ARC break check which would amount to a missed withhold check. The person would be asked by the auditor some such question as "Do you have an ARC break with Scientology-the org, etc." or "Do you have any disagreement with Scientology-the org, etc." This would get a motivator, but it would put them in a hot area of "overts". The auditor once he has located the area of ARC break, then pulls the "overts", and who has missed them. (Failed to find out about them.) An auditor could be used for this if he doesn't have a pc, or in case of a weekend, the auditor on a "free" week, can have a day of that week off to make up for auditing on the weekend. This is an experiment in which we hope to get ARC broken people active in Scientology and paying on their bills. We hope this to be successful enough to make it a whole programme for the USA with all orgs, and field auditors. At first we will only use it on the local people here, and if successful, will expand from there. It is planned that the ARC breaks can be cleaned up in from 2 to 5 hours. L. RON HUBBARD by Fred Fairchild Tech Director Washington D.C. LRH:dr.cden Copyright (c) 1962 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 349 NOT HCO POLICY LETTER CORRECT COLOUR FLASH BLUE ON WHITE ARC BREAK CLEANUP PROGRAMME [Excerpt from EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE of 1 September 196 7 ED 4 73 WW 842 SH "WW Emergency Condition "I A general condition of EMERGENCY BY TREND is assigned WW on a basis of leveling or dropping composite outer org graphs. 11. It also means local tech is out in outer orgs and the areas are full of ARC Breaks not caught. In such a case I always order orgs to pick up and smooth out AT ANY ORG EXPENSE every ARC broken pc they can find in their files or areas as A SPECIAL PROGRAMME. They put in an ARC Break Registrar who liaisons with accounts and with Review and with CF searching for ARC Broken pcs, and students. A special genned in full time auditor is put in Review and AT NO CHARGE to pcs is kept busy on ARC Breaks only WITH IT BEING AN ETHICS OFFENSE TO USE HIM OR THE ARC BREAK REGISTRAR FOR ANY OTHER STUDENT PC OR DUTY. And you clean up the whole field from years and years back. This ARC Break auditor cures the ARC Breaks with Level III tech and sends the person to the usual registrar when done. THIS is his stable datum: IF YOUR PC IS NOT SMILING AND HAPPY AT THE END OF SESSION YOU ARE NOT AUDITING. 12. The ARC Break Registrar has a special dual stat-how many ARC Broken pcs, have been found, in files, etc, how many contacted. The ARC Br Auditor has a special dual stat-how many ARC Breaks (not pcs, found, how many handled. L. RON HUBBARD Founder [Note: Full text of ED 473 WW 842 SH is in Volume: 7, page 60.] HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1968 Issue 11 (Corrects HCO PL 2 November 1967 Dissem. Division and HCO PL 2 November 1967 Qualifications Division) Remimeo ARC BREAK REGISTRARS AND AUDITORS ARC BREAK REGISTRARS AND AUDITORS ARE RELOCATED IN QUAL TO WORK AS A TEAM. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH.js.rd Copyright (c) 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 350 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 JANUARY 1969 Issue 11 Remimeo Org Exec Sec Hat HCO Exec Sec Hat HCO Area Sec Hat Qual See Hat Dir Review Hat ARC Break Reg Hat ARC Break Auditor Hat ARC BREAK PROGRAM An ARC broken field equals blocks to the expansion of Scientology and decreased income for Orgs. Therefore a Special Program for finding, contacting, handling and getting ARC broken Scientologists back on the lines is vital. The Program that handles this is the ARC Break Program, which picks up and handles AT ANY ORG EXPENSE every ARC broken Scientologist that can be found in the field AT NO CHARGE. Under this Program a full time ARC Break Registrar and Auditor are assigned to the Department of Review in the Qualifications Division WITH IT BEING AN ETHICS OFFENSE TO USE THEM FOR ANY OTHER STUDENT OR PC DUTY. The ARC Break Registrar must employ every possible source of information and spare no effort or expense to get ARC broken Scientologists located, contacted and into session. The ARC Break Auditor then, using Standard Tech, handles whatever upset the person has, which is preventing him from continuing processing or training to the point where he signs up for his next service. This Program is quite simple,. but extremely vital to the expansion of Scientology and increased income. So let's get all those who have reached but withdrawn because of some upset with us rapidly back on The Road to Total Freedom. Qual See WW - Jim Keely HCO Area See WW - Bruce Glushakow Ad Council WW - Rodger Wright (Chairman) LRH Comm WW - Rodger Wright The Guardian WW - Jane Kember for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jsk.el.rd Copyright (c) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Cancelled by HCO P/L 9 August 1971, ARC Break Program, page 352.1 351 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 AUGUST 1971 Remimeo Exec Hats Dissem Hats Qual Hats ARC Break Reg Hat. ARC Break Auditor Hat ARC BREAK PROGRAM (Cancels HCO PL 20 Jan 69 which had the ARC Break Registrar incorrectly posted under the Qual Div, & omitted blown students.) An ARC Broken field equals blocks to the expansion of Scientology and decreased income for orgs. Therefore a special Program for finding, contacting, handling and getting ARC Broken Scientologists and blown students back on lines is vital. The Program that handles this is the ARC Break Program, which picks up and handles at ORG EXPENSE every ARC Broken Scientologist and blown student that can be found in the field. A Free Revitalization Session is given each person at NO CHARGE. Under this Program a full time ARC Break Registrar for Div 2, Dept 6, and a full time ARC Break Auditor for the Qual Div are assigned. During the Program it is an Ethics Offense to use them for any other student or pc duty. The ARC Break Reg must employ every possible source of information and spare no effort or expense to get ARC Broken Scientologists. and blown students located, contacted and turned over to Qual for a session. If a person does not or will not come to the org, the ARC Break Auditor then goes to the person's home and politely 8C's the person into receiving his Free Revitalization Session. The ARC Break Auditor then, using Standard Tech, handles whatever upset the person has which is preventing him from continuing processing or training to the point where he signs up for his next service or returns to completing the course he was on. To really complete cleaning up blown students, they would need full Word Clearing in Qual at own expense before being routed back on Course. This Program is simple, but extremely vital to the expansion of Scientology and increased income. So let's get all those who have reached but withdrawn because of some upset with us rapidly back on the Routing and Gradation Chart and the Road to Total Freedom. Dissem Aide for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:RR:nt.rd Copyright (c) 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 352 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE 3 7 Fitzroy Street, London W. I HCO POLICY, LETTER OF 3 AUGUST 1960 (Re-issued from Sthil) CenOCon SECURITY OF PERSONS LEAVING STAFFS Before a person may leave staff and receive a final pay cheque, a security check must be made and any overts and "withholds on the organization or personnel discovered must be audited at organization expense. