Case Analysis and Programming Course

December 26th, 1990

BASIC DATA

In analyzing cases and programming the first objective of the C/S is to estimate, where the person - thetan- is in relation to the Bridge.
Every game has a Bridge. So, the analysis must include where he is in relationship to this game (Loop 3, Ring 10.000) and any other game he may be stuck in.
It must also be realized that as a thetan proceeds up a Bridge, he will improve his ability to play and his logic of that game you are handling. If he doesn't, you may have the wrong program or wrong Bridge-sequence for him.
It must also be realized that as you bring a thetan up the bridge he will improve from broken piece to piece to player. And even go beyond that into being a Games Master.

Example:

Handling an OTIII or NOTs PreOT on LTA-charge would be analyzed by somebody outside the Free Zone the player/OT has become a broken piece again and would try to handle with lower Grade processes or Dianetics, when in actual fact he has cleared away enough TTA-charge that he can now handle his LTA-track to improve his play in TTA.
In all cases, when you are not sure what the program should be, realize you do not have enough data on this case. Therefore get more data. Folders, DofP, OCA, DN-assessment (how doing on different dynamics), history of auditing, etc.
The above points are vital, because you can't even start analyzing the case to make the program unless you have enough data.

Case Analysis
Case analysis is one of the points of the Auditing-triangle, LRH mentions on the Class VIII - course, which consists of Auditor-basics (TRs, drills, metering), Processes, and Case Analysis.

This whole triangle adds up to successful programming that will improve the person's case, keep him winning, and interested, and in session.
In case-analysis one has to know, what a case "looks like" from No-Auditing to the point you want to bring him. So, the C/S should always be building a "mock-up" of the case as he reads the data about the case.
To do a successful analysis you must have a datum of comparable magnitude to compare it to. And that mock-up is the mock-up of the unaudited case with all the various Levels, Grades, resistive points, etc., never (not, un-) handled.

Example:
In Class IV seminar, picture of case "no Auditing".

Example:
On higher levels what awareness of Time and Space he has, that has totally been cleaned out as an OT.
Remember: The Auditor + PC is greater than the PC's bank. Therefore a person on OT-Levels can be audited to handle phenomena beyond his capability to handle it solo.
Note: Review is a totally separate subject than doing the Bridge. A PreOT gets into a Review by not being able to do the part of the bridge he is on. The Review purpose therefore is limited and has as its purpose returning the person to the part of the bridge he should be on - meaning the part he can do without any extra effort, either audited or solo. The Review is to remove the exact charge that is stopping or slowing the person's progress on the Bridge.
Reviews come about usually from three possible areas of the case or from the three points of the Auditing Triangle, being out.
Three points of the case:
1. Bypassed or missed charge lower on the bridge including resistive points
2. Parallel charge occurring in his Dynamics or environment while he is being audited in PT
3. He has touched into higher level charge from higher on the Bridge. Because of his own cogs, talking to others about their cases who are higher on the Bridge and study of Levels, even LRH's data), or reading or viewing programs or movies that restimulated that charge, and bring it to his awareness prematurely. Also by other-determined intention to put it into his awareness, such as black NOTs, Implanter Operations from Excalibur-Level, touching into Postulate-, or Loop-Thetan-areas, or wondering about, where the people are, he knew that should be here. Also other practices are included.
It is also important to realize that as a person goes up the Bridge he always has his body in the session-space. Although this is looked at as part of the Composite below Clear, and can be handled with Dianetics it is quite often neglected above Clear, when in actual fact it can be a major source of stopping the person or slowing down his progress. As we know, the Body-Org is very large, and it itself has a track of charge, and can be influenced by the environment and other-determined intentions. Thus even during Auditing right Items for the PC may be wrong Items for the Body-Org.
In most cases, especially those coming from other Orgs outside the Free Zone, these areas of Review are in combination on the case (one or more areas). So this is why Case Analysis must be very exact and have enough data.
Once all this data is known, the C/S must then evaluate what the sequence must be to get the Review done and the charge off to get the person back to the Bridge.
Remember, it's the data, not somebody's evaluation or opinion of the data.

