ULR 36

Case Data

Data on "Source in Pawn" Implant

20 May 1988

TO : Capt. Bill, C/S RONS

FM : Erich Fritsch, C/S RONS MUNICH

TECHNICAL REPORT

SOURCE IN PAWN IMPLANT

In running the first nine SIPIs (source in pawn implants) I found that they had all occurred around Inc. II/LTA. Some were before Inc.II and some after. The earliest SIPI found in my first sessions was 75,312 mill. years ago in LTA and the latest one 74,317 mill. years ago in LTA.

So far I only audited one SIPI that was only given to one Thetan but 8 SIPIs which were given to groups of 2 to 25 thetans. The single one was a clone of Xenu the other ones were players.

I have verified in each case they were really having their SIPI as a mutual incident.

I found the following steps to be very workable in getting the charge off fast for the beings audited:

"Is there a player thetan or clone who had a SIPI?" getting BD or at least small BD

"Is it a mutual incident of several thetans?" "Is it the individual incident of one thetan?"

If "several" was reading: "How many?" get the number by reply from them or if not responsive count them down by meter read. Then indicate the number to them. This will produce an FIN or BD-F/N. Then find out how many players and how many clones so you know you need to take care of the clones specially on the B/CB steps.
Then date/locate the SIPI and indicate what you found to them. This usually results in another BD-F/N and in more charge off for them speeding up the procedure.
Give them the R/F on what an SIP (source in pawn) and what an SIPI (source in pawn implant) is (as per 6 Apr.88 "The SIP-trick"). Also let them know it might have been in the form of an implant or of auditing that the SIPI was given. You'll get a read on "implant" or on "auditing". Indicate to them which one it is. Also let them know the date given in the implant is "forever". The location given in the implant may be "in your CVP" or "in my CVP". Establish which one it is and indicate it to them. By now they'll be very ready to run it.
Run Pr.Pr. 2 or 3 on them as a group depending on if you got "implant" or "auditing" 5) above. The EP is they are separated and the SIPI is as-ised.
B/CB steps on the Sips.

Include the concept of their cases in your TR0. If clones were used as SIP include clone handling.

Love,
Erich

TO : Capt. Bill, Snr. C/S RONS ORG

FM : Erich Fritsch, C/S RONS MUNICH

25 May 1988

TECHNICAL REPORT

Data on Source in Pawn Implants

In auditing SIPs (sources in pawn) one can experience incredible relief in a very short period of session time.

The SIPs are being "one with" the Pre-OT or OT therefore freeing them results in an experience of relieving or even kind of desolidifying ones CVP.

On B/CB you may find on the can't blow part there are incidents later than the SIPI occurred or even in LTA-future. This seems to have to do with the postulate "we are one". The SIP recorded incidents the OT had on a similar mechanism like we know from Inc. I.

So far all SIPIs I audited took place at Coltus in the big grey implant station with one exception of one SIPI in the form of auditing which took place on Antares 75,012 mill. years ago in LTA.

The SIPIs were run only on players the implanters couldn't get their hands at to implant them. The idea was that of a kind of cruise missile implant. The SIP was implanted and then found its way to the CVP of the player she had become the postulate of being one with.

In running Excal one may have already run some of the case of one or more SIPs partially in particular on B/CB steps.

I have audited SIPIs so far which occurred before and after Inc.II LTA, in the 1980s in LTA and one implanted SIPI of 15,3 mill. years ago in LTA given on Coltus.

Love,
Erich

TO : Capt. Bill, Snr. C/S RONS ORG

FM : Erich Fritsch, C/S RONS MUNICH

2 June 1988

TECHNICAL REPORT

Multi-level SIPs

I have found SIPs who were themselves the target of SIPs prior to arriving in the OT's CVP.

That means they had already one or more SIPs in their CVP when they were given their SIPI and were made into a SIP themselves.

The handling is to audit the SIPI as given in my Technical Report of 20 May 1988. In the course of the B/CB steps this former SIP who got audited (or one or several of the group which had the SIPI together) wont be able to blow.

One needs to check "Is there an SIP inside your CVP?" and if reading indicate this to this thetan. He will then realise this SIP he got in his CVP.

Now one gets him to run the steps of SIPI handling on his SIP. After the B/CB steps you need to do B/CB on him again. But it may also happen that he is able to leave before that.

Love,
Erich.

TO : Capt. Bill, Snr. C/S RONS ORG

FM : Erich Fritsch, C/S RONS MUNICH

21 July 1988

TECHNICAL REPORT

The SIP Postulate

Since the SIPs are being one with the player who was targeted by the implanters by the SIPs being the postulate of "we are one" or such they tend to get in a rather surprised or confused state after the date/locate step wondering who they are each of them.

Therefore on the R/F step it is important that they are given the R/F that they were made to not-is or forget who they were and made to become another source.

Once they cognite either on the R/F step or on the Pr.Pr. 2 or 3 step that they had become another source it will be also clear to them which one and it will be the one the OT was known as at the time of the SIPI and not his PT/TTA name and beingness.

In auditing SIPIs you are auditing on the level of postulate thetans and it may happen that you trigger some of them and they will try to interfere in your session and distract you. Just audit them and free them and carry on with your auditing action.

I have found a third postulate that was given in the SIPI. It is "we are all the one". The others stated in the 6 April 1988 "The SIP-trick" are "we are one" and "we are all one" I found too.

Love,
Erich