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:js.gh.cden Copyright (c) 1960 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 DECEMBER 1960 CenOCon SECURITY CHECKS A security check may be made on Any Academy student, Central Org staff member or any Hubbard Guidance Center preclear where there is a possibility of a threat to survival of a Scientology, Organization.,,, A security check -is not a punishment; it is actually "help" to the person being checked. A security check may be requested by the Assoc See, Org See, HCO Exec See, HCO Area See, HCO Board of Review, HCO WW and Exec Dir. Issued by: Peter Hemery HCO Secretary WW for MARY SUE HUBBARD Deputy Executive Director MSH-.js.rd Copyright 1960 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 353 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 JANUARY 1961 CenOCon NEW SECURITY RULES All Security Checks, to be valid, must be done on an HCO WW form As all permanent staff members must pass a security check to become so, the following constitutes a pass: No Lie Reactions 1. Lie Reaction must be unmistakable on E-Meter during first ten test questions. If not present when subject responds "No" to all ten statements (half of them untrue) and yet there is no registry of the untruth on the meter to such things as "Are you sitting in a chair?" then the lack of lie reaction flunks the subject so far as a security check is concerned. Needle Fails To Clear 2. If falls, rock slams or theta bops do not clear out when the question is carefully repeated and all efforts by the examiner fail to clear them out, the subject is to be considered a security risk and the test is flunked. Perversion 3. When the subject demonstrates current peculiar interests which could be made the subject of blackmail by people antagonistic to Scientology, the person is a security risk and the test is flunked. Felonies 4. If the subject is shown to have committed crimes (felonies) for which he could be arrested in present time the subject should be flunked. Unreadable Needle 5. If the E-Meter needle is too sticky or too wild to be. read throughout the interview, the subject should be flunked. It should be noted that all but 3 (Perversions) and 4 (Felonies) above can be cleaned up by processing. 3 (Perversions) could also be cleaned up by processing and a change of activities. 4 (Felonies) could be cleaned up by processing and some social adjustment with the persons offended against or the law. L. RON HUBBARD LRH.js.cden Copyright 0 1961 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 354 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 MARCH 1961 CenOCon SECURITY RULES (Cancels HCO Policy Letter of January 28 1961 "New Security Rules") Since a Security Check failure can compromise or injure a person's position or economics, and because we are not moralists, it is better to be more positive on the subject of a Security Check failure, leaving no part of it up to judgement. The question of what constitutes a Security Check failure has now troubled enough people to make it necessary to lay down the following policies. A Security Check to be used for any organizational reason must be made on an HCO WW form. There are only three ways a Security Checker may flunk any person. I . The Security Check may be considered flunked if there is no needle response of any kind to any question with meter sensitivity even at extreme high. 2. The Security Check may be considered flunked if any compromising or important question still persists in getting a consistent drop even after the Security Checker has done his best to get the person being checked to clear it by answering truthfully. 3. Refusal to be checked. Lie reaction failure may no longer be considered a flunk. Important questions always have enough charge on them to cause a fall even on bad criminals and the fall will continue consistently or sporadically if the person is still withholding information. The question of something falling because of past life crimes is ruled out if, when a question fails to clear, the Security Checker adds "In this lifetime?" to or in the question and works on that question continuing to use that added phrase. Falls by reason of past lives tend to drop out and clear if this is done. The task of the Security Checker is to carefully question and clear if possible changes of meter needle behaviour caused by the question. The Lie Reaction questions were originally used in Scientology only to study the needle pattern of the person being checked so that changes in it could then be judged in their true light. Some pcs, for instance, get a slight fall every time any question is asked. Some get a fall only when there is heavy charge. Both can be Security Checked by studying the common pattern of the needle demonstrated in asking the Lie Reaction questions. The purpose of the Lie Reaction questions is returned to the original intention. A totally stuck needle can be freed by processing, or by getting off withholds. If a person is flunked by reason of 1. above, they require auditing before another check is taken, the auditing to be taken at the responsibility of the person being checked. CHECK SHEETS All Security Check Sheets of persons Security Checked should be forwarded to Saint Hill, complete with all markings and the reason why the question would not at first clear, if important, or the drop marked which would not clear and whether or not the person was passed or failed. (c) of T FLUNKS Nothing in this Policy Letter changes the responsibility of the Director of Training in preventing Scientology from being taught to persons who would use it in violation of the Code of a Scientologist. LRH:iet.aap L. RON HUBBARD Copyright (c) 1961 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 355 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 DECEMBER 1961 CenOCon SEC CHECKS ON STAFF Once a staff member has passed a Form 7A or 7B, no further use of this form should be made on that staff member. It is the responsibility of the (c) of P thereafter that staff members continue to remain in good condition by reason of routine staff clearing processing. If any staff member fails thereafter in security, the (c) of P should be placed on evening auditing on the Joburg, Form 6 and other policy checks to get all the (c) of P's withholds off so the (c) of P will not be diffident in keeping staff clearing going well and getting off withholds on staff members. LRH:ph.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright (c) 1961 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 DECEMBER 1961 HCO Area Sees Org Sees Ds of P PROCESSING (c) OF P Effective immediately, please arrange for your Director of Processing, and anyone subsequently appointed to this post, to be processed on the last two pages of the 'Joburg' (Form 3) Processing Check-starting with the question:- "Have you ever injured Dianetics or Scientology?", also the whole of the Form 6 Processing Check, AND the Executives' Security Check (HCO Information Letter of November 22, 1961). It is imperative that these Checks be completed on your Director of Processing very soon, so please insist on the (c) of P taking sufficient auditing time to thoroughly flatten them-starting NOW. LRH:ew.cden Issued by Copyright (c) 1961 HCO Technical Secretary WW by L. Ron Hubbard for ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD 356 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Gen Non Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JANUARY 1962 Qual Hats Reissued on 7 June 1967 Tech Hats Level VI Students & Above RESPONSIBILITY AGAIN The common denominator of the Goals Problem Mass is "No Responsibility". This is the end product that continues any circuit or valence. This is a deterioration of Pan Determinism over a game into "No responsibility" as follows: No Previous or Current Contact - No responsibility or liability. Pan Determinism - Full responsibility for both sides of game. Other Determinism - No responsibility for other side of game. Self Determinism - Full responsibility for self, no responsibility for other side of game. Valence (Circuit) - No responsibility for the game, for either side of the game or for a former self. The Goals Problem Mass is made up of past selves or "valences", each one grouped and more or less in a group. Therefore, the