December 28th, 1990
Further Data on Case Analysis
The self-Audit case can present a mysterious Review-situation to the C/S. Indicators could be TA always high at start of session (because of overrun in between of sessions or just general BPC and not completing cycles, or the person practicing another practice outside of session, which hasn't been given as data on the case). Key-question: "self-auditing?" or "doing something with the mind between sessions?" Note: This can throw the process or the program off.

Note:
The auditor should notice, whether the TA is up, when the PC first came to the cans and stays up or whether it starts rising when the Auditor says SOS, or when it rises up when he starts the process.
The first or third it could be self auditing, the second could be the session itself is an old restim by something like bad auditing or even LTA.

18A. Another thing which can stop or slow case advance is the Hidden Standard. Thus the question: "What is your purpose in being audited?" on the why-finding is very important if a specific answer was given which could operate as a Hidden Standard.

If you miss it on why-finding you can catch it later with "What would have to happen for you to know that auditing works?"

Note:

The Hidden Standard is only handled until it is not a thing the PC MUST have handled before he can continue up the bridge (As some of these things may require higher PC-Ability or higher processes to handle fully).
1. EP of Review would bea) PC doesn't consider it's stopping him and realizes it is being handled on a gradient
2. He can continue on the bridge without being fixated and get his own gains.
Above Clear, when you are sure as a C/S that the PC has become Clear, and you have made sure all his lower Grades are in, and any Dianetics after Clear has been handled by L3RG assessed and indicated, you may make another datum of comparable magnitude to compare the case to, which is the Thetan in a cleared out space with the composite upper level stuff, like OTIII, Excal, and his body, outside of that space - that doesn't mean he is exterior necessarily, but operating as a Thetan in a cleared out space (called a CVP). This space has a dimension, which is the maximum at the moment of Clear or the resurgence in DCSI, and varies from person to person. It also has a time dimension, which can be estimated by the amount of track the person has run up to that point.
Now you can analyze for when any shrinkage or impingement into his space bypass as a Needs/Wants handled before approaching OT II, III, etc.
Realize after Clear and before OTIII the main problem with the case is ownership problem or inability to differentiate (who's incident it is or where it is coming from). This is natural as before Clear the person was composite and everything was his case.
Above Excal correctly and fully done another comparative can be made for case analysis. And that is a Thetan with his CVP that he can expand at will to cover the entire Universe, GUM 0 back to Game of Gods, TTA.
Therefore, if you are sure he has come this far, any apparent lower level phenomena or high level of mass or feeling that he is back down the Bridge by his own statement is an indicator of LTA, Ring 9999. Reason for this is there is more charge for him in LTA than there is in the rest of the TTA ring leading back to LTA.
Another comparison can be made after 16 and SSRD for use in analyzing cases above that level.
It should be noted by a C/S that LTA cannot be run as part of the Bridge or a specific part of the Bridge as the amount of charge varies from person to person. It varies from being run on OT 16 when one has to confront all the rings and since he didn't run into it before means he has very little unhandled charge on it except on other flows, to hitting LTA in Excal down to, occasionally, hitting LTA in OTIII or below, all the way down, occasionally though.
A person can be in LTA without necessarily having a high TA. In fact by removing interference you can get the TA in normal range in a LTA Review. But that doesn't mean the PC is back in TTA. It means he is now on his own LTA track and can confront and run it.
Another major point of confusion on case analysis is out of valence. Out of valence is also a gradient.

Example:

A person can go out of valence at certain times on the lower Bridge, or others can be in his valence as at Clear and above, because he is now the stronger valence, the winning valence, and he could still handle BTs and incidents up to the point where those in his valence can't handle them.

This can fool a C/S and he may miss the resistive point out of valence and be puzzled why a PC can run some things but not other things on the lower Bridge or why a Clear can handle some B/Cs but not others.
It is pretty obvious, when a suppressive valence is in the guys Flow 0 on the lower Bridge, he will not be able to attest Grade 1, and on upper Bridge, OTIII especially, by changes of attitude about BTs or incidents.
Out of valence by reason of a Source in Pawn after hitting LTA the person can feel he is two people or has a dual personality, conflicting thoughts etc. This is the Source in Pawn trying to influence him or be him.

Note:

Occasionally in TTA you might find a person driven out of valence by Coitus Implant, done usually since Inc. II or just before.
The C/S has to realize that the Body Org is a very large organization of MOCOs with a specific purpose of
1. operate for the player in charge of it
2. maintain it
3. repair it.
  
  But the Body Org lambda is not a creation of the player running it, but of some other player of the game.
The Body Org goes up the Bridge slower than the player/PC/PreOT.

Example:

It goes Clear on OT14 CO-Cycle RD. So, it's always lagging behind the PreOTs progress on the Bridge. So a C/S must have to catch up to it's progress at certain points on the Bridge when the PC or PreOT gets too much attention on it. This can be done with processes of that level or processes specifically for the body.
Above Clear the body can be impinged upon by BTs, Clusters, Plugs. And above Excal the body can be impinged upon by intentions aimed at the PreOT or his (not any more existing) composite case. This results in wrong items or conditions on the body which may give the PreOT a lot of trouble in operating it.
The other mysterious key-in for a Body-Org can be from two sources and that is Hidden Body Incidents and LTA Body Deaths.
Hidden Body Incidents can be run anywhere on the Bridge, after you tried the normal body org processes for that level.
The LTA Body Death can only be run in conjunction with LTA Review or after the first LTA Review has been completely done.
In LTA reviews, remember, there is also the Resurrection Clone which tries to push the PreOT out of his body, and may make him feel the body is doing it, which is not true.
Remember, the infiltrated Prime MOCO can react to pull the PreOT out of the body, using a tractor beam rather than a pressor beam. This will also fixate the PreOT's attention to the situation with his body.

December 29th, 1990
Analysis of the Counter-Intention-to-the-Auditor-Case
Can occur at any time of the Bridge, when the PC or PreOT gets an opposite intention toward what the auditor is trying to do in bringing him up the Bridge.
Example: Lower Bridge PC wants to commit suicide or drop the body somehow. Do not audit on the Bridge past that point or the auditor and C/S will take a loss on the case. It must be handled at the first point the CI occurs. Auditor and C/S must realize that they are trying to help the PC survive and play a better game, and PC is saying he wants to succumb and get out of the game. So, under these conditions no successful auditing can occur until this is handled.
These situations are usually a case of mis-ownership - but not always. Therefore the first thing to do is to establish, who's intention it is. This can easiest be done by taking the PC's statement and running VI SW on it, as per ULR, to determine if it's the PC's or someone else's.
If it is the PC's and the VII-SW goes to FIN, VGI's, in lower level you probably have her a Service Fac. So, if it's his, you can handle by Right-Wrong-Dominate-Survive Brackets. And/or Prepcheck on the computation. If he has agreed to it from another he may also have to run 6 Ruds on the other person (all forms - False, Reverse False, LD). It can shift in this case of the PC agreed to the solution from another, into a valence handling.
However, if its another's and the VI SW went downtone, and you have indicated it was a wrong item for the PC you must now find, who's item it is, and audit that entity or individual with whatever process is appropriate.
In the case of "I want to drop the body" this is covered above, but in the case the PC says 'I want to die', or "I feel like dying", or "This processing is killing men it could turn out that the item belongs to the body org. In this case the body org is trying to get rid of the PC and the VI would be the wrong item for the PC but the right item for the body org.
In this case the PC is way out of ARC with his body and the body wants a new C/O. So that should start indicate the processes needed
1. get PC in comm with his body: Hallo-OKs
2. 6 Ruds between PC and body
3. Help Flows (PC to body - body to PC <6way> , first on PC, then on body)
4. find the body's wording, how it feels about the PC at this point
5. run VI on that.
Non-Interference-Zone Clear through Excal. This is normally a SPBT and not the PreOT's item - but that you would find the same way by VI-process and handle whoever's item it is with PrPr6 or Implanter-handling or PrPrl on Inc II, Inc I.
From Excal up this can be an LTA computation or that of an interference being or group of beings, or a SIP, or even an ULR phenomenon. Here again it would be differentiated by VI, and here again there may be a Logic- or Valence-problem connected. Upper bridge would be the same, but if it's his do the prepcheck only, and it normally will differentiate out if its Postulate, Loop, or SIP. However, in the case of LTA, it can be that it is on the PC's own auditing track (suicide connected with bad auditing)- in which case it's PrPr3.