characteristic of the part (the valence) is the characteristic of the whole, the collection of valences known as the Goals Problem Mass. The way a being is hung with persistent masses is the mechanism of getting him to believe certain things are undesirable. These, he cannot then have. He can only combat or ignore them. Either way, they are riot as-ised. Thus they persist. Only undesirable characteristics tend to persist. Therefore the least desirable valences or traits of valences persist. The way not to have is to ignore or combat or withdraw from. These three, ignoring or combatting or withdrawing sum up to no having. They also sum up to no responsibility for such things. Thus we can define responsibility as the concept of being able to care for, to reach or to be. To be responsible for something one does not actually have to care for it, or reach it or be it. One only needs to believe or know that he has the ability to care for it, reach it or be it. "Care for it" is a broader concept than but similar to start, change or stop it. It includes guard it, help it, like it, be interested in it, etc. When one has done these things, and then had failures through overts and withholds, one cycles down through compulsive and obsessive care, reach and be and inverts to withdraw from, combat or ignore. Along with ignore goes forgetting or occlusion. Thus a person has occlusion on past valences and past lives go out of sight. These return to memory only when one has regained the concept that they can be reached, or that one dares be them again or that one can care for them. Herein is the cause and remedy of whole track occlusion. There are many uses of these principles. Sec Checking gets off the overts and withholds and opens the gates. All chronic somatics and behavior patterns are contained in valences and are not traceable to the current life time since one can reach present life, is caring for present life and is being present life, so present life is an area of responsibility. All real difficulty stems from no responsibility. However, one can use these principles even on present life with considerable gain. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:sf.jp.oden Founder Copyright (-) 1967 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 357 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 JANUARY 1962 HCO Sees Assoc Sees Tech Depts URGENT SECURITY CHECKS Effective immediately, all Security Security Checks, i.e. HCO WW Forms 5A, 7A and 7B etc, when being used specifically as Security Checks, must be done in Model Session form. This is because it has been found that bad security risks have been passed on these forms due to wildly out rudiments nulling the needle. Conversely, good staff members have been flunked because questions read on ARC Breaks etc, rather than on the question being asked. Issued by: Mike Rigby Senior Instructor LRH:jw.pp.kd Saint Hill Special Copyright (c) 1962 Briefing Course by L. Ron Hubbard for ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 FEBRUARY 1962 CenOCon CLEAN HANDS CLEARANCE CHECK In order for an auditor who is regarded as a security risk to be considered to have Clean Hands, it is necessary for him to receive a Clean Hands Clearance Check from HCO. The Clean Hands Clearance Check consists of that auditor having the following rudiments put in very thoroughly by an HGC Class Il Staff Auditor using prep-clearing techniques. I . Auditor. Are you willing to talk tome about your difficulties? 2. Withholds - Last two pages of Joburg Form 3 or all of Form 3A (to be released soon); and all of an HCO WW Sec Form 6A. Plus asking "Has a withhold been missed on you?" frequently as all such persons specialise in getting them missed. This will be checked out on completion by the HCO Area Secretary for any questions on Form 3 or 3A and Form 6A which may be still alive and for any missed or partial withholds. If there are questions which are alive or if there are any missed or partial withholds the person must go back to the HGC to have them cleaned up before he is considered to have Clean Hands. If no questions are alive and there are no missed or partial withholds, then the person will be awarded a Clean Hands Seal on his certificate and will be considered to be in good standing with HCO. LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright (c) 1962 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 358 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 OCTOBER 1962 CenOCon SECURITY RISKS INFILTRATION As the Organization rapidly expands so will it be a growing temptation for anti-survival elements to gain entry and infiltrate, and attempts to plant will be made. To foil these, all staff members must be alert to attempts of this nature and it is their duty to inform ' the Technical Director, or above, of any doubts they may have and to see that the necessary action is taken. The Technical Director, working in liaison with HCO, now becomes in charge of Security in an Organization and the results of which are to be notified to the Assoc/Org Secretary and HCO and, after confirmation, thence to me. Forms 7A and 7B for Staff, and Form SA for HPA/HCA Students, are herewith supplemented by the Rock Slam Security Check and this is to be carried out exactly in accordance with HCO Bulletin of September 12, AD 1 2'~ To increase reality in some cases, it may be necessary to substitute "Consider committing bad things to. . ." rather than "Consider committing overts against. . " In very rare cases it may be necessary to increase the number of buttons but this is to be the exception rather than the rule. In the vast majority of cases, just use the four questions only, as per this bulletin. This Security Check must be done with full auditor presence, be done in Model Session and the beginning rudiments especially must be properly in. Those partaking in Staff Clearing Programmes can be given this Check during one of their sessions by their usual auditor. In the event of any doubt, the Technical Director may also make arrangements for a further check to be done. Those not partaking in any Staff Clearing Programme must be checked by a skilled and reliable auditor under the direct supervision of the Technical Director. This Programme will simultaneously also handle picking up Missed Withholds of old-time Scientologists returning to the Orgs of whom we can expect a great number, the Security Check being given in proper Model Session and the Missed Withholds being pulled in the beginning rudiments. When a Rock Slam is reported as a result of this Security Check, a further check should be done to the satisfaction of HCO to confirm the fact. Action to be taken to handle a Rock Slammer: 1. If a Staff Member, suspend from any executive post and any post which involves important action on the communication lines of Scientology. Such a person may however still be used, at the discretion of Assoc/Org Sec and HCO, in a subordinate position under reliable supervision. He is to remain in this position until his goal has been found, when the situation will again be reviewed. 2. A student on the HPA/HCA Course, (or any other Professional Course) who is found to be a Rock Slammer should be suspended from the Course and ordered to the HGC for Auditing. 3. HGC Preclears should be checked early on in their Intensives to ascertain whether this condition exists. 