General Rules About Sequence of Handling in Review
Always try to handle first anything which is preventing the PC or PreOT from being in session. It also includes Auditor's code.
What keeps the PC or PreOT unsessionable or out of session:
1. Interference
2. Free Wheel condition - where PC can't sleep
3. condition where PC or PreOT can't eat or hold food down
4. a sit where the PC can't talk to the auditor or doesn't want to
5. restim on having a session in the first place restim of doing a process
6. counter-intention to auditing or its purpose
7. whatever is preventing the meter from operating properly
If these are not handled first you can't handle anything else. These are called session basics. So the first sequence of handling in a Review is to handle anything which is keeping session basics out.
If there are several of the above needing handling, the first would be to establish comm with the PC I PreOT again. Even if you would have to do it out of session.
Second priority would be to somehow get an interview done on meter, prefixed by "I am not auditing you" to get some data.

December 30th, 1990
As a C/S you may find that the out basics in auditing are such to require a different auditor for the Review.

Example:

The auditor happens to be the same auditor in LTA on the case who screwed it up, so suddenly there is a mutual out-rud sit, when the PreOT hits LTA.

Example:

The auditor can remind of or restimulate the PC (on lower level) on some terminal in his life or track that was very suppressive or very much admired or loved and therefore considers that he is not the auditor but the terminal he hates or loves. So again a change of auditor is indicated for Review. If this is not possible, then 'Look at me, who am I?" or "Who would I have to be to audit you?", first or both, even off the meter if necessary.
If we can get to a normal session environment of PC willing to talk to the auditor (not to the 2D or SP) and interested in his case, the next thing to handle is getting the meter working, and this is usually stopped because of the following:

Interference
Out Int on a BT or Cluster
Bad auditing in the past
PC's phobia about meters in general
Overruns in Life and Livingness environment including such minor things like vitamins and minerals

Body interference (because its in between the PC and the meter) You can assess all the various things concerning the body until you get the needle moving, get more data about it and handle.

After these above things are handled, we should have the PC in session and the meter working. So that gives you the sequence of C/Sing Review points at the beginning of a Review.
From this point on the program should address in sequence the areas from most to least charge, meaning that the PC will get the most gain or destimulation and thereafter less and less charge will come off until the Review is complete. However, this does not always this way as the first area of charge may have to come off, before a second greater area of charge can be addressed. So the decision of the C/S has to be based on two datums: volume (or amount) of charge and availability of charge or ability of the PC to confront the charge.

Example:

Still to be handled as other practice and a recent divorce. You see from the folder that handling the other practice would be a great gain or handle (nearly) the whole Review and it may go back to several lifetimes. But the recent divorce is more available and has L&L charge, which can more easily be confronted. So, the C/S would program that to be handled first. This is an application of a general rule about Review and psychotic cases. When the restim is heavy, go light with the processing, don't overwhelm. As he gets through with the Review he will be able to confront more and more. That's from the C/S viewpoint, but there is another factor in this, and that is the PC's interest.
If the interest factor is higher than the C/Ss programming sequence of what to do, the program may go out of sequence at this point. And the PC/PreOT may start running the thing his interest is on, regardless of what process is run to handle something else.
What you are doing in a Review is returning the PC into more selfdeterminism and more ability to do the Bridge.
Because you are removing confusion and charge on the first steps to get him in session and the meter working.
At this point of mis-estimation of PC's self-determinism and own interest being consulted is where you get PC starting to protest. At this point, after handling the protest, or seeing that he is running another point at the program, get the protest off and/or a new C/S to run the correct thing for the PC at that time. The solution at this point of Review is to consult the PC's interest before running the remaining points of the program - with C/S OK, of course. Realize this is the point of the gains or good indicators that the PC is returning to cause. You are returning to cause. You are giving him the choice of what of the remaining points to run next.
At some point you may find the PC is saying, "I'm ready to go back on the Bridge" with VGI's and big FIN or FTA - but the Review is not completed per the program.
By all means ack the F/N, FTA and cognition of the PC and send the folder to C/S.
The C/S can then either do one of three things:
1. allow the PC to continue on the Bridge, knowing that the remaining points will come up or slow or stop him later, but may even get handled on the bridge
2. can order an assessment or DofP on the remaining points to see if there is any charge there
3. from these data can encourage the PC to handle them by giving the PC the proper R-factor at beginning of session.
  