4. In a Clearing Co-Audit, Rock Slammers should be segregated so that they are auditing each other, as far as possible, so that they do not hold back other members of the Co-Audit who are not Rock Slammers. Remember, that this Programme should not be regarded as just a passing phase. It is to be instituted immediately and kept in force in all Orgs throughout the world for our secure and speedy expansion. Insidious methods are used to infiltrate, and especially at times when expansion is fast and it is thought that our security arrangements are lax or apparently being relaxed owing to pressure of work. So, BE ALERT TO THIS AND DON'T MISS ANYONE OUT "BY MISTAKE". LRH:dr.rd Copyright (c) 1962 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 359 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 AUGUST 1968 BPI Auditor SECURITY CHECKS ABOLISHED The practice of security checking from security check lists like the "Joburg" has been abolished. There are several reasons for this: 1. We have no interest in the secrets and crimes of people and no use for them. 2. Security checking is often done without regard to the point where the person feels better and so became overrun. 3. Security checking is often done in disregard of the state of a person's case. 4. Low level cases do not react on actual crimes and so the "security" furnished is often a false security. 5. There is public criticism of security checking as a practice. 6. The existence of lists of crimes in folders often makes it necessary to destroy the folders which may contain other technical data which is constructive and valuable. 7. If a person is a criminal or has overt acts which affect his case, and speaks of them to an auditor of his own volition, the auditor is bound by the Auditor's Code not to publish, use or reveal them. Nothing in this policy letter alters standard grade processing or rudiments. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH.js.cden Copyright (c) 1968 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 360 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1970 Remimeo HCO Secs I & R Hat Ethics Hat Tech C/S Qual Personnel THE TECH AND ETHICS OF CONFESSIONALS (Compiled from a briefing to 3rd Mate and 4th Mate Flag given by L. RON HUBBARD) HCO is primarily interested in JUSTICE. The method of Justice practised in the 17th and 18th Centuries was to catch the offenders and hang them, thus keeping the countryside "quiet". Although useful as a method of quietening things down, however, it doesn't do people any good to be hung! You will find the remedy expressed in this rule: WHEN YOU GIVE A CONFESSIONAL TO A PERSON WITHOUT FINDING THE EARLIER BASIC, YOU HANG THEM. If you can't chase back a Confessional to an F/N you are going to get continuous Ethics trouble from that person from then on until it is remedied. When you give a guy a Confessional and it doesn't produce anything and the needle is clean you should indicate that the Confessional was unnecessary. You will probably get an F/N. HCO's interest in someone is normally in what is going on, what is he up to NOW. So one tends to omit to ask how come this guy has been committing overts for the past two-and-a-half years-the same ones-and it is still going-on? Back in that earlier zone is one hell of an overt, continuous overts against Scientology or LRH. So what is it? You should trace it back and you could find a dilly! It's the EARLIEST item available on that chain that will get the F/N. And remember that overts of Omission are always preceded by overts of Commission. So you should ask yourself "How come all these overts of omission?" There's an earlier overt of commission, you can be sure. This gives us another rule: IF YOU CANNOT F/N A CONFESSIONAL, YOU HAVEN'T GOT IT. Now it could be the buttons are out (invalidate, protest, action unnecessary). Did you know you can beef up a TA (send it up high) by doing an unnecessary action? It acts somewhat like forcing a wrong item on a pc It puts him on a protest, a rejection and effort to stop the action. That is where a lot of the unpopularity of Confessionals stems from. Of the rudiments ARC Break, problem, withhold, the Confessional specializes in overts and withholds. So the full panorama of Confessional buttons is Ruds plus False, Suppress, Invalidate, Evaluate, Protest, Unnecessary. These buttons are of more interest to Qual but are perfectly valid in an HCO Confessional. So if the TA goes up during a Confessional you would check ruds or buttons. IF YOU DON'T GET AN F/N ON A CONFESSIONAL YOU SHOULD HAVE A LINE TO QUAL THAT CLEANS IT UP WITHIN 24 HOURS. Every time the Ethics Officer can't fly a Confessional it has got to be a 24 hour urgent review. The Confessional repair list consists of the ruds and buttons, 361 HCO's Technical action should be "Why the hell doesn't this thing fly?" There is earlier stuff on that chain, or there is other stuff not yet found. That it flies (F/Ns) means he hasn't done that. It can of course be an ARC Break needle-people ARC Break with the physical universe, with fellow men, feel wronged in some way and have to take it out on somebody, and so commit the overt. But the somebody they attack is not the source of the upset. They mis-identify the source. If their think was straight they would be able to see what the score was and have no charge on it. An overt therefore is preceded by an ARC Break, and you will find an ARC Break is the result of a problem. So each time you don't take a Confessional to FIN you run up against this. This gives another way for them to get unpopular. But if it didn't FIN, you also know it was necessary to give the person a Confessional! If you give a person a Confessional and you see a trail of catastrophes in that person's wake afterwards you know it didn't fly. Similarly a person who makes huge overts out of every little action, which is in essence self-invalidation, has behind that somewhere a huge overt-big enough to set the police of several galaxies after them! If it doesnt FIN you haven't got it! The FIN has never been integrated into Confessional technology up 'til now. There hasn't been anything issued that says run a Confessional to FIN and tells you what to do if it doesn't or won't FIN. THE E-METER AND THE CRIMINAL The joker in all this is that the E-Meter reads on Reality. So you can have a guy who reads on none of your questions, but you find out the next day he had done exactly what you asked him. Yet it didn't read! A real criminal just doesn't read on having killed his grandmother in cold blood five minutes before the Confessional. Even if he admits it it doesn't read! But a real criminal won't clear and won't FIN. Occasionally they will RS. You have to handle it on a gradient of reality. "Why wasn't that an overt?" is one way you could try. He would at first be very surprised at the very thought of it being an overt. But you could get a stream of justifications off. Another way is to magnify the overt. You can use that on a "no-overt" case. The tech of it belongs more in the field of auditing. However HCO should make an attempt to fly it. It doesn't matter how good or bad. If there is any question on the FIN or if you can't take it to FIN send it over to Qual to find the reason why. Anytime a Confessional is done, some notification of the fact must go into the pc folder otherwise the C/S can make an error in C/Sing because of the omitted data. In fact, unless there is criminal data in the Confessional the whole thing should be slid into the folder. HCO AND CASE GAIN (See HCO P/L 20 July '70, Cases & Morale of Staff) The percentile of people who have case gain will be proportional to the level of morale in your org. So it is of interest to HCO to ask the CIS how many no-case-gain cases he has (Pile 4) trace them down and isolate them. The names of those not doing well (Piles 2 and 3) should also be known and the numbers so you can make sure the greater percentage is getting good case gain. HCO can get trouble stemming from lack of staff case progress. For instance you find an Exec giving excuses for not doing his job. It can be due to a no-case-gain under him enturbulating seniors and associates. They in turn, not recognizing him as the source of the enturbulation, buy the stops and the "can't be dones" and find some other excuse as to why not to do their job. Recognize that when someone dumps his hat on you he has overts, man! 362 An executive instead of reporting that people don't want to work in his