  But if this is protested, then realize you are starting to over Review and it is better to let the PC go back to the Bridge until these unhandled points again slow or stop him.
The basic on over Review is what the PC/PreOT is doing in this particular game with his Prime MOCOs. He has been storing in his Security MOCO all the things he was withholding from other players or that might make him appear to be a bad or illogical player. Also something he couldn't figure out, such as Engrams and Incidents on his track. The incidents are there, because he didn't figure them out and didn't confront them, so in auditing by getting these security MOCO incidents handled he feels like a better player and more logical. So, when a certain amount of charge has been removed in a Review, he may feel like playing the game again with his new awareness. If you don't let him change the flow here, you may start making him believe that there is something wrong with him, where there isn't in his consideration at that level. And that is again the point where the C/S assumption can wreck (harm) a case. The C/S knows, there is more to handle, but from the PC's viewpoint there isn't at that time.

December 31st, 1990
The PC should attest the end of Review so he knows it is complete and it has been accepted by the C/S land the auditor).
Of course, if the PC wouldn't attest then you have to get more information as to what he wants handled in Review, as this was omitted data in the original analysis. And this could've been so overburdened with charge that it never came up in the original data gathering.
On middle and upper Bridge there is an extra gradient in a Review sometimes. And that is when to possibly groove in the PreOT to handle the rest of the Review solo.
This is important on solo levels, because you are trying to return the PreOT to a solo Bridge, and if you go too far with auditing him on processes or area he could handle himself you may again overreview him and drive him into areas he could not handle alone and thus invalidate him.
Sometimes, however, this cannot be done, because the Review auditor is trained to handle certain phenomena which the PreOT is not yet trained to handle.

Example:

ULR things, and some LTA things or for instance an otherdetermined creation when he is just on Excal.

But ususally the higher level charge would have been handled in the first part of the Review, and now the charge missed at the PreOTs level, because he got restimulated on the upper level stuff can be handled by the PreOT solo, once the upper level stuff is out of the way.

Example:

PreOT hits LTA in the middle of a plug, auditor does complete LTA Review, then grooves in PreOT to complete plug or plugs, using LTA on all incidents.

Example:

Would be OTIII, where a PreOT got pulled out of a free wheel by an auditor, and can now been given a solo C/S to find any more unrun Inc Is on BTs, Clusters who had their Inc 11 run. Example: In LTA handling, LTA second Review, PreOT is audited to handle the first blow offs of a group of BSTs and then can finish the rest solo, when he understands the counting procedure and the Power Processes.

However, there are two important datums the C/S must consider in doing this:
1. PreOTs training and skill as a solo auditor, or auditor in general
2. the realization that he still is in Review, even so on solo, and therefore must have daily C/Sing, and preferably at the Org, if he lives nearby he can come to the Org with his folder.
Remember, the C/S has to see the session on the Review actions after every session, even though while on the normal Bridge the PreOT may report in every now and then but not necessarily has to show his folder.
In any case, when he has completed the Review and attested, any weakness in his own solo-auditing should be handled in Cramming or even retrain and he should do one or two solo sessions for the C/S on the Bridge before allowed to go back on the onto the normal reporting procedure.
There are two reasons for this:
1. so the C/S can pick-up any faulty auditing and can handle
2. so he can determine that the Review is really complete and the PreOT is back on the Bridge.
  
  Note:
  
  Under a) this includes that the PreOT is not now trying to use something that he learned in the Review or saw the auditor do in the Review as part of his normal solo.
As a C/S don't make an assumption on grooving the PreOT over to solo based on PreOT's financial ability to pay. Make the decision only on the basis of when he is able to do it.
A point to remember is on Review cases and on people wanting to do the Bridge but can't pay no matter what is analyzed what needs handling in the first point to on any program is an objective one in L&L , get the person out in L&L and get some kind of job or income source, so he can do the Review or Bridge (or give an appropriate exchange).