division should be asking "How come they don't want to work in the division?" Things will get better to the degree that such cases producing stops and "cant's" have a line for them to be handled on. HCO should turn over to the CIS a list of those who have received Confessionals. The files of the Confessional are turned over and on those that did not FIN, using the repair list, Qual gets it cleaned up or otherwise. Begin a campaign to get all these cases winning. If there is any query as to which of the four categories of case folders (per HCO P/L 20 July '70) a person belongs on, it goes on the one lower. For instance a category (Pile 2) queried as to status immediately becomes Pile 3. Pile 4 cases go to HCO and are given Confessionals. If he gets an FIN, okay. If he doesn't, then it is purely a Div I disciplinary action-Non Enturbulation order or whatever. Put up a notice where it can be seen to the effect that "Anyone who feels bad after a Confessional or who feels they have been falsely given a Confessional should turn in their names to the Qual Examiner". The Ethics Officer can "hot-up" his Confessional by putting in some test buttons-overts, withholds, missed withholds. You could even do a pre-assessment for the Confessional. It's all in what you are looking for. STATISTICS HCO has its neck out to the degree that it does not have Stats. Make sure there is someone in Dept 3 who can handle stats, collect them, graph them and post them up. A person with bad or low stats on post will always trace back to having committed an overt of some kind or another. AMNESTIES In order to take advantage of an amnesty, the person accepting it should make a written statement of the Crimes on which he is accepting the amnesty. STATUS OF REPAIR ACTION A Confessional repair action is not classed as an auditing session in that the data revealed in it is actionable and is turned over to HCO. So before turning over to Qual a Confessional that didn't FIN, tell the person "You have told me all you wish to. You recognize that any further discoveries in this line will be actionable." Written into published form by 4th Mate Flag for L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:RL:rr.aap Copyright (c) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 363 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 NOVEMBER 1970 Remimeo HCO Hats Tech Hats CONFESSIONALS HCOs may not do Confessionals or "See Checks". HCO may only do Meter Checks. This consists of putting the pc on a meter and noting down the TA, state of needle and attitude of pc. Where these reads are non optimum (no F/N VGI state of meter) the pc may be sent to Qual for further check. Too many cases, too many case programmes, have been fouled up by non C/Sed See Checking or Confessionals in the past for the practice to continue. Real criminals may have bad meters but crimes are often so unreal to them that they do not read (meters needle read only on things within the reality or borderline reality of a person). This permits unskilled See Checking or Confessional actions to pass right by the culprit. HCO should learn full investigatory procedure and should only do metering to establish the pc's meter state, asking no questions. HCO Investigatory Procedure P/Ls that MUST be known to HCO are: HCO P/L May '65 - ETHICS OFFICER HAT HCO P/L 19 Sept '70 - Data Series No. 16, INVESTIGATORY PROCEDURE HCO, P/L 19 Sept '70 Issue 11 - Data Series No. 17, NARROWING THE TARGET TECH & QUAL Asked to do "Confessionals" or "See Checks" Tech and Qual may do them only as part of a C/S programme and only as a gradient in the general action of improving the reality of the case. An R/S still means crimes. All the other data is true and should be known but POLYGRAPHS, LIE DETECTORS, METERS ONLY REGISTER AT THE REALITY LEVEL OF THE BEING, and the reality level of a criminal is too bad for reads to occur in a majority of cases. Thus the guilty are falsely freed and the innocent are subjected to annoyance and upset. Overts, crimes, etc may come off first as a critical thought under which lies a harmful (overt) act. On such gradients one builds up reality and so releases overts. No meter or See Check or Confessional is sufficiently valuable to use in detection of crime. The state of the meter itself is of value since it tells one whom to investigate. Thus neither Tech nor Qual should assist investigations but should work on the case against proper C/Ses to get off the overts and withholds for the case benefit. 364 Overts disclosed in sessions may not be used for justice purposes. Therefore only crimes discovered by routine investigation are actionable. It could be that a crime discovered by investigation is also gotten off in session. That it was also gotten off in session does not protect the person from discipline. That it was gotten off in session is irrelevant and sessions are not part of justice procedures. SICKNESS The broad general clues about suspects are: The person with the worst meter (TA and needle state) is the most suspect. The person whose job product is itself an overt act is the most likely to commit other crimes. The person who is most crazy is the most likely to be the guilty one. The person who is chronically ill is a suspect. These are true because the cause of insanity and sickness is overts. The person who acts most "PTS" is the one who has most harmed his fellows. The person with the worst stats is the most likely suspect. Beyond these technical observations one cannot go in the field of justice. HCOs should learn Investigatory procedures when looking for criminals. Confessionals and Sec Checks will fail them and they also mess up cases. Investigatory procedures are quite good enough. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:sb.rd Copyright (c) 1970 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 365 CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX OF CONTENTS 1950 20 Nov. Instruction Protocol-Official (reissued 2 Sept. 1970) Vol. 4-108 12 Dec. Certification Board-Duties & Responsibilities 115 1954 The Church of Scientology Creed 280 1955 7 Nov. Hubbard Communications Office (Operational Bulletin) 165 1957 20 Mar. Staff Certificate Display 165 20 Mar. Ministerial Ordination 281 6 Apr. Membership Handling (excerpt) (HCOB) 205 11 Apr. Intensives for Staff see-212 28 Apr. HCO Board of Review-Goal 165 2 May Qualifications of a Permanent Staff member see-239 3 May Ministerial Qualifications see-281 16 May Intensives for Staff 212 3 June Qualifications of a Permanent Staff Member (Assoc Sec Directive) 239 11 June Staff Intensives (Assoc Sec Directive) 212 15 Aug. Ministerial Qualifications (supersedes 3 May 1957) see-281 19 Aug. Release All Certificates 166 2 Sept. Field Certificates 166 5 Sept. Validation of Staff 240 16 Sept. HGC Policy Vol. 4-498 19 Nov. HCO-Final Authority on Certificates (HCOB) 166 1958 28 Mar. Only Org Offices can Certify Clears (HCOB) 167 12 June Ministerial Qualifications (second revision) 281 30 June Procedure for Certifying Clears (HCOB) (revision of HCOB 28 May 1958) 168 30 June Clear Bracelet Procedure (revision of 25 Feb. 1958) 169 9 July Staff Clearing HICOB) 213 1 Oct, HCO Board of Review (excerpt) 116 27 Oct, Staff Member Processing 213 17 Nov. Clear Bracelets (HCOB) 170 25 Nov. HCO Board of Review-Fimetion and Practice 117 1959 28 Feb. HCO Board of Review Ditties 119 10 Mar. Permanent Staff Members 240 20 Mar. Certificates Handling 170 24 Apr. Final HPA Exam-HCO Board of Review 121 2 July Staff Auditing Requirement Vol. 0-120 22 July Processing of Staff Members 213 29 July Sending Certificates by Mail 171 28 Aug. BScn Interneships 308 31 Aug. Certifications 171 27 Nov. Purpose-HCO ])card of Review (excerpt) 114 27 Nov. HCO Board of Review (excerpt) 164 31 Dec. Routing of Certificates for Sterling Areas 172 1960 18 Jan. Qualifications of Permanent Staff Members 241 22 Feb. HPA Qualifications 172 25 Apr. Important Certification