Analyzing How the Case Is Going On a Long Distance Comm Line
This would normally occur on solo levels, when the PreOT lives some distance from the org or is only visited by the C/S or auditor from time to time.
First of all it is not an optimum situation, but will occur until we have enough C/Ses around the planet that are in good coordination, and are near enough to handle any solo auditor in the field, say within a 2 hrs. drive radius.
Until that time it will occur, even to the point the PreOT will be in another country or continent.
The first sign of something going wrong with the case is no comm after a report system of course has been set up. The handling is to originate a comm from the C/S asking for a report of how he is doing after the appropriate interval. If no reply, originate another comm, but this time indicating that the person may have run into some BPC or something the person couldn't handle, and please say what it is. After the appropriate interval, if no reply to this, study the folder and analyze from folder and the way of L&L of the person the possible major BPC and indicate it to him in the third communication. Also indicate that you know about and know how to handle it, and it is not from the level he is running. If there is no response to this repeat the analysis and indicate another possible BPC and that you can handle it. Most examples of this occur in the Non-Interference-Band between Clear and the end of Excal, and the second most possible is when the person hits LTA the first time.

January 2nd, 1991
Examples of Hard to Analyze Cases
The bypassed case is when the PC has been forced or been PRed his way up the Bridge without good programming or C/Sing and sitting at an apparently higher level on the Bridge with all kind of weird and unexplainable restims and problems. This is not the same as a person who has a long Review, say to handle LTA or interference. That is determined by the amount of charge in the interference or the LTA area for that individual but the bypassed case may also have lots of reviews or long reviews, but when you can compare his amount of time he has been in Review you will see that the Review time is much greater than the time on the Bridge.

Example:

Quickie grades, one process per flow, attested Clear but it was really a BT that went Clear, not him, unhandled resistive points that were there at the beginning of the Bridge but were not addressed by the C/S, haft done OTII, because he didn't do the CC himself, skimpy OTIII, long time on audited NOTs. These are all misprogrammed or misanalyzed points of the bypassed case which may be there singly or in combination when you find him in the middle OT-levels.

An alert C/S will be able to see from the person's behavior and comments that his out-points in life or auditing are lining up with parts of the Gradechart and levels he was supposed to have done and thus do a thorough study of his folders or interview to determine these proportions of time spent on Review and on the Bridge.

Example:

PreOT says ready for Excal but keeps having Out-Ruds, PTPs, commits OWs, does right-wrong-computations and hasn't had much body improvement, and thinks, the next higher level will handle. This is the case that has been falsely attested by earlier auditor or C/S.

Example:

PreOT did the Bridge very fast but in L&L has all kinds of lower Bridge problems and can't operate or handle anything. Uses auditing as a solution and has a status viewpoint about doing the levels. Although no much Review, as he has been PRing which has been accepted.

The most probable point of taking on without recognizing a bypassed case in the Free Zone is when you didn't have his folders and he has come from another independent or Church auditing program and you didn't have much knowledge about his L&L but he has all kinds of certificates and states he has done all the processes up to a certain level. The missing point is there again the comparison of his L&L to the supposed abilities.
At the first sign of outpoints or better yet, to do a full interview on the meter on the times spent in processing, a Dynamics-assessment, and questions about how many BTs blown and so on on OTIII. The data will come out so that you don't make the mistake on continuing him on the Bridge.
A bypassed case should be treated as an overrestimulated and possibly psychotic case. And the key first steps in Review are to only destimulate.

Example:

Person says he is ready for Excal and has come to you with some audited NOTs done. You do the interview and fine out he is a bypassed case; so you wouldn't be doing the Excal assist to run a few Plugs and stabilize him so that he can do Excal. If any Plugs are the first barrier you would merely handle them in Review to the point where he could now confront and handle in Review BTs with Out-Ruds or unrun Inc Is, and then on down to L3RG on the composite, locate and indicate, D/Ls on Incidents he can't get his attention off, a grades-check, rehab or run but not to run them until all original resistive points are handled.

So, essentially you are destimulating what has been keyed-in in Review backwards down the Bridge until you can start him off correctly.
The bypassed case normally needs as the first point on his Review program an R-factor of some length to get him off the status-Button and to make him realize that you intend to make sure that he has done the entire Bridge correctly. The R-factor should be non accusative or invalidative and with good two-way-comm.

The LTA Case
The LTA case may be long in Review, but all of his charge he is handling is in LTA, not in TTA. The bypassed case, as mentioned before, has his charge in TTA. So don't confuse that. The LTA-indicators and case handling is very well covered in the SS C/S course and Tech Briefing 13 and beginning of 14.
A strange case is someone who has heard about or been briefed about LTA but was not really there or ready to run. This can appear to be like a bypassed case and should be treated as an overrestimulated case. And depending on the degree of restimulation of LTA may have to have a LTA Review so that you can properly handle the remaining TTA charge.

This is determined by the C/S with an interview on the meter to find out a LTA is really blanketing his TTA case or not. If it is blanketed only LTA stuff will read and if it is not, then the TTA areas will read well, and the LTA only small. So you would give an interview based on the differentiating the amount of charge on LTA and the level he is on.
Rarely LTA is found blanketing a case on the lower level of the Bridge. In this case usually no process will get the TA moving and the person is totally on his LTA track and duplicating it.
On these cases, K you have to run LTA to get the case moving, you tailor the LTA interview and process B/CBs to the reality level of where the person is on the Bridge.

Example:

A BST equals a product of bad auditing in that earlier game, he got exterior but took a lot of mass with him.

Example on B/CBs:

A being around with an Incident 75 Million years ago, and then 75 million years ago from that date in that earlier game that was like this one.

Use just enough reality to make it run, you as the Review auditor intend the rest. Thus to avoid further overwhelm and is the application of the gradient scale.

The ULR Case
ULR is covered on the course of the same name but is sometimes puzzling in case analysis because the C/S doesn't believe the PreOT could be affected at that level yet, and there is no mass connected just illogic, which of cause can be found on many levels on the Bridge. But ULR illogic comes in the cogs and certainties the PC or PreOT gets. This can be handled similarly to LTA, on a gradient of reality adjusted to where the PC or PreOT is on the Bridge.
It is even questionable when handling LTA and ULR phenomena on a person below OTIII whether you even have to do a B/CB as the left over loose B/C would merely realign themselves into the space of the person's OTIII case.
However, they may be closer in and give the person trouble or fixes his attention and therefore a B/CB on these can be done. But don't expect it goes to FTA as it does on an OT. It's better to end off after one time through B/CB/B with an F/N, no matter how big.

L&L Interference Case
The reason the C/S usually misses this, is because he doesn't get any data on it. He just sees the PC or PreOT slowing down or getting worse from session to session. He must realize he has not enough data on the case and get an interview done covering the person's dynamics, and what is happening between sessions. this is when there is no indication in the folder of something going wrong.

Example:

New diet, new 2D, relative living in the house who is a bit SPish.

Body Org Case
The point is the body is always between the person being audited and the meter. So, if something restimulates on the body, and is not handles, it can make the C/S think the PC or PreOT is doing badly. Most PCs and PreOTs are in such poor communication with the body that they don't notice it or not-is it that they can have a session.

Example:

The Thetan has conditioned the body to hold onto BTs so the body does appear nervous or shaky. He did this as a use and forgot about it. So, when he starts OTIII he can't get something to blow even though the rest of the Bridge was done right.

Example:

Body Org getting stuck with wrong items or conditions from times in the Church or from other Scientologists or from Black NOTs.

Example:

Hidden Body Incident

Example:

The body having counter intention to that Thetan as a CO.

Example:

Out ruds between the PC or PreOT and his body. This could be on any activity in his life he can't do, such as 2D or sports or games, typing, anything. And he could be invalidated by people who can do it and the body gets on the opterm side.

Example:

Authoritarian announcements about his body condition by doctors or older people or family etc.

Example:

On upper Bridge body is using solutions from former C/Os or from its own creator.

Example:

On middle Bridge, end of Excal, body has charge of being in the auditing but not getting auditing.

When these suddenly appear on the case it can be very puzzling to the C/S, and he may not pick it up on a dynamic assessment unless he adds questions specifically about the body and the PC's relation to it.
These above things may occur in combination. For instance L&L, body, and LTA or ULR.

- Holding onto body - R/W - Prepcheck
On SCN DRD to Prior Assessment
1. Find time when first taken habitually drugs or alcohol Find with D/L
2. Find who else was involved
3. If pushing by others, Ruds first, then Prepcheck on taking that drug.
  