Change 173 29 Apr. Certification Change 173 3 May Keeping Memberships in Force 206 18 May Certifications 174 23 May Cancellation of Certificates Vol. 1-366 2 June Requirements for Staff Posts 241 7 June Staff Auditing 213 7 July Training Applicants Vol. 2-318, Vol. 4- 132 28 July International Membership Privileges Vol. 2-195 3 Aug. Security of Persons Leaving Staffs 353 11 Oct, Case Assessments for Students 123 7 Nov. HCO Area Secretary Hat Addition Vol. 1- 31 23 Nov. Reality Test for Students see- 128 26 Nov. Permanent Staff Member Requirements 242 13 Dec. Security Checks 353 21 Dec. Staff Clearing-New Policy 214 1961 28 Jan. New Security Rules 354 12 Feb. Certificates and Awards-ReAsed List 175 13 Feb. Permanent Staff Requirement Changes (modifies 26 Nov. 1960) 243 17 Feb. Staff Post Qualifications Permanent Executives to be Approved see-244 22 Feb. Permanent Staff Exam 124 26 Feb. Qualification of Executives 243 13 Mar. Staff Auditor Training Vol. 1- 114 22 Mar. Staff Members Ordered to Processing 215 25 Mar. Security Rules (cancels 28 Jan. 1961) 355 CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX OF CONTENTS 1961 (cont.) 28 Mar. Personnel Policies-Staff Post Qualifications Permanent Executives to be Approved (modifies 17 Feb. 1961) 244 2 Apr. Staff AuditorTraining-Sequence of Study 334 7 Apr. Examinations of Academy Students to be done by Director of Processing 126 9 Apr. Staff Intensives (modified) 216 16 May HPA/HCA Requirement 176 22 July Executives' Pay 247 19 Sept. Reality Test for Students (cancels 23 Nov. 1960) 128 20 Sept. Training Policy 128 3 Oct. Auditing Schedules 217 6 Oct. Staff Clearing 218 23 Oct. Pay of Executives (modifies 22 July 1961) 247 2 Nov. Allowed Processes from Courses 129 2 Nov. Training Quality (reissued 3 Mar. 1967) 129 14 Nov. Stabilization of Clean 176 21 Nov. Training Course Requirements Vol. 4-306 27 Dec. Processing D of I 356 27 Dec. Sec Checks on Staff 356 1962 3 Jan. Upgrading of Auditors Vol. 4-308 5 Jan. Examination for HGC Auditors 336 7 Jan. HCO Board of Review-Class I I Awards 130 17 Jan. Responsibility Again (reissued 7 June 1967) 357 22 Jan. Security Checks 358 22 Jan. Crash Programme Vol. 4- 26 23 Jan.Permanent Executives (amends 17 Feb. 1961) 247 27 Feb. Clean Hands Clearance Check 358 17 May Staff Staff Auditor's Hat 219 21 May Permanent Staff 248 21 May Tape Examinations Vol. 4-158 29 May Interne Hat-What is Expected of Internee 309 5 June Permanent Staff Privilege 206,248 6 June ARC Break Cleanup Programme 349 29 June Staff and I Interne Auditors 311 30 July Certification and Validation Requirements Vol. 4-326 31 July Oral Examination for HPA/HCA 131 10 Sept. Staff Clearing Program 221 12 Sept. Goal Processing-Importance of 224 13 Sept. Certificate Application Form 177 28 Sept. Saint Hill Briefing Course Terminations Vol. 4-414 2 Oct. Termination & Classification Vol. 4-415 12 Oct. HPA/HCA Written Examination Vol. 4-334 19 Oct. Preparation of HPA/HCA Certificates 179 29 Oct. Religion 282 30 Oct. Security Risks Infiltration 359 4 Dec. R2-12 Validation 179 1963 13 Feb. Academy Taught Processes Vol. 4-339 14 Feb. How to Examine Theory Examinations Vol. 4-163 30 Apr. The Saint Hill Staff Co-Audit 225 17 June Staff Clearing Program (amends 10 Sept. 1962) 226 5 July Sales of Lifetime Memberships or Shares 207 9 July HPA/HCA Certificate Check Sheet Vol. 4-342 12 Aug. Certificates and Awards ISO 22 Aug. ARC Break Assessments on Staff 228 8 Oct. New Saint Hill Certificates and Course Changes Vol. 4-434 26 Nov. Certificate and Classification Changes Everyone Classified Vol. 4-360 4 Dec. Org Staff W/H Checks 228 11 Dec. Classification for Everyone (amends 26 Nov. 1963) Vol. 4-364 13 Dec. Co-Audit 229 1964 5 Feb. Founding Scientologist Certificate Vol. 2-264 21 Feb. Issuing of Certificates 183 21 Feb. Staff Regulations Auditing Venus Job Vol. 0- 43 19 Mar. Staff Regulations-Staff Intensives, 230 16 June Personnel Records-Admin Carte (modifies 12 Aug. 1963) 184 1 July Certification and Classification 186 10 Aug Good Workers Vol, 0- 44 5 Sept. Examinations 131 16 Sept. Terminations Vol. 4-447 18 Sept. Final Classification on Termination from Saint Hill Vol. 4-447 23 Sept. Policies: Dissemination and Programmes Vol. 2-4 1, Vol. 4- 40 13 Nov. Provisional Class VI Classification (cancels IS Sept. 1964) Vol. 4-449 31 Dec. Certificates 187 366 1965 circa '65 Qualifications Division 5 Org; Board Outline 3 7 Feb. Keeping Scientology Working (reissued IS June 1970 & 28 Jan. 1973) 43 14 Feb. Safeguarding Technology (reissued 7 June 1967) 48 5 Mar. Certificates and Awards New Status of Honorary Awards 188 16 Mar. Further Material on Study Examinations see- 133 29 Mar. Administration-Flows and Expansion The Fast Flow System 78 2 Apr. Meter Checks 140 2 Apr. Star-Rate Checkouts for Process (modifies 27 Feb. 1965) Vol. 4-453 7 Apr. Book Auditor 190 8 Apr. HCO, Org Executive and Divisional Secretaries, Justice on, and Auditing of Vol. 1-565 9 Apr. Correction to Policy Letters on Certification and Awards 191 12 Apr. Classification Pan Marks 131 16 Apr. Drills, Allowed Vol. 4-188 19 Apr. Training and Processing Regulations Technical Discipline Students' Questions Vol, 1-388, Vol. a- 65 21 Apr. Basic Certificates - Uncertified Personnel 192 21 Apr. Membership-Attestations 207 23 Apr. Clarification Auditing of Org Executives Vol. 1-566 24 Apr. Review 341 28 Apr. Routing (excerpt) 141 28 Apr. Power Processes 343 28 Apr. Technical Personnel Vol. 4- 67 29 Apr. Bonuses 231 29 Apr. Ethics-Review (excerpt) (correction to 24 Apr. 1965) 345 4 May Release Award-Saint Hill 80 13 May SHSBC Unit-Graduation Vol. 4-457 16 May Academy Courses - General Remarks Zero Courses Hubbard Recognized Scientologist Vol. 4-347 17 May Academy Processing Vol. 4-224 27 May Processing Vol. 4-570 17 June Scientology Pins (amends & cancels 12 Apr. 1965) Vol. 2-381 1 July Comm Cycle Additives Vol. 1-426 1 July Ethics Chits Vol. 4- 69 4 July Pc Routing-Review Code 346 7 July Releases, Policy on Vol. 4- 71 9 July Qual Goofs 142 10 July Lines and Terminals-Routing Vol. 0- 113 11 July Assignment of Tech Personnel (amends & cancels 5 July 1965) Vol. 4- 70 12 July Release Policies Starting the Pc Vol. 2-326, Vol. 4-572 19 July Release Checks, Procedure for Vol. 4-574 26 July Release Declaration Restrictions Healing Amendments 193 30 July Preclear Routing to Ethics Vol. 1-427, Vol. 4-606 31 July Purposes of the Qualifications Division 1 2 Aug. Chaplain 283 5 Aug. Release Check Outs 143 6 Aug. Qualifications Technical Actions (HCOB) 58 7 Aug. Floating Needle on Former Releases 145 9 Aug. Release Check Outs (addendum to 5 Aug. 1965) 145 17 Aug. Certification of Franchise Students 193 23 Aug. Crediting of Auditor in Release Log Book 194 23 Aug. Classification at Upper Levels Temporary measure Vol. 4-392 24 Aug. Pcs Released Routing Vol. 4-606 Sept. Membership Policies 208 Sept. Current Policy-Franchise Vol. 3-253 21 Sept. Auditor Estimation Test 337 24 Sept. Free Release Check Vol. 2-275 30 Sept. Statistics for Divisions (excerpt: Qual Division 5) 2 14 Oct. Potential Trouble Source Routing 348 14 Oct. Course Pattern (amends 27 Feb. 1965) Vol. 4-464 19 Oct. Release Declarations 146 22 Oct, Requirements for Student Classification 146 27 Oct. Grade Award Insignia 194 0 Nov. The Cramming Section 305 3 Nov. Release Pins 195 30 Nov. The Promotional Actions of an organization (excerpt: Qualifications Division 5) 4 10 Dec. Membership Billing (Sec ED 147 INT) 209 13 Dec. Numbering of Certificates 196 15 Dec. Additions to "The Promotional Action, of a. Organization" seeing, 205 28 Dec. Met Allowed Vol. 4- 77 30 Dec. ITS Auditing and Routing Vol. 1-439, Vol. 4-578 1966 4 Jan. Personnel Staff Status 249 13 Jan. Regulations for Auditing of Staff & Students 233 17 Jan. Uncrossed Certificates-HAS, MBAs HQS 197 19 Jan. Chaplain, Transfer of 283 1 Feb. HGCCum Interne Training and Staff Auditors 63 1 Feb. Staff Auditor and Supervisor Procurement 65 10 Feb. Tech Recovery 66 10 Feb. Bonuses for Service Delivery Vol. 3-204 10 Feb. Check Sheets, Course Vol. 4-466 14 Feb. Doctor Title Abolished Vol. 2-119 7 Mar. HGC Cum (Continued) 69 7 Mar. Star Rates on Tech and Qual Staff 70 8 Mar. High Crime 71 29 Apr. Policy Check Outs and Meter 252 9 May Bonuses Adjusted (correction to 10 Feb. 1966) Vol. 3-206 29 June Keep Academy Check Sheets Up-to-Date 132 20 July Staff Status see-253 21 July Tech vs Qual 82 1 Aug. Sign Ups and Discounts 198 1 Aug. Refund Addition-Membirship Refunds (adds to 31 July 1966) Vol. 3-347 5 Aug. Chaplain's Court-Civil Hearings 284 6 Aug. Declare, Multiple 83 16 Aug. Release Grades 199 22 Aug. Addendum to HCO Pol Ltr of 20 July 1966 "Staff status" 254 6 Oct. Cramming-Students Who Flunk Classification for a Level 306 12 Oct. Examinations Vol. 4-198 17 Oct. Bonuses Vol. 3-209 7 Nov. Clear Check-outs in Continental Orgs 147 15 Nov. Routing of Chaplain's Court Orders 286 21 Nov. Addendum to HCO PC of 17 October 1966 "Bonuses" Vol. 3-211 1967 1 Feb. Student Auditing of Preclear (replaces 29 Oct. 1965) 132 3 Mar. Training Quality (reissue of 2 Nov. 196 1) 129 21 Mar. Org Exec Course Vol. 0- 3 7 June Safeguarding Technology (reissue of 14 Feb. 1965) 48 7 June Responsibility Again (reissue of 17 Jan. 1962) 357 1 Sept. ARC Break Cleanup Programme (excerpt from ED 473 WW 842 SH) 350 6 Sept. Clear Check Outs see-148 1 Sept. Interne Training Programme 312 13 Sept. Further Material on Study-Examinations (reissue of 16 Mar. 1965) 133 13 Sept. Clear Check Outs (amends 6 Sept. 1967) 148 15 Sept. Release and Clear Check Outs 149 15 Sept. Examiner Bonuses 151 20 Sept. Confidential Data Vol. 4-90 22 Sept. Solo Auditing Folders 135 22 Sept. Ministerial Qualifications (reissue of 12 June 1958) see-281 22 Sept. Routing Form Attestations Vol. 1-62 25 Sept. Grades Above Clear 153 8 Oct. Clear Checks and Re-Clear Checks HICOB) 152 20 Oct. The Lines of the Qualifications Division The Interview Invoice Section 102 2 Nov. Qualifications Division, Depts. of Examinations, Review and Certifications and Awards 5 2 Nov. Chaplain's Section (excerpt) 7, 287 8 Nov. Clear Checks and Re-Clear Checks 154 28 Dec. Qual Senior Datum 73 1968 9 Jan. Cancellation of HCO PL of 12 Sept. 1967 and HCO PL of 13 Sept. 1967 154 11 Jan. Speed of Service (ED 805 INT) 84 6 Feb. Organization-The Flaw 79 7 Feb. Fast Flow and Ethics 84 24 Feb. Fast Flow for SHSBC Students' Preclears (amends 30 Dec. 1966) 85 2 Mar. Qual Sec Must Be Clear (modifies 15 Sept. 1967) 74 11 Mar. False Attestation 85 13 Mar. Statistics 75 14 Mar. Policies Governing the Qualifications Division Fast Flow (reissued 8 May 1968) 86 19 Mar. Staff Status (20 July 1966 amended) 253 8 May Policies Governing the Qualifications Division Fast Flow (reissue of 14 Mar. 1968) 86 15 May Additions to HCO PL 14 March 1968, reissued 8 May 1968, "Policies Governing the Qualifications Division" 91 31 May Scientology Technology 49 17 June ARC Break Registrars and Auditors (corrects 2 Nov. 1967) 7,350 1 Aug. Cancel Attestation on UK and US SHSBC... (LRH ED 29WW 16SH I EU I US) 92 26 Aug. Security Checks Abolished 360 367 1968 (cont.) 27 Aug. Sea Org Internes 315 2 Sept. Chaplain 287 7 Sept. Review Complete-Pc Attestations 92 18 Sept. Examiner's Form see-163 30 Sept. Examiner's Form (Revised) see-163 13 Oct. Examiner 155 14 Oct. The Auditor's Code AD 18 Vol. 4-111 19 Oct. Course Completion Student Indicators Vol. 4-202 29 Oct. Star for Clan Vill C/S Qual 7 2 Nov. Auditor's Code-Add to Pol Ltr 14 October AD IS see Vol. 4-112 21 Nov. Senior Policy 49 2 Dec. Examinations 135 9 Dec. Qual Has No Backlog (LRH ED 61 INT issued as HCO PL 4 Oct. 1970) 75 11 Dec. Examiner (addendum to 13 Oct. 1968) 155 13 Dec. Cancellation (of 14 Mar. 1968) 93 1969 5 Jan. Staff Status Two (modifies 4 Jan. 1966) 255 12 Jan. Auditors and Training 340 13 Jan. Standard Examinations 136 17 Jan. Pc Attestations 93 20 Jan. ARC Break Program 351 20 Jan. Classification see-200 20 Jan. A Vital Target-Trained Auditor Programme (LRH ED 81 INT) Vol. 4- 93 20 Jan. Attestation Reinstated (LRH ED 82 INT issued as HCO PL 3 Sept. 1969) 95 28 Jan. Addition to HCO Pol Ltr of 14 March 1968 Policies Governing the Qualifications Division Fast Flow 94 5 Feb. Press Policy-Code of a Scientologist Vol. 0- 25 12 Feb. Religion 288 13 Feb. Ethics Protection Conditions - Blue Star, Gwen Star, Gold Star Vol. 0-248, Vol. 1-492 6 Mar. Scientology is a Religion 289 4 Apr. Scientology Marriage Ceremonies 291 24 Apr. A Scientology Church Register 291 5 May Dianetic Course Examinations 137 5 May Auditor's Code and Dianetics Vol. 4-234 8 May Fast Flow by Attestation Vol. 4-237 9 May Examiner's Form (30 Sept. 1968 revised) see- 163 13 May Cramming Section Service to Trained Auditors 307 20 May Keeping Dianetics Working in an Area (HCOB) 50 24 June Dianetics-Pre-Aurfiting Examination 138 11 July Dianetics Auditing Completion Certificate 199 22 July Fast Flow Training (cancels 28 Jan. 1969) 94 3 Sept. Attestation Reinstated (LRH ED 82 INT issued as a Policy Letter) 95 7 Sept. Classification (20 Jan. 1969 amended & reissued) 200 21 Sept. Staff Training Officer 237 13 Nov. Interneships and Case Supervisors 316 15 Nov. Rights and Duties 76 18 Nov. Dianetics-Right to Audit 201 18 Nov. Dianetics - Right to Teach 202 1970 26 Jan. Examiner and Floating Needle (revises 13 Oct. 1968 & I I Dec. 1968) 156 26 Jan. Examiner's Form (replaces & revises 9 May 1969) see- 163 26 Jan. Scientology Prayer 292 23 Feb. Ethics Quality of Service Vol. 1-506, Vol. 4-100 28 Mar. R6EW and Clear (cancels & replaces 28 Jan. 1970) 157 29 Mar. Qual Sears Revised (excerpt) (amends 30 Sept. 1965) 8 6 Apr. Scientology Release Attestation Form 96 11 Apr. Review Complete? 158 16 Apr. Monte 293 18 Apr. Correction to HCO P/L 13 Nov. 1969 see-316 25 Apr. Guarantee of Service Delivery . 203 10 May Single Declare (cancels 6 Aug. 1966) 98 21 May Fast Flow Grades Cancelled (LRH ED 103 INT) 99 23 May Cancellation of Policies Governing the Qualifications Division-Fast Flow 101 30 May Cutatives 52 3 June Orders to Divisions for Immediate Compliance (excerpt: Division V) (LRH ED 107 INT) 9 8 June Student Auditing Vol. 4-227 15 June Keeping Scientology Working (reissue of 7 Feb. 1965) (winced 28 Jan. 1973) 43 17 June OIC Change-Cable Change (excerpt) (cancels 29 Mar. 1970, amends 30 Sept. 1965) 10 17 June Technical Degrades 54 25 June Expanded Lower Grades Chart of Abilities Gained and Inabilities Lost (cancels 6 Apr. 1970) see- 159 1970 (cont.) 25 June Expanded Lower Grades-Chart of Abilities Gained and Inabilities Lost (revised & reissued 17 July 1970) (cancels 6 Apr. 1970) 159 15 July Reorganization of the Correction Division I I 17 July Expanded Lower Grades - Chart of Abilities Gained and Inabilities Lost (revision & reissue of 25 June 1970) (cancels 6 Apr. 1970) 159 20 July Cases and Morale of Staff 234 20 July Internships and Case Supervisors (amends 13 Nov. 1969 &IS Apr. 1970) 317 22 July Hubbard Scientist of Standard Tech 319 30 July The Tech and Ethics of Confessionals 361 8 Aug. Reorganization of the Correction Division (amends 15 July 1970) 14 2 Sept. Instruction Protocol-Official (reissue of 20 Nov. 1950) Vol. 4- 108 8 Sept. Examiner's 24 Hour Rule 161 22 Sept. Ideal Scenes and Statistics for Correction Division Five 18 3 Oct. Medicine and Dianetics 298 3 Oct. The Role of the Medical Officer 300 4 Oct. Qual Has No Backlog (originally issued as LRH ED 61 INT, 9 Dec. 1968) 75 11 Oct. Medical Officer's Code 303 27 Oct. A Book: "The Background to the Religion of Scientology and Ceremonies of the Church of Scientology of California World Wide" 294 15 No, Confessionals 364 1971 13 Jan. Exam 24 Hour Rule (additional information) 162 13 Jan. Attestation at Certs & Awards 204 5 Feb. Ong Gross Divisional Statistics Revised (excerpt: Qual Division 5) (amends 30 Sept. 1965, 17 June 1970 & 22 Sept. 1970) 22 7 Feb. FEBC Org Board Division 5 23 17 Feb. Clan VII 320 5 Mar. The Fantastic New HGC Line (HCOB) Vol. 4-581 6 Mar. Line Design-HGC Lines, An Example Vol. 4-585 8 Mar. Examiner's Form (replaces & revises 9 May 1969 & 26 Jan. 1970) 163 12 Apr. Ordination Ceremony 29S 4 June Prayer Day Ordination Ceremony 296 19 July Internes (HCOB) 322 2 Aug. Additional Qual Stat 28 2 Aug. Study Time 256 9 Aug. ARC Break Program (cancel, 20 Jan. 1969) 352 14 Aug. Die V Mini Qual Org Board (revised 5 Sept. 1971 & 19 Nov. 197 1) 29 24 Aug. Interne Checksheets - Okays to Audit 324 2 Oct. Divisional Summary for Division V Correction Division (FDD 18 Qual Intl 30 23 Oct. Personnel Programming Rules (HCOB) 259 23 Oct. Personnel Programming Technology (HOOD) 262 23 Oct. Personnel Programming White Form (HCOB) 264 23 Oct. Master Personnel Programming Tally Sheet (HCOB) 268 23 Oct. Personnel Programmer Ethics Intervention Rights (HCOB) 272 23 Oct. Individual Staff Study Orders (HCOB) 273 26 Oct. Tech Downgrades 56 6 Nov. Selling Internships (amends 20 July 1970) 325 6 Nov. Interneships Line-Up-Auditor Interneships 326 6 Nov. Case Supervisor Interneships 328 6 Nov. HGC Auditors and HOC Auditors in Training 329 8 Nov. Interneships Electronic Attestation Form see-330 21 Nov. Scientology Courses Examination Policy (addition to 8 Mar. 1966) 139 7 Dec. Correction Division-Purposes, Ideal Scenes, Products, Statistics (cancels 22 Sept. 1970, 15 July 1970 & 8 An& 1970) 35 14 Dec. The Linn of the Correction Division Qual Interview and Invoice Lines and Beatings (amends 20 Nov. 1967) 106 14 Dec. Qual Student Lines 107 14 Dec. Qual Preclear Lines 109 14 Dec. Qual Staff Service Lines III 14 Dec. Qual Technical Lines 112 14 Dec. Qual Interview and Invoice Officer Lines Administration 113 1972 13 Jan. Tips on Personnel Programming (HCOB) 274 13 Jan. Inter-Dependent Halting and Programming Functions 276 14 Jan. Management Cycle (24 June 1970 revised) 277 14 Jan. The "OK To Be A - - " System 278 22 Jan. Personnel Programming 258 5 Feb. Div V Mini Qual Org Board (revision of 14 Aug. 1971 & 19 Nov. 1971) 42 16 Feb. The Purpose of the Department of Personnel Enhancement 210 18 Feb. Interneships-Electronic Attestation Form (revises 8 Nov, 197 1) 330 22 Feb. Interneship Errors Found 332 368 HUBBARD SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS THE CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY ADVANCED ORGANIZATIONS Church of Scientology of California Advanced Organization of LOS Angeles 916 South Westlake Street Los Angeles, California 90006 Church of Scientology Advanced Organization United Kingdom Saint Hill Manor East Grinstead, Sussex, England Church of Scientology Advanced Organization Denmark Jernbanegade 6 1608 Copenhagen V Denmark HUBBARD COLLEGES OF SCIENTOLOGY Church of Scientology of California American Saint Hill Organization 2723 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90026 Church of Scientology Hubbard College of Scientology Saint Hill Manor East Grinstead, Sussex, England Church of Scientology Saint Hill Denmark Jernbanegade 6 1608 Copenhagen V Denmark CONTINENTAL AND AREA ORGANIZATIONS UNITED STATES PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization C/O ASHO 2723 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90926 CELEBRITY CENTRES Church of Scientology of California Celebrity Centre 1661 North La Brea Avenue Hollywood, California 90026 Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre New York 65 East 82nd Street New York, New York 10028 LOCAL CHURCHES WASHINGTON, D.C. Founding Church of Scientology 2125 S Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20008 AUSTIN Church of Scientology 2504 Rio Grande Austin, Texas 78705 HAWAII Church of Scientology 143 Nenue Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96821 SAN DIEGO Church of Scientology 926 "C" Street San Diego, California 92102 SAN FRANCISCO Church of Scientology of California 414 Mason Street San Francisco, California 94102 LAS VEGAS Church of Scientology 2108 Industrial Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 LOS ANGELES Church of Scientology of California 2005 West 9th Street Los Angeles, California 90006 PORTLAND Church of Scientology 1607 N.E. 41st Street Portland, Oregon 97232 SEATTLE Church of Scientology 1531 4th Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 ST. LOUIS Church of Scientology 3730 Lindell Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63108 TWIN CITIES Church of Scientology 730 Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 BOSTON Church of Scientology 448 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02115 BUFFALO Church of Scientology 1116 Elmwood Avenue Buffalo, New York 14222 DETROIT Church of Scientology 19 Clifford Street Detroit, Michigan 48226 MIAMI Church of Scientology 1235 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 NEW YORK Church of Scientology of New York 25-30 West 74th Street New York, New York 10023 PHILADELPHIA Church of Scientology 8 West Lancaster Avenue Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003 SACRAMENTO Church of Scientology of California 819 19th Street Sacramento, California 95814 CHICAGO Church of Scientology 1555 Maple Street Evanston, Illinois 60201 CANADA TORONTO Church of Scientology 124 Avenue Road Toronto 180, Ontario VANCOUVER Church of Scientology 4857 Main Street Vancouver 10. British Columbia OTTAWA Church of Scientology 292 Somerset Street, West Ottawa MONTREAL Church of Scientology 1168 St. Catherine Street, W.101 Montreal, Quebec H2Y 1B5 UNITED KINGDOM LOCAL CHURCHES Saint Hill Foundation Saint Hill Manor East Grinstead, Sussex PLYMOUTH Hubbard Scientology Organization 39, Portland Square Sherwell Plymouth, Devon MANCHESTER Hubbard Scientology Organization 43 Faulkner Street Manchester LONDON Hubbard Scientology Organization 68, Tottenham Court Road London W.1. SCOTLAND HAPI Fleet House 20 South Bridge Edinburgh Scotland AUSTRALIA/NEW ZEALAND ADELAIDE Church of the New Faith 57 Pulteney Street Fullarton, Adelaide 5000 South Australia MELBOURNE Church of the New Faith 724 Inkerman Road North Caulfield 3161 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia PERTH Church of the New Faith Pastoral House St. George's Terrace Perth 5000 Western Australia SYDNEY Church of the New Faith 1 Lee Street Sydney 2000 New South Wales Australia AUCKLAND Church of Scientology New Imperial Buildings 44 Queen Street Auckland, New Zealand EUROPE PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION Church of Scientology Publications Organization C/O SH Denmark Jernbanegade 6 1608 Copenhagen V Denmark LOCAL CHURCHES COPENHAGEN Church of Scientology Hovedvagispade 6 1103 Copenhagen K Denmark Church of Scientology Frederiksborgvej 5 2400 Copenhagen V Denmark PARIS Church of Scientology 12, rue de la Montagne Ste Genevieve 75005 Paris, France VIENNA Scientology-Osterreich A-1070 Wien Marlahilferstrasse 88A/Stg. 3/1/9 Vienna, Austria BRUSSELS Church of Scientology 45A, Rue de l'Ecuyer 1000 Brussels, Belgium AMSTERDAM Church of Scientology Singel 261 Amsterdam, Netherlands BERLIN Church of Scientology 1000 Berlin 12 Giesebrechstrasse 10 Berlin, Germany MUNICH Church of Scientology 8000 Munich 2 Lindwurmstrasse 29 West Germany GOTEBORG Church of Scientology Magasinsgatan 12 S-411 18 Goteborg, Sweden STOCKHOLM Scientology Kyrkan Kammakaregatan 46 S-111 60 Stockholm, Sweden MALMO Church of Scientology Skomakaregatan 12 S-211 34 Malmo, Sweden AFRICA JOHANNESBURG Church of Scientology 99 Polly Street Johannesburg, South Africa CAPE TOWN Church of Scientology 3rd Floor, Garmour House 127 Plein Street Cape Town, South Africa PORT ELIZABETH Church of Scientology 2 St Christopher's 27 Westbourne Road Port Elizabeth, South Africa 6001 DURBAN Church of Scientology 57 College Lane Durban, South Africa PRETORIA Church of Scientology 224 Central House Cnr Central & Pretorious Streets Pretoria, South Africa BULAWAYO Church of Scientology 508 Kirrie Bldgs. Abercorn Street Bulawayo Rhodesia [end]