  EP: Attention off, no further desire to take (TB 12)
Case does the Bridge, going up, but doesn't change in L&L.
1. the C/S is assuming too much for PC or PreOT and is putting his standards on him.
2. PC or PreOT is not really in the dynamics game but in a personal and private game and taking overburden charge off.
3. C/S has not found out what he expects in L&L or his Ideal Scenes, therefore can not evaluate his program properly.
4. you have upset his balance of exteriorization vs. havingness or misestimated. In this case (where he is doing very well on the Bridge but not seems in life) he's getting his wins on the exteriorization side and may even be to reducing his havingness in life.
5. the player has had a real bad time in the game by being too active without real success, so gets a lot out of auditing to remove all that, but needs a time in L&L to rest, replan his life and to gather resources and abilities before trying big games / actions again. he has misunderstoods and needs more study of the areas of life that he wants to do better in with his current body.
6. we are trying to analyze him as a player but he is a confused Games Master.
Setting up a Life Repair Program
1. All apparent resistive points have been handled. (Setting up for Bridge that prevents good auditing and good gains. That's what needs to be handled to get him onto the Bridge.)
2. The LR then would be, what the PC wants to be handled so he can be comfortably on the Bridge, and therefore the first thing is to find out what the PC wants to be handled in his L&L. For this you need data, not necessarily on the case but on the L&L of the PC and on his attitude about it. Realize, this LR also prevents later out ruds on the Bridge and maybe save a lot of reviews being needed if these points are not handled.
3. Don't depend just on the White Form, to make a LR program. The WF is to give you a case analysis basically to find what resistive points need to be handled and after you handled the resistive points you have already made a change in the case and therefore need new data in PT.
Case where body is pregnant

The thing to realize about a pregnant woman is that at some point after conception there will be in the space of the body two body orgs and two big Thetans at least plus their cases. And the reason you don't audit pregnant women on the Bridge processes is because of mis-ownership possibilities, wasting their time, restimulating the ones not being audited, and confusing the case analysis and C/S.
However, destim key-out processes such as indication of BPC, or touch assists, locational assists can be done.
If she is below Clear, it can be even dicey to do ruds and prepchecks because of the ownership confusion. You can get away with it by using false read- but remember, ifs not necessarily a false read on a BT or C on the person's case, but may be on the other big Thetan, and/or his case ready to take the body. So, if you do run ruds on a pregnant woman just use Itsa e/s Itsa, no assessment.
Essentially what you are dealing with here is a constant source of interference on the case that the woman does not want to run out necessarily.
When a woman discovers she is pregnant usually within 4 to 6 weeks, when she misses the next period, and she is on the Bridge, it is normally possible to complete that process, grade, or level or at least to a win point if you don't go past 6 weeks into pregnancy.
The new body org may show up within 3 weeks, or there could be an abortion. And the Thetan usually shows up between conception and 12 weeks to stake his claim on the body.
Note: If you run Dianetics and find out the woman is pregnant, don't even tray to complete to end off the level, just end off after the chain.

Old OT IV to OT VII
In the past these levels were dune usually not correctly or falsely attested, because they were out gradient because Excal was not done.

Current OT IV to OT VII
Current OTIV to VII are used as additional rundowns and programs to get a person fully through OTIII.
OTIV: Valenceshifter and confront and Rehabs up the Bridge.

This originally was a handling of a bypassed case. Today with good C/Sing we normally only need to use the VS&C and the Prepcheck on OTIII.
OTV: The mutual Cluster making incident TLT on the body. This is normally needed at the beginning of OTIII, when he can't find any because they are all clustered with his body.
OTVI - OT-DRD. If he was a heavy druggy and is having difficulty with running normal OTIII, switch him onto this.
OTVII. This is the intention booster and then he is put back on OT IIIx. Biggest indicator: he has missed a lot of Incident Is, gets free-wheel type pictures.
OT IIIx are made: parts of the body, M,E,S,T, invisible, hiding etc. BTs being it.
On getting data from PC or PreOT or from his folder, when you are reading or listening to what he is saying, remember he is not technically trained as a C/S.
Realize on handling interference a senior interference can act as interference on handling original.

Example:

Loop-Thetan holding a BST.
As stated in the beginning, the key is to get enough data to do the analysis.

i.e.

KNOW BEFORE YOU GO!

BR
Sr C/S RON'S
5